Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 9782625, 10 pages
Research Article

New Bismuth Germanate Oxide Nanoparticle Material for Biolabel Applications in Medicine

1Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Centro de Nanociencias y Nanotecnología, Km 107 Carretera Ensenada-Tijuana, 22800 Ensenada, BCN, Mexico
2Instituto de Biotecnología, UNAM, Avenida Universidad 2001, 62250 Cuernavaca, MOR, Mexico
3Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, 49100-000 Sao Cristóvão, SE, Brazil
4Departamento de Química, Universidad de Guadalajara, Marcelino García Barragán 1421, 44430 Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico

Received 11 September 2015; Revised 10 December 2015; Accepted 31 December 2015

Academic Editor: Ilaria Armentano

Copyright © 2016 M. J. Oviedo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Bismuth germanate (Bi4Ge3O12, BGO) has been the focus of several studies due to its scintillation properties. It has been employed as detector in scientific research and medicine, and herein we studied its possible biomedical applications. The photoluminescence properties of the uncoated and protein-coated nanoparticles were analyzed in different body fluids, at different pH. The nanoparticles yielded blueish-white luminescence with a maximum emission peak at 485 nm corresponding to the 3P11S0 electron transition of Bi3+. They showed luminescence properties at different pH values and in human fluids, such as urine and blood serum. Finally, the BGO nanoparticles were functionalized with the anti-HLA I W6/32 monoclonal antibody and the capacity of the antibody-loaded nanoparticles to recognize the cognate antigen (HLA I) of the W6/32 mAb was assessed on the human promyelocytic leukemia cell line THP-1. The possibility of functionalizing BGO nanoparticles with W6/32 antibodies and their specificity to identify THP-1 cells make them promising candidates for biomedical applications as biolabels.

1. Introduction

Materials science and engineering are capable of tuning the physicochemical properties of materials to transform technologies in many areas including chemical manufacturing, food industry, medicine, personal care, electronics, sensors, and catalysis [17]. Surface modifications of nanoparticles will provide new opportunities for their effective application in a wide variety of fields, such as the peptide and protein surface modifications recently applied in nanomedicine [8, 9]. In the rapidly emerging field of nanobiotechnology, new kinds of materials that combine the properties of biological molecules with nanostructured materials, such as recognition, catalysis, or other properties, combined with those of nanomaterials offer a wide range of novel possibilities to the medical industry. Inorganic nanoparticles with luminescent properties have been used as biolabels, for example, quantum dots (QDs) for in vivo imaging. QDs possess bright emission and are capable of identifying specific cells when functionalized with antibodies [10]. However, the emission wavelength strongly depends on the particle size, and the present QD synthesis methods must still control particle size [11]. Nanocrystalline silicon has also been used as a biolabel and because it shows biocompatibility, it was tested inside a biological tissue. However, once inside, its luminescence properties decreased considerably [12]. The luminescent activation of a biolabel can provide signs that enable earlier diagnosis by, for example, discerning the presence of certain compounds at a primitive stage of the disease.

In materials science, bismuth germanate (Bi4Ge3O12, BGO) has received much attention for its scintillation properties. A scintillator is a luminescent material that converts ionizing (high-energy incident) radiation into light with very short decay time (≪μs). The main application of BGO single crystal scintillators has been in the medical imaging field as detector in positron emission tomography (PET) equipment [13], but so far, it has not been examined as a biomaterial and/or biolabel. The aim of this work was to investigate the synthesis and optical properties of bismuth germanate and to explore its possible use as synthetic biolabel. The interaction of BGO with body fluids such as human urine, blood serum, and protein was explored. Finally, the BGO nanoparticles were functionalized with W6/32 antibodies and tested to detect human cancer cells (THP-1 cell line).

2. Experimental Procedures

2.1. BGO Nanoparticles Synthesis

A mixture was prepared containing 4.049 g of high purity Bi2O3·H2O (Puratronic 99.999%) and 0.631 g of GeO2 (Alfa Aesar 99.98%) according to stoichiometric calculations and dispersed in a solution of 4% HNO3 (40 mL). In another flask, 2.58 g of L-tartaric acid (Aldrich, USA) was dissolved in 10 mL of deionized water and the individual solutions were mixed under constant stirring. These two solutions were then mixed and stirred for 24 h at room temperature; the resulting solution was maintained at pH 1. Thereafter, the mixture was heated under constant stirring to 80°C and kept at this temperature for 2 h, which made it denser, eventually forming the sol. Subsequently, the sol was heated to 120°C producing a gel which was dried to form the precursor. The as-synthesized powders were heated twice in air, the first starting gradually from room temperature to 950°C at a rate of 1°C min−1. The powders were maintained at this temperature for 4 h and then cooled down at the same rate. The second annealing was performed keeping the powders at 800°C for 1 h.

2.2. BGO Nanoparticle Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed with a Philips X’pert diffractometer equipped with CuKα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm). Measurements in a 2θ = 20–60° range were taken with a step size of 0.1° and a 1 sec dwell per point. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained with a JEOL-2010 operated at 200 kV accelerating voltage. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images were obtained with a XE-BIO of Park Systems. The photoluminescence (PL) properties of the powders were studied with a fluorescence spectrophotometer (Hitachi FL-7000). A Nicolet 6700 spectrometer with an attenuated total reflectance device was used to obtain infrared spectra with a resolution of 2 cm−1 and accumulation of 32 scans. BGO powders were characterized by Raman spectroscopy using a Jobin Yvon Horiba LabRam-HR system interfaced with an Olympus BX41 optical microscopy and an Ar laser (Olympus TH4-100, 20 mW at 532 nm) source. The scintillator properties were studied by radioluminescence (RL) measurements obtained by the D08B:XAFS2 beam line at the Brazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory (LNLS) in Campinas/SP, Brazil, with the X-ray beam tuned at 7 keV. The RL signal was obtained using a spectrometer (Ocean Optics HR2000). All optical measurements were performed at room temperature.

2.3. BGO Nanoparticle Functionalization

The BGO functionalization method was standardized as follows: 50 mg of BGO nanoparticles was mixed with 50 μL of bovine serum albumin (BSA) (8 mg/mL) and 10 μL of 0.1 M 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC). The mixtures were completed up to 1 mL with 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 5.5) to maintain the protein stable and active. The suspensions were incubated at 37°C for 2 h and then centrifuged at 6,000 rpm for 4 min at 4°C. The suspensions of conjugated nanoparticles were washed two times with Tris-HCl buffer and then three times with distilled water, and the supernatant was recovered by centrifugation. Two controls were included, one with uncoated nanoparticles (BGO-EDC) to estimate the possible unspecific adsorption of reagent dye, and another with BGO nanoparticles and BSA protein without EDC as linker (BGO-BSA) to determine if the nanoparticles can be coated with BSA without linker.

2.4. Conjugated Protein Determination

To corroborate the protein functionalization of BGO, the attached protein was quantified. For protein quantification, 50 mg of coated and 50 mg of uncoated nanoparticles were suspended in 900 μL of distilled water and 100 μL of Bio-Rad reagent was added in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube. This amount of reagent dye was calculated to produce 0.5 absorbance (λ = 595 nm) units with an excess of protein. After 15 min incubation, all suspensions were centrifuged at 6,000 rpm for 4 min. An aliquot of 500 μL of the supernatant of each suspension was transferred into a separate test tube to which excess BSA protein was then added (36 μL of 8 mg/mL BSA solution), and the unconjugated reagent dye was spectroscopically determined at an excitation wavelength of 595 nm. Absorbance measurements were transformed to BSA protein equivalents (μg/mL) using the standard curve. The amount of protein attached to the nanoparticles was estimated by subtracting the absorbance of the unconjugated reagent from that initially added. Two control determinations were included: the first was prepared by mixing 50 mg of uncoated nanoparticles with 10 μL of EDC and 890 μL of distilled water; the second contained 50 mg of uncoated nanoparticles in 900 μL of distilled water.

2.5. Stability in Physiological Fluid and pH Stability

In order to examine if the BGO nanoparticles could be utilized as biolabel, their photoluminescence was tested in different environments of pH and human fluids. The photoluminescence was studied by dispersing the particles into human urine, blood serum, and distilled water. One milligram of BGO was mixed into 1.5 mL of each fluid and dispersed in an ultrasonic bath. The stability of BGO nanoparticles under different pH conditions was assayed in water. The basal pH value for water was 5.7. Extreme pH conditions were explored in water by adding nitric acid and ammonia solutions, to test the stability under acid and alkaline environments, respectively. The pH of these fluids was then adjusted to test BGO at values of 1 and 12.

2.6. Functionalization of BGO Nanoparticles with Antibodies

After BGO nanoparticle functionalization with BSA protein either with or without carbodiimide (EDC) as linker (described in Section 2.3), the W6/32 monoclonal antibody (mouse IgG2a) that recognizes human HLA I molecules present on nucleated human cells was added at a concentration of 7.5 μg per 50 mg of nanoparticles (Table 1). W6/32 mAb was purified from ascitic fluid following institutional guidelines and provided by Dr. Y. Rosenstein.

Table 1: Mixed solution used for antibody functionalization of nanoparticles.

Particles were incubated in this solution at 37°C for 2 h. Primary antibody-functionalized nanoparticles were washed three times with 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer pH 7.4. Particles were centrifuged and the supernatant was recovered to determine the efficiency of mAb binding to the nanoparticles. Thereafter, the nanoparticles were resuspended in 500 μL of FACS solution (PBS pH 7.4, 2% fetal calf serum, and 0.01% NaN3) and incubated for 30 min at room temperature with a fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody goat-anti mouse IgG coupled with Alexa 488 (Invitrogen Co.), which is excited at 488 nm and emits at 519 nm. After this period, samples were washed with FACS solution and centrifuged at 1200 rpm (400 g) for 5 min at room temperature. Subsequently, samples were analyzed via flow cytometry with a FACSCanto II cytometer and the DIVA software (BD Biosciences). Antibody-functionalized nanoparticles with no secondary antibody and nanoparticles without W6/32 but incubated with the secondary antibody only were used as controls. Data were analyzed with the FlowJo flow cytometry analysis software.

2.7. Cellular Recognition (Targeting)

To assess the capacity of the antibody-loaded nanoparticles to recognize the cognate antigen (HLA I) of the W6/32 mAb on human cells, the acute monocytic leukemia cell line THP-1 [HLA I+: A2, A9; B5] (ATCC TIB-202) was incubated with the particles at 1 : 20 cell : particle ratio for 2 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. This mAb recognizes a public epitope present on all HLA I molecules [14]. Controls included THP-1 cells, mAb-loaded nanoparticles, and THP-1 cells with nonfunctionalized nanoparticles. A488-labeled anti-mouse IgG was used as secondary antibody as described for visualization of mAb binding to the nanoparticles surface. Samples were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde prior to epifluorescence and flow cytometry measurements.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Structural and Luminescence Properties of BGO Nanophosphor

Figure 1(a) shows the XRD pattern with indexed reflections, matching the JCPDS Card number 340416 of Bi4Ge3O12 powders. The sample crystallized in the typical body-centered cubic structure of Bi4Ge3O12 with a space group . Transmission electron microscopy analysis confirmed the crystal structure and revealed the morphology of the nanocrystals. Figure 1(b) shows representative TEM images of the powders. The inset of Figure 1(b) shows a high-resolution (HR) TEM image of the BGO cubic structure observed along the zone axis. The nanoparticles have a spherical shape and a size distribution of around 12 nm of average. The image shows the and planes with 0.32 and 0.28 nm of spacing, respectively, and an angle between them of 21.62°. TEM analysis confirmed the results observed by XRD and suggests the presence of a BGO cubic structure. In our previous work, under the same first annealing conditions, two different phases, Bi4Ge3O12 and β-Bi2O3, were obtained [15]. This report states that a second annealing processing at 800°C for 1 h was enough to obtain a pure phase of Bi4Ge3O12.

Figure 1: (a) XRD pattern of Bi4Ge3O12. (b) TEM image showing spherical nanocrystalline particles of BGO. (c) PL spectra of BGO; the PL spectrum of the single crystal (dot line) [31] shows similar broadband emission. (d) RL spectra of Bi4Ge3O12 synthesized by sol-gel and annealed by STT. RL spectrum of single crystal BGO (dot line) [31] shows a similar emission band.

The PL excitation and emission spectra are shown in Figure 1(c). The excitation peaks are centered at 250 and 280 nm, near the band gap edge of the BGO [16]. The BGO sample yielded blueish-white luminescence when excited with UV photons, thus presenting a broadband emission in the visible region, where the maximum peak was centered at 485 nm, associated with the 3P11S0 of Bi3+ electron transition. Photoluminescence properties of single crystal BGO have been reported [17] and a typical PL spectrum is included for comparison. The emission band of the BGO powder at 485 nm is similar to the single crystal emission peak. The radioluminescence experiment revealed a single emission peak centered at 500 nm (Figure 1(d)). For comparison, the RL curve reported for the single crystal BGO under X-ray excitation is also included [17]. In both luminescence experiments, the emission peaks derive from the 3P11S0 electron transition in the Bi3+ ions [18].

The two excitation peaks detected by PL at 250 and 280 nm are ascribed to 1S03P1 and 1S01P1, respectively. The 3P0 state is the lowest excited state of Bi3+; however, 3P01S0 emission is forbidden. Since the 3P0 level is situated below the 3P1 level, at low temperatures, the 3P01S0 transition occurs, while at higher temperatures (room temperature) the practically allowed 3P11S0 emission takes over [19]. Hence, the observed emission of Bi3+ originates from the thermal population of the 3P1 level and the 3P11S0 electronic transitions. Weber and Monchamp [18] estimated the radiative decay rate from the levels 3P1 and 3P0 integrating the absorption cross section and the Einstein A-B relationship [18]. Decay time for 3P0 is longer than that for 3P1. If 3P1 levels are within a few (: Boltzman constant and : temperature) of 3P0, lifetime shortening of the latter due to increased radiative decay may be anticipated.

3.2. BGO Nanoparticles after BSA Protein Functionalization

The conjugated protein determination showed a value of μg protein/g BGO. Protein-containing nanoparticles (BGO-EDC-BSA and BGO-BSA) showed blue color due to the protein reagent binding. Control experiments (BGO-EDC and BGO) do not show nonspecific protein reagent adsorption after five washings (Figure 2). The Bio-Rad Protein Assay is a dye-binding assay in which a color change occurs in response to protein concentration. This reagent is an improved preparation of the classical Bradford method [20]. Coomassie blue (dye used for staining proteins) binds to basic and aromatic amino acid residues, especially arginine [21], displaying a color change in response to protein concentration. A color shift from 465 nm to 595 nm occurred due to the presence of proteins, suggesting that BSA is contained in the synthesized nanomaterial powder [21]. Figure 3 shows AFM images of the powders with and without BSA. The particles show regular shape and narrow size distribution with an average particle size between 8 and 40 nm for the uncoated particles and 50–90 nm for the coated particles. TEM images presented spherical particles, and the size observed by the AFM technique also corresponds to spheres. Thus, the increment in size after functionalization is presumably related to the formation of a protein shell over the BGO particles.

Figure 2: BGO nanoparticles preparations after protein reagent treatment and later centrifugation. (1) BGO nanoparticles treated with BSA in the presence of EDC in 10 mM Tris HCl. (2) BGO nanoparticles treated with BSA in the absence of EDC in 10 mM Tris HCl. (3) BGO nanoparticles treated with EDC and without BSA in 10 mM Tris HCl. (4) BGO nanoparticles in 10 mM Tris HCl without BSA and EDC.
Figure 3: AFM image of BGO nanoparticles. The red and green lines are the AFM section analysis that show nanoparticles size (a) before and (b) after the BSA functionalization. TEM images presented spherical particles, and the size observed by the AFM technique also corresponded to spheres. Thus, the increment in size after functionalization is presumably related to the formation of a protein shell over the BGO particles.

To identify the amino groups that characterize the EDC and BSA organic molecules, infrared and Raman spectroscopy were conducted. The infrared spectrum of uncoated BGO shows intense bands of Bi-O and Ge-O [2224] moieties in the low wavenumber region, as shown in Figure 4(a). After the BGO functionalization with BSA, the powder showed bands of O-H and N-H stretching vibrational modes, which reveal the presence of water and amino acid molecules. The wide band around 3300 cm−1 results from hydrogen bonds at different degrees involving water, amino, or hydroxyl groups, thus widening the range of vibrational frequencies. The stretching mode of carbonyl of amides groups at 1650 cm−1 [25] clearly confirms the presence of BSA, and no changes were detected in BGO vibrations at 1095, 857, 780, and 480 cm−1. Thus, the molecular integrity of BGO was maintained in the functionalized BGO particles, which is needed to preserve the light emission properties of BGO.

Figure 4: (a) Infrared spectra of BGO nanoparticles before (dashed line) and after (solid line) BSA functionalization. (b) Raman analysis of BGO at different stages of BSA functionalization.

Raman analyses conducted on BGO particles showed a typical profile (Figure 4(b)) formed by lattice vibrations below 300 cm−1 and Bi-O or Ge-O fractions up to 730 cm−1, as reported elsewhere [2527]. A band of low intensity at 530 cm−1 is detected in the spectra of samples treated with EDC, with BSA, and with higher intensity in the EDC-BSA treated sample, which can be assigned to the amino groups of the protein chains, since the amino groups linked to metal centers present a skeletal bending mode between 550 and 250 cm−1 [25]. This signal is further evidence indicating the presence of BSA on the BGO particles. This vibrational mode is confirmed by the shoulder found in the FTIR spectrum of the BGO-EDC-BSA sample near 550 cm−1.

3.3. Photoluminescence Stability of BGO in Human Urine, Blood Serum, and BSA Protein at Different pH Values

In order to prove if BGO powders can function as biolabel, it must firstly corroborate the luminescence of these nanoparticles in different chemical environments such as blood serum, human urine, water, and air. PL spectra were obtained from samples subjected to different organic fluids: human urine (pH = 7.2), blood serum (pH = 7.28), and carbodiimide-BSA solution (pH = 5.5), which were compared with the powder dispersed in water (pH = 5.7), as shown in Figure 5(a) under excitation of 280 nm. The emission peak at 485 nm corresponds to the typical emission attributed to 3P11S0 electron transition of Bi3+ ions [27]. The relative intensity of the emission spectrum did not change in the different fluids. However, the small shift in the emission spectrum of the blood serum could be due to the biological molecules which blood serum possesses such as glucose and lipids, absorbing the photons that are emitted in a wavelength region between 400 and 500 nm. The nanoparticles were suspended in the different fluids for two weeks and measured daily (data not shown). In the case of human urine and blood serum, they were maintained half a day because the biological fluids are degraded rapidly at room conditions. The BGO nanoparticles show high optical stability in the different fluids, which make BGO nanoparticles applicable as biolabel.

Figure 5: (a) Photoluminescence spectra of the BGO powder in different fluids: human urine (green), blood serum (red), water (blue), BSA protein (pink), and air (black). (b) Emission spectra of BGO dispersed in distilled water with different pH values: pH 1 (red), pH 5.7 (green), and pH 12 (blue). Emission spectrum in air (without fluid) was included for comparison (black).  nm.

Figure 5(b) shows the intensity of PL spectra for the nanoparticles dispersed in aqueous solutions at different pH values (the solutions were maintained and measured for two weeks). A PL spectrum obtained from the nanoparticles in air is also included. The photoluminescence diminished in all dispersed solutions probably due to the light absorption of the media. Besides, under extreme acidic condition (pH = 5.7 and 1), the PL emission still occurs. This resistance against acid pH opens the possibility of using the BGO nanoparticles for biological applications.

On the other hand, urine, blood serum, and cerebrospinal fluid are common fluids for disease diagnosis because they can be easily obtained and contain significant information. For example, the gastrointestinal cancers alter the pH profile in humans, which initiates extremely acidic in the stomach at pH of 1–2.5, then in the small intestine at pH 6.6, and 7.0 in the colon [28]. Thus, the BGO nanoparticles are stable and preserve their luminescence properties in a pH range of 1 to 12, which makes these nanoparticles an excellent candidate for biomedical applications as biolabels.

3.4. BGO Functionalization with W6/32 Antibody and Recognition of Leukemia Human Cells

The side scatter (SSC, complexity) versus forward scatter (FSC, size) cytometry plot of nonfunctionalized BGO nanoparticles shows that nanoparticles are distributed along the 104 to 105 values, confirming their heterogeneity (Figure 6(a)). In order to assess the potential coupling of antibodies to particles that were either functionalized with BSA and carbodiimide or only carbodiimide or left untreated (Table 1), particles were incubated with the W6/32 mAb as specified under Materials and Methods. After removing the excess antibody, particles were further incubated with a fluorophore- (A488-) labeled secondary antibody and the relative fluorescence intensity was measured as compared to particles incubated only with the secondary antibody. As shown in Figure 6(b), independently of the functionalization process, all particles bound equivalent amounts of the W6/32 mAb. Also, independent of the treatment, the nonspecific binding of the secondary antibody to the particles was equivalent and overlapped with the histogram of particles that were left untreated (data not shown).

Figure 6: (a) Scattering of nonconjugated BGO nanoparticle. (b) Histograms of W6/32 conjugated BGO nanoparticles subsequently treated with fluorophore-conjugated anti-mouse IgG. A solution of nanoparticles without antibody was added as control.

To further explore whether the binding capacity of the W6/32 mAb to its cognate antigen (HLA I) on the THP-1 cell surface was not affected by the carbodiimide (EDC) treatment, cells were incubated with the Ab-coated EDC-treated nanoparticles and particle binding to the cells was assessed with A488-labeled secondary antibody by flow cytometry. Figure 7(a) shows the relative size (FSC) and complexity (SSC) of the BGO nanoparticles (NP, upper panel) and those of control THP-1 cells (lower panel) on a linear scale. Incubating the cells with BGO-W6/32 labeled particles and the secondary antibody (blue dot plot) resulted in enhanced complexity/granularity of the cells (upward shift on the SSC axis) as compared to cells incubated with control, particles, not coated with the W6/32 mAb but incubated with the secondary antibody (red plot). The change in complexity/granularity reflects the binding of the antibody-labeled particles to the HLA I molecules on the cell surface (Figure 7(b), upper panel). The presence of the W6/32 mAb and hence that of the BGO particles on the cell surface were evaluated by measuring the relative fluorescence intensity of the cells. The shift of the histograms to the right (Figure 7(b), lower panel) indicates that all cells bound mAb-labeled nanoparticles, consistent with the increased granularity/complexity of the cells shown in Figure 7(a).

Figure 7: BGO-W6/32 mAb-labeled nanoparticles recognize HLA I molecules on THP-1 cells. (a) Relative size and complexity of nanoparticles (NP, upper panel) and control THP-1 cells (lower panel) on a linear scale. (b) Complexity of THP-1 cells incubated with mAb-labeled nanoparticles (blue dot plots) or without nanoparticles (red dot plots) upper panel. Fluorescence histogram of the THP-1 cells combined with the W6/32-functionalized nanoparticles (lower panel), incubated with or without Alexa 488 secondary antibody (dark grey and light grey, resp.). (c) Image of fluorescence on the THP-1 cell surface due to BGO nanoparticles functionalized with W6/32 antibody. Objective 60x and ocular 10x, final magnification 600x.

THP-1 cell recognition by the W6/32-functionalized BGO nanoparticles was also assessed by optical microscopy, confirming the association of the BGO nanoparticle with MHC I molecules on the cell surface (Figure 7(c)).

The most important result of this work is that BGO nanoparticles can be functionalized with antibodies, in this case, an anti-MHC I mAb, enabling them to recognize cell surface molecules on tumor cells such as THP-1 cells. This evidences that BGO nanoparticles are suitable as biolabel. In addition to this result, a further benefit emerged from this study. The quite similar scintillating behavior of BGO nanoparticles compared with the commercial single crystal BGO detectors suggests that BGO nanoparticles could be good components of high-energy detectors. Overall, data reported here (lower oxidative stress as compared with carbon nanotubes and 100 μM H2O2, stability in different biological environments, capacity of mAb-functionalized BGO particles to recognize neoplastic cells antigens, and scintillation properties) support that BGO nanoparticles might be considered as a prospective candidate for further biological applications such as bioimaging to reveal the presence and position of tumors.

4. Conclusions

Bismuth germanate (Bi4Ge3O12, BGO) nanoparticles were successfully synthesized by the sol-gel method. The nanoparticles yielded strong blueish-white luminescence under UV excitation, showing a single peak at 485 nm associated with the electronic transitions of the Bi3+. The uncoated and bovine serum albumin-coated nanoparticles presented high optical stability in organic components (human urine, blood serum). They showed photoluminescence properties under different pH values (pH = 1 to pH = 12). In addition, BGO nanoparticles were successfully functionalized with BSA protein and with W6/32 antibody and they can recognize human acute monocytic leukemia cells. Further investigations are under progress in order to determine the applicability of these nanoparticles to specific cancer cell detection of human neoplasms.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


Technical support was provided by E. Aparicio, F. Ruiz, I. Gradilla, J. A. Peralta, E. Flores, D. Dominguez, J. A. Díaz, Erika Melchy, and M. I. Perez-Montfort. The authors acknowledge the financial support from CONACYT (Grant nos. 100555 and 82984) and DGAPA UNAM (Grants IN-109013 and IN-101509). Z. S. Macedo acknowledges the Brazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory (LNLS), Proposal D04B-XAFS1-9349.


  1. Q. Q. Zhao, A. Boxman, and U. Chowdhry, “Nanotechnology in the chemical industry—opportunities and challenges,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 5, no. 5-6, pp. 567–572, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. N. Sozer and J. L. Kokini, “Nanotechnology and its applications in the food sector,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 82–89, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Boulaiz, P. J. Alvarez, A. Ramirez et al., “Nanomedicine: application areas and development prospects,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 3303–3321, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. Morganti, “Use and potential of nanotechnology in cosmetic dermatology,” Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, vol. 3, pp. 5–13, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Haselman and S. Hauck, “The future of integrated circuits: a survey of nanoelectronics,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 11–38, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S.-H. Yeom, B.-H. Kang, K.-J. Kim, and S.-W. Kang, “Nanostructures in biosensor: a review,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 997–1023, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. T. Bell, “The impact of nanoscience on heterogeneous catalysis,” Science, vol. 299, no. 5613, pp. 1688–1691, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Knopp, D. Tang, and R. Niessner, “Review: bioanalytical applications of biomolecule-functionalized nanometer-sized doped silica particles,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 647, no. 1, pp. 14–30, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. De La Rica and H. Matsui, “Applications of peptide and protein-based materials in bionanotechnology,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 3499–3509, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. X. H. Gao, L. Yang, J. A. Petros, F. F. Marshall, J. W. Simons, and S. Nie, “In vivo molecular and cellular imaging with quantum dots,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 63–72, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. E. M. Goldys, K. Drozdowicz-Tomsia, S. Jinjun et al., “Optical characterization of Eu-doped and undoped Gd2O3 nanoparticles synthesized by the hydrogen flame pyrolysis method,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 128, no. 45, pp. 14498–14505, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J.-H. Park, L. Gu, G. V. Maltzahn, E. Ruoslahti, S. N. Bhatia, and M. J. Sailor, “Biodegradable luminescent porous silicon nanoparticles for in vivo applications,” Nature Materials, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 331–336, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. I. G. Valais, C. M. Michail, S. L. David et al., “Luminescence emission properties of (Lu, Y)2SiO5:Ce (LYSO:Ce) and (Lu, Y)AlO3:Ce (LuYAP:Ce) single crystal scintillators under medical imaging conditions,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 785–789, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. P. Parham, “Use of a monoclonal antibody (W6/32) in structural studies of HLA-A,B,C, antigens,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 342–349, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. J. Oviedo, O. Contreras, C. E. Rodriguez, Z. S. Macedo, G. A. Hirata, and J. McKittrick, “Photo- and radioluminescence characteristics of bismuth germanate nanoparticles by sol–gel and pressure-assisted combustion synthesis,” Optical Materials, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1116–1119, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Polosan and M. Secu, “X-ray excited luminescence and photoluminescence of Bi4(GeO4)3 glass-ceramics,” Radiation Measurements, vol. 45, no. 3–6, pp. 409–411, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. F. A. A. De Jesus, R. S. D. Silva, and Z. S. MacEdo, “Synthesis of Bi4Ge3O12 ceramic scintillators by the polymeric precursor method,” Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 537–541, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. J. Weber and R. R. Monchamp, “Luminescence of Bi4Ge3O12: spectral and decay properties,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 44, pp. 5495–5499, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. O. M. Bordun, “Influence of oxygen vacancies on the luminescence spectra of thin Bi4Ge3O12 films,” Journal of Applied Spectroscopy, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 974–978, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. M. M. Bradford, “A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 72, no. 1-2, pp. 248–254, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. J. Compton and C. G. Jones, “Mechanism of dye response and interference in the Bradford protein assay,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 151, no. 2, pp. 369–374, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. Beneventi, R. Capelletti, L. Kovacs, A. Peter, A. M. L. Manotti, and F. Ugozzoli, “FTIR spectroscopy of OH stretching modes in BSO, BGO and BTO sillenites,” Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, vol. 6, no. 31, pp. 6329–6344, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. S. Rojas, J. E. De Souza, M. R. B. Andreeta, and A. C. Hernandes, “Influence of ceria addition on thermal properties and local structure of bismuth germanate glasses,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 356, no. 52–54, pp. 2942–2946, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. P. Yu, L. Su, H. Zhao et al., “Spectroscopic properties of OH doped and Bi-rich Bi4Ge3O12 crystals by vertical Bridgman method,” Journal of Luminescence, vol. 131, no. 8, pp. 1608–1611, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. Nakamoto, Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds: Applications in Coordination, Organometallic, and Bioinorganic Chemistry. Part 2, Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009.
  26. J. H. Cho, S. J. Kim, and Y. S. Yang, “Structural change in Bi4(SixGe12−x)3O12 glasses during crystallization,” Solid State Communications, vol. 119, pp. 465–470, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  27. D. F. Evans, G. Pye, R. Bramley, A. G. Clark, T. J. Dyson, and J. D. Hardcastle, “Measurement of gastrointestinal pH profiles in normal ambulant human subjects,” Gut, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1035–1041, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. L. Levine, J. A. Williams, E. R. Stadtman, and E. Shacter, “Carbonyl assays for determination of oxidatively modified proteins,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 233, pp. 346–357, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus