Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 896185, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/896185
Research Article

Laser-Assisted Synthesis of Mn0.50Zn0.50Fe2O4 Nanomaterial: Characterization and In Vitro Inhibition Activity towards Bacillus subtilis Biofilm

1Department of Physics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan
2Department of Chemistry, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan
3Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 173, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
4Department of Biochemistry, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan
5Department of Applied Chemistry & Biochemistry, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
6Deanship of Scientific Research College of Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 800, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Received 19 November 2014; Accepted 16 February 2015

Academic Editor: Ali Khorsand Zak

Copyright © 2015 Shaukat Ali Shahid et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

There is growing interest in the development of novel nanomaterials with potential antimicrobial activity and lesser toxicity. In the current research work, Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles were synthesized via a novel coprecipitation cum laser ablation technique yielding fine spinal structured material. The synthesized nanomaterial was structurally characterized by X-ray diffraction technique which confirmed the formation and the crystalline nature of Mn0.50Zn0.50Fe2O4 nanomaterial. The crystallite size determined by Debye-Scherrer’s formula was found to be ~12 nm. The formation of nanoparticles was evidenced by scanning electron microscopy. Energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDXA) was performed for elemental analysis. The synthesized nanomaterial was interestingly found to be an effective antimicrobial agent and inhibited the growth of Bacillus subtilis biofilm formation. The 5 µg of Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanomaterial dissolved in 1 mL of DMSO showed excellent biofilm inhibitory activity 91.23% ± 1.87 against Bacillus subtilis.

1. Introduction

Preparation of nanosized fine spinal structure is an emerging research area in the field of nanotechnology. Presently, the applications of such nanomaterials are being explored to address the problems associated with water treatment, and so forth [1], catalysis [2], and microbial control [3, 4]. Nanosize metal particles can provide considerably large surface area as compared to bulk material. Theoretically, for spherical particles of identical size, a decrease in the particle size from 10 μm to 10 nm can escalate the contact surface area by 109 [5, 6].

Biofilms are aggregates of microorganisms formed by the attachment of microbial cells in polymeric substances [7]. Mostly, biofilms are highly resistant to antibiotics and are therefore being extensively studied in quite a lot of scientific disciplines, including evolutionary biology, biomedicine, and water treatment [811]. The growth of a microbial biofilm initiates with the attachment of free-floating microorganisms to a surface. Subsequently, these adherent microbes are entrenched repeatedly within a self-produced medium of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) usually composed of extracellular DNA, proteins, and polysaccharides. These bacterial biofilms can cause several infectious diseases and develop resistance manifold [1113].

In the recent past, use of metal-based nanoparticles for curing bacterial infections has got great scientific interest [14]. Some in vitro studies revealed that the metal nanoparticles exhibited potential antibiofilm activity as tested on biofilms formed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis [14, 15]. The antibacterial efficiency of metal nanoparticles is not only due to metal-ion release but mostly based on their high surface-to-volume ratio [15].

Although coprecipitation is considered convenient method to prepare nanomaterials, it is rather difficult to prepare fine nanostructure with larger surface area using this approach. Therefore, we were motivated to prepare Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 by novel coprecipitation cum laser ablation technique with the expectation of improved performance for inhibition of Bacillus subtilis biofilm. Furthermore, to the best of author’s knowledge, Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 has never been investigated by microtiter-plate assay for inhibition of Bacillus subtilis biofilm. To bridge the research gap in biofilm inhibition using novel Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanomaterial is fascinating task; hence, we report synthesis of Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles using coprecipitation approach followed by laser irradiation technique to assess their potential application in Bacillus subtilis biofilm inhibition by microtiter-plate assay [16].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

All the chemicals (MnCl2·4H2O, ZnCl2, FeCl3·6H2O, and NaOH) used in the synthesis were analytical reagent grade (99.9% purity) (purchased from Sigma Chemical Company Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) and were used without further purification.

2.2. Synthesis of Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 Nanoparticles

For the synthesis of Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles by chemical coprecipitation technique [1, 2], a 0.5 M solution of analytical grade MnCl2·4H2O and 0.5 M of ZnCl2 were prepared by dissolving in 50 mL sterile deionized water. Another solution was prepared by dissolving 1 M of FeCl3·6H2O in 50 mL sterile deionized water. These stoichiometric quantities led to the formation of atomic ratios 1 : 1 : 4 for Mn : Zn : Fe in Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4. These two solutions were homogenized by stirring at 65°C for 30 min using hot plate magnetic stirrer at moderate speed (55 rpm). For precipitation of chloride precursors, the solution pH was increased to 10 by adding dropwise 3.5 M NaOH with continuous stirring (it took about 120 min) until reddish brown precipitates formed. To get fine spinal structure of nanomaterial, thermal decomposition of Mn, Zn, and Fe chlorides was performed by irradiation of solution for 5 min with a 532 nm green laser beam (20 mW power) produced with Continuous Wave (CW) Diode Pumped Solid State Laser (DPSSL) Model CDPS532M-020 (JDS Uniphase Corp, USA). The synthesized material was then cooled to room temperature (30°C) and digested for 120 minutes to settle down the particles at the bottom of the beaker. The precipitate of Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 was filtered using Grade 287 filter paper (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) and then washed using deionized water till chloride became free and the pH of the residual solution reached 7.0. It took 6 to 7 hours to make the residual neutral. The recovered precipitates were dried for 90 min at 100°C in an oven and then ground with pestle and mortar into a fine powder followed by calcination at 700°C for 4 hours in a muffle furnace (Vulcan, A550).

2.3. Characterization of Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 Nanomaterial

The structural analysis of ultrafine homogeneous powder of Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanomaterial was performed using X-ray diffractometer (D8 FOCUS 2220 Bruker AXS) with Cu Kα radiation ( Å). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern was recorded at a scanning rate of 0.02°/s in ranging from 10° to 80°. The gold coated specimen was utilized to appraise the morphologies of the nanoparticles by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM, JEOL JSM 7401F JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Japan) operated at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. The elemental analysis was performed by using energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis (EDX, Inca-FET-3, Oxford Instruments, UK Ltd.). The BET specific surface area was investigated by N2 adsorption (77 K) using a Micromeritics ASAP 2000 system during the overnight treatment (130°C) under vacuum thereby degassing the sample. On average, BET specific surface area was found to be 78.3 m2 g−1.

2.4. Assessment of Biofilm Inhibition

The inhibition of bacterial (Bacillus subtilis) biofilm formation was assessed by the microtiter-plate method as described by Stepanović et al. [16]. The wells of a sterile 24-well flat bottomed plastic tissue culture plate were filled with 100 μL of nutrient broth (Oxoid, UK). Two concentrations, that is, 2.5 and 5.0 μg of testing samples (dissolved in 1 mL of DMSO), were added in different wells. Finally, 20 μL of bacterial suspension containing 1 × 109 CFU/mL was inoculated. Positive control well contained Rifampicin and nutrient broth (Oxoid, UK) while negative control well contained nutrient broth and microbial strain. Afterwards, plates were covered and then incubated aerobically for 24 hours at 37°C. Thereafter, the contents of each well were behed thrice with 220 μL of sterile phosphate buffer (pH: 7.2). To remove all nonadherent bacteria, plates were vigorously shaken. Then, attached leftover bacteria were fixed with 220 mL of 99% methanol per well. Next, after 15 min, plates were emptied and left to dry. Then, plates were stained for 5 min with 220 mL of 50% crystal violet per well. Surplus stain was rinsed off using distilled water. Then plates were air-dried and the bound dye was resolubilized with 220 μL of 33% (v/v) glacial acetic acid per well. The optical density (OD) of each well was measured at 630 nm using microplate reader (Biotek, USA). All the tests were carried thrice against selected bacterial strain and the results were averaged. The bacterial growth inhibition (INH%) was calculated using the following formula:

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Analysis of Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 Nanomaterial

The powder X-ray diffraction patterns of Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 calcined at 700°C temperature exhibited sharp, intense diffraction peaks and single cubic phase with fcc structure of Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 without any impurity phase (Figure 1), revealing the highly crystalline character of the sample indexed with JCPDS card number 74-2401. The crystallite size determined by Debye-Scherrer’s formula was found to be ~12 nm and the calculated lattice parameters α for Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 sample were found to be 0.869 nm (Table 1).

Table 1: Characterization data of XRD for Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4.
Figure 1: XRD pattern of Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4.

It is worth mentioning here that laser irradiation brings confined thermal modifications in the light absorbing structures; nevertheless it evades thermal destruction to the nearby structure due to its directionality. Besides, diode laser output is narrowband; hence most of it is absorbed and exploited during irradiation of the material producing the fine crystal structure.

The average particle size ~12 nm was estimated from ten particles at ×50,000 magnification from the SEM micrographs (Figure 2). Besides, it is evident from the SEM micrograph that MnZnFe2O4 sample has uniform and spherical structural morphology with a narrow size distribution of the particles.

Figure 2: SEM micrograph of Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles.

For quantitative analysis, the as synthesized ultrafine homogeneous nanomaterial sample (in bulk, flat, and polished form) was exposed to electron beam of accelerating voltage 15 kV in electron microscope under high vacuum. The EDXA spectrum (Figure 3) of the Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanomaterial shows that it contains only Fe, Mn, Zn, and O with no traces of byproducts. Table 2 lists the relative abundance of each of the elements which is analogous to the theoretical stoichiometric values. No contamination is detected due to high purity of the starting materials used for the synthesis of the Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles.

Table 2: Characterization data of EDX for Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4.
Figure 3: Energy dispersive X-ray spectra of Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4.

3.2. Bacillus subtilis Biofilm Inhibition Activity

Figure 4 depicted that 5 μg of Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles dissolved in 1 mL of DMSO showed excellent biofilm inhibitory activity 91.23% ± 1.87 against Bacillus subtilis (Table 3). This antibacterial potential of the tested nanomaterial can be attributed to the fact that the Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles have greater surface area and unique crystal form having more sharp edges and site to enhance their activity by joining up with bacterial membrane to disrupt the membrane [14].

Table 3: Bacillus subtilis biofilm inhibition.
Figure 4: Phase contrast microscopic view of inhibition of Bacillus subtilis biofilm by Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles at 100x ((a) controlled (native) Bacillus subtilis biofilm; (b) Rifampicin treated control; (c) biofilm treated by 5.0 μg of Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles dissolved in 1 mL of DMSO; (d) biofilm treated by 2.5 μg of Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles dissolved in 1 mL of DMSO).

There may be different possible mechanisms of action for the observed antibacterial activity of Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles. For example, the tested nanoparticles stick to the bacterial cell wall and breach the cell membrane [17] and cause degradation and lysis of the cytoplasm, resulting in cell death. As nanoparticles possess large surface area, their bactericidal efficacy is enhanced contrary to the bulky particles with lesser surface area. Furthermore, the Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles keep a large surface-to-volume ratio, which leads to an increase in their bioactivity making them active and potent bactericidal agents [15, 18]. Previous studies on zinc nanoparticle structures revealed that zinc fixes to the membranes of microbes, analogous to mammalian cells by delaying their growth, thereby, prolonging the cell division time of the organism. Similarly, according to some other reports, the main chemical species linked to the antibacterial activity of such nanomaterials were supposed to be active oxides; for example, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) formed from the surface of the ceramic zinc [19, 20]. Hydroxyl radicals are very strong oxidants and when nanoparticles directly stick to the microbes, their surface undergoes crucial oxidative attack. The active oxides eagerly penetrate through the bacterial cell wall and cause cell destruction and thus inhibit the bacterial growth [20, 21].

Typically, in the case of Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles, upon excitation by light, the photon energy produces a pair of electron and hole on the Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 surface. The hole (in the valence band) might have reacted with H2O or hydroxide (OH) ions adsorbed on the surface producing hydroxyl radicals () while the electron (in the conduction band) reduces O2 to generate superoxide ions (). The holes and both are extremely reactive towards organic complexes [22, 23] and thus might have caused disruption of the cell membrane/cell wall of Bacillus subtilis and leakage of intracellular K+ ions leading to cell death (Figures 4 and 5). Previously, outer cell membrane damage was noted by Sunada et al. [24] in case of E. coli wherein they found that the endotoxin, a vital part of the outer cell membrane, was smashed while photocatalysis was performed with TiO2.

Figure 5: Mechanism of bactericidal action of Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles.

Polyunsaturated phospholipids are vital constituents of the bacterial cell membrane and high vulnerability of these organic compounds to be attacked by reactive oxygen species (ROS) is an established fact [25, 26]. Many functions, such as semipermeability, oxidative phosphorylation reactions, and respiration, are influenced by the cell membrane composition and structure. Therefore, lipid peroxidation is detrimental to all forms of life. Besides, the usual functionalities linked with an intact membrane, for example, respiratory activity, are vanished by lipid peroxidation reaction. Hence, any damage to bacterial cell membrane structure or modification in membrane architecture and design initiated by lipid peroxidation causes alterations in membrane-bound proteins, electron mediators, orientation of compounds across the cell membrane, leakage of K+ ions, and successive functional changes, thereby causing cell death upon contact with Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles [25, 26].

4. Conclusions

The bacterial biofilms can cause several infectious diseases and develop resistance against antibiotics. In the present study, for the first time, the antibacterial properties of Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles were established in an in vitro trial against biofilm formed by Bacillus subtilis using microtiter-plate assay. Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles showed excellent inhibitory effect against the highly multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacterial strain Bacillus subtilis. The results indicate that the Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanocomposite is a promising disinfection material that can also be used in surface coatings to effectively inhibit bacterial growth and proliferation.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for its funding of this research through the Research Group Project no. RGP-VPP-312.

References

  1. I. Ullah, S. Ali, M. A. Hanif, and S. A. Shahid, “Nanoscience for environmental remediation: a review,” International Journal of Chemical and Biochemical Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 60–77, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  2. S. A. Shahid, A. Nafady, I. Ullah et al., “Characterization of newly synthesized ZrFe2O5 nanomaterial and investigations of its tremendous photocatalytic properties under visible light irradiation,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2013, Article ID 517643, 6 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Raffi, S. Mehrwan, T. M. Bhatti et al., “Investigations into the antibacterial behavior of copper nanoparticles against Escherichia coli,” Annals of Microbiology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 75–80, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. W.-L. Du, S.-S. Niu, Y.-L. Xu, Z.-R. Xu, and C.-L. Fan, “Antibacterial activity of chitosan tripolyphosphate nanoparticles loaded with various metal ions,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 385–389, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. R. Morones, J. L. Elechiguerra, A. Camacho et al., “The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles,” Nanotechnology, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 2346–2353, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. Burda, X. Chen, R. Narayanan, and M. A. El-Sayed, “Chemistry and properties of nanocrystals of different shapes,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 1025–1102, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. S. Teodósio, M. Simões, L. F. Melo, and F. J. Mergulhão, “Flow cell hydrodynamics and their effects on E. coli biofilm formation under different nutrient conditions and turbulent flow,” Biofouling, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Ganguly, S. K. Mukhopadhayay, and S. Biswas, “Potential threat to human health from foodborne illness having serious implications on public health—a review,” International Journal of Chemical and Biochemical Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 65–68, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  9. J. W. Austin and G. Bergeron, “Development of bacterial biofilms in dairy processing lines,” Journal of Dairy Research, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 509–519, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. H. Carr, R. L. Anderson, and M. S. Favero, “Comparison of chemical dehydration and critical point drying for the stabilization and visualization of aging biofilm present on interior surfaces of PVC distribution pipe,” Journal of Applied Bacteriology, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 225–232, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. Hall-Stoodley, J. W. Costerton, and P. Stoodley, “Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 95–108, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. Lear and G. D. Lewis, Microbial Biofilms: Current Research and Applications, Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, UK, 2012.
  13. E. Karatan and P. Watnick, “Signals, regulatory networks, and materials that build and break bacterial biofilms,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 310–347, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. P. Allaker, “The use of nanoparticles to control oral biofilm formation,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 89, no. 11, pp. 1175–1186, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. K. Stoimenov, R. L. Klinger, G. L. Marchin, and K. J. Klabunde, “Metal oxide nanoparticles as bactericidal agents,” Langmuir, vol. 18, no. 17, pp. 6679–6686, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Stepanović, D. Vuković, I. Dakić, B. Savić, and M. Švabić-Vlahović, “A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation,” Journal of Microbiological Methods, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 175–179, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C.-H. Hu and M.-S. Xia, “Adsorption and antibacterial effect of copper-exchanged montmorillonite on Escherichia coli K88,” Applied Clay Science, vol. 31, no. 3-4, pp. 180–184, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. O. Yamamoto and J. Sawai, “Preparation and characterization of novel activated carbons with antibacterial function,” Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, vol. 74, no. 9, pp. 1761–1765, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Sawai, S. Shoji, H. Igarashi et al., “Hydrogen peroxide as an antibacterial factor in zinc oxide powder slurry,” Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 521–522, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. D. Wikins, L. V. Holdeman, I. J. Abramson, and W. E. Moore, “Standardized single-disc method for antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 451–459, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. E. Nel, L. Mädler, D. Velegol et al., “Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface,” Nature Materials, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 543–557, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. W. A. Jacoby, P. C. Maness, E. J. Wolfrum, D. M. Blake, and J. A. Fennell, “Mineralization of bacterial cell mass on a photocatalytic surface in air,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 32, no. 17, pp. 2650–2653, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. O. Legrini, E. Oliveros, and A. M. Braun, “Photochemical processes for water treatment,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 671–698, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. K. Sunada, Y. Kikuchi, K. Hashimoto, and A. Fujishima, “Bactericidal and detoxification effects of TiO2 thin film photocatalysts,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 726–728, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. P.-C. Maness, S. Smolinski, D. M. Blake, Z. Huang, E. J. Wolfrum, and W. A. Jacoby, “Bactericidal activity of photocatalytic TiO2 reaction: toward an understanding of its killing mechanism,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 4094–4098, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. T. Saito, T. Iwase, J. Horie, and T. Morioka, “Mode of photocatalytic bactericidal action of powdered semiconductor TiO2 on mutans streptococci,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 369–379, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus