Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2015 / Article
Special Issue

Catalyst Nanomaterials

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 738089 |

Yunchen Du, Di Guo, Meiling Xiong, Yanwu Qi, Chenkui Cui, Jun Ma, Xijiang Han, Ping Xu, "Fe3+-Exchanged Titanate Nanotubes: A New Kind of Highly Active Heterogeneous Catalyst for Friedel-Crafts Type Benzylation", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2015, Article ID 738089, 9 pages, 2015.

Fe3+-Exchanged Titanate Nanotubes: A New Kind of Highly Active Heterogeneous Catalyst for Friedel-Crafts Type Benzylation

Academic Editor: Takuya Tsuzuki
Received06 Jan 2015
Accepted20 Apr 2015
Published25 Aug 2015


Heterogeneous catalysis for Friedel-Crafts type benzylation has received much attention in recent years due to its characteristic of environmental benefits. In this paper, titanate nanotubes (TNTs) were employed as heterogeneous catalyst support, and a new kind of Fe3+-exchanged titanate nanotubes (Fe-TNTs) catalyst with highly dispersed ferric sites was constructed by an ion exchange technique. The obtained catalyst was systematically characterized by XRD, TEM, N2 adsorption, XPS, and UV-vis spectra. As expected, Fe-TNTs showed excellent catalytic activities in the benzylation of benzene and benzene derivatives. The recycling tests for Fe-TNTs were also carried out, where the reason for the gradually decreased activity was carefully investigated. Superior to some reported catalysts, the catalytic ability of used Fe-TNTs could be easily recovered by ion exchange again, indicating that Fe-TNTs herein were a highly active and durable heterogeneous catalyst for Friedel-Crafts type benzylation. These results might be helpful for the design and preparation of novel heterogeneous catalysts by combining the structural advantages of titanate nanotubes and active metal ions.

1. Introduction

Friedel-Crafts type benzylation, typically reacted between aromatic compounds and benzyl chloride/alcohol, is a classical chemical reaction for the production of diphenylmethane and substituted diphenylmethanes, which can be widely used in the fields of pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, fine and bulk chemicals, and dielectric oil formulations [1, 2]. Although some Lewis acid (e.g., AlCl3, FeCl3, and BF3) and protonic acid (e.g., H2SO4, HF, and HNO3) catalysts are very active in these reactions, several undesirable problems derived from these homogeneous catalysts, including difficulty in separation and recovery, disposal of spent catalyst, corrosion, and high toxicity, severely limit their practical applications [3].

Following the advanced development of green chemistry, various kinds of heterogeneous solid catalysts, for example, zeolites, metal oxides, sulfated zirconia, clay, doped mesoporous silica, and heteropoly acids, for Friedel-Crafts type benzylation have been extensively studied in past decades [415]. Among those different active sites in heterogeneous catalysts, Fe-containing sites have received more and more attention due to their superior catalytic activities and low cost. For example, Choudhary and Jana investigated the activities of Fe-, Zn-, Ga-, and In-modified ZSM-5 zeolite catalysts, and they found Fe-modified ZSM-5 showed the best performance in benzylation of benzene [16]; Salavati-Niasari et al. supported FeCl3, MnCl2, CoCl2, NiCl2, CuCl2, and ZnCl2 on alumina, where FeCl3/Al2O3 exhibited much better conversion and selectivity than other catalysts in the benzylation of benzene [17]. It is well known that, besides the species of active sites, surface area and dispersion of active sites are also critical factors for the catalytic activities. Therefore, it may be an effective method to further improve catalytic activity in benzylation by dispersing Fe-containing sites on some supports with high surface area.

In recent years, mesoporous silica materials emerged as ideal catalyst supports because of their high surface area, which have been considered to be favorable for the dispersion of Fe-containing sites [2, 9, 11, 1826]. As expected, these Fe-containing mesoporous silica materials are very active for Friedel-Crafts type benzylation. Vinu et al. developed a method for the direct synthesis of Fe-containing SBA-15 that was rich in tetrahedrally coordinated Fe3+ ions under weak acidic condition (), and the obtained catalysts showed superior catalytic performance and recyclability as compared to the Al-SBA-15 catalysts in the benzylation of benzene [18]; Sun et al. and Lei et al. loaded small Fe2O3 nanoparticles into SBA-15 with the assistance of surfactants and chemical vapor infiltration, respectively, and these Fe2O3/SBA-15 catalysts could trigger the reaction between benzene and benzyl chloride even at relatively low temperature (60°C) [19, 20]; Li et al. reported a simple incipient wetness coimpregnation route to produce highly dispersed Fe(III) centers in SBA-15 by casting furfuryl alcohol solution of iron acetylacetonate, and the catalysts displayed extraordinarily high catalytic performance with a 100% yield of monoalkylated product even in 1.5 min at 60°C [2]; our group also fabricated a series of novel Fe-containing mesoporous materials (Fe-JLU-15s) by using semifluorinated surfactant as template, which were generally active for the benzylation of various aromatic compounds [11]. Although the significant enhancement has been achieved in these Fe-containing mesoporous silica materials, it is not easy to maintain their catalytic activities during the processes of recycling and regeneration, since amorphous nature of mesoporous silica will result in the collapse of structure and leaching of active sites [2, 2022]. Therefore, it still remains a challenge to find new supports that can possess stable structure and anchor Fe-containing active sites.

Since the discovery of multilayered titanate nanotubes (TNTs) [27], they have shown promising applications in photocatalysis, catalyst support, batteries, absorption, gas sensing, and hydrogen storage due to their high surface area, large pore volume, stable one-dimensional nanostructures, wideband gap semiconductor properties, and excellent ion exchange ability [2833]. More recently, Hara et al. studied the acidity of protonated TNTs in detail, and they found that protonated TNTs could be also used as an active heterogeneous catalyst for benzylation of toluene, and the high protonation degree was favorable for the high yield of benzyl toluene [34, 35]. However, due to the absence of better effective sites, the benzylation of benzene, which is more difficult to be catalyzed, has not been mentioned. By considering unique characteristics of TNTs and superior catalytic activities of Fe-containing species, the performance of Fe3+-exchanged TNTs in Friedel-Crafts type benzylation can be expected. On one hand, multilayered crystalline structure of TNTs is more stable than amorphous structure of mesoporous silica materials. On the other hand, ion exchange ability of TNTs can produce high dispersion of Fe-containing active sites, even to extent of single active site. Moreover, electrostatic interaction between titanates and Fe3+ may suppress the leaching of Fe-containing active sites. Herein, we investigated the catalytic behaviors of Fe3+-exchanged TNTs as a new heterogeneous catalyst for the Friedel-Crafts type benzylation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Preparation

Titanate nanotubes (TNTs) were prepared by hydrothermal method according to a previous literature [27]. Briefly, 3.0 g of anatase TiO2 powder was dispersed into 100 mL of NaOH aqueous solution (10 M) under magnetic stirring for 30 min. After that, the mixture was transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave and sealed to heat at 140°C for 16 h. The white powder deposited at the bottom of Teflon liner was redispersed into 0.1 M HCl solution to neutralize the residual NaOH. Then, the white powder was collected by filtration, thoroughly washed with distilled water until the pH value of the filtrate reached 7.0, and dried at 60°C to obtain titanate nanotubes (TNTs).

To obtain Fe3+-exchanged TNTs, 1.0 g of protonated TNTs was dispersed into 50 mL of FeCl3 solution (0.25 M) and stirred for 24 h. Fe3+-exchanged TNTs were collected by centrifugation and washed with distilled water. This process should be repeated many times until Cl in solution could not be detected by AgNO3 solution (1 M). Finally, the yellow powder was dried at 80°C and denoted as Fe-TNTs.

2.2. Characterization

Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) data were recorded on a Rigaku D/MAXRCX-ray diffractometer with CuKα radiation source (45.0 kV, 50.0 mA). Transmission electron micrograph (TEM) images were obtained on a Tecnai G2 F30 operating at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was recorded at room temperature in a PHI 5700 ESCA system with Al Kα radiation (1486.6 eV). The diffuse reflectance UV-vis spectra for powder samples were obtained on a spectrometer Perkin-Elmer Lambda 750 UV-vis spectrometer equipped with an integrating sphere, and BaSO4 was used as an internal standard. Nitrogen adsorption isotherms were obtained at −196°C on a QUADRASORB SI-KR/MP. Samples were normally prepared for measurement by degassing at 120°C until a final pressure of 1 × 10−3 Torr was reached. Pore size distributions were calculated using Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method.

2.3. Catalytic Tests

The liquid phase benzylation of benzene with benzyl chloride (BC) was carried out in a 50 mL three-necked round-bottomed flask equipped with a reflux condenser and heated in a precisely controlled oil bath under atmospheric pressure. In a typical run, 100 mg of catalyst, 10 mL of benzene, and 2 mmol of dodecane (internal standard) were added into the flask, followed by stirring for 30 min at required temperature (60~80°C). Then, 0.5 mL of BC was finally added. The products were analyzed by gas chromatography (Varian CP-3800) with a FID detector. The benzylations of other aromatic compounds were carried out at 70°C, and their experimental procedures were the same as benzene except that equivalent mole of aromatic compounds was used.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of TNTs and Fe-TNTs. It is clear that TNTs exhibit four well-resolved diffraction peaks at ~9.6°, 24.4°, 28.6°, and 48.5°, which can be indexed as the (200), (110), (211), and (020) planes of crystalline phase of NaxH2–xTi3O7 [28, 36, 37], where Na+ and H+ are located in interlaminations of zigzag ribbons of edge-sharing [TiO6]2− octahedrons to keep the charge balance. The (200) diffraction peak at ~9.6° is characteristic of the layered structure of TNTs, and the value (ca. 9.2 Å) corresponds to the spacing between the neighboring [TiO6]2− octahedron layers in the walls of TNTs [38, 39]. There are no diffraction peaks assigned to anatase TiO2, indicating that anatase TiO2 particles as raw materials have been completely transformed into TNTs. It has been reported that ion exchange would bring the change in the profile of XRD pattern, mainly symbolized by the weakened intensity of (200) and (211) diffraction peaks and even H+ was used to replace the remaining Na+ [4045]. Although some possible reasons such as variable chemical environment, different scattering factors, and lower crystallinity have been proposed [4143], no scientific and reliable explanations can be widely accepted, and the only consensus is that the variations will not cause the destruction and the collapse of TNTs. Compared with the XRD pattern of TNTs, Fe-TNTs herein also present obvious variations in the intensity of (200) and (211) diffraction peaks, but the peaks at ~24.4° (110) and 48.5° (020) are still distinguishable, which is a hint that the basic structure of TNTs is well retained.

Figure 2 shows optical and TEM images of TNTs and Fe-TNTs. It is very interesting that the colors of TNTs and Fe-TNTs powder are quite different (Figure 2, inset), where the former is white and the latter becomes yellow due to the successful introduction of Fe species. Although the chemical composition changes, Fe-TNTs still exhibit typically tubular microstructure with similar size to pristine TNTs (Figure 2), convincingly validating the fact that the structure has not been destroyed during the process of ion exchange. A closer look (Figure 2(b), inset) reveals that the external surface of Fe-TNTs is very clean without any additional deposited particles or amorphous coatings, implying that Fe species in Fe-TNTs are highly dispersed.

The structural parameters of TNTs and Fe-TNTs are determined by typical isotherms of nitrogen adsorption and desorption conducted at 77 K. As shown in Figure 3, TNTs give standard IV-type isotherms with a sharp capillary condensation step at relative pressure () from 0.4 to 1.0, indicating a high density of mesopores in the material according to the IUPAC classification. A relatively narrow pore size distribution centered at 4.82 nm can be also observed, and this value is very close to that of inner diameter measured from TEM image (Figure 2). It is very important that the sample of Fe-TNTs exhibits very similar isotherms and pore size distribution, which again verifies the good maintenance of microstructure. However, one can also discover that the process of ion exchange produces a slight decrease in BET surface and total pore volume. BET surface and total pore volume of TNTs are 255 m2/g and 0.63 cm3/g, respectively, while they are 224 m2/g and 0.61 cm3/g for Fe-TNTs. This difference may come from the fact that element Fe has much heavier atomic weight than the substituted H and Na.

XPS and UV-vis spectra are utilized to discern the existing state of Fe species in Fe-TNTs (Figures 4 and 5). In the survey of XPS spectrum for Fe-TNTs (Figure 4), the initial Auger peak of Na+ at about 500 eV disappears, and a distinguishable signal in the range of 700~730 eV assigned to Fe species can be observed. This result implies that ion exchange is carried out effectively, and almost all Na+ ions have been substituted. The Fe 2p spectrum of Fe-TNTs (Figure 4, inset) gives two typical peaks at 710.7 and 724.5 eV, as well as a satellite peak at 717.0 eV, which are labeled as the characteristic of ferric species [46], indicating that there is no redox reaction that occurred in the process of ion exchange. Considering the preparative system of Fe-TNTs, Fe3+ in final product can combine with [TiO6]2− octahedron, OH, and Cl by electrostatic interaction, whereas Cl is easily excluded due to the absence of typical XPS peaks (Figure 4); thus [TiO6]2− octahedron and OH may be responsible for the charge balance of Fe-TNTs. It is worth noting that the molar ratio of Fe/Ti deduced by the survey spectrum (Figure 4) is about 0.198, less than the theoretical value of ferric titanates [0.222, Fe2(Ti3O7)3] from complete ion exchange. The inferior Fe/Ti molar ratio conceals two clues: (1) a few exchangeable sites in titanates are still not accessible for Fe3+, although the concentration of Fe3+ is much excessive; (2) the contribution of charge balance from OH is limited, because once considerable OH groups are involved in the final product, for example, Fe(OH)Ti3O7 or Fe(OH)2(Ti3O7)1/2, the Fe/Ti ratio will be markedly increased. That is to say, most Fe3+ ions in final product are mainly located at [TiO6]2− octahedron layers rather than other anions, and this complexation makes it difficult for Fe3+ ions to escape and aggregate and favors the formation of highly dispersed ferric sites. This assumption can be substantially supported by UV-vis spectra (Figure 5). According to previous literatures, highly dispersed ferric species can produce a band in the range of 250–280 nm due to dπ-pπ charge transfer between Fe and O atoms in [FeO4] tetrahedral geometry [47], while there will be a redshift if these dispersed ferric species aggregate to nanoclusters (e.g., Fe3+ in Oh coordination between 300 and 400 nm) or bulk iron oxides (>450 nm) [19]. Fe-TNTs herein display relative broadband centered at 270 nm; although this band is overlapped with that of pristine TNTs, the absence of obvious absorption band in the range of 400–800 nm, especially at 350 and 550 nm, indicates that Fe-TNTs possess highly dispersed ferric species. Similar phenomena have also been reported in some Fe-doped mesoporous materials [11, 18, 19, 21, 47].

Figure 6 shows the conversion of BC and the catalytic selectivity of diphenylmethane (DPM) over Fe-TNTs at different temperature. In the studied temperature interval, Fe-TNTs are highly effective in catalyzing the benzylation of benzene with BC, while pristine TNTs are absolutely inactive for this reaction under the same conditions, indicating that ferrite species are the primary active sites. It is worth noting that the conversion of BC is strongly dependent on the reaction temperature (Figure 6(a)). For example, it takes less than 10 min to reach complete BC conversion at 80°C, while it will cost about 30 min if the reaction temperature is 70°C. The lowered temperature not only results in the slow reaction rate but also produces obvious induction period, so that Fe-TNTs cannot provide any detectable BC conversion until the reaction is carried out over 5 min, 10 min, 20 min, and 25 min for 75°C, 70°C, 65°C, and 60°C, respectively. The phenomenon of induction period, which commonly exists in the heterogeneous catalysis of benzylation of benzene [7, 17, 21, 22, 4851], has been attributed to the moisture adsorbed on the catalytic sites that could delay the diffusion and activation of reaction substrates [16, 52]. Ferric sites in Fe-TNTs are highly dispersed; thus it is not difficult to understand that these active sites are occupied by some moisture due to the hydrophilicity of Fe3+ ions. To evaluate the catalytic ability of Fe-TNTs, we also examined the conversion of BC over different heterogeneous catalysts, including Fe-containing mesoporous silica (Fe-JLU-15), Fe-containing zeolites (Fe-ZSM-5), and sulfated zirconia, which are prepared according to previous literatures [11, 16, 53]. As shown in Figure S1 (see Figure S1 in Supplementary Material available online at all of these heterogeneous catalysts are effective for the benzylation of benzene, while the induction periods and conversion of BC over sulfated zirconia are obviously inferior to those over Fe-containing catalysts, confirming the advantages of ferric species in Friedel-Crafts type benzylation. Compared with Fe-JLU-15 and Fe-ZSM-5, the induction period of Fe-TNTs is moderate, but it can also guarantee the rapid conversion once the reaction is induced, and the conversion of BC over Fe-TNTs is even a little superior to that over Fe-ZSM-5, which indicates that Fe-TNTs can be taken as a novel heterogeneous catalyst with excellent catalytic activity. In addition, it can be found that the reaction temperature also impacts the selectivity of DMP (Figure 6(b)). Although BC can be consumed in a short time at relatively high temperature (e.g., 80°C), the selectivity for the desired product (DPM) is very poor (87.8%), and a large number of by-products, dibenzylbenzene (DBB), can be detected. With decreased temperature, the selectivity of DMP is effectively improved, and regular selectivity above 98% can be performed at 70°C.

To test the generality of Fe-TNTs, some aromatic compounds with electron-donating groups, such as toluene, xylene, ethylbenzene, and anisole, are used to replace benzene. Based on classical mechanism of Friedel-Crafts alkylations, one or more electron-donating groups in the aromatic ring will facilitate benzylation of an aromatic compound [16]. Unfortunately, as observed in some reported heterogeneous catalysts, BC conversions were unexpectedly reduced by the introduction of electron-donating groups in the aromatic compounds, where the influences of steric effect and possible poisonous adsorption of aromatic substrates have been assigned to the primary reasons [18, 23, 26, 54]. Table 1 presents the conversion of BC and product selectivity in benzylation of aromatic compounds with various electron-donating groups over Fe-TNTs at 70°C. It is satisfying that electron-donating groups in the aromatic ring significantly facilitate benzylation in current system, and all reactions can be carried out in accelerating models under the catalysis of Fe-TNTs, giving complete conversion of BC in less than 25 min. However, this facilitation is not consistent with the electron-donating ability very well. For example, both p-xylene and o-xylene have two methyl groups, while they need different time for complete BC conversion; ethylbenzene gives the same complete conversion time with toluene, although electron-donating ability from ethyl is a little stronger than methyl in toluene. Apparently, steric effects may be another factor that should be considered in the benzylations of aromatic compounds [11]. In addition, although previous work confirmed the catalytic activities of pristine TNTs in the benzylation of toluene [34, 35], it is still catalytically inactive for these benzylations of substituted benzene even if we prolong the reaction to 5 h, which can be attributed to the low protonation degree in our case. This result further demonstrates the importance of ferric species for Fe-TNTs.

RunAromatic compoundTimeb (min)Selectivity (%)


Reaction conditions: 10 mL of benzene (or equivalent mole of substituted benzene), 0.5 mL of benzyl chloride, and 100 mg of catalyst. The conversion was calculated from benzyl chloride.
bTime required for complete conversion of benzyl chloride.
d(o-) 2-Methyl diphenylmethane, (p-) 4-methyl diphenylmethane.
e2,5-Dimethyl diphenylmethane.
f2,3-Dimethyl diphenylmethane.
g(o-) 2-Ethyl diphenylmethane, (p-) 4-ethyl diphenylmethane.
h2,4,6-Trimethyl diphenylmethane.
i(o-) 2-Methoxy diphenylmethane, (p-) 4-methoxy diphenylmethane.

The most important advantage of heterogeneous catalysts is the possibility of their regeneration and reusability. In our case, the used Fe-TNTs are regenerated by simple washing with absolute ethanol to remove the adsorbed organic species, and their catalytic activities are studied in the benzylation of benzene under the same conditions (Figure 7). As observed, the regenerated Fe-TNTs give a quite similar activity to the fresh catalyst in their first recycling, implying the feasibility of Fe-TNTs as a reusable heterogeneous catalyst. However, the catalytic activity starts to decline when Fe-TNTs are regenerated again, represented not only by the slowing reaction rate, but also by the prolonging induction period. The situation will become worse if more recycles are applied. Driven by this phenomenon, we recharacterize the catalyst of Fe-TNTs used for three times. As shown in Figures S2–S6, the results of XRD, TEM, N2 adsorption, and UV-vis spectra are almost identical to those of fresh Fe-TNTs, as well as the profiles of XPS. The only difference is the molar ratio of Fe/Ti from XPS, where the used Fe-TNTs give Fe/Ti molar ratio at 0.149, suggesting that the partially lost ferric content should be related to the decreased activity. It is very important to note that the lost ferric content in Fe-TNTs also means the leaching of ferric species during the catalytic process; thus a new problem appears: will the leaching of ferric species contribute to the activity in homogeneous catalysis? Given that the leaching of Fe3+ is equal in three catalytic processes, the homogeneous [Fe3+] is about 1.87 mM in each batch. To make clear the real mechanism of Fe-TNTs, a homogeneous catalytic system is designed by using Fe3+ (1.87 mM) to replace Fe-TNTs (0.1 g), while no BC conversion can be detected after 30 min. Even we increase [Fe3+] to 3.36 mM; the benzylation of benzene still cannot be induced, which directly confirms that the catalytic activity indeed comes from heterogeneous catalytic sites rather than the leaching Fe3+.

In previous literatures on heterogeneous catalysis for the benzylation of benzene, the decreased catalytic activity accompanied with the leaching of active sites was a general phenomenon, because HCl as the main by-product could facilitate the leaching process [2, 2022]. Some reported catalysts seem to survive the leaching of active sites, where only several recycles were applied [9, 11, 54]. Few catalysts could keep their activities during more recycles for a long time. Once the catalytic activities of these catalysts decrease to a certain extent, they will become useless permanently for this kind of reaction. Compared with these catalysts, it is fortunate that the catalytic activity of Fe-TNTs can be easily recovered by treating used Fe-TNTs with FeCl3 solution again (Figure 7), although the electrostatic interaction between Fe3+ and [TiO6]2− fails to inhibit the leaching of Fe3+ completely. This unique advantage makes Fe-TNTs superior to previous catalysts, due to its possibility as a durable heterogeneous catalyst with constant activity.

4. Conclusions

A new kind of heterogeneous catalyst, Fe-TNTs, has been successfully prepared by treating titanate nanotubes (TNTs) with Fe3+ solution through an ion exchange process. The characterization results indicated that the process of ion exchange did not destroy the basic structure of TNTs and produced highly dispersed active sites on their surface. As a result, Fe-TNTs exhibited excellent catalytic activities in the benzylation of benzene. Even at relatively low temperature (60°C), it could still perform the complete conversion of BC. More importantly, Fe-TNTs herein were universal for the benzylation of benzene and its derivatives, where the poisonous phenomenon by the adsorption of aromatic substrates in some previous catalysts was not observed. Although the steric effect more or less affected the catalytic progress, the positive contributions from electron-donating groups were still dominant, so that complete conversion of BC was significantly improved. During the recycling tests, the catalytic ability of Fe-TNTs could be well maintained in the initial recycle, while it became debilitated gradually with more recycles. The used catalyst was carefully characterized, and the loss of active sites in Fe-TNTs was confirmed to be primarily responsible for the decreased catalytic ability. A homogeneous system with Fe3+ equal to the leaching of active sites failed to promise any conversion of BC, suggesting the heterogeneous nature of Fe-TNTs. Superior to other heterogeneous catalysts, the catalytic ability of used Fe-TNTs could be easily recovered by ion exchange again, which meant that Fe-TNTs were a durable heterogeneous catalyst for a series of Friedel-Crafts type benzylations. We believe that these results may open a door for the design and preparation of various heterogeneous catalysts for different organic reactions.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This work is supported by Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, HIT (QA201414), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2013M541394, 2014M560253, and 2014T70341), Postdoctoral Scientific Research Developmental Fund of Heilongjiang Province (LBH-Q14062), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and PIRS of HIT (B201411), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (21446006, 21471039).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials: the comparison in catalytic activities of Fe-JLU-15, Fe-ZSM-5, Fe-TNTs, and sulfated zirconia; XRD, TEM image, N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm, XPS, and UV-vis spectrum of used Fe-TNTs.

  1. Supplementary Material


  1. K. Mertins, I. Iovel, J. Kischel, A. Zapf, and M. Beller, “Transition-metal-catalyzed benzylation of arenes and heteroarenes,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 238–242, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. Y. Li, Y. Chen, L. Li et al., “A simple co-impregnation route to load highly dispersed Fe(III) centers into the pore structure of SBA-15 and the extraordinarily high catalytic performance,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 366, no. 1, pp. 57–64, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. V. R. Choudhary, S. K. Jana, and B. P. Kiran, “Alkylation of benzene by benzyl chloride over H-ZSM-5 zeolite with its framework Al completely or partially substituted by Fe or Ga,” Catalysis Letters, vol. 59, no. 2-4, pp. 217–219, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. B. Coq, V. Gourves, and F. Figuéras, “Benzylation of toluene by benzyl chloride over protonic zeolites,” Applied Catalysis A, General, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 69–75, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. V. R. Choudhary, S. K. Jana, and B. P. Kiran, “Highly active Si-MCM-41-supported Ga2O3 and In2O3 catalysts for friedel-crafts-type benzylation and acylation reactions in the presence or absence of moisture,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 192, no. 2, pp. 257–261, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. K. Das, M. K. Bhunia, A. K. Sinha, and A. Bhaumik, “Self-assembled mesoporous zirconia and sulfated zirconia nanoparticles synthesized by triblock copolymer as template,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 113, no. 20, pp. 8918–8923, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. N. B. Shrigadi, A. B. Shinde, and S. D. Samant, “Study of catalytic activity of free and K10-supported iron oxyhydroxides and oxides in the Friedel-Crafts benzylation reaction using benzyl chloride/alcohol to understand their role in the catalysis by the Fe-exchanged/impregnated K10 catalysts,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 252, no. 1, pp. 23–35, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. T. Cseri, S. Békássy, F. Figueras, and S. Rizner, “Benzylation of aromatics on ion-exchanged clays,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis. A, Chemical, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 101–107, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Y. Q. Jiang, K. F. Lin, Y. N. Zhang et al., “Fe-MCM-41 nanoparticles as versatile catalysts for phenol hydroxylation and for Friedel-Crafts alkylation,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 445-446, pp. 172–179, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Y. Izumi, M. Ogawa, and K. Urabe, “Alkali metal salts and ammonium salts of Keggin-type heteropolyacids as solid acid catalysts for liquid-phase Friedel-Crafts reactions,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 127–140, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Y. C. Du, S. Liu, Y. Y. Ji et al., “Highly efficient synthesis of Fe-containing mesoporous materials by using semi-fluorinated surfactant and their high activities in Friedel-Crafts alkylations,” Catalysis Today, vol. 131, no. 1–4, pp. 70–75, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. D. Cuong, N. D. Hoa, T. T. Hoa et al., “Nanoporous hematite nanoparticles: Synthesis and applications for benzylation of benzene and aromatic compounds,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 582, pp. 83–87, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. S. Hamdy and G. Mul, “TUD-1-encapsulated HY zeolite: a new hierarchical microporous/mesoporous composite with extraordinary performance in benzylation reactions,” ChemCatChem, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 3156–3163, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. K. Y. Leng, Y. Wang, C. M. Hou et al., “Enhancement of catalytic performance in the benzylation of benzene with benzyl alcohol over hierarchical mordenite,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 306, pp. 100–108, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Z. C. Miao, H. L. Song, H. H. Zhao, L. L. Xu, and L. J. Chou, “One-pot synthesis of mesoporous ZrPW solid acid catalyst for liquid phase benzylation of anisole,” Catalysis Science & Technology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 838–850, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. V. R. Choudhary and S. K. Jana, “Benzylation of benzene by benzyl chloride over Fe-, Zn-, Ga- and In-modified ZSM-5 type zeolite catalysts,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 224, no. 1-2, pp. 51–62, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Salavati-Niasari, J. Hasanalian, and H. Najafian, “Alumina-supported FeCl3, MnCl2, CoCl2, NiCl2, CuCl2, and ZnCl2 as catalysts for the benzylation of benzene by benzyl chloride,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, vol. 209, no. 1-2, pp. 209–214, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. Vinu, D. P. Sawant, K. Ariga et al., “Direct synthesis of well-ordered and unusually reactive FeSBA-15 mesoporous molecular sieves,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 17, no. 21, pp. 5339–5345, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Y. Y. Sun, S. Walspurger, J.-P. Tessonnier, B. Louis, and J. Sommer, “Highly dispersed iron oxide nanoclusters supported on ordered mesoporous SBA-15: a very active catalyst for Friedel-Crafts alkylations,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 300, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Z. B. Lei, S. Y. Bai, L. Q. Dang et al., “Fe2O3/SBA-15 catalyst synthesized by chemical vapor infiltration for Friedel-Crafts alkylation reaction,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 123, no. 1–3, pp. 306–313, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. L. Gu, X. Dong, S. P. Elangovan et al., “Simultaneous pore enlargement and introduction of highly dispersed Fe active sites in MSNs for enhanced catalytic activity,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 186, pp. 208–216, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. E. L. Preethi, T. Sivakumar, and M. Palanichami, “Room temperature efficacious synthesis of diphenylmethane over Fe/Al-MCM-41 catalysts,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 876–879, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. K. Bachari, J. M. M. Millet, B. Benaïchouba, O. Cherifi, and F. Figueras, “Benzylation of benzene by benzyl chloride over iron mesoporous molecular sieves materials,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 221, no. 1, pp. 55–61, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. Arafat and Y. Alhamed, “Catalytic activity of mesoporous catalysts in Friedel-Crafts benzylation of benzene,” Journal of Porous Materials, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 565–572, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. C. Anand, G. Lawrence, A. A. Elzatahry et al., “Highly dispersed and active iron oxide nanoparticles in SBA-15 with different pore sizes for the synthesis of diphenylmethane,” Science of Advanced Materials, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1618–1626, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Anand, S. V. Priya, G. Lawrence et al., “Cage type mesoporous ferrosilicate catalysts with 3D structure for benzylation of aromatics,” Catalysis Today, vol. 204, pp. 125–131, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. T. Kasuga, M. Hiramatsu, A. Hoson, T. Sekino, and K. Niihara, “Formation of titanium oxide nanotube,” Langmuir, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 3160–3163, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. X. Sun and Y. Li, “Synthesis and characterization of ion-exchangeable titanate nanotubes,” Chemistry: A European Journal, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 2229–2238, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. Z. S. Hong, X. Z. Zheng, X. K. Ding, L. L. Jiang, M. D. Wei, and K. M. Wei, “Complex spinel titanate nanowires for a high rate lithium-ion battery,” Energy and Environmental Science, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1886–1891, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. D. V. Bavykin, A. A. Lapkin, P. K. Plucinski, J. M. Friedrich, and F. C. Walsh, “Reversible storage of molecular hydrogen by sorption into multilayered TiO2 nanotubes,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 41, pp. 19422–19427, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. H.-H. Ou, C.-H. Liao, Y.-H. Liou, J.-H. Hong, and S.-L. Lo, “Photocatalytic oxidation of aqueous ammonia over microwave-induced titanate nanotubes,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 4507–4512, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. T. Wang, W. Liu, N. Xu, and J. Ni, “Adsorption and desorption of Cd(II) onto titanate nanotubes and efficient regeneration of tubular structures,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 250-251, pp. 379–386, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. D. V. Bavykin, A. A. Lapkin, P. K. Plucinski, L. Torrente-Murciano, J. M. Friedrich, and F. C. Walsh, “Deposition of Pt, Pd, Ru and Au on the surfaces of titanate nanotubes,” Topics in Catalysis, vol. 39, no. 3-4, pp. 151–160, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Kitano, E. Wada, K. Nakajima et al., “Protonated titanate nanotubes with Lewis and Brønsted acidity: relationship between nanotube structure and catalytic activity,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 385–393, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. E. Wada, M. Kitano, K. Nakajima, and M. Hara, “Effect of preparation conditions on the structural and acid catalytic properties of protonated titanate nanotubes,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 1, no. 41, pp. 12768–12774, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Q. Chen, G. H. Du, S. Zhang, and L. M. Peng, “The structure of trititanate nanotubes,” Acta Crystallographica Section B: Structural Science, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 587–593, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. W. Liu, T. Wang, A. G. L. Borthwick et al., “Adsorption of Pb2+, Cd2+, Cu2+ and Cr3+ onto titanate nanotubes: competition and effect of inorganic ions,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 456-457, pp. 171–180, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. C.-K. Lee, K.-S. Lin, C.-F. Wu, M.-D. Lyu, and C.-C. Lo, “Effects of synthesis temperature on the microstructures and basic dyes adsorption of titanate nanotubes,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 494–503, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. X. K. Li and Y. S. Zhong, “Ion-exchangeable titanate nanotubes with visible light responsive photocatalytic activities for dyes degradation,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 7151–7156, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. Y. X. Tang, D. G. Gong, Y. K. Lai et al., “Hierarchical layered titanate microspherulite: formation by electrochemical spark discharge spallation and application in aqueous pollutant treatment,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 45, pp. 10169–10178, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. Qamar, S. J. Kim, and A. K. Ganguli, “TiO2-based nanotubes modified with nickel: synthesis, properties, and improved photocatalytic activity,” Nanotechnology, vol. 20, no. 45, Article ID 455703, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. B. C. Viana, O. P. Ferreira, A. G. Souza Filho et al., “Decorating titanate nanotubes with CeO2 nanoparticles,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 113, no. 47, pp. 20234–20239, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S.-T. Myung, N. Takahashi, S. Komaba et al., “Nanostructured TiO2 and its application in lithium-ion storage,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 21, no. 17, pp. 3231–3241, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. Kim, S.-H. Hwang, S. K. Lim, and S. Kim, “Effects of ion exchange and calcinations on the structure and photocatalytic activity of hydrothermally prepared titanate nanotubes,” Crystal Research and Technology, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 1190–1194, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. L. Shi, L. X. Cao, W. Liu, G. Su, R. J. Gao, and Y. L. Zhao, “A study on partially protonated titanate nanotubes: enhanced thermal stability and improved photocatalytic activity,” Ceramics International, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 4717–4723, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. L. Guo, Z. Q. Zhou, and H. M. Yuan, “Hydrothermal synthesis and magnetic properties of Fe3+-doped multiferroic hexagonal rare-earth manganates,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 616, pp. 454–460, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. Y. C. Du, Y. Yang, S. Liu, N. Xiao, Y. L. Zhang, and F.-S. Xiao, “Mesoporous aluminophosphates and Fe-aluminophosphates with highly thermal stability and large surface area templated from semi-fluorinated surfactant,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 114, no. 1–3, pp. 250–256, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. V. R. Choudhary, R. Jha, and V. S. Narkhede, “In-Mg-hydrotalcite anionic clay as catalyst or catalyst precursor for Friedel-Crafts type benzylation reactions,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, vol. 239, no. 1-2, pp. 76–81, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. V. R. Choudhary and R. Jha, “GaClx- or GaAlClx-grafted Si-MCM-41: highly active and moisture insensitive/stable catalyst for the acylation and benzylation of benzene, naphthalene and substituted benzenes,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 333, no. 1, pp. 42–48, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. N. He, S. Bao, and Q. Xu, “Fe-containing mesoporous molecular sieves materials: very active Friedel-Crafts alkylation catalysts,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 29–36, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. K. Y. Leng, S. N. Sun, B. T. Wang, L. Sun, W. Xu, and Y. Y. Sun, “Benzylation of benzene with benzyl chloride on iron-containing mesoporous mordenite,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 28, pp. 64–68, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. V. R. Choudhary, S. K. Jana, N. S. Patil, and S. K. Bhargava, “Friedel-Crafts type benzylation and benzoylation of aromatic compounds over H beta zeolite modified by oxides or chlorides of gallium and indium,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 21–35, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. Y. C. Du, S. Liu, Y. L. Zhang, F. Nawaz, Y. Y. Ji, and F. S. Xiao, “Urea-assisted synthesis of hydrothermally stable Zr-SBA-15 and catalytic properties over their sulfated samples,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 121, no. 1–3, pp. 185–193, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. K. Bachari and O. Cherifi, “Study of the benzylation of benzene and other aromatics by benzyl chloride over transition metal chloride supported mesoporous SBA-15 catalysts,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, vol. 260, no. 1-2, pp. 19–23, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Yunchen Du et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.