Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2018, Article ID 3086269, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3086269
Research Article

Influence of Surfactant on the Morphology and Photocatalytic Activity of Anatase TiO2 by Solvothermal Synthesis

1School of Resources and Materials, Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao, Northeastern University, Qinhuangdao, China
2Key Laboratory of Dielectric and Electrolyte Functional Material Hebei Province, School of Resource and Materials, Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, China
3School of Computer and Communication Engineering, Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao, Northeastern University, Qinhuangdao, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Junfang Wei; nc.ude.quen@gnafnujiew

Received 6 February 2018; Revised 7 May 2018; Accepted 10 June 2018; Published 5 July 2018

Academic Editor: Giuseppe Compagnini

Copyright © 2018 Junfang Wei et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Highly photocatalytically active anatase TiO2 were synthesized by a solvothermal method using tetrabutyl titanate (TBT), citric acid, and ethanol as row material. The morphology and photocatalytic activity of titanium oxide have changed significantly with the presence of surfactants, such as cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (SDBS), and diethanolamine (DEA). Scanning electron microscope and X-ray powder diffraction results show that the synthesized products are anatase TiO2 spherical particles with a micronanostructure. The crystal type of TiO2 has no obvious change with the addition of different surfactants, but the morphology, size, and dispersion of the TiO2 particles have changed to some extent. Among the three surfactants, CTAB is beneficial to reduce TiO2 particle size and improve TiO2 dispersion and agglomeration. DEA is favor to self-assembly the nanocrystals into spherical particles. Degradation of methyl orange photocatalyzed by TiO2 prepared with CTAB as surfactant reaches 95.4% under ultraviolet light for 100 min. After five recycles, the catalyst did not exhibit significant loss of photocatalytic activity, confirming that the photocatalyst is essentially stable. This work indicates that the surfactant-assisted solvothermal method is an effective approach to improve the structure, morphology, and photocatalytic performance of TiO2. Moreover, the surfactants with various types can interact with the precursors of TiO2 in different ways.

1. Introduction

Among various types of photocatalysts, titanium dioxide- (TiO2-) assisted photocatalytic oxidation has received much attention in the last few years due to its nontoxicity, strong oxidizing power, and long-term photostability [17]. These remarkable advantages originate from the unique physical and chemical properties of TiO2 which depend not only on the crystal phase and particle size but also on the particle morphology. Therefore, controlling the morphology of TiO2 nanoparticles is of key importance in the fabrication of materials with desired photocatalytic properties [812]. Over the past decades, a variety of controlled synthesis methods have been attempted to synthesize well-defined particles with varied morphologies [13, 14]. Compare with the sol-gel method, the solvothermal method not only enables obtaining materials with a large surface area and high crystallinity but also flexibly adjust the parameters to control the morphology of products. In the course of solvothermal synthesis, the reaction path is very sensitive to the experimental conditions. Also, it is of practical importance to select suitable surfactant molecules, which act as templates or shape controllers, directing the formation of a structure toward a desired target arrangement [15]. The modification of TiO2 nanoparticles with surfactant is an effective method to control their morphologies and structures. Wang et al. [16] reported a simple synthetic approach based on the solvothermal technique with oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OM) as two surfactants for preparation of TiO2 nanocrystals with different morphologies such as elongated rhombic, dog-bone, oval, and core-shell structure. Leng et al. [17] demonstrated a surfactant-assisted exfoliation method to synthesize TiO2 2D nanosheets and revealed that tetrabutylammonium hydroxide as a cationic surfactant played a crucial role in retaining the 2D nanosheet structures. Lekphet et al. [18] studied the effect of amounts of tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) surfactant on the morphology and size of TiO2 particles. Obviously, TiO2 assisted by different kinds of surfactants show various morphologies. However, few complete comparison has been made in the past years about the interactions between different kinds of surfactants and the precursors of TiO2.

In this paper, we reported a simple solvothermal method by using surfactants to make well-defined highly crystalline mesoporous anatase TiO2. Herein, CTAB, SDBS, and DEA as the typical anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactants were introduced into the solvothermal system to prepare the TiO2 nanoparticles with diverse morphologies, respectively. The structural and morphologic changes of TiO2 nanoparticles were compared. The as-prepared TiO2 nanoparticles were used in the comparative study in the photocatalytic degradation of methylene orange (MO) solution under UV light irradiation. TiO2 were prepared here by a surfactant-assisted solvothermal approach to provide a valuable and interesting way for further improving the photocatalytic activities and stability.

2. Experimental Sections

2.1. Materials

All of the chemical reagents were of analytical purity and used without further purification.

2.2. Catalyst Preparation

TiO2 was prepared via a facile one-step solvothermal process. Briefly, 30 mL TBT’s ethanol solution (1.3 mol/L) was added drop by drop to 20 mL ethanol solution containing quantitative citric acid and surfactant (10 mmol) under stirring. After vigorously stirring for 60 min at room temperature, the as-formed mixture was transferred to a 100 ml Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave, sealed, and then heated at 180°C for 24 h. After cooling to room temperature, the white precipitates were collected by a centrifugation and washed with ethanol and distilled water for three times, respectively. The samples were dried overnight at 80°C. Then, the dried masses were calcined at 460°C for 30 min in air atmosphere to remove the organics adsorbed on the surface. The as-prepared samples are referred to a (without surfactant), b (with CTAB as surfactant), c (with SDBS as surfactant), and d (with DEA as surfactant), respectively.

2.3. Characterization

The samples were studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD, DX-2500) using Cu Kα radiation ( = 1.5406 Å) from  = 20–80° at a scan speed of 0.08°/s. The microstructure of the particles was characterized by a scanning electron microscope (SEM, ZEISS SUPRA55). FT-IR studies were performed on a Shimadzu-8400S spectrometer for confirmation of the surfactant presence and surface hydroxyl functional group. The special-surface area and pore size distribution were estimated by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET.SSA-4300) multiple points’ method, based on the nitrogen gas adsorption isotherm (77 K).

2.4. Photocatalytic Reduction Test

The prepared samples were subjected to liquid phase photocatalytic evaluation using a self-made photocatalytic reactor. The photocatalytic experiments were examined by adding 200 mg TiO2 powder into a quartz tubes (120 mL) containing 50 mL of the MO aqueous solution (25 mg/L). The suspension was kept stirring (500 r/min) in the dark for 1 h to reach the adsorption-desorption equilibrium prior to the irradiation, and the initial absorbance of the MO aqueous solution was recorded as . After that, a 250 W mercury lamp was opened as an ultraviolet-visible light source. The power density of the lamp on the solution (20 cm away from the photocatalytic reactor) is 43.5 mW/cm2. During the UV light irradiation, 2 mL of the suspension solution was extracted at every 20 min intervals and the solution was separated from the catalyst through centrifugation. The value of MO concentration was checked on the basis of its UV-vis absorption which measured by the UV-vis spectrophotometer (772S Jingke Shanghai) at 461 nm.

The photodegradation percentage was estimated as follows: where is the initial absorbance of MO aqueous solution after the adsorption-desorption equilibrium and is the absorbance of methyl orange at reaction time (min).

After washing with ethanol and deionized water for several times, the recycled catalyst (sample b) was redispersed in 50 mL of MO solution and the new photocatalytic cycle began. The photocatalytic activity of recycled catalyst was also measured under the same conditions as reference.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Photocatalyst

The SEM images in Figure 1 confirm the effect of surfactants on the morphology and particle size of TiO2. SEM images reveal that the irregular spherical nanobundles (Figure 1(d)), relatively uniform nanospheres (Figure 1(b)), and not uniform spherical nanoparticles (Figure 1(c)) are prepared by applying DEA, CTAB, and SDBS as surfactants, respectively (Figures 1(b)1(d)). It seems that when the surfactant type changes, the grain size and aggregation of TiO2 are different. It is generally considered static repulsion and special hindrance from the reaction of interfacial energy among particles that could prevent the aggregation of nanometer particles [19]. In general, the formation of TiO2 in the solvothermal system mainly depends on the hydrolysis rate of TBT and the growth rate of nuclei. In acidic solution, a large number of hydrolytic micelles form rapidly due to the hydrolysis of TBT. The adsorption of H+ makes the micelles with positive charges and produces the electrostatic repulsion by the polar groups of the CTBA barrier and steric hindrance. On the other hand, CTAB has a large molecular size as a commonly used cationic surfactant. The cationic ion can attach to the negatively charged Ti-O bonds, thus reduce their surface energy effectively, making the nanoparticles stable in solution. Based on the above reasons, CTAB is the optimum surfactant for uniform spherical TiO2 nanoparticle preparation with small particle size in our solvothermal reaction conditions. In contrast to this, the anion SDBS induces the micelles to assemble, and thus not uniform spherical nanoparticles were synthesized. In addition, from the results of particle size distribution and morphology control, the effect of adding the nonionic surfactant DEA apparently is smaller than others. We speculate that static repulsion may have a significant impact on the shape and grain size control of TiO2 particles.

Figure 1: SEM images of TiO2 samples synthesized by different surfactants.

To characterize the crystal structure and crystallinity of TiO2 samples, XRD patterns were taken and illustrated in Figure 2. As observed in the XRD patterns of TiO2 samples, all nanostructured diffraction peaks are well matched to pure anatase TiO2 (JCPDS 89-4921). The peaks at  = 25.3°, 37.8°, 48.0°, 53.9°, 55.0°, and 62.7° were ascribed to the (101), (004), (200), (105), (211), and (204) crystallographic plane diffraction of anatase TiO2, respectively, confirming that the presence of surfactants in the solvothermal system has no effect on the crystal structure of TiO2. The intensity and width of XRD diffraction peak changed with the addition of surfactant, which indicated that the modification of surfactant had a certain effect on the grain growth. The average crystallite size of the samples calculated by applying the Scherrer equation and the relative crystallinity based on sample a were listed in Table 1. XRD results show that the crystallite size trend is consistent with the SEM results. With the addition of CTAB, the small particle size and favorable dispersion of TiO2 are achieved. Under the same synthesis conditions, the presence of surfactants can improve the crystallinity.

Figure 2: XRD patterns of TiO2 samples synthesized by different surfactants.
Table 1: The average crystallite size, relative crystallinity, and BET surface area of the samples.

N2 adsorption-desorption measurements indicate that the BET surface areas are b (83.45 m2/g) > d (76.31 m2/g) > c (67.64 m2/g) > a (49.09 m2/g) (as in Table 1), respectively. Surfactants in the solvothermal system can inhibit TiO2 grain growth and increase particle dispersity. After thermal treatment, surfactants adsorbed in the TiO2 particles will decompose to produce CO2, notably increasing the intrinsic pore volume and surface area. High surface area can provide more active sites, which is beneficial to the photocatalytic property. The pore size distribution of sample b calculated by the BJH model shows the presence of uniform nanopores with sizes of 3.2 nm which is typical mesoporous. The pore size distribution of sample b shows the presence of two sets of uniform nanopores with sizes of 2.2 and 13.0 nm (Figure 3(b)). These results indicate that the surfactant-assisted solvothermal system had a dramatic impact on the structure of as-prepared anatase TiO2 samples. High crystallinity and high porosity anatase TiO2 samples were obtained after thermal treatment in air at 460°C for 30 min. Specifically, during annealing in air, the adjacent nanocrystal building blocks can be cross-linked by removing surfactant molecules and the increasing oriented attractive forces can further lead to in situ three-dimensional crystallographic fusion to minimize the total system energy through reducing the high surface energy and eliminating the crystal defects, yielding mesoporous TiO2 spherical nanobundles [20].

Figure 3: N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (a) and pore size distribution (b) of samples a and b.

The FT-IR spectra of as-obtained samples were exhibited in Figure 4. For the pure TiO2, the absorption peaks at 3400 cm−1 and 1630 cm−1 are attributed to the hydroxyl group from water and Ti-OH, respectively, while the peak situated at 500 cm−1 could be assigned to the characteristic frequency of Ti-O-Ti. As for the samples a, b, c, and d, there are no significant differences of peak positions observed, indicating that the introduction of surfactants into the TiO2 synthetic system cannot alter the structure of TiO2, which accords well with the XRD results. The area of absorption peaks at 3400 cm−1 and 1630 cm−1 increased significantly in sample b, which indicated that the introduction of CTAB can introduce more surface hydroxyl groups of the TiO2. Photocatalytic chemical reactions occurring on the surface of semiconductor materials depend on the process, which starts from the absorption of light and results in attainment of photogenerated electrons and holes in the surface. The illuminated semiconductor surface is regarded as a producer of hydroxyl radicals (e.g., h+ + OH → OH). These and other highly oxidizing initial products of this indirect photochemical reaction go on to attack oxidizable contaminants. Commonly, the enhancement of surface hydroxyl content on the surface of TiO2 is beneficial to the improvement of photocatalytic performance [21], which can be supported by the results of photocatalytic investigation.

Figure 4: FT-IR spectra of TiO2 samples synthesized by different surfactants.

Because TiO2 sample b have a large surface area (83.45 m2/g) and thus can offer abundant adsorption sites that are catalytically active, further investigations on the optical absorption property and electronic band structure of TiO2 sample b were performed. Figure 5 depicts the UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectrum of TiO2 sample b. The absorption peak appears at 330 nm in Figure 5(a). The band gap may be calculated based on the absorption spectrum by utilizing Tauc’s relationship [22]. The of TiO2 sample b may be determined by extrapolating against at  = 0 (Figure 5(b)). The energy gap quantity of the TiO2 sample b is calculated to be 2.97 eV which is lower than that of typical anatase titanium oxide. Such differences in optical absorption properties and band edges of TiO2 sample b may be interpreted as numerous defects being generated upon fabricating the mesocrystalline architecture, which could then alter the electronic band structures of the products [23].

Figure 5: UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectrum (a) and plot to determine the band gap (b) of the TiO2 sample b.
3.2. Photocatalytic Activities of TiO2 Samples

Photocatalytic activity tests were conducted by the self-sensitized degradation of MO in aqueous solution under ultraviolet light irradiation. Figure 6 shows the concentrations of MO with irradiation time for the four samples. It is clearly observed that all three samples synthesized by different surfactants possess higher photocatalytic activity than the samples synthesized without surfactant. This indicates that the activities of the mesoporous TiO2 samples prepared by the solvothermal with surfactants are superior to the conventional sample in the dye self-sensitized degradation. Sample b is obviously the most active sample, and the order of photocatalytic activities is b > c > d > a.

Figure 6: Degradation efficiency of TiO2 samples synthesized by different surfactants.

It is well known that the photocatalytic activity of nanocatalyst is related to the grain size, specific surface area, adsorption capacity of the sample, and number of surface hydroxyl groups [2426]. By introducing surfactants into the solvothermal system, the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 was improved in some extent. Among several kinds of surfactants, CTBA shows more significant modification. Due to electrostatic repulsion and steric hindrance of the CTBA barrier, the agglomeration and growth of TiO2 grain was inhibited, the particle size of TiO2 was significantly reduced, and the specific surface area increased. The surfactants not only have great influence on the particle size and morphology of TiO2 but also affect the functional groups on the surface of TiO2. The introduction of CTBA increases surface hydroxyl groups on the TiO2 surface, thereby the catalytic activity is improved.

Considering the stability of a catalyst is also important for its application; multiple runs for the degradation of MO upon sample b were performed. As shown in Figure 7, after five runs of photocatalytic reaction, the photocatalytic efficiency of sample b decreases only about 6.8% and the catalytic ability of sample b almost completely recovered after regenerating with distilled water, which may due to the adsorbed intermediates on the surface of the catalyst during the recycling experiments. The catalyst did not exhibit significant loss of activity. It indicates that the TiO2 particles synthesized by the solvothermal method with CTAB as surfactant have high stability, which is especially important for its application.

Figure 7: Recovery test of sample b.

4. Conclusions

In summary, the high crystallinity anatase TiO2 with different morphologies was prepared by the solvothermal method using TBT as the titanium source and the surfactant in the ethanol system. Shape, size, and surface hydroxyl groups of TiO2 can be manipulated by using different surfactant compositions and concentrations during preparation. The TiO2 samples with different shapes and sizes show different photocatalytic activities. The novelty of this research is that through comparison, it was found that the static repulsion cationic surfactants played an important role on shape and grain size control. The introduction of CTAB in the solvothermal system could reduce the particle size and agglomeration of TiO2 particles and increase the specific surface area and surface hydroxyl groups of TiO2, which could significantly improve the photocatalytic activity of TiO2. The degradation of methyl orange was 95.4% over the reference TiO2 within 100 min. The degradation was not less than 90% of initial activity after 5 times of recycling. In the solvothermal synthesis of TiO2 and other oxide photocatalysts, these findings will be greatly useful in controlling the microscopic and macroscopic morphologies of the nanomaterials.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This project was supported financially by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (no. N162304012).

References

  1. A. Ajmal, I. Majeed, R. N. Malik, H. Idriss, and M. A. Nadeem, “Principles and mechanisms of photocatalytic dye degradation on TiO2 based photocatalysts: a comparative overview,” RSC Advances, vol. 4, no. 70, pp. 37003–37026, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. Jafari, E. Moharreri, A. Amin, R. Miao, W. Song, and S. Suib, “Photocatalytic water splitting-the untamed dream: a review of recent advances,” Molecules, vol. 21, no. 7, p. 900, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Ge, C. Cao, J. Huang et al., “A review of one-dimensional TiO2 nanostructured materials for environmental and energy applications,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 4, no. 18, pp. 6772–6801, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M.-Z. Ge, C.-Y. Cao, J.-Y. Huang et al., “Synthesis, modification, and photo/photoelectrocatalytic degradation applications of TiO2 nanotube arrays: a review,” Nanotechnology Reviews, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 75–112, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. Zhang, Z. Jiang, J. Huang et al., “Titanate and titania nanostructured materials for environmental and energy applications: a review,” RSC Advances, vol. 5, no. 97, pp. 79479–79510, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. P. Que, J. Weng, L. H. Hu, J. H. Wu, and S. Y. Dai, “High open voltage and superior light-harvesting dye-sensitized solar cells fabricated by flower-like hierarchical TiO2 composed with highly crystalline nanosheets,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 307, pp. 138–145, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Bai and B. Zhou, “Titanium dioxide nanomaterials for sensor applications,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 114, no. 19, pp. 10131–10176, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. Shibata, T. Ogura, T. Mukai, T. Ohkubo, H. Sakai, and M. Abe, “Direct synthesis of mesoporous titania particles having a crystalline wall,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 127, no. 47, pp. 16396-16397, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. Zimny, T. Roques-Carmes, C. Carteret, M. J. Stébé, and J. L. Blin, “Synthesis and photoactivity of ordered mesoporous titania with a semicrystalline framework,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 116, no. 11, pp. 6585–6594, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. W. S. Chae, S. W. Lee, and Y. R. Kim, “Templating route to mesoporous nanocrystalline titania nanofibers,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 3072–3074, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. Guo, M. Ge, L. Liu, G. Gao, Y. Feng, and Y. Wang, “Directed synthesis of mesoporous TiO2 microspheres: catalysts and their photocatalysis for bisphenol A degradation,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 419–425, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Z. Zheng, B. Huang, J. Lu, X. Qin, X. Zhang, and Y. Dai, “Hierarchical TiO2 microspheres: synergetic effect of {001} and {101} facets for enhanced photocatalytic activity,” Chemistry, vol. 17, no. 52, pp. 15032–15038, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. Park, Y. Park, W. Kim, and W. Choi, “Surface modification of TiO2 photocatalyst for environmental applications,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews, vol. 15, pp. 1–20, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Zinatloo-Ajabshir, S. Mortazavi-Derazkola, and M. Salavati-Niasari, “Schiff-base hydrothermal synthesis and characterization of Nd2O3 nanostructures for effective photocatalytic degradation of eriochrome black T dye as water contaminant,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, vol. 28, no. 23, pp. 17849–17859, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. H. Adair and E. Suvaci, “Morphological control of particles,” Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, vol. 5, no. 1-2, pp. 160–167, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. Wang, J. Yang, X. Li et al., “Preparation of morphology-controlled TiO2 nanocrystals for the excellent photocatalytic activity under simulated solar irradiation,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 94, pp. 38–44, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Leng, Y. Chen, and J. Xue, “Synthesis of TiO2 nanosheets via an exfoliation route assisted by a surfactant,” Nanoscale, vol. 6, no. 15, pp. 8531–8534, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. W. Lekphet, T. C. Ke, C. Su et al., “Morphology control studies of TiO2 microstructures via surfactant-assisted hydrothermal process for dye-sensitized solar cell applications,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 382, pp. 15–26, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. Beshkar, S. Zinatloo-Ajabshir, S. Bagheri, and M. Salavati-Niasari, “Novel preparation of highly photocatalytically active copper chromite nanostructured material via a simple hydrothermal route,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 6, article e0158549, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. Liu, Y. Luo, A. A. Elzatahry et al., “Mesoporous TiO2 mesocrystals: remarkable defects-induced crystallite-interface reactivity and their in situ conversion to single crystals,” ACS Central Science, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 400–408, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. B. Zhong, J. Z. Li, F. M. Feng et al., “Improved photocatalytic performance of SiO2-TiO2 prepared with the assistance of SDBS,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, vol. 357, pp. 101–105, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Moshtaghi, S. Zinatloo-Ajabshir, and M. Salavati-Niasari, “Nanocrystalline barium stannate: facile morphology-controlled preparation, characterization and investigation of optical and photocatalytic properties,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 834–842, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. U. Diebold, “The surface science of titanium dioxide,” Surface Science Reports, vol. 48, no. 5-8, pp. 53–229, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. M. Ge, Q. Li, C. Cao et al., “Water splitting: one-dimensional TiO2 nanotube photocatalysts for solar water splitting (Adv. Sci. 1/2017),” Advanced Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–31, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. M. Thomas, G. A. Naikoo, M. U. D. Sheikh, M. Bano, and F. Khan, “Effective photocatalytic degradation of Congo red dye using alginate/carboxymethyl cellulose/TiO2 nanocomposite hydrogel under direct sunlight irradiation,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 327, pp. 33–43, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Logar, I. Bračko, A. Potočnik, and B. Jančar, “Cu and CuO/titanate nanobelt based network assemblies for enhanced visible light photocatalysis,” Langmuir, vol. 30, no. 16, pp. 4852–4862, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus