Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2018 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 4324072 | 8 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4324072

Structural and Optical Studies of Cadmium Sulfide Quantum Dot-Graphene Oxide-Chitosan Nanocomposite Thin Film as a Novel SPR Spectroscopy Active Layer

Academic Editor: Rajesh R. Naik
Received11 Jul 2018
Revised24 Sep 2018
Accepted26 Sep 2018
Published02 Dec 2018

Abstract

The aim of this study is to prepare and study the cadmium sulfide quantum dot-graphene oxide-chitosan composite thin film. This composite material was coated on top of the gold layer by a spin-coating technique as a modification of the active layer for metal ion sensing using surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy (SPR). The composite material was prepared using a simple wet solution mixing method. An atomic force microscope (AFM) shows that the addition of GO increased the roughness of the composite thin film and the presence of CdS QDs cannot be observed as the size of the QDs are very small. The morphology of the nanocomposite material was observed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). From the TEM images, it is observed that the materials mixed to form a nanocomposite material. The optical properties of the thin film via UV-Vis spectroscopy shows that the absorbance peaks of the thin film can be observed around 220 nm to near 300 nm, and the band gaps are around 4.0 eV. Lastly, the prepared thin film was tested as an active layer for metal ion detection via surface plasmon resonance (SPR), where the angle shift was observed to show that the prepared thin film has high potential for Co2+ ion detection.

1. Introduction

In recent years, a lot of novel materials have been discovered and studied. One of the most promising materials is chitosan. Chitosan is a semicrystalline polymer material that is derived from chitin by deacetylation under alkaline conditions. Chitosan is said to be the most important chitin derivative, which is cationic in nature and has good adsorption capacity and film-forming capability [1]. It is used to produce films, hydrogels, and fibers where it is mostly used in the biomedical field because of its biocompatibility [13]. However, the stability of chitosan is low because of its hydrophilic character and pH sensitivity [1, 2]. Therefore, a number of techniques have been used to improve the mechanical and chemical properties of chitosan. One of the techniques is crosslinking chitosan with a reagent such as ionophore or glutaraldehyde [46]. Chitosan can also be reinforced by blending it with other novel materials such as graphene oxide [79].

Quantum dots (QDs) on the other hand are nanosized crystals which are composed of semiconducting materials. In other words, they are actually tiny semiconductors that have the ability to convert incoming energy. As a material for semiconductor nanostructures, a quantum dot confines the motion of conduction band electrons, valence band holes, or excitons, which means it contains a small finite number of conduction band electrons, valence band holes, or excitons. The size of this nanoparticle is usually around several nanometers. Due to these confinement effects, QDs exhibit unique and remarkable physical and chemical properties compared to bulky materials. Some of the advantages of QDs over other bulky materials include a broader absorption spectra, narrow emission spectra, better photostability, and longer fluorescent lifetime after excitation [10]. Furthermore, its properties can be greatly affected by only altering the particle size without changing the chemical composition [11].

Quantum dots are made up of atoms from group II–VI, group III–V, or group IV–VI elements in the periodic table [12]. In the past few decades, QDs have attracted considerable attention due to their special properties. Cadmium sulfide quantum dots (CdS QDs) are one of the most studied QDs which are composed of group II to VI element semiconductors. There is a considerable amount of information from research that can be searched and obtained from various sources regarding the preparation, properties, and applications of CdS QDs [1315]. Cadmium sulfide-based quantum dots are promising materials for the development of optics, optoelectronics, medicine, and sensor technology [16, 17]. CdS QDs have been widely used in fluorescence sensors for metal ion-sensing applications [18, 19]. To the best of our knowledge, this material has not been used as a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) active layer for the detection of metal ions.

In the present study, quantum dots, chitosan, and graphene oxide are mixed to form a composite material thin film, since it is believed that the properties of composite materials are better compared to the properties of the individual materials. In addition, an attempt was made to apply the composite material thin film onto the surface of a gold glass substrate which will be applied as an active layer in the surface plasmon resonance technique for metal ion sensing [2022].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Reagents

Medium molecular weight (MMW) chitosan with an MW of 190,000–310,000 and degree of deacetylation of 75–85%, acetic acid (assay ≥ 99.7%) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Cadmium chloride decahydrate (CdCl2⋅10H2O), mercaptoacetic acid (MPA) (HS-CH2-COOH), and disodium sulfide nonahydrate (Na2S⋅9H2O) were purchased from R&M Chemicals. Graphene oxide (GO) (4 mg/ml) was purchased from Graphenea (Cambridge, MA, USA).

2.2. Preparation of Chemicals

All chemicals used were of analytical grade and deionized water was used for all solution preparations. At first, a chitosan solution was prepared by dissolving 0.4 g of medium molecular weight chitosan that was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich with 50 ml of 1% acetic acid [23]. The cadmium sulfide quantum dots were prepared by a simple wet process [16]. It started by dissolving 0.5 mmol of MPA and 0.5 mmol of CdCl2⋅10H2O by adding 250 ml of ddH2O water in a 500 ml beaker. Then, the pH of the solution was adjusted to 6.0 by adding the NaOH solution (1 M) dropwise with constant stirring. Subsequently, the solution was purged with nitrogen gas for at least 60 min under vigorous stirring. Sodium sulfide (Na2S⋅9H2O) (0.5 mmol) was then added dropwise into the stirred solution until the clear yellowish suspension of CdS QDs was obtained. The obtained aqueous CdS QDs were then quenched at 0°C in the freezer (45 min) and stored in a refrigerator at 4°C. Finally, a composite solution with a 1 : 1 : 1 ratio was prepared by stirring 10 ml of chitosan, CdS QDs, and GO solution using a magnetic stirrer for 1 hour and then sonicating again for one hour.

2.3. Preparation of Thin Film

Glass cover slips (24 mm × 24 mm × 0.1 mm, Menzel-Glaser, Germany) were cleaned using acetone to remove dirt and impurities on the surface of the glass slide before any coating process. The glass slides were first deposited with a thin gold layer using an SC7640 sputter coater [24]. Then, the spin-coating technique (Specialty Coating System, P-6708D) was used to produce a thin layer of CdS QD-GO-chitosan composite. Approximately 0.55 ml of the composite solution of CdS QD-GO-chitosan was placed on the gold layer covering the majority of the surface. The glass cover slip was spun at 4000 rev/min for 30 s to produce the composite thin film.

2.4. Characterization and Optical Study of Thin Film

An atomic force microscope (AFM) (Bruker Multimode 8) was used to observe the changes of the surface morphology of the composite thin film with the base material thin films. The morphology of the composite material was observed by using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (JEOL JEM-2100). The optical properties of the thin film was studied using UV-Vis spectroscopy (UV-3600, Shimadzu). The optical sensor test was then carried out via surface plasmon resonance (SPR) spectroscopy by observing the angle shift of the active composite layer in contact with deionized water and cobalt ion solution.

2.5. Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) System

An optical spectroscopy was designed to test the capability of the nanocomposite thin film for the Co2+ ion. A 5 mW He-Ne laser () was p-polarized and directed to a prism (refractive index, at 632.8 nm). The optical setup of this SPR technique consists of a He-Ne laser, an optical stage driven by a stepper motor with a resolution of 0.001° (Newport MM3000), a polarizer, and an optical chopper (SR540). The He-Ne laser beam was incident on to the prism (refractive index of 1.77861), passed through the sample (derivative thin film), and the reflected beam was detected by a large area photodiode. The signal was then processed by the lock-in amplifier (SR530) [25] with a glass cover slip and coated with gold/CdS QD-GO-chitosan films attached onto one side of the prism. A cell was constructed and attached to the gold/CdS QD-GO-chitosan film surface to hold the Co (II) ion solution. A schematic diagram of the SPR setup is shown in Figure 1. The prism and the cell were mounted on a rotating plate to control the angle of the incident light. The reflected beam was detected by a sensitive photodiode and then processed by the lock-in amplifier (SR530).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Surface Morphology of Thin Film

Atomic force microscopy analysis is used as a quantitative measurement of the nanometric-dimensional surface roughness and for visual observation of the deposited film nanotexture [26]. Two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) AFM images of the chitosan, chitosan-GO, and CdS QD-GO-chitosan thin films are shown in Figures 2, 3, and 4, respectively. From Figure 2, it is observed that the granular surface of chitosan seems to have a smooth surface and is well distributed on top of the glass substrate. The addition of graphene oxide (Figure 3) shows that graphene oxide mixes well in the chitosan matrix, and the addition of GO in the chitosan increases the surface roughness of the chitosan-GO composite thin film from 0.216 nm to 0.948 nm. The graphene sheets can be clearly seen with their addition to the granular surface of the chitosan. In addition, the increase of surface roughness may be due to the graphene sheets of the graphene oxide. On the other hand, the surface roughness of a chitosan-GO-CdS QD thin film is 0.627 nm. It can be seen from Figure 4 that the graphene sheets of graphene oxide are lesser compared to the graphene sheets present in the chitosan-GO thin film in Figure 3.

3.2. Morphology of the Composite Material

The composite solution was first diluted using deionized water with the ratio of 1 : 10 before the solution was dropped on top of the Cu grid to prevent a thick film from depositing on the Cu grid. The morphology of the CdS QD-GO-chitosan nanocomposite solution was investigated using the TEM technique as shown in Figure 5. From the figure, the TEM image shows a thin extended wrinkled sheet of GO with chitosan covering the surface of GO [27]. It can also be seen from the figure that CdS QDs were immobilized on the surface of the GO sheet with a few free CdS QDs observed [28]. This figure shows the presence of the three elements as a composite material. Figure 6 shows the distribution of chitosan particles on GO sheets with greater magnification and it confirmed the granular surface contributed by the chitosan particle as shown in the AFM result.

3.3. Optical Studies of Thin Film

The optical properties of the thin films were confirmed by observing the absorbance spectrum at a different wavelength in the range of 220 nm to 800 nm. The absorbance curves of the composite thin film materials are shown in Figure 7. The figure shows the absorption spectra of different materials that make the chitosan-CdS QD-GO composite thin film. As shown in the figure, chitosan-GO shows the highest absorption value followed by the CdS QD-GO-chitosan, and lastly chitosan only. It is said that absorbance may depend on the atomic number and density of the material [29]. From the figure, the absorbance peaks of GO can be seen in the range of 230 nm to 280 nm. This result is the same as that of Zheng et al. in 2013 who stated that the typical absorption of GO is observed between 225 nm and 270 nm. From Figure 7, it can be observed that both chitosan-GO and chitosan-GO-CdS QD composite thin films produced a peak at approximately 228 nm. The absorption peak at about 220 nm to 240 nm corresponds to the transition of the C=C bond [30]. However, there is no peak seen at that wavelength for the chitosan thin film. Its absorption peak near 300 nm can also be assigned to the transitions of the C=O bond [31]. The peaks for both the chitosan-GO thin film and CdS QD-GO-chitosan thin film are almost similar except for the peak at approximately 250 nm where the peak for the chitosan-GO thin film is more obvious.

3.4. Band Gap of the Thin Film

The optical band gap of the thin films was obtained by applying the Tauc relation: where it can be rearranged into where the absorption coefficient, can be obtained by extracting the UV-Vis data. is the photon energy. is a constant. is the band gap energy. The obtained optical band gaps of chitosan, GO, chitosan-GO, and CdS QD-GO-chitosan thin film are shown in Figures 8, 9, 10, and 11, respectively. It can be seen from the figures that the values of the energy band gap of the thin films are slightly different. The graphene oxide thin film has the lowest energy band gap at 3.954 eV, while chitosan has a slightly higher band gap of 4.021 eV. The mixture of chitosan and GO thin film produced a band gap of 4.049 eV. On the other hand, the addition of CdS QDs slightly lowered the band gap of the composite thin film to 4.033 eV. GO has the lowest band gap due to the excellent conductivity of graphene that provides better electron transportation between the conduction band and valence band [3234]. Overall, there are no major changes to the optical band gap by the addition of GO and CdS QDs into the chitosan matrix which is in the range of 4.021 eV to 4.049 as shown in the figures. This may be due to the biopolymer nature of chitosan as the main matrix [2].

3.5. SPR Test of the Thin Film

The active layer thin film was tested with deionized water with 0.01 ppm, 0.1 ppm, 1 ppm, and 10 ppm of cobalt ion via surface plasmon resonance. Surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy worked by observing the changes of the refractive index of the active layer due to the interaction of the active layer with the targeted metal ion [35]. Figure 12 shows that there is a resonance angle shift by observing the SPR curve of the active layer in contact with the deionized water and cobalt ion. The angle shift of the SPR signal increases from 0.01289°, 0.09237°, 0.11063°, and 0.18367°, respectively, for 0.01 ppm, 0.1 ppm, 1 ppm, and 10 ppm. This shift was contributed by the attachment of the metal ion onto the active layer thin film [3638]. The attachment of the metal ion with the active layer changes the refractive index of the active layer hence causing a shift in the resonance angle [3941].

4. Conclusions

In summary, the physical and optical properties of the CdS QD-GO-chitosan nanocomposite thin film were successfully prepared and studied. The addition of GO into the matrix increases the absorbance of the composite thin film and the band gap of the nanocomposite thin film is around 4.0 eV. The surface of the nanocomposite thin film is relatively well distributed and the presence of graphene sheets increases the surface roughness as confirmed by AFM and TEM results. Finally, the thin film gave some response to the metal ion binding by comparing the SPR curve of deionized water and cobalt ion in contact with the active layer. It can be concluded that the thin film has high potential for metal ion sensing using surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Malaysian Government for the fund support through Putra Grant Universiti Putra Malaysia (Putra Grant 9531500 and 9627300). The laboratory facilities provided by the Department of Physics, Department of Chemistry and the Institute of Advanced Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, are also acknowledged.

References

  1. C. K. S. Pillai, W. Paul, and C. P. Sharma, “Chitin and chitosan polymers: chemistry, solubility and fiber formation,” Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 641–678, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. Rinaudo, “Chitin and chitosan: properties and applications,” Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 603–632, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. N. V. Ravi Kumar, “A review of chitin and chitosan applications,” Reactive and Functional Polymers, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. Kumar, N. Nigam, T. Ghosh, P. K. Dutta, R. S. Yadav, and A. C. Pandey, “Preparation, characterization, and optical properties of a chitosan–anthraldehyde crosslinkable film,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 3056–3062, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Y. W. Fen, W. M. M. Yunus, N. A. Yusof, N. S. Ishak, N. A. S. Omar, and A. A. Zainudin, “Preparation, characterization and optical properties of ionophore doped chitosan biopolymer thin film and its potential application for sensing metal ion,” Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, vol. 126, no. 23, pp. 4688–4692, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Kumar, P. K. Dutta, and P. Sen, “Preparation and characterization of optical property of crosslinkable film of chitosan with 2-thiophenecarboxaldehyde,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 563–569, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. A. Zainudin, Y. W. Fen, N. A. Yusof, and N. A. S. Omar, “Structural, optical and sensing properties of ionophore doped graphene based bionanocomposite thin film,” Optik, vol. 144, pp. 308–315, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. Kumar and J. Koh, “Physiochemical and optical properties of chitosan based graphene oxide bionanocomposite,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 70, pp. 559–564, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. Han, L. Yan, W. Chen, and W. Li, “Preparation of chitosan/graphene oxide composite film with enhanced mechanical strength in the wet state,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 653–658, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. S. Liji Sobhana, M. Vimala Devi, T. P. Sastry, and A. B. Mandal, “CdS quantum dots for measurement of the size-dependent optical properties of thiol capping,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1747–1757, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. Bera, L. Qian, T. K. Tseng, and P. H. Holloway, “Quantum dots and their multimodal applications: a review,” Materials, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 2260–2345, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. Frigerio, D. S. M. Ribeiro, S. S. M. Rodrigues et al., “Application of quantum dots as analytical tools in automated chemical analysis: a review,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 735, pp. 9–22, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Z. Tshemese, S. Mlowe, N. Revaprasadu, and N. Deenadayalu, “Synthesis of CdS quantum dots in an imidazolium based ionic liquid,” Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, vol. 71, pp. 258–262, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. Šajinović, Z. V. Šaponjić, N. Cvjetićanin, M. Marinović-Cincović, and J. M. Nedeljković, “Synthesis and characterization of CdS quantum dots–polystyrene composite,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 329, no. 1-2, pp. 168–172, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Ben Taieb, T. N. Pham Truong, S. Chaguetmi et al., “An easy-to achieve approach for the fabrication of CdS QDs sensitized TiO2 nanotubes and their enhanced photoelectrochemical performance,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 332, pp. 337–344, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. H. Mat Zaid, J. Abdullah, N. A. Yusof et al., “PNA biosensor based on reduced graphene oxide/water soluble quantum dots for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 241, pp. 1024–1034, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. H. M. Zaid and J. Abdullah, “Preparation and characterization of amine functionalized graphene oxide with water soluble quantum dots for sensing material,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1877, no. 1, article 040002, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. N. Wang, J. Zhu, X. Li, J. J. Li, and J. W. Zhao, “Fluorescence turn-on sensing of trace cadmium ions based on EDTA-etched CdTe@CdS quantum dot,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, vol. 201, pp. 119–127, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Y. Fan, Y. Q. Cai, H. J. Liu, and Y. Chen, “CdS quantum dots capped with hyperbranched graft copolymers: role of hyperbranched shell in fluorescence and selective mercury-sensing,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 251, pp. 171–179, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. L. Kee, J. L. Y. Chyi, Z. A. Talib et al., “Synthesis of zinc selenide/graphene oxide composite via direct and indirect hydrothermal method,” Sains Malaysiana, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1201–1206, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  21. W. M. E. M. M. Daniyal, Y. W. Fen, J. Abdullah, S. Saleviter, and N. A. Sheh Omar, “Preparation and characterization of hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide modified nanocrystalline cellulose/graphene oxide composite thin film and its potential in sensing copper ion using surface plasmon resonance technique,” Optik, vol. 173, pp. 71–77, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. Saleviter, Y. W. Fen, N. A. S. Omar, A. A. Zainudin, and W. M. E. M. M. Daniyal, “Optical and structural characterization of immobilized 4-(2-pyridylazo) resorcinol in chitosan-graphene oxide composite thin film and its potential for Co2+ sensing using surface plasmon resonance technique,” Results in Physics, vol. 11, pp. 118–122, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Y. W. Fen, W. M. M. Yunus, and Z. A. Talib, “Analysis of Pb (II) ion sensing by crosslinked chitosan thin film using surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy,” Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 126–133, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Y. W. Fen, W. M. M. Yunus, Z. A. Talib, and N. A. Yusof, “Development of surface plasmon resonance sensor for determining zinc ion using novel active nanolayers as probe,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, vol. 134, pp. 48–52, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. S. Saleviter, Y. W. Fen, N. A. S. Omar, A. A. Zainudin, and N. A. Yusof, “Development of optical sensor for determination of Co (II) based on surface plasmon resonance phenomenon,” Sensor Letters, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 862–867, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. B. R. Kumar and T. S. Rao, “AFM studies on surface morphology, topography and texture of nanostructured zinc aluminum oxide thin films,” Digest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1881–1889, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  27. K. Bustos-Ramírez, A. Martínez-Hernández, G. Martínez-Barrera, M. Icaza, V. Castaño, and C. Velasco-Santos, “Covalently bonded chitosan on graphene oxide via redox reaction,” Materials, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 911–926, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. T. A. Pham, B. C. Choi, and Y. T. Jeong, “Facile covalent immobilization of cadmium sulfide quantum dots on graphene oxide nanosheets: preparation, characterization, and optical properties,” Nanotechnology, vol. 21, no. 46, pp. 465603–465612, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. S. Eluyemi, M. A. Eleruja, A. V. Adedeji et al., “Synthesis and characterization of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide thin films deposited by spray pyrolysis method,” Graphene, vol. 05, no. 03, pp. 143–154, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. T. Wang, S. Zhang, C. Mao et al., “Enhanced electrochemiluminescence of CdSe quantum dots composited with graphene oxide and chitosan for sensitive sensor,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 369–375, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. Rattana, S. Chaiyakun, N. Witit-Anun et al., “Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide nanosheets,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 32, pp. 759–764, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. Hunt, E. Z. Kurmaev, and A. Moewes, “Band gap engineering of graphene oxide by chemical modification,” Carbon, vol. 75, pp. 366–371, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. K. Hazra and S. Basu, “Graphene-oxide nano composites for chemical sensor applications,” C, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 12, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. Y. Zhu, S. Murali, W. Cai et al., “Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications,” Advanced Materials, vol. 22, no. 35, pp. 3906–3924, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. Y. W. Fen and W. M. M. Yunus, “Characterization of the optical properties of heavy metal ions using surface plasmon resonance technique,” Optics and Photonics Journal, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 116–123, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. N. A. S. Omar, Y. W. Fen, J. Abdullah, C. E. N. C. E. Chik, and M. A. Mahdi, “Development of an optical sensor based on surface plasmon resonance phenomenon for diagnosis of dengue virus E-protein,” Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research, vol. 20, pp. 16–21, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. Y. W. Fen, W. M. M. Yunus, and N. A. Yusof, “Surface plasmon resonance optical sensor for detection of Pb2+ based on immobilized p-tert-butylcalix[4]arene-tetrakis in chitosan thin film as an active layer,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 171-172, pp. 287–293, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. A. Zainudin, Y. W. Fen, N. A. Yusof, S. H. Al-Rekabi, M. A. Mahdi, and N. A. S. Omar, “Incorporation of surface plasmon resonance with novel valinomycin doped chitosan-graphene oxide thin film for sensing potassium ion,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, vol. 191, pp. 111–115, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. Y. W. Fen, W. M. M. Yunus, M. M. Moksin, Z. A. Talib, and N. A. Yusof, “Surface plasmon resonance optical sensor for mercury ion detection by crosslinked chitosan thin film,” Journal of Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials, vol. 13, no. 2–4, pp. 273–279, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  40. W. M. E. M. M. Daniyal, S. Saleviter, and Y. W. Fen, “Development of surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy for metal ion detection,” Sensors and Materials, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 2023–2038, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. S. H. Al-Rekabi, Y. Mustapha Kamil, M. H. Abu Bakar et al., “Hydrous ferric oxide-magnetite-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite for optical detection of arsenic using surface plasmon resonance,” Optics & Laser Technology, vol. 111, pp. 417–423, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Silvan Saleviter et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

904 Views | 416 Downloads | 9 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.