Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2018 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 3091970 |

Lirong Yao, Li Dong, Xiaojuan Li, Sijun Xu, Guangyu Zhang, Qilong Sun, "TiO2-Intercalated Graphene Oxides with Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation for Methylene Blue", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2018, Article ID 3091970, 10 pages, 2018.

TiO2-Intercalated Graphene Oxides with Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation for Methylene Blue

Academic Editor: Nageh K. Allam
Received30 May 2018
Revised23 Sep 2018
Accepted30 Sep 2018
Published19 Dec 2018


The low photocatalytic decomposition activity of TiO2 toward industrial pollutants at room temperature is one of the main obstacles for its practical application. TiO2-intercalated graphene oxide (GO) composites were prepared by in situ hydrolysis of butyl titanate in a GO aqueous solution, followed by hydrothermal reaction to improve their photoelectron separation efficiency. The in situ generated TiO2 nanocrystals could grow and adhere to the GO walls, thereby greatly improving the contact area and binding strength among them and resulting in low photoelectron transfer resistance. The photocatalytic activities of the as-prepared catalyst were evaluated via photodegradation of methylene blue (MB). The TiO2-intercalated GOs displayed much higher catalytic activity than GO, TiO2, and TiO2-adsorbed GOs. The degradation efficiency of MB by TiO2-intercalated GOs increased with increasing bath ratio of TiO2-intercalated GOs to MB solution, but it decreased with increasing initial concentration of MB. Degradation of MB by UV light was much faster than by simulated sunlight. The degradation time by sunlight was only 5% of degradation time by UV light. Cyclic catalytic experiments indicated that TiO2-intercalated GO maintained 99.97% degradation activity after repeated degradation (five times), thereby indicating the good decomposition durability.

1. Introduction

Solar energy has been used for 2.4 billion years. Plants, including algae, can generate carbohydrate using water, carbon dioxide, and sunlight. Photosynthesis has become a complex and efficient biochemical reaction that translates solar energy into organic matter. However, solar energy can also be transformed by many semiconductors, such as silicon, CdS, CdTe, GaAs, titanium oxide, zinc oxide, and perovskite. Among them, titanium oxide (TiO2) is one of the most promising materials due to its advantages of low-cost, nontoxic, high physicochemical stability and transparency [15]. TiO2 nanomaterials are widely used in organic wastewater treatment because of their excellent photocatalytic activity [617]. However, the high rate of electron-hole recombination is one of the main drawbacks of TiO2 in photodegradation applications [18, 19].

To improve the photocatalytic efficiency, several methods, such as modification of TiO2 nanoparticles with conductive organic materials, metal nanoparticles, and carbon materials, were developed to prevent electron-hole pair recombination [4, 2024]. The integration of TiO2 and graphene (GR) is intensively investigated, and advancement in this technology is obvious in recent studies because of the super photoelectric properties of GR. For example, TiO2-GR nanocomposites have been prepared via a facile hydrothermal reaction of graphene oxide (GO) and TiO2 in an ethanol-water solvent. Such TiO2-GR nanocomposites exhibited much higher photocatalytic activity and stability toward benzene gas, which is a volatile aromatic pollutant in air, than bare TiO2 [25]. Wen et al. prepared TiO2-Ag-GR nanocomposites that showed significantly increased visible light absorption and photocatalytic activity compared with Ag-TiO2 and TiO2-GR nanocomposites [26]. Fan et al. compared TiO2-reduced GO nanocomposites prepared by UV, hydrazine, and hydrothermal reductions. TiO2-reduced GO composites prepared by the hydrothermal method exhibited optimal photocatalytic performance [27]. Nanakkal and Alexander developed graphene/BiVO4/TiO2 ternary nanocomposites through a facile, ultrasonic wave-assisted one-pot hydrothermal method. The as-prepared composite exhibited enhanced photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue (MB) under visible light irradiation [28].

However, the photocatalytic efficiency of TiO2-GR/TiO2-GR is still limited because of the high contact resistance and low binding strength between prefabricated TiO2 nanocrystals due to their large morphology mismatch and lack of chemical interactions that lead to low contact area [29]. To solve this problem, we synthesized closely integrated TiO2-intercalated GO (TiO2-GO-TiO2 sandwich-like) composite nanosheets. TiO2 could grow in situ on GOs and form the sandwich-like TiO2-intercalated GO nanosheets by following hydrothermal reaction, when the hydrolysis and condensation of tetrabutyl titanate (TBOT) in GO solution is carefully controlled. The contact resistance and contact strength of TiO2 nanocrystals can be greatly improved, because they grow by adhering to the GO surfaces [29]. The resultant TiO2-intercalated GOs possessed a sandwich-like structure with an ultrathin nature and highly crystallized TiO2 nanocrystals. Most importantly, the TiO2-GO-TiO2 nanosheets provide high photodecomposition efficiency and durability for the model dye, MB, compared with TiO2 and TiO2-adsorbed GOs [3037].

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials and Reagents

The natural flake graphite (mesh = 1000) was purchased from Qingdao Jintao Graphite Co. Ltd. (China), and the TiO2 was purchased from Jinan Jiyu Titanium Chemical Co. Ltd. (China). The concentrated sulfuric acid, potassium permanganate, hydrogen peroxide, hydrochloric acid, butyl titanate, and MB were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (China) and were of analytical grade.

2.2. Synthesis of GOs, TiO2-Intercalated GOs, and TiO2-Adsorbed GOs

GOs were prepared from purified natural graphite by the modified Hummers method [38]. A total of 20 g of graphite and 460 mL of H2SO4 were mixed in a beaker container at 0°C under vigorous stirring. Then, 60 g of KMnO4 was added to the suspension sample, maintaining a temperature of below 5°C. After addition of KMnO4, the rising temperature should be maintained below 30°C for 30 min. The mixture was diluted with 1000 mL of DI water and heated to 95°C, maintaining this temperature for 15 min. Finally, 3000 mL of DI water and 100 mL of H2O2 were added to the mixture to terminate the reaction. The resultant mixture was washed with 10% of HCl aqueous solution, ultrasonicated for 30 min, and stored overnight. The suspension mixture was finally filtered, washed by DI water several times, and dried in a dry oven at 60°C.

The schematic of the preparation of TiO2-intercalated GOs is presented in Figure 1. A 0.1 g of GOs was dissolved in 30 mL of DI water, sealed by a hydrothermal reactor (50 mL), and hydrothermally reacted at 135°C for 6 h. Then, the GO aqueous solution was ultrasonicated for 30 min, filtered, dried at 60°C, and then dissolved in tetrahydrofuran with ultrasound treatment for three to four hours. Subsequently, 10–50 mL of butyl titanate was added into the GO solution and ultrasonicated for 30 min. The mixture was added into a hydrothermal reactor and crystallized at 180°C for 12 h. Finally, the resultant TiO2-intercalated GO powder was filtered, washed, and finally dried at 60°C.

To synthesize TiO2-adsorbed GOs (control), 40 mL of butyl titanate was added to 100 mL of absolute ethanol solution, after which 5 g of GOs was added. TiO2-adsorbed GO solution was prepared by stirring for 5 h and then crystallized in a hydrothermal reactor at 180°C for 12 h. The obtained solution was centrifuged and dried at 60°C.

2.3. Characterizations

To identify the crystalline phase of synthesized samples, all samples were subjected to X-ray diffractometer (XRD; Shimata XD-D1, Japan) experiments at a scan speed of 2°/m−1. The morphology of TiO2 nanoparticles and GO sheets was observed by an S-3400N scanning electron microscope (SEM; Hitachi, Japan) and JEOL 2100F transmission electron microscope (TEM; JEOL, Japan) that operate at 200 kV accelerating voltage. The diffuse reflectance spectra were recorded on a TU-1901 ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectrophotometer (PG Scientific, USA). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were obtained on a Thermo Nicolet AVATAR 370 FTIR spectrometer (Bruker, Germany). The X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were studied by the ESCALAB 250 XI X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (Thermo Scientific, USA).

2.4. Photocatalytic Degradation of MB

The samples were added into 50 mL of the MB solutions and stored in the dark for 24 hours to reach the adsorption equilibrium. The obtained mixtures were placed onto a XPA-4 photochemical reactor (Xujiang Electromechanical Plant, China) with a 300 W UV light type mercury lamp and/or a 350 W solar-simulated xenon lamp. All light sources were located at 15 cm above the reaction solution. In the catalytic decomposition, 1 mL mixture was sampled and centrifuged at regular intervals. The supernatants were obtained and measured using a UV-vis spectrophotometer at a maximum absorption wavelength () of 664 nm to detect the MB concentration. To study the photocatalytic degradation of TiO2-intercalated GOs toward MB in aqueous solution, we examined the initial MB concentration (ranging from 100–300 mg/L), the bath ratio between TiO2-intercalated GOs and MB solution (1 : 50, 1 : 100, and 1 : 200), and the light source (without light, UV light, and simulated sunlight). The catalytic performances of the controls, TiO2, GOs, and TiO2-adsorbed GOs (prepared by adsorption of TiO2 to GOs), were studied by following the experimental method.

The concentration (mg/L) and the degradation rate (%) were calculated according to the standard curve of MB. The calculation formula is as follows (1): where is the initial concentration of MB, and is the concentration of MB at time .

3. Results and Discussion

The integration of TiO2 and GOs may influence the adsorption band of TiO2 because of the special electrochemical properties of GOs. The UV-vis absorption spectra in Figure 2 showed that the light absorption edge of TiO2-intercalated GOs extended to about 426 nm while that of TiO2 was only about 394 nm. The redshifts into the visible regions demonstrated the significant influence of GOs on the optical characteristics in which the adding of GOs narrowed the bandgap of TiO2 owing to the formation of Ti–O–C chemical bonding in their interface [39, 40].

The FTIR spectra of graphite, GOs, and TiO2-intercalated GOs are shown in Figure 3. The FTIR spectra of the natural flake graphite show a very smooth curve, indicating its poor infrared activity. A broad absorption band, which is a characteristic of the hydroxyl groups in GOs, can be observed at approximately 3430 cm−1. In particular, 3500–3800 cm−1 exhibited a wide range of absorption peaks, which can be attributed to the absorbed water by GOs [41]. In addition, due to the hydroxyl groups in GOs, the FTIR spectra exhibited an absorption band in the vicinity of 1634 cm−1, corresponding to the absorption peak for the bending vibration of O-H [42]. Furthermore, the band at the vicinity of 1720 cm−1 is attributed to the absorption of carboxylic acid and/or the carbonyl stretching vibration of C=O, which is attributed by –COOH and C=O in the surface and/or edge and of the GOs. The band observed at 1380 cm−1 is the stretching vibration of the epoxy groups (C-O-C) and carboxyl C-O in GOs [43]. The band in the vicinity of 1045 cm−1 is generated by the C-OH stretching vibration of GOs. All these absorption bands derived from the oxygen-containing groups in GO nanosheets. This indicates that graphite was fully oxidized and it generated abundant hydrophilic oxygen-containing groups. Hydrogen bonds were readily formed with water molecules because the GO surfaces contain these polar functional groups, thereby explaining the hydrophilic nature of GOs after the oxidation. For TiO2-intercalated GOs, the absorption band near 3430 and 1634 cm−1, representing the OH stretching and blending vibrations of GOs, respectively, weakened, whereas the C-O adsorption at approximately 1045 cm−1 broadened. The OH groups in GOs were likely to form Ti-O-C during the hydrothermal reaction [29], suggesting the possible chemical interactions between TiO2 and GOs.

The photocatalytic capability of TiO2-intercalated GOs was derived from TiO2 nanocrystals, which were mainly influenced by their crystal form, degree, and morphology. Figure 4 shows the XRD patterns of the natural flake graphite, GOs, and TiO2-intercalated GOs. The characteristic diffraction peak was located at 2 = 30° for the natural flake graphite. The XRD pattern of GO showed diffraction peaks at 2 = 10°, with lattice spacing of 0.887 nm. However, for TiO2-intercalated GOs, several new peaks were detected at approximately 2 = 24.8°, 2 = 37.7°, 2 = 48.0°, 2 = 53.8°, 2 = 54.8°, 2 = 62.5°, 2 = 68.2°, 2 = 70.0°, and 2 = 74.8°, corresponding to the diffractions from the (101), (004), (200), (105), (211), (204), (116), (220), and (215) crystal planes of anatase TiO2 (JCPDS card 21-1272), respectively [44]. In addition, the XRD signals of TiO2 nanocrystals were extremely strong that the GO signals were completely concealed, thereby suggesting the high content of well-crystallized TiO2 nanoparticles.

To examine the chemical composition and binding states of the samples, XPS spectra were collected, as displayed in Figure 5. All binding energies in the XPS experiments are trued by referring to the C1 (284.6 eV) peak. Figure 5(a) presents the wide-scan XPS spectra of GOs and TiO2-intercalated GOs. TiO2-intercalated GOs showed three strong peaks at 530.1, 454.8, and 284.1 eV, corresponding to O1s, Ti2p, and C1s [5, 45], respectively. However, only O1 and C1 signals were detected for GOs, indicating that Ti was successfully combined to GO surfaces. Figure 5(b) shows the C1 XPS spectra of TiO2-intercalated GOs. The C1 XPS spectrum of TiO2-intercalated GOs could be deconvoluted into three peaks, which were ascribed to sp2 bonded carbon (C-C, 284.6 eV), epoxy/hydroxyls (C-O, 286.5 eV), and carboxyl (O=C-O, 288 eV) in line with GOs before the reaction [46, 47]. Therefore, GOs maintained their chemical construction after the hydrothermal reaction [48].

The distribution state of TiO2 on/in the GO-GO surfaces and interlayers is significant for the catalytic activity of TiO2 nanocrystals. The severe agglomeration of TiO2 not only leads to low specific surface area but also to low contact efficiency of GO surfaces, thereby greatly influencing the electron-hole separation efficiency. The surface morphology and microscopic structure of the GOs and as-prepared TiO2-intercalated GOs are initially observed by SEM (Figure 6). GOs were loosely stacked to form microsized layers (Figure 5(a)). Such loose structure was mainly caused by strong electrostatic repulsion among GOs due to the negatively charged oxygen-containing functional groups such as -OH and -COOH in GOs. After the reaction, as shown in Figure 5(b), the as-prepared TiO2-intercalated GOs had abundant wrinkles and slight curling, indicating good flexibility. Most importantly, TiO2 nanocrystals were almost uniformly monodispersed on the GO surfaces because these TiO2 nanocrystals grow on OH, COOH-containing defect sites in the GO nanosheets, restricting their self-agglomeration. Such well-dispersed TiO2 nanocrystals improved the photocatalytic efficiency of TiO2-intercalated GO nanosheets by facilitating the generation and separation of electron-hole pairs.

The TiO2 nanocrystals were not only attached to the GO surfaces but also to their interlamination. As shown in Figure 7(b), dense TiO2 nanocrystals were found on and/or in the GOs, thereby suggesting that TiO2 has good affinity to GOs [49]. To analyze the detailed hierarchical structure, the GO edge was observed in detail by HRTEM. As shown in Figure 6(a), two GO nanosheets were clearly observed. The nanosheets consisted of 8–10 one-atom thick GOs (arrows 1 and 2 in Figure 7(a)). Such multilayered GO nanosheets preserved certain conductivity and rigidity after oxidation. Notably, TiO2 nanocrystals were found not only on the outer surface of GOs but also in the interlamination. As shown in box 1, these TiO2 nanocrystals have relatively clear lattice fringes, indicating that they are on the upper surface of GOs. Interlaminar TiO2 could be distinguished through careful confirmation of the relative space position between TiO2 and GO nanosheets. As shown in the circle, TiO2 nanocrystals were clamped by two GO nanosheets, evidencing the sandwich structure. Similarly, as shown in box 2, the TiO2 nanocrystals covered by bottomed GOs proved that they are on the lower GO surfaces.

3.1. Photocatalytic Degradation of MB

The photocatalytic activities of TiO2-intercalated GOs, TiO2-adsorbed GOs, GOs, and TiO2 for MB were evaluated. As shown in Figure 8(a), GOs and TiO2 showed relatively weak photocatalytic activity toward MB. For TiO2-adsorbed GOs, only ~60% of MB was decomposed after 1 h UV radiation. On the contrary, the TiO2-intercalated GOs exhibited much higher photocatalytic degradation efficiency than other catalysts (TiO2-intercalated GOs > TiO2-adsorbed GOs > GOs > TiO2). They could degrade nearly 99.9% of MB within 18 min under the UV light which was much faster than reported literature [25, 33, 5053]. Because of in situ growth of TiO2 nanocrystals by adhering to GO surfaces and/or GO-GO interfaces, the contact resistance between TiO2 and GOs was significantly reduced. As a result, the photoelectron generated by TiO2 could be efficiently led away by GOs, thereby greatly improving the separation of electron-hole pairs on TiO2 surfaces. In addition, GO nanosheets could help TiO2 to adsorb MB organic molecules due to their huge surface area and abundant anionic OH and COOH groups.

To study the effect of MB initial concentration on the photocatalytic degradation efficiency, the photocatalytic degradation experiments were conducted with MB concentrations that range from 100 mg/L to 300 mg/L, while maintaining other parameters constant. As shown in Figure 8(b), TiO2-intercalated GOs nearly completely degraded MB when MB concentration even reached up to 300 mg/L, indicating their high catalytic capacity. The complete degradation time for 100–300 mg/L of MB was 18, 30, and 60 min, suggesting the high catalytic efficiency of TiO2-intercalated GOs. The calculated photodegradation efficiency of TiO2-intercalated GOs showed significant decrease with increase in MB concentration because of the incident of UV light depth which became shallower with increasing MB concentration, thereby greatly reducing the photodegradation efficiency in the low solution.

To study the effect of the bath ratio between the TiO2-intercalated GO catalyst and MB solution on the photocatalytic degradation performance, 0.5–2 g TiO2-intercalated GOs was added into 100 g of 100 mg/L MB solution, while maintaining the other parameters constant. As presented in Figure 8(c), although the photodegradation ratio of MB changed with increasing bath ratio, the corresponding photodegradation rate of TiO2-intercalated GOs toward MB increased. The nearly complete photodegradation time for MB stretched from 18 min to 23 min and then to 32 min. Thus, the increase in the mass of TiO2-intercalated GOs could improve the photodegradation efficiency toward MB.

We varied the light conditions (simulated sunlight and UV light) to test their influence on the photocatalytic degradation of MB. As shown in Figure 8(d), 99.99% of MB was degraded by TiO2-intercalated GOs for only 18 min under UV light, whereas only 99.89% degradation efficiency was obtained under 360 min sunlight irradiation. The degradation time under UV light is only 5% of that under simulated sunlight. The low degradation efficiency is caused by the UV light, which only accounts for a small fraction (3%–5%) of the sunlight, whereas the TiO2-intercalated GOs only showed photocatalytic degradation activity in the UV band. However, the TiO2-intercalated GOs could degrade 99.89% of MB under 360 min (<6 h) simulated sunlight irradiation, still indicating their good applicability.

Figure 9 showed MB with and without UV radiation in the presence of TiO2-intercalated GOs. The color of MB with UV radiation soon became shallow and finally colorless, whereas that without UV radiation showed no obvious change after 20 min magnetic stirring in the dark. This indicates that physical adsorption by GOs was negligible during short UV irradiation probably because a number of OH and COOH groups reacted with TiO2 to form Ti-O-C groups. The high treatment efficiency for MB should mainly attribute to the high photodegradation of TiO2-intercalated GOs.

To further demonstrate the decomposition durability, the circulating runs of the TiO2-intercalated GO catalyst in the photocatalytic degradation of MB were carried out. After the complete photodegradation of MB every time, TiO2-intercalated GO catalyst was collected, washed, dried at 60°C, and used for the next photodegradation cycle. As shown in Figure 10, the TiO2-intercalated GO catalyst did not exhibit evident significant loss of photocatalytic activity after four runs of MB degradation. The photodegradation rate of MB reached up to 99.98%, 99.98%, 99.99%, and 99.97% after two to four times of circulation. The relative degradation time was 24, 32, 41, and 70 min. Nevertheless, after five times of circulation photodegradation, the TiO2-intercalated GOs obtained only 55.47% photodegradation rate even after 330 min UV light irradiation. The results indicated that the optimal cycle time of TiO2-intercalated GOs was four times. To examine the possible damage for the chemical structure of TiO2-intercalated GOs during prolonged exposure to UV light, FTIR spectra of TiO2-intercalated GOs before and after six-cycle UV irradiation were measured (Figure 11). The adsorption intensity of OH groups for TiO2-intercalated GOs slightly weakened after six time cycles while the chemical construction remained unchanged, indicating the high chemical stability. The decrease in hydroxyl, small molecular contamination, and interlayer blocking may be responsible for the weakened photocatalytic performance after five time cycles.

4. Conclusion

In summary, we demonstrate a synthesis strategy of sandwich-like TiO2-intercalated GO nanosheets to improve the contact area between TiO2 and GOs. Our FIIR, XPS, and XRD measurements showed that the as-prepared TiO2-intercalated GOs maintained the inherent chemical construction of GOs and generated high content and high crystallized TiO2 nanoparticles after the hydrothermal reaction. The SEM and TEM results indicated that TiO2 nanocrystals were uniformly dispersed on and in GO nanosheets, forming an independent sandwich-like structure. Notably, GOs consisted of 8–10 layered one-atom thick GOs. Such structure was beneficial to maintain certain electric conductivity of GOs. In addition, the photocatalytic activities of the as-prepared catalyst were further studied using methylene blue as a degradation sample. The results indicated that the catalytic activity of the TiO2-intercalated GOs was much stronger than pure TiO2 and TiO2-adsorbed GOs. Moreover, decreasing the initial concentration of MB and increasing the bath ratio of TiO2-intercalated GOs could increase the degradation efficiency of MB. The contrast tests further indicated that the degradation of MB by UV light was much faster than that by simulated sunlight. The final cyclic photodegradation test showed that the TiO2-intercalated GOs maintained 99.97% degradation activity after four times of repeated degradation, indicating good decomposition durability.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


The authors acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Young Foundation) (no. 51703098 and no. 51503105) and Jiangsu Qing Lan Project.


  1. M. Xing, J. Zhang, and F. Chen, “New approaches to prepare nitrogen-doped TiO2 photocatalysts and study on their photocatalytic activities in visible light,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 89, no. 3-4, pp. 563–569, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. X. Feng, K. Zhu, A. J. Frank, C. A. Grimes, and T. E. Mallouk, “Rapid charge transport in dye-sensitized solar cells made from vertically aligned single-crystal rutile TiO2 nanowires,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 2727–2730, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Z. Bian, T. Tachikawa, and T. Majima, “Superstructure of TiO2 crystalline nanoparticles yields effective conduction pathways for photogenerated charges,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 1422–1427, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. B. Qiu, M. Xing, and J. Zhang, “Mesoporous TiO2 nanocrystals grown in situ on graphene aerogels for high photocatalysis and lithium-ion batteries,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 136, no. 16, pp. 5852–5855, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. K. Zhang, J. K. Kim, B. Park et al., “Defect-induced epitaxial growth for efficient solar hydrogen production,” Nano Letters, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 6676–6683, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. T. Kuwabara, H. Sugiyama, M. Kuzuba, T. Yamaguchi, and K. Takahashi, “Inverted bulk-heterojunction organic solar cell using chemical bath deposited titanium oxide as electron collection layer,” Organic Electronics, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1136–1140, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. Gholami, I. Khazaee, S. Eslami, M. Zandi, and E. Akrami, “Experimental investigation of dust deposition effects on photo-voltaic output performance,” Solar Energy, vol. 159, pp. 346–352, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. X. Kong, C. Liu, W. Dong et al., “Metal-semiconductor-metal TiO2 ultraviolet detectors with Ni electrodes,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 94, no. 12, article 123502, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Y. Wang, H. Yu, C. Chen, and Z. Zhao, “Review of the biocompatibility of micro-arc oxidation coated titanium alloys,” Materials & Design, vol. 85, pp. 640–652, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. R. Reddy, M. Hassan, and V. G. Gomes, “Hybrid nanostructures based on titanium dioxide for enhanced photocatalysis,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 489, pp. 1–16, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. T. Luttrell, S. Halpegamage, J. Tao, A. Kramer, E. Sutter, and M. Batzill, “Why is anatase a better photocatalyst than rutile? - Model studies on epitaxial TiO2 films,” Scientific Reports, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 4043, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. Cheng, A. Amini, C. Zhu, Z. Xu, H. Song, and N. Wang, “Enhanced photocatalytic performance of TiO2-ZnO hybrid nanostructures,” Scientific Reports, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 4181, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. N. Ahmed, A. A. Farghali, W. M. A. El Rouby, and N. K. Allam, “Enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting characteristics of TiO2 hollow porous spheres by embedding graphene as an electron transfer channel,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 42, no. 49, pp. 29131–29139, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. W. A. Abbas, M. Ramadan, A. Y. Faid et al., “Photoactive catalysts for effective water microbial purification: morphology-activity relationship,” Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management, vol. 10, pp. 87–93, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Ramadan, H. M. A. Hassan, A. Shahat, R. F. M. Elshaarawy, and N. K. Allam, “Ultrahigh performance of novel energy-efficient capacitive deionization electrodes based on 3D nanotubular composites,” New Journal of Chemistry, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 3560–3567, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. Ramadan, A. M. Abdellah, S. G. Mohamed, and N. K. Allam, “3D interconnected binder-free electrospun MnO@C nanofibers for supercapacitor devices,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 7988, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. S. Hassanien, R. A. Shedeed, and N. K. Allam, “Graphene quantum sheets with multiband emission: unravelling the molecular origin of graphene quantum dots,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 120, no. 38, pp. 21678–21684, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. G. Kumar and L. G. Devi, “Review on modified TiO2 photocatalysis under UV/visible light: selected results and related mechanisms on interfacial charge carrier transfer dynamics,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, vol. 115, no. 46, pp. 13211–13241, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. G. Mele, C. Annese, L. D'Accolti et al., “Photoreduction of carbon dioxide to formic acid in aqueous suspension: a comparison between phthalocyanine/TiO2 and porphyrin/TiO2 catalysed processes,” Molecules, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 396–415, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. T. Morikawa, R. Asahi, T. Ohwaki, K. Aoki, and Y. Taga, “Band-gap narrowing of titanium dioxide by nitrogen doping,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 40, 6A, Part 2, pp. L561–L563, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. C. Belver, C. Han, J. J. Rodriguez, and D. D. Dionysiou, “Innovative W-doped titanium dioxide anchored on clay for photocatalytic removal of atrazine,” Catalysis Today, vol. 280, pp. 21–28, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Y. Zhang, Y. Meng, K. Zhu et al., “Copper-doped titanium dioxide bronze nanowires with superior high rate capability for lithium ion batteries,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 7957–7965, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. Na Phattalung, S. Limpijumnong, and J. Yu, “Passivated co-doping approach to bandgap narrowing of titanium dioxide with enhanced photocatalytic activity,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 200, pp. 1–9, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Q. Xiang, J. Yu, and M. Jaroniec, “Graphene-based semiconductor photocatalysts,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 782–796, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Y. Zhang, Z. R. Tang, X. Fu, and Y. J. Xu, “TiO2−graphene nanocomposites for gas-phase photocatalytic degradation of volatile aromatic pollutant: is TiO2−graphene truly different from other TiO2−carbon composite materials?” ACS Nano, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 7303–7314, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. Y. Wen, H. Ding, and Y. Shan, “Preparation and visible light photocatalytic activity of Ag/TiO2/graphene nanocomposite,” Nanoscale, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 4411–4417, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. W. Fan, Q. Lai, Q. Zhang, and Y. Wang, “Nanocomposites of TiO2 and reduced graphene oxide as efficient photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 115, no. 21, pp. 10694–10701, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. R. Nanakkal and L. K. Alexander, “Graphene/BiVO4/TiO2 nanocomposite: tuning band gap energies for superior photocatalytic activity under visible light,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 52, no. 13, pp. 7997–8006, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. W. Li, F. Wang, Y. Liu et al., “General strategy to synthesize uniform mesoporous TiO2/graphene/mesoporous TiO2 sandwich-like nanosheets for highly reversible lithium storage,” Nano Letters, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 2186–2193, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Y. Cong, M. Long, Z. Cui et al., “Anchoring a uniform TiO2 layer on graphene oxide sheets as an efficient visible light photocatalyst,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 282, pp. 400–407, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. D. Zhao, G. Sheng, C. Chen, and X. Wang, “Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue under visible irradiation on graphene@TiO2 dyade structure,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 111-112, pp. 303–308, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. H. Sun, S. Liu, S. Liu, and S. Wang, “A comparative study of reduced graphene oxide modified TiO2, ZnO and Ta2O5 in visible light photocatalytic/photochemical oxidation of methylene blue,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 146, pp. 162–168, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. N. Raghavan, S. Thangavel, and G. Venugopal, “Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue by reduced graphene-oxide/titanium dioxide/zinc oxide ternary nanocomposites,” Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, vol. 30, pp. 321–329, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. X. Luan, M. T. Gutierrez Wing, and Y. Wang, “Enhanced photocatalytic activity of graphene oxide/titania nanosheets composites for methylene blue degradation,” Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, vol. 30, pp. 592–598, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. Y. Min, K. Zhang, W. Zhao, F. Zheng, Y. Chen, and Y. Zhang, “Enhanced chemical interaction between TiO2 and graphene oxide for photocatalytic decolorization of methylene blue,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 193-194, pp. 203–210, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. S. Liu, H. Sun, S. Liu, and S. Wang, “Graphene facilitated visible light photodegradation of methylene blue over titanium dioxide photocatalysts,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 214, pp. 298–303, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. X. Shao, W. Lu, R. Zhang, and F. Pan, “Enhanced photocatalytic activity of TiO2-C hybrid aerogels for methylene blue degradation,” Scientific Reports, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 3018, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. W. S. Hummers Jr. and R. E. Offeman, “Preparation of graphitic oxide,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 1339–1339, 1958. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. K. Zhang, L. Wang, J. K. Kim et al., “An order/disorder/water junction system for highly efficient co-catalyst-free photocatalytic hydrogen generation,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 499–503, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. K. Zhang, K. C. Kemp, and V. Chandra, “Homogeneous anchoring of TiO2 nanoparticles on graphene sheets for waste water treatment,” Materials Letters, vol. 81, pp. 127–130, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. W.-D. Yang, Y.-R. Li, and Y.-C. Lee, “Synthesis of r-GO/TiO2 composites via the UV-assisted photocatalytic reduction of graphene oxide,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 380, pp. 249–256, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. J. Liu, H. Bai, Y. Wang, Z. Liu, X. Zhang, and D. D. Sun, “Self-assembling TiO2 nanorods on large graphene oxide sheets at a two-phase interface and their anti-recombination in photocatalytic applications,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 20, no. 23, pp. 4175–4181, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. Bagri, C. Mattevi, M. Acik, Y. J. Chabal, M. Chhowalla, and V. B. Shenoy, “Structural evolution during the reduction of chemically derived graphene oxide,” Nature Chemistry, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 581–587, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. Y. F. You, C. H. Xu, S. S. Xu et al., “Structural characterization and optical property of TiO2 powders prepared by the sol–gel method,” Ceramics International, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 8659–8666, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. K. Baba and R. Hatada, “Synthesis and properties of TiO2 thin films by plasma source ion implantation,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 136, no. 1-3, pp. 241–243, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. J. Oh, S. Lee, K. Zhang et al., “Graphene oxide-assisted production of carbon nitrides using a solution process and their photocatalytic activity,” Carbon, vol. 66, pp. 119–125, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. K. Zhang, N. Heo, X. Shi, and J. H. Park, “Chemically modified graphene oxide-wrapped quasi-micro Ag decorated silver trimolybdate nanowires for photocatalytic applications,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 117, no. 45, pp. 24023–24032, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. Y.-H. Lin, H.-D. Lin, C.-K. Liu et al., “Annealing effect on the structural, mechanical and electrical properties of titanium-doped diamond-like carbon films,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 518, no. 5, pp. 1503–1507, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. Z. D. Meng and W. C. Oh, “Sonocatalytic degradation and catalytic activities for MB solution of Fe treated fullerene/TiO2 composite with different ultrasonic intensity,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 757–764, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. B.-K. Choi, W.-K. Choi, S.-J. Park, and M.-K. Seo, “One-pot synthesis of Ag-TiO2/nitrogen-doped graphene oxide nanocomposites and its photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 6075–6080, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. Y. Yang, L. Xu, H. Wang, W. Wang, and L. Zhang, “TiO2/graphene porous composite and its photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue,” Materials & Design, vol. 108, pp. 632–639, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. H. Safardoust-Hojaghan and M. Salavati-Niasari, “Degradation of methylene blue as a pollutant with N-doped graphene quantum dot/titanium dioxide nanocomposite,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 148, pp. 31–36, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. Y. Liu, Y. Shi, X. Liu, and H. Li, “A facile solvothermal approach of novel Bi2S3/TiO2/RGO composites with excellent visible light degradation activity for methylene blue,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 396, pp. 58–66, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Lirong Yao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.