Review Article

Mechanisms of Cellular Effects Directly Induced by Magnetic Nanoparticles under Magnetic Fields

Table 1

In vitro and in vivo studies of different MNPs that have been treated with a variety of cell types under an AMF.

Kind of MNPsSize of MNPsRationCellIncubation time Alternating Magnetic fieldExposure time (°C)Study typeCell effectsRef
intensityfrequency

Fe2O330 nm7.5 μg FeA54924 h208 A/m1 MHz20 min5In vitroEradicating target cancer cells[6]

Fe3O412 nm2.5 mg FeA5491.5 h6 kA/m386 kHz30 min13In vitroInducing the acute necrosis o and a slower, ROS-mediated cell death[30]

Fe/Fe3O410 nm360 μg FeB16-F105 kA/m366 kHz10 min11In vivoA decrease in tumor size[31]

Fe3O420–30 nm363 μg FeHela24 h20 kA/m210 kHz60 min9In vitroCausing about 70% decrease of cell viability[32]

Fe3O410 nm~2.14–7.23 mg FeBT474118 kHz30 min9In vivoTumor regression was observed[33]

Fe/MgO75 nm6.72 mg FeMDA cell2 h20 kA/m765 kHz10 min9In vitroIncreasing monotonically within the experimental time interval[34]

Fe3O472 nm6.53 mg FeCaco-2Immediately20 kA/m238 kHz120 min8In vitroA significant decrease in cell viability[35]

Fe3O420 nm725.6 μg FeMCF72 h23.3 kA/m265 kHz10 min5In vitroCell killing was further enhanced[36]

Fe3O420 nm62.5 mg/ml MNPs (half of tumor volume)Walker-2654.4 kA/m180 kHz30 min15In vivoTumor growth was inhibited and the survival of the tumor-bearing rats was promoted[37]

As2O3/Fe3O450 nm1 mg/ml MNPs (half of tumor volume)Hela230 kHz30 min8In vivoA significant inhibitory effect on the mass and volume of xenograft cervical tumors[38]

CoFe2O4/MnFe2O415 nm75 μg MNPsU8737.3 kA/m500 kHz10 min9In vivoThe therapeutic efficacy is superior to that of a common anticancer drug[39]