Preparations, Characterizations, and a Comparative Study on Photovoltaic Performance of Two Different Types of Graphene/TiO2 Nanocomposites Photoelectrodes
Table 4
Comparative DSSC performance of the various graphene/TiO2 electrodes from different works.
References
Cell descriptions
PCE (%) of cells with different electrodes
Photoanode materials
Optimum graphene content (wt%)
Active area (cm2)
Graphene/TiO2
Bare TiO2
Wang et al., 2012
GO/TiO2
0.83
0.50
2.78
1.79
Kusumawati et al., 2014
GO/TiO2
1.20
0.36
7.49
5.78
Cheng and Stadler, 2015
GO/TiO2
1.60
0.25
7.68
4.78
Chou et al., 2015
GO/TiO2
0.05
0.57
5.26
n/a
Ding et al., 2015
rGO/TiO2
0.75
n/a
7.89
6.06
Tang et al., 2010
rGO/TiO2
0.25
1.68
0.32
This study
rGO/TiO2
0.03
0.40
2.90
2.68
This study
rGO/TiO2
0.01
0.40
1.28
2.68
This study
GO/TiO2
0.01
0.40
3.69
2.68
refers to %w/v of RGO as compared to titanium(IV) butoxide colloids.
