An Atomistic-Based Continuum Modeling for Evaluation of Effective Elastic Properties of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes

Table 2

Elastic properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes (AR = 20).

Armchair
(6, 6)	0.814	2.124	2.124	1.184	1.137	0.493
(7, 7)	0.950	2.125	2.123	1.183	1.148	0.487
(8, 8)	1.086	2.126	2.123	1.182	1.156	0.484
(9, 9)	1.221	2.126	2.123	1.182	1.161	0.481
(10, 10)	1.357	2.126	2.132	1.190	1.169	0.482
(11, 11)	1.493	2.126	2.132	1.189	1.172	0.480
(12, 12)	1.628	2.126	2.131	1.188	1.173	0.479
(13, 13)	1.764	2.126	2.130	1.187	1.175	0.478
(14, 14)	1.900	2.126	2.130	1.186	1.176	0.477
(15, 15)	2.035	2.126	2.129	1.186	1.176	0.476
(16, 16)	2.171	2.126	2.129	1.185	1.177	0.476
(17, 17)	2.307	2.126	2.128	1.185	1.177	0.475
(18, 18)	2.443	2.125	2.128	1.184	1.178	0.475
(19, 19)	2.578	2.125	2.133	1.189	1.181	0.476
(20, 20)	2.714	2.125	2.132	1.188	1.181	0.476
(21, 21)	2.850	2.125	2.132	1.187	1.181	0.475
(22, 22)	2.985	2.125	2.131	1.187	1.181	0.475
(23, 23)	3.121	2.125	2.131	1.187	1.181	0.475
Average		2.126	2.129	1.186	1.171	0.479
Zigzag
(11, 0)	0.862	1.877	1.882	0.951	0.900	0.491
(12, 0)	0.940	1.872	1.875	0.946	0.904	0.485
(14, 0)	1.097	1.876	1.877	0.945	0.914	0.482
(16, 0)	1.254	1.878	1.878	0.945	0.920	0.479
(17, 0)	1.332	1.879	1.879	0.944	0.922	0.478
(19, 0)	1.489	1.881	1.880	0.944	0.926	0.477
(21, 0)	1.645	1.962	1.961	1.058	0.990	0.485
(22, 0)	1.724	1.890	1.888	0.947	0.934	0.477
(24, 0)	1.880	1.890	1.888	0.946	0.936	0.476
(26, 0)	2.037	1.948	1.946	1.036	0.983	0.482
(28, 0)	2.194	1.890	1.892	0.949	0.940	0.476
(29, 0)	2.272	1.943	1.945	1.030	0.981	0.482
(31, 0)	2.429	1.939	1.941	1.024	0.979	0.481
(33, 0)	2.585	1.890	1.891	0.948	0.941	0.475
(35, 0)	2.742	1.890	1.891	0.948	0.942	0.475
(36, 0)	2.820	1.890	1.891	0.947	0.942	0.475
(38, 0)	2.977	1.890	1.894	0.951	0.944	0.475
(40, 0)	3.134	1.890	1.894	0.951	0.944	0.475
Average		1.899	1.900	0.967	0.941	0.479