Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2017 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 1064863 | 5 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1064863

Facile Synthesis and Special Phase Transformation of Hydrophilic Iron Oxides Nanoparticles

Academic Editor: Paulo Cesar Morais
Received10 Oct 2017
Accepted02 Nov 2017
Published23 Nov 2017

Abstract

Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs), -Fe2O3, with hydrophilic surfaces are fabricated in ethylene glycol solutions, without surfactant or additive, by solvothermal process from -Fe2O3 nanoparticle as precursors. With the addition of a trace of hydrazine hydrate, the cubic phase Fe3O4 nanoparticles are obtained instead of γ-Fe2O3. The saturation magnetization value of γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles is up to 74.3 emu/g. This study provides a low cost, safe, and universal route to serve as excellent biocompatibility magnetic core for future applications in biomedical, agriculture, and horticulture applications.

1. Introduction

Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) attracted increasing attention due to their promising applications like tissue cryopreservation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), immunoassay, biomolecule separation, hyperthermia, and drug delivery [14]. All of these biomedical applications require the nanoparticles to have high magnetization values and hydrophilic surface and also nontoxicity and biocompatibility [5, 6].

Until now, various wet chemical processes such as coprecipitation, sol-gel, hydrothermal/solvothermal, thermal decomposition, electrochemical strategy, and ultrasonic chemistry have been extensively applied to prepare superparamagnetic nanoparticles [710]. Among these routes, different surfactants, such as oleic acid, are introduced to prevent the aggregation of nanoparticles; also toxic reagents such as Fe(III) glucuronate, Fe(acac)3, or Fe(CO)5 are usually used, which render the surface of as-obtained samples to be nonbiocompatible, and obstructed the further surface modification [4, 8, 11, 12].

Benefiting from previous study [13], we find a novel route to synthesize superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles through α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles as precursor in this study, only in presence of ethylene glycol, without the presence of any other agents, surfactants, and additives. Herein, nanoscale γ-Fe2O3 particles were obtained using a smaller particle size of α-Fe2O3 as precursors and the mild ethylene glycol as a solvent. This study provides excellent biocompatibility magnetic core for applications in biomedical, agriculture, and horticulture applications.

2. Experimental

α-Fe2O3 precursors were synthesized by the modified solvothermal method as previously reported [13]: 0.273 g of FeCl3·6H2O (0.1 mmol) was dissolved under vigorous magnetic stirring in ethanol (10.0 mL) and 2 mL of deionized water. Until completely dissolved, 0.6 g of sodium acetate was added while stirring. The mixture was sealed in a Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave (25 mL) and maintained at 160°C for 3 h for solvothermal crystallization. γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles were synthesized by the following procedure: the samples were washed by distilled water and absolute ethanol then transferred to a Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave (25 mL) and sealed after adding 10 mL of ethylene glycol, and solvothermal processing was maintained at 180°C for 12 h. The resulting products were washed with water and alcohol several times and finally dried in a desiccator at 60°C for ca. 10 h.

Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) was characterized by a Rigaku D/MAX 2200 diffractometer. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was taken with a FEI Quanta 400. TEM images were prepared on a JEM-2010HR transmission electron microscope. X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were recorded on an ESCALAB 250 spectrometer. The magnetic properties of the samples were measured at 300 K on a Quantum Design MPMS XL-7 SQUID magnetometer.

3. Results and Discussion

The powder X-ray diffraction patterns (pXRD) of as-prepared α-Fe2O3 precursor in Figure 1(a) match with JCPDS card number 33-0664 for rhombohedral α-Fe2O3 with  nm and  nm, confirming that the product is hematite. The weak peaks of XRD patterns probably foretold a very small crystal size or amorphous state of the final products. Figure 1(b) shows the XPS spectrum of as-prepared nanoparticles. The binding energy of 710.9 eV and the corresponding satellite peak at 719.5 eV, a result of charge transfer screening, can be solely attributed to the presence of Fe3+ of the solid samples, indicating that the as-synthesized sample is composed of α-Fe2O3 [14]. From the SEM and TEM image in Figures 1(c) and 1(d), we could see that the sample consists of nanoparticles with sizes of only less than 3 nm, which are greatly less than α-Fe2O3 in our previous work [13].

Then, the new structure were obtained by adding 10 mL of ethylene glycol into as-prepared α-Fe2O3 precursors, and solvothermal processing was maintained at 180°C for 12 h. The pXRD of as-synthesized typical sample in Figure 2(a) match well with JCPDS card number 39-1346 for cubic-structure iron oxide with  nm. However, it is difficult to distinguish the γ-Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 phases only from the XRD patterns due to their similarity of phase structures. The XPS spectrum is usually an important way to distinguish γ-Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 phase. The powder samples (Figure 2(b)) are similar to that of α-Fe2O3 precursors, and the satellite peak at 719.6 eV still exists, indicating that the as-synthesized sample is composed of γ-Fe2O3. The atom ratio of the product is determined as Fe (23.99%) and O (56.54%) using XPS analysis. The oxygen content is higher than that of both Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3. On one hand, it is probably because oxygen atoms are as the terminal atom layer for iron oxide crystals, which results in a higher oxygen detecting value near the crystals surfaces; on the other hand, the clean surfaces easily adsorb oxygen in the air.

From the TEM image in Figure 2(c), we can see that the product consists of highly dispersed polyhedral nanoparticles and the sizes of particles are about 18 nm with narrow size distribution. The clear lattice fringes of nanoparticles in the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) show the as-obtained powders with high crystallinity (Figure 2(d)).

In our previous report, the side surface edges α-Fe2O3 nanoplates gradually redissolved into nanoparticles through “a mass transformation” during solvothermal processing [13]. We could speculated that other iron oxides particles should be obtained if we tune some experimental conditions during “a mass transformation.” Herein, nanoscale γ-Fe2O3 was synthesized by using less than 3 nm or amorphous α-Fe2O3 as precursor in present of ethylene glycol.

However, if a trace of hydrazine hydrate was brought, the cubic phase Fe3O4 nanoparticles are obtained instead of γ-Fe2O3. We believe that the possible “intermediate” phase Fe3O4 forms during regrowth of γ-Fe2O3 or Fe3O4 crystals from α-Fe2O3 precursors, but the “intermediate” is unstable and fast converts into γ-Fe2O3 under the condition of high temperature and rich-oxygen [15]. If hydrazine hydrate is used at the same experiment conditions, the “intermediate” is maintained due to the strong reducing atmosphere, resulting in the final products of cubic Fe3O4 (Figure 3(a)); however, sizes of the products are still nanoscale (Figure 3(b)). Therefore, we can speculate that the reducing atmosphere in the hydrothermal system determines the final phase of the iron oxides.

Finally, the magnetic characteristics of the prepared nanoparticles in the presence of magnetic field were measured using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). Figure 4(a) shows the hysteresis loops at 300 K of as-prepared α-Fe2O3 precursor. It can be found that the saturation magnetization (Ms), remanent magnetization (Mr), and coercivity (Hc) are 13.6 emu/g, 0.016 emu/g and 92.6 Oe, respectively, showing soft ferromagnetic behaviour. Accordingly, the three values of as-synthesized γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles are 74.3 emu/g, 2.86 emu/g, and 43 Oe, respectively. The low remanent magnetization and high saturation magnetization simply indicate that the as-synthesized γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles are with good superparamagnetic property [9].

4. Conclusions

Our work offers a facile method to prepare biocompatible nanoparticles. Herein, we adopted α-Fe2O3 as precursor to realize the growth of γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles, and Fe3O4 nanoparticles can also be obtained only with the addition of a trace of hydrazine hydrate. The as-obtained samples are dispersed in water with a clean surface. This route provides a practical method to controllably prepare high quality iron oxides for biomedical application. The magnetic measurement by VSM revealed that the prepared iron oxides exhibit excellent superparamagnetic behavior.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 51261008 and 11604298) and Scientific Research Foundation of Zhejiang Ocean University (Q1444, 1446, and 1539).

References

  1. N. Manuchehrabadi, Z. Gao, J. Zhang et al., “Improved tissue cryopreservation using inductive heating of magnetic nanoparticles,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 9, no. 379, Article ID eaah4586, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. Y. Hu, J. Li, J. Yang et al., “Facile synthesis of RGD peptide-modified iron oxide nanoparticles with ultrahigh relaxivity for targeted MR imaging of tumors,” Biomaterials Science, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 721–732, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. F. M. Kievit, O. Veiseh, N. Bhattarai et al., “PEI-PEG-chitosan-copolymer-coated iron oxide nanoparticles for safe gene delivery: synthesis, complexation, and transfection,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 19, no. 14, pp. 2244–2251, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. W. Zhang, X. Liu, X. Zhao, and X. Zhang, “Controllable delivery of peptides by superparamagnetic Fe3O4/slica nanoparticle vehicles,” Materials Letters, vol. 201, pp. 177–180, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. B. Alqasem, N. Yahya, S. Qureshi, M. Irfan, Z. Ur Rehman, and H. Soleimani, “The enhancement of the magnetic properties of α-Fe2O3 nanocatalyst using an external magnetic field for the production of green ammonia,” Materials Science and Engineering: B Advanced Functional Solid-State Materials, vol. 217, pp. 49–62, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. Cai, A. Xiao, J. Cui et al., “Facile hydrothermal synthesis and surface functionalization of polyethyleneimine-coated iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1722–1731, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  7. D. Han, S. Yang, J. Yang et al., “Synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles via chemical coprecipitation method: modification of surface with sodium dodecyl sulfate and biocompatibility study,” Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Letters, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 335–339, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. V. Patsula, L. Kosinová, M. Lovrić et al., “Superparamagnetic Fe3O4 Nanoparticles: synthesis by thermal decomposition of Iron(III) glucuronate and application in magnetic resonance imaging,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 7238–7247, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. I. Karimzadeh, H. R. Dizaji, and M. Aghazadeh, “Development of a facile and effective electrochemical strategy for preparation of iron oxides (Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3) nanoparticles from aqueous and ethanol mediums and in situ PVC coating of Fe3O4 superparamagnetic nanoparticles for biomedical applications,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 416, pp. 81–88, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. Beriache, N. A. C. Sidik, M. N. A. W. M. Yazid, R. Mamat, G. Najafi, and G. H. R. Kefayati, “A review on why researchers apply external magnetic field on nanofluids,” International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 78, pp. 60–67, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. L. Kholmetskii, S. A. Vorobyova, A. I. Lesnikovich, V. V. Mushinskii, and N. S. Sobal, “A novel route for the preparation of magnetic fluids,” Materials Letters, vol. 59, no. 16, pp. 1993–1996, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. B. Zhang, Z. Tu, F. Zhao, and J. Wang, “Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles prepared by using an improved polyol method,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 266, pp. 375–379, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. L. Chen, X. Yang, J. Chen et al., “Continuous shape- and spectroscopy-tuning of hematite nanocrystals,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 49, no. 18, pp. 8411–8420, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. Lu, X. Jiao, D. Chen, and W. Li, “Solvothermal Synthesis and Characterization of Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3 Nanoplates,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 113, no. 10, pp. 4012–4017, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. G. Zhao, C. Wu, and M. Yan, “Enhanced magnetic properties of Fe soft magnetic composites by surface oxidation,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 399, pp. 51–57, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Liqiao Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

630 Views | 263 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.