Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 1867271 |

Ahmed M. Ammar, Hemdan S. H. Mohamed, Moataz M. K. Yousef, Ghada M. Abdel-Hafez, Ahmed S. Hassanien, Ahmed S. G. Khalil, "Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (DSSCs) Based on Extracted Natural Dyes", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2019, Article ID 1867271, 10 pages, 2019.

Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (DSSCs) Based on Extracted Natural Dyes

Academic Editor: Hiromasa Nishikiori
Received20 Oct 2018
Accepted25 Feb 2019
Published18 Apr 2019


Here, three natural dyes were extracted from different fruits and leaves and used as sensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Chlorophyll was extracted from spinach leaves using acetone as a solvent. Anthocyanin was extracted from red cabbage and onion peels using water. Different characterizations for the prepared natural dyes were conducted including UV-vis absorption, FTIR, and steady-state/time-resolved photoluminescence spectroscopy. Various DSSCs based on the extracted dyes were fabricated. The degradation in the power conversion efficiencies was monitored over a week. The effect of the TiO2 mesoporous layers on the efficiency was also studied. The interfaces between the natural dyes and the TiO2 layers were investigated using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy.

1. Introduction

Over the last years, various types of solar cells have been developed to convert sunlight to electricity. Crystalline, polycrystalline, and amorphous silicon solar cells have been widely used for different domestic and industrial application [13]. Multijunction semiconductor solar cells have shown the world record efficiency of 46% [4]. However, their applications are mostly limited to space industry. There are other types of less efficient and low-cost cells, such as dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) [5] and organic solar cells [6]. These cells have been around for years and stimulated useful studies; however, their implementation for large-scale applications is still limited.

DSSC was firstly reported by O’Regan and Grätzel in 1991 [5]. The highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) reported for DSSCs using ruthenium complex dyes (N719) was 11-12% [7, 8]. One of the main challenges of DSSCs is the long-term stability. Electrolyte leakage, dye desorption, and degradation of the dye itself are considered the most important parameters affecting the cell stability [9, 10].

Researchers have been focusing on the modification of each component of the DSSC with the aim to improve the PCE. For instance, in order to obtain more effective nanostructured semiconductor photoanodes, different shapes have been utilized such as nanoparticles, nanorods, nanotubes, nanosheets, and mesoporous structure [1115]. Ruthenium and osmium metal-organic complexes have been the most stable and effective dyes used for DSSCs [16, 17]. Due to the fact that these dyes are toxic, expensive, and difficult to synthesize, growing activities for using natural dyes have been reported [1820]. Natural-based DSSCs have not shown high efficiency compared to the artificial ones, mainly due to the weak binding with TiO2 film as well as the low charge-transfer absorption in the whole visible range [21]. However, many reports have been recently published on using extracted natural dyes from natural products and tested for DSSCs [2231]. Karakuş et al. employed Pelargonium hortorum and Pelargonium grandiflorum as sensitizers in their DSSCs and achieved a PCE of 0.065% and 0.067%, respectively [32]. Ramanarayanan et al. extracted the dye from the leaves of red amaranth and studied the effect of using different solvents, such as water and ethanol, and achieved PCE of 0.230% and 0.530%, respectively [33]. Hosseinnezhad et al. extracted the dye from Sambucus ebulus and PCE of 1.15% was reported [34]. Despite the fact that all these studies showed low PCE compared to other conventional cells, still the mechanism of operation and performance are of great interest, mainly to explore new insights and understanding for these sophisticated cells.

In this work, different dyes were extracted from red cabbage, onion peels, and spinach and used as sensitizers for the DSSCs. The optical and structural properties of the dyes and the fabricated cells were studied. Furthermore, the interface between the dye and TiO2 was investigated by impedance spectroscopy. The degradation in the PCE of N719 and natural-based DSSCs was monitored.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Onion peels, red cabbage, and spinach leaves used in this study were collected from Fayoum City, Egypt. HCl and acetic acid were purchased from Loba Chemie. Isopropanol was purchased from Fisher Scientific. FTO conductive glass (sheet resistance: 7 Ω/sq), P25 TiO2 nanopowder, titanium isopropoxide, α-terpineol, ethyl cellulose, and di-tetrabutylammonium cis-bis(isothiocyanato)bis(2,2-bipyridyl-4,4-dicarboxylato)ruthenium(II)—(N719 dye)—were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Iodolyte was purchased from Solaronix.

2.2. Extraction of the Natural Dyes

Water was used as the extraction solvent for onion peels and red cabbage. 6 gm of onion peel and 147 gm of chopped red cabbage were dispersed into 250 ml and 400 ml of distilled water, respectively. The dispersions were heated up at 90°C for 24 hours. After cooling down to room temperature, the dispersions were filtered through filter papers to extract the anthocyanin (dye) for use as sensitizers. A third dye was extracted from spinach using acetone as the extraction solvent. 11 gm of spinach was crushed into fine powder using a mortar and dispersed in acetone. The solution was then filtered, and the resulting filtrate was used as natural sensitizer. All dye solutions were stored in the dark.

2.3. DSSC Fabrication

FTO conductive glass substrates were firstly cleaned in labosol solution for 30 min followed by rinsing in water-ethanol solution of NaOH for another 30 min. TiO2 blocking layer was prepared by adding 2.4 ml of titanium isopropoxide to 34 ml of isopropanol into a plastic bottle with stirring. Then, 0.8 ml of 2 M HCl was added dropwise and the solution left under stirring for 24 hours. The coating solution was spread on the surface by using spin coater (1000 rpm for 10 s followed by 3000 rpm for 60 s). The formed layer was sintered at 120°C for 120 min. TiO2 mesoporous layer was prepared by adding 1.5 gm of titania with 6 ml of terpineol-ethyl cellulose mixture. 0.25 ml of acetic acid was slowly added to the mixture with continuous grinding for 15 min. Then, 6 ml of isopropanol was added with grinding for 15 min until it gets homogenous. The paste was deposited on the FTO conductive glass by doctor-blading technique to obtain a TiO2 mesoporous with a thickness of 15 μm and an area of 1 cm2. The layer was preheated at 120°C for 150 min then sintered at 460°C for 15 min. After cooling to 80°C, the TiO2 electrode was immersed in dye solutions for 24 h. The iodide/triiodide (I-/I3-) was used as the electrolyte solution. DSSC was assembled by filling the electrolyte between a TiO2 electrode (anode) and a conductive glass substrate plated with Pt (cathode).

2.4. Characterizations

The UV-vis absorption was recorded using Agilent Cary 60 spectrometer. The Fourier transmission infrared (FTIR) spectra were recorded using Mattson Satellite IR to analyze the functional groups of the natural dyes. The steady-state photoluminescence spectroscopy was carried out using AVANTUS Ava-florescence setup featured with AvaSpec-ULS2048L-USB2 detector with the following specifications: back-thinned CCD (charged coupled device) image sensor array of 2048 pixels, symmetrical Czerny-Turner monochromator (600 line/mm), 200–1160 nm of wavelength scanning range, 25 μm slit, DCL-UV/VIS-200 detector collection lens, AvaLight-LED355, 450 nm light sources, and two FCR-UV200/600-2-IND fiber optics. Time-resolved PL measurements were performed using a time correlated single photon counting device (PicoQuant “PicoHarp-300”). A pulsed diode laser head at different repetition rates was used to excite the sample at 440 nm controlled by (PicoQuant PDL 800-D pulsed driver controller). The pulse duration of the laser was about 200 ps. The PL from the sample was filtered using long pass filters from 520 nm to pick up only band edge emission. The emitted photons were focused onto a fast avalanche photodiode (MPD-100-CTB, SPAD, Micro Photon Device). The response time of the photodiode was <50 ps. The excitation photon flux was controlled using neutral filters with different optical density.

The surface morphology of the TiO2 films was characterized by scanning electron microscope (Carl ZEISS Gemini, Sigma 500 VP). The photocurrent-voltage (-) characteristics were performed using Keithley 2450 under sunlight. SMP smart pyranometer (Kipp & Zonen, Netherlands) was used to measure the reference input irradiation. A Voltalab PGZ 100 potentiostat/galvanostat system was used to perform the electrochemical impedance spectroscopic measurements. All potentiodynamic polarization experiments were carried out using a constant scan rate of 10 mV s-1. The impedance measurements were recorded in the frequency domain 0.1-105 Hz, with a superimposed ac-signal of 10 mV peak to peak. Each experiment was carried out at least twice to be sure that the results are reproducible.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 displays the optical images of the extracted natural dyes from onion peels, spinach, and red cabbage and their representative UV-vis absorption. The UV-vis absorption of N719 was also shown for the sake of comparison. It can be noticed that N719 have two wide absorption peaks at 387 nm and 530 nm. These peaks have been previously reported [35]. For the anthocyanin extracted from red cabbage and onion peels, absorption peaks at 544 nm and 486 nm have been shown, respectively. The absorption of the chlorophyll extracted from spinach shows two different peaks at 662 nm and 431 nm. The shifts in the absorption peaks are mainly due to the different chemical structure of these dyes.

Figure 2(a) shows the schematic diagram of the main structure of DSSC prepared in this work. The detailed preparation conditions were described in Section 2. It should be emphasized here that the PCE is very sensitive to every single preparation step. Our reported results were repeated several times to make sure about the effect of the varied parameters on the PCE. Figure 2(b) presents SEM micrograph of TiO2 mesoporous layer formed on the FTO-coated glass. It can be seen that the TiO2 particles were aggregated to form homogenous and crack-free nanoclusters. Similar morphology was reported in [36]. The morphology of the photoanode strongly affects the photoelectrochemical activity of the DSSCs. The effect of TiO2 concentration in the mesoporous layer on the absorption is shown in Figure 2(c). Layers with different TiO2 concentrations (4%, 6%, 8%, and 10%) were formed and the representative UV-vis absorption was recorded. 10% TiO2 mesoporous layer resulted the highest possible absorption.

Different DSSCs were prepared using TiO2 mesoporous layers with different concentrations and N719 as a sensitizer. The - characteristics of these cells are shown in Figure 3(a). The overall efficiency () was calculated using the following equations: where is the radiation power incident on the cell, is short-circuit current density at zero voltage, is the open-circuit voltage at zero current density, is the maximum current density, is maximum voltage, and FF is the fill factor. The resulted values are summarized in Table 1. It is clearly shown that the efficiency increases with increasing the concentration of TiO2. The short-circuit current and open-circuit voltage of 10% TiO2 were much greater than the other concentrations. The 10% TiO2 concentration is the threshold of the mesoporous layer, where it gives the highest possible efficiency (2.23%). The efficiency of 10% TiO2 cell is comparable to what has been previously reported [37].

TiO2 wt (%) (mA·cm-2) (mA·cm-2) (V) (V)FF (%) (%)


Figure 3(b) shows the efficiency of the 10% TiO2 DSSC over a week. The power conversion efficiencies were 2.2%, 1.88%, 1.68%, and 1.15% for days 1, 2, 3, and 7, respectively (Table 2). was rapidly decreased even after the first day. After a week, about 50% degradation in the efficiency was observed. The deterioration of the PV performance is mainly due to leakage or solvent evaporation of the liquid electrolyte [38]. As soon as the cell is exposed to the air and sunlight, the electrolyte becomes unstable by producing iodate [39]. After a week, it was noted that the electrolyte evaporated. When extra amount of the electrolyte was readded, the efficiency recovered its initial values (SI 1-3). It was also reported that the degradation of the solar cell performance is due to the detachment of the dye from the TiO2 surface [40]. In our experiments, we found out that the amount of dyes adsorbed is very close to each other (-8 mol/cm2--8 mol/cm2). However, due to the different type of interactions, N719 has showed the highest possible efficiency under the used experimental conditions. The detachment can be noticed by significant rising of the internal resistance of the cell (will be discussed in the EIS section).

Days (mA·cm-2) (mA·cm-2) (V) (V)FF (%) (%)

FTIR studies were done to confirm the chemical structure of the extracted dyes. The natural dyes need to own specific functional groups in order to effectively adsorb on the TiO2 layers [41]. As shown in Figure 4, the chlorophyll dye extracted from spinach shows a peak at 3435 cm-1 due to the presence of the hydroxyl group. The peaks at 2923 cm-1 and 2854 cm-1 correspond to C–H stretching vibrations confirming the presence of aromatic C–H group. C=O stretching vibrations shows a peak at 1643 cm-1. The peak at 1056 cm-1 is attributed to the C–O–C stretching vibrations of acid and carbohydrate groups. C–N–C bending vibrations demonstrate a peak at 1385 cm-1. As observed from the functional groups of anthocyanin dye extracted from onion and red cabbage in Figure 3, the OH group among molecules indicates peaks at 3444 cm-1 and 3467 cm-1, respectively.

C=O stretching vibration shows a peak at 1639 cm-1. Stretching vibrations of C–O–C esters demonstrate peaks at 1037 cm-1 and 1033 cm-1, respectively. These functional groups confirm the presence of chlorophyll and anthocyanin [42].

Figure 5(a) represents the steady-state photoluminescence of the extracted dyes measured in parallel configuration of Aventus setup. The data was collected after 10 ms of acquisition time (in case of onion and red cabbage) and 1 ms for spinach. All data was averaged over 10 times of measurements. The spectra were fitted and normalized according to Gaussian distribution.

All extracted dyes exhibited a spectral shift from UV to visible region. For anthocyanin dye, it showed an emission peak at 565 nm, which is red-shifted by 15 nm compared to the extracted dye from red cabbage. On the other hand, the spinach dye emits at 485 nm which in prominent for an efficient photoexcitation process between absorption and emission.

The behavior of photoexcitation process in the three dyes was investigated with time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) as shown in Figure 5(b). It demonstrates a long lifetime for chlorophyll dye relative to anthocyanin dyes. Consequently, higher efficiency for chlorophyll-based solar cells compared to anthocyanin ones was observed.

- characteristic curves of DSSCs based on natural dyes are given in Figure 6(a). Chlorophyll-based cells showed a high short-circuit current of 0.41 mA/cm2 when compared to 0.24 mA/cm2 and 0.21 mA/cm2 for onion- and red cabbage-based cells, respectively (Table 3). The open-circuit voltage () of spinach, onion, and red cabbage was 0.59 V, 0.48 V, and 0.51 V, respectively. Furthermore, the degradation of DSSC based on spinach extract was investigated as shown in Figure 6(b). The photoelectric conversion efficiency of DSSC decreased from 0.17% to 0.08%. It can be observed that the PCE of natural dye-based cells is low compared to the ones based on N719. This is attributed to the poor interaction between the natural dyes with the semiconductor electrode, restricting the transport of electrons from the excited dye molecule to the TiO2 layers [43]. The extraction process of anthocyanin from plants is nonselective and yields pigment solutions with large amounts of byproducts such as sugars, sugar alcohols, organic acids, amino acids, and proteins [44]. These impurities cause the acceleration of anthocyanin degradation during storage. For spinach, the dyes extracted contains mainly chlorophyll and carotenoids (xanthophyll and carotene). Xanthophyll contains oxygen atoms, most frequently as hydroxyl and epoxide groups, which increase their polarity and are useful for the bindings on the TiO2 layer [45]. For this reason, the spinach extract presented a considerably large PCE of 0.17%, compared to 0.0647% and 0.060% for onion and red cabbage extracts, respectively. Spinach has the highest efficiency which is reasonable in comparison with its lifetime. These results are in agreement with the previously reported reports [22]. The photoelectrochemical parameters of the sensitized cell with spinach extract for a week are presented in Table 4.

Dye (mA·cm-2) (mA·cm-2) (V) (V)FF (%) (%)

Red cabbage0.210.1560.510.3246.610640.060145

Days (mA·cm-2) (mA·cm-2) (V) (V)FF (%) (%)


The interfacial kinetics and reactions of DSSC were investigated under dark conditions at 0 V by measuring the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The results of EIS are shown in Figure 7. Normally, the Nyquist plot of DSSC exhibits three frequency regions. The high-frequency region can be attributed to the charge transfer resistance at Pt/electrolyte interface. The middle-frequency region corresponds to the charge transfer recombination resistance at TiO2/dye/electrolyte interface. The low-frequency region is assigned to Warburg resistance and the diffusion properties of the redox couple (I3-/I-) in the electrolyte. The Nyquist plots of different dyes were fitted using a suitable circuit as shown in Figure 7. The big semicircles in the middle-frequency region indicated low charge recombination at the TiO2/dye/electrolyte interface. Natural dyes anchored to TiO2 showed a larger impedance compared to N719, which explains the higher performance of DSSC based on N719 compared to the extracted dyes. The DSSCs based on onion peel dye showed higher resistance to recombination than the other dyes. Larger radius indicated slower charge recombination rate [46].

Table 5 summarizes the fitting results. is the series resistance, is the resistance of electron transport in the counter electrode, and is the electron transfer resistance between the TiO2 film and electrolyte. The charge transfer resistances for N719, spinach, onion, and red cabbage were 79.76, 126.3, 371.3, and 430.6 Ω, respectively. The increase in charge transfer resistance refers to higher degradation and detachment rate [40, 47] which is in consistent with the cell efficiencies shown in Figures 3 and 6. Furthermore, it can be concluded that spinach dye shows high efficiency due to its longer charge carrier lifetime (20.98 ms, Table 5). The long lifetime implies a lower recombination rate and enhanced electron collection efficiency [48]. Accordingly, it is expected for spinach-based DSSC to obtain higher efficiency than N719. However, this is not the case, very likely due to the favorable bonding conditions of N719 complex with TiO2 compared to the natural dyes [49].

Dye (ohm) (ohm) (ohm) (Hz)n (ms)

Red cabbage25.4116.021430.635.484.486

4. Conclusions

The extraction, preparation, and photovoltaic performance of DSSCs based on natural sensitizers and N719 were optimized. Natural dyes can be easily and safely extracted by simple techniques. The UV-visible absorption and photoluminescence properties of the extracted dyes were studied. Among the dyes extracted, chlorophyll gave the longest lifetime and the highest possible efficiency. The DSSCs prepared with a photoelectrode thin film of 10% TiO2 showed the highest photoelectric conversion efficiency of 2.239%. The DSSC based on chlorophyll dye showed the highest performance among the natural extracted dyes with power conversion efficiency of 0.17%.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the submitted article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.


This work was partially supported by the Egyptian Ministry of Higher Education (STDF and ASRT).

Supplementary Materials

SI 1: - curves of (A) spinach-based DSSC and (B) N719-based DSSC after extended operation time and electrolyte reloading. SI 2: performance of spinach-based DSSC after extended operation time and electrolyte reloading. SI 3: performance of N719-based DSSC after extended operation time and electrolyte reloading. (Supplementary Materials)


  1. C. Dang, R. Labie, E. Simoen, and J. Poortmans, “Detailed structural and electrical characterization of plated crystalline silicon solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 184, pp. 57–66, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. F. Schindler, A. Fell, R. Müller et al., “Towards the efficiency limits of multicrystalline silicon solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 185, pp. 198–204, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. Stuckelberger, R. Biron, N. Wyrsch, F. J. Haug, and C. Ballif, “Review: progress in solar cells from hydrogenated amorphous silicon,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 76, pp. 1497–1523, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. F. Alta and E. S. Asu, “National Renewable Energy Labs (NREL) efficiency chart,” 2019, p. 2020, View at: Google Scholar
  5. B. O'Regan and M. Grätzel, “A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films,” Nature, vol. 353, no. 6346, pp. 737–740, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. Zhang, H. S. Tan, X. Guo, A. Facchetti, and H. Yan, “Material insights and challenges for non-fullerene organic solar cells based on small molecular acceptors,” Nature Energy, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 720–731, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Y. Chiba, A. Islam, Y. Watanabe, R. Komiya, N. Koide, and L. Han, “Dye-sensitized solar cells with conversion efficiency of 11.1%,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 45, no. 25, pp. L638–L640, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. Buscaino, C. Baiocchi, C. Barolo et al., “A mass spectrometric analysis of sensitizer solution used for dye-sensitized solar cell,” Inorganica Chimica Acta, vol. 361, no. 3, pp. 798–805, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. K. Kashif, M. Nippe, N. W. Duffy et al., “Stable dye-sensitized solar cell electrolytes based on cobalt(ii)/(iii) complexes of a hexadentate pyridyl ligand,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 52, no. 21, pp. 5527–5531, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. Sarwar, K. W. Ko, J. Han, C. H. Han, Y. Jun, and S. Hong, “Improved long-term stability of dye-sensitized solar cell by zeolite additive in electrolyte,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 245, pp. 526–530, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. Lv, D. Zheng, M. Ye et al., “Optimized porous rutile TiO2 nanorod arrays for enhancing the efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 6, no. 5, p. 1615, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. H. Zhang, Y. Wang, D. Yang et al., “Directly hydrothermal growth of single crystal Nb3O7(OH) nanorod film for high performance dye-sensitized solar cells,” Advanced Materials, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1598–1603, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Ye, D. Zheng, M. Lv, C. Chen, C. Lin, and Z. Lin, “Hierarchically structured nanotubes for highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells,” Advanced Materials, vol. 25, no. 22, pp. 3039–3044, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Y. Shi, C. Zhu, L. Wang, W. Li, K. K. Fung, and N. Wang, “Asymmetric ZnO panel-like hierarchical architectures with highly interconnected pathways for free-electron transport and photovoltaic improvements,” Chemistry - A European Journal, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 282–287, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. K.-N. Li, Y. F. Wang, Y. F. Xu, H. Y. Chen, C. Y. Su, and D. B. Kuang, “Macroporous SnO2 synthesized via a template-assisted reflux process for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 5105–5111, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Y. Huang, W. C. Chen, R. Ghadari et al., “Highly efficient ruthenium complexes with acetyl electron-acceptor unit for dye sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 396, pp. 559–565, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. K. L. Wu, S. T. Ho, C. C. Chou et al., “Engineering of osmium(II)-based light absorbers for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 51, no. 23, pp. 5642–5646, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. Leyrer, M. Rubilar, E. Morales, B. Pavez, E. Leal, and R. Hunter, “Factor optimization in the manufacturing process of dye-sensitized solar cells based on naturally extracted dye from a Maqui and blackberry mixture (Aristotelia chilensis and Rubus glaucus),” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 6136–6143, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. G. Calogero, J. Barichello, I. Citro et al., “Photoelectrochemical and spectrophotometric studies on dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) and stable modules (DSCMs) based on natural apocarotenoids pigments,” Dyes and Pigments, vol. 155, pp. 75–83, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. E. C. Prima, A. Nuruddin, B. Yuliarto, G. Kawamura, and A. Matsuda, “Combined spectroscopic and TDDFT study of single-double anthocyanins for application in dye-sensitized solar cells,” New Journal of Chemistry, vol. 42, no. 14, pp. 11616–11628, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Hao, J. Wu, Y. Huang, and J. Lin, “Natural dyes as photosensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cell,” Solar Energy, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 209–214, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. H. Chang, H. M. Wu, T. L. Chen, K. D. Huang, C. S. Jwo, and Y. J. Lo, “Dye-sensitized solar cell using natural dyes extracted from spinach and ipomoea,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 495, no. 2, pp. 606–610, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. G. R. A. Kumara, S. Kaneko, M. Okuya, B. Onwona-Agyeman, A. Konno, and K. Tennakone, “Shiso leaf pigments for dye-sensitized solid-state solar cell,” Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, vol. 90, no. 9, pp. 1220–1226, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. E. Yamazaki, M. Murayama, N. Nishikawa, N. Hashimoto, M. Shoyama, and O. Kurita, “Utilization of natural carotenoids as photosensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Solar Energy, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 512–516, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. N. M. Gómez-Ortíz, I. A. Vázquez-Maldonado, A. R. Pérez-Espadas, G. J. Mena-Rejón, J. A. Azamar-Barrios, and G. Oskam, “Dye-sensitized solar cells with natural dyes extracted from achiote seeds,” Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 40–44, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. P. M. Sirimanne, M. K. I. Senevirathna, E. V. A. Premalal, P. K. D. D. P. Pitigala, V. Sivakumar, and K. Tennakone, “Utilization of natural pigment extracted from pomegranate fruits as sensitizer in solid-state solar cells,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 177, no. 2–3, pp. 324–327, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. K. Wongcharee, V. Meeyoo, and S. Chavadej, “Dye-sensitized solar cell using natural dyes extracted from rosella and blue pea flowers,” Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 566–571, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. G. Calogero and G. Di Marco, “Red Sicilian orange and purple eggplant fruits as natural sensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 92, no. 11, pp. 1341–1346, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. Q. Dai and J. Rabani, “Photosensitization of nanocrystalline TiO2 films by anthocyanin dyes,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 148, no. 1–3, pp. 17–24, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. N. J. Cherepy, G. P. Smestad, M. Grätzel, and J. Z. Zhang, “Ultrafast electron injection: implications for a photoelectrochemical cell utilizing an anthocyanin dye-sensitized TiO2 nanocrystalline electrode,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 101, no. 45, pp. 9342–9351, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Furukawa, H. Iino, T. Iwamoto, K. Kukita, and S. Yamauchi, “Characteristics of dye-sensitized solar cells using natural dye,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 518, no. 2, pp. 526–529, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. Özbay Karakuş, İ. Koca, O. Er, and H. Çetin, “Dye ingredients and energy conversion efficiency at natural dye sensitized solar cells,” Optical Materials, vol. 66, pp. 552–558, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. R. Ramanarayanan, P. Nijisha, C. V. Niveditha, and S. Sindhu, “Natural dyes from red amaranth leaves as light-harvesting pigments for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 90, pp. 156–161, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Hosseinnezhad, R. Jafari, and K. Gharanjig, “Characterization of a green and environmentally friendly sensitizer for a low cost dye-sensitized solar cell,” Opto-Electronics Review, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 93–98, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. D. Joly, L. Pellejà, S. Narbey et al., “A robust organic dye for dye sensitized solar cells based on iodine/iodide electrolytes combining high efficiency and outstanding stability,” Scientific Reports, vol. 4, no. 1, article 4033, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. O. Adedokun, Y. K. Sanusi, and A. O. Awodugba, “Solvent dependent natural dye extraction and its sensitization effect for dye sensitized solar cells,” Optik, vol. 174, pp. 497–507, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. R. S. Ganesh, M. Navaneethan, S. Ponnusamy et al., “Enhanced photon collection of high surface area carbonate-doped mesoporous TiO2 nanospheres in dye sensitized solar cells,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 101, pp. 353–362, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. D. K. Hwang, B. Lee, and D. H. Kim, “Efficiency enhancement in solid dye-sensitized solar cell by three-dimensional photonic crystal,” RSC Advances, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 3017–3023, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. H. Tributsch, “Dye sensitization solar cells: a critical assessment of the learning curve,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 248, no. 13–14, pp. 1511–1530, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. Lohrasbi, P. Pattanapanishsawat, M. Isenberg, and S. S. C. Chuang, “Degradation study of dye-sensitized solar cells by electrochemical impedance and FTIR spectroscopy,” in 2013 IEEE Energytech, pp. 1–4, USA, July 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. H. Chang, M. J. Kao, T. L. Chen, C. H. Chen, K. C. Cho, and X. R. Lai, “Characterization of natural dye extracted from wormwood and purple cabbage for dye-sensitized solar cells,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2013, Article ID 159502, 8 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. D. Ganta, J. Jara, and R. Villanueva, “Dye-sensitized solar cells using aloe vera and cladode of cactus extracts as natural sensitizers,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 679, pp. 97–101, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. R. Kushwaha, P. Srivastava, and L. Bahadur, “Natural pigments from plants used as sensitizers for TiO2 based dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Energy, vol. 2013, Article ID 654953, 8 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. J. Chandrasekhar, M. C. Madhusudhan, and K. S. M. S. Raghavarao, “Extraction of anthocyanins from red cabbage and purification using adsorption,” Food and Bioproducts Processing, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 615–623, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. Rossi, F. Matteocci, A. Di Carlo, and C. Forni, “Chlorophylls and xanthophylls of crop plants as dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSC),” Journal of Plant Science and Phytopathology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 087–094, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. L. Wei, Y. Yang, Z. Zhu et al., “Effect of different donor groups in bis(6-methoxylpyridin-2-yl) substituted co-sensitizer on the performance of N719 sensitized solar cells,” RSC Advances, vol. 5, no. 117, pp. 96934–96944, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. B. Macht, M. Turrión, A. Barkschat, P. Salvador, K. Ellmer, and H. Tributsch, “Patterns of efficiency and degradation in dye sensitization solar cells measured with imaging techniques,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 163–173, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. D. Maheswari and P. Venkatachalam, “Performance enhancement in dye-sensitized solar cells with composite mixtures of TiO2 nanoparticles and TiO2 nanotubes,” Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 354–361, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. H. J. Ahn, S. Thogiti, J. M. Cho, B. Y. Jang, and J. H. Kim, “Comparison of triphenylamine based single and double branched organic dyes in dye-sensitized solar cells,” Electronic Materials Letters, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 822–827, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Ahmed M. Ammar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.