Continuous Size-Dependent Sorting of Ferromagnetic Nanoparticles in Laser-Ablated Microchannel

<table class="figure-group"><tr class="fig-image" id="a"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/jnm/volume-2016/7315821/figures/7315821.fig.003a.svgz" name="7315821.fig.003a" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(a) </b>Plot on <svg height="8.68572pt" id="M24" style="vertical-align:-0.0498209pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.6359 23.2351 8.68572" width="23.2351pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M748 650H522L515 622L546 617C580 611 587 604 565 575C518 513 469 451 419 393C376 474 349 534 330 580C318 609 325 612 361 618L383 622L392 650H151L144 622C214 616 224 612 257 543L360 327C270 218 187 124 159 95C106 40 92 34 26 28L17 0H252L259 28L236 31C189 37 188 47 209 78C249 136 308 210 377 294L478 79C494 44 487 37 449 32L418 28L409 0H673L680 28C596 34 591 39 554 116L436 361C526 469 574 521 604 553C659 612 669 614 739 622L748 650Z" id="g113-89"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="765" vert-adv-y="765"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,9.945,0)"><path d="M300 253H71L57 198H286L300 253Z" id="g190-46"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="356" vert-adv-y="356"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,14.591,0)"><path d="M640 650H413L406 622L438 617C475 611 483 605 463 571C422 503 346 400 296 333C264 403 215 529 199 575C189 604 191 614 228 618L262 622L271 650H30L23 622C90 615 97 609 119 553L212 321C222 295 223 285 218 259L193 127C176 39 167 33 82 28L76 0H350L356 28C266 36 257 40 275 127L303 266C308 290 314 302 328 322C396 418 454 493 498 546C551 610 565 616 631 622L640 650Z" id="g113-90"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="652" vert-adv-y="652"></glyph.data></g></svg> plane</td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="b"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/jnm/volume-2016/7315821/figures/7315821.fig.003b.svgz" name="7315821.fig.003b" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(b) </b>Plot on <svg height="9.01194pt" id="M25" style="vertical-align:-0.04981995pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.96212 23.757 9.01194" width="23.757pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M748 650H522L515 622L546 617C580 611 587 604 565 575C518 513 469 451 419 393C376 474 349 534 330 580C318 609 325 612 361 618L383 622L392 650H151L144 622C214 616 224 612 257 543L360 327C270 218 187 124 159 95C106 40 92 34 26 28L17 0H252L259 28L236 31C189 37 188 47 209 78C249 136 308 210 377 294L478 79C494 44 487 37 449 32L418 28L409 0H673L680 28C596 34 591 39 554 116L436 361C526 469 574 521 604 553C659 612 669 614 739 622L748 650Z" id="g113-89"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="765" vert-adv-y="765"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,9.945,0)"><path d="M300 253H71L57 198H286L300 253Z" id="g190-46"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="356" vert-adv-y="356"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,14.591,0)"><path d="M669 636L663 650H260C230 650 221 652 208 675H186C177 621 162 548 144 481L173 479C195 534 211 560 226 578C248 604 266 615 373 615H544C460 511 114 112 23 16L31 0H561C577 34 611 135 622 170L594 182C566 125 544 88 515 65C481 38 416 35 319 35C249 35 197 37 152 41C270 184 542 501 669 636Z" id="g113-91"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="692" vert-adv-y="692"></glyph.data></g></svg> plane</td></tr></table>

<div>Simulation results for the 3D magnetic flux density of the neodymium magnet. (a) The magnetic flux density distribution on <svg height="8.68572pt" id="M22" style="vertical-align:-0.0498209pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.6359 23.2351 8.68572" width="23.2351pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M748 650H522L515 622L546 617C580 611 587 604 565 575C518 513 469 451 419 393C376 474 349 534 330 580C318 609 325 612 361 618L383 622L392 650H151L144 622C214 616 224 612 257 543L360 327C270 218 187 124 159 95C106 40 92 34 26 28L17 0H252L259 28L236 31C189 37 188 47 209 78C249 136 308 210 377 294L478 79C494 44 487 37 449 32L418 28L409 0H673L680 28C596 34 591 39 554 116L436 361C526 469 574 521 604 553C659 612 669 614 739 622L748 650Z" id="g113-89"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="765" vert-adv-y="765"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,9.945,0)"><path d="M300 253H71L57 198H286L300 253Z" id="g190-46"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="356" vert-adv-y="356"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,14.591,0)"><path d="M640 650H413L406 622L438 617C475 611 483 605 463 571C422 503 346 400 296 333C264 403 215 529 199 575C189 604 191 614 228 618L262 622L271 650H30L23 622C90 615 97 609 119 553L212 321C222 295 223 285 218 259L193 127C176 39 167 33 82 28L76 0H350L356 28C266 36 257 40 275 127L303 266C308 290 314 302 328 322C396 418 454 493 498 546C551 610 565 616 631 622L640 650Z" id="g113-90"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="652" vert-adv-y="652"></glyph.data></g></svg> plane. (b) The magnetic flux density distribution on <svg height="9.01194pt" id="M23" style="vertical-align:-0.04981995pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.96212 23.757 9.01194" width="23.757pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M748 650H522L515 622L546 617C580 611 587 604 565 575C518 513 469 451 419 393C376 474 349 534 330 580C318 609 325 612 361 618L383 622L392 650H151L144 622C214 616 224 612 257 543L360 327C270 218 187 124 159 95C106 40 92 34 26 28L17 0H252L259 28L236 31C189 37 188 47 209 78C249 136 308 210 377 294L478 79C494 44 487 37 449 32L418 28L409 0H673L680 28C596 34 591 39 554 116L436 361C526 469 574 521 604 553C659 612 669 614 739 622L748 650Z" id="g113-89"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="765" vert-adv-y="765"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,9.945,0)"><path d="M300 253H71L57 198H286L300 253Z" id="g190-46"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="356" vert-adv-y="356"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,14.591,0)"><path d="M669 636L663 650H260C230 650 221 652 208 675H186C177 621 162 548 144 481L173 479C195 534 211 560 226 578C248 604 266 615 373 615H544C460 511 114 112 23 16L31 0H561C577 34 611 135 622 170L594 182C566 125 544 88 515 65C481 38 416 35 319 35C249 35 197 37 152 41C270 184 542 501 669 636Z" id="g113-91"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="692" vert-adv-y="692"></glyph.data></g></svg> plane.</div>

Journal of Nanomaterials

fig3

Figure 3

Figure 3: Continuous Size-Dependent Sorting of Ferromagnetic Nanoparticles in Laser-Ablated Microchannel 