Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 7586790 |

Yuxin Ma, Ping Cui, Dan Zhan, Bing Gan, Youliang Ma, Ying Liang, "Enhancement of the Electrochemical Performance of LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 Cathode Material by Double-Layer Coating with Graphene Oxide and SnO2 for Lithium-Ion Batteries", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2019, Article ID 7586790, 10 pages, 2019.

Enhancement of the Electrochemical Performance of LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 Cathode Material by Double-Layer Coating with Graphene Oxide and SnO2 for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Academic Editor: Ungyu Paik
Received01 Dec 2018
Revised07 Feb 2019
Accepted17 Feb 2019
Published22 Apr 2019


The graphene oxide-coated SnO2-Li1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 (GO-SnO2-NCM) cathode material was successfully synthesized via a facile wet chemical method. The pristine NCM and GO-SnO2-NCM were characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The results showed that the double-coating layer did not destroy the NCM crystal structure, with multiple nano-SnO2 particles and GO uniformly covering the NCM surface. Electrochemical tests indicated that GO-SnO2-NCM exhibited excellent cycling performance, with 90.7% capacity retention at 1 C after 100 cycles, which was higher than 74.3% for the pristine NCM at the same cycle. The rate capability showed that the double-coating layer enhanced surface electronic–ionic transport. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy results confirmed that the GO-SnO2-coating layer effectively suppressed the increased electrode polarization and charge transfer resistance during cycling.

1. Introduction

Current methods for addressing the global energy crisis and serious climate change issues require the development of sustainable and high-performance storage equipment, such as lithium-ion batteries [1], sodium–sulfur batteries [2], supercapacitors [3], solar cells [4], and fuel cells [5]. Advanced lithium-ion batteries have been widely used as power sources in battery electric vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), and parallel HEVs because of their advantages of high energy density, high power capability, low cost, long life cycle, and environmental friendliness [68]. Lithium-ion batteries are mainly composed of cathodes, anodes, and electrolytes. Cathode materials play a significant role in determining battery performance. As the cathode material for the first generation of lithium-ion batteries, LiCoO2 has the advantages of easy synthesis, excellent cycling stability, and high rate capability [9]. Only half of the theoretical capacity can be utilized because of structure degradation when LiCoO2cathode is charged at 4.2 V. Additionally, its high cost, poor thermal stability, and toxicity limit the large-scale application of LiCoO2 commercially. LiNiO2 [10] is considered as a second-generation commercial lithium-ion battery owing to high power, energy density, low cost, and high discharge capacity; however, it is difficult to synthesize LiNiO2 because of the chemical instability of Ni3+ ions. LiMn2O4 [11] provides high thermal stability and high voltage and has a low cost; it exhibits poor performance at high temperatures.

Recently, layered LiNi1-x-yCoxMnyO2 material has earned much interest because it combines the merits of LiCoO2, LiNiO2, and LiMn2O4 and overcomes certain shortcomings associated with each material. The amount of Ni represents the specific capacity and an increase in Ni content results in the deterioration of electrochemical performance owing to the cation mixing. Typically, LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 is considered a promising cathode material that exhibits high discharge capacity, has low cost, and represents a moderate voltage platform. The electrochemical inactivity of tetravalent manganese plays a stabilizing role in preventing capacity fading induced by Mn dissolution. The cobalt reduces cation mixing and prohibits charge forming in the structure of the cathode material during cycling [12]. In particular, there are several substantial issues such as inevitable capacity degradation, poor rate capability, and bad cyclability that originate from the severed side reaction between the electrode and electrolyte.

Many strategies have been explored to reduce the side reaction and improve electrochemical performance, particularly the rate capability and cycle performance of cathode materials. Surface modification is one of the most facile and practical approaches, which is capable of effectively suppressing solid electrolyte interphase layer growth and maintaining the surface integrity of cathode materials. Presently, the most common coating materials include metal oxides such as Nb2O5 [13], Al2O3 [14], ZrO2 [15], and TiO2 [16] and metal phosphates such as Li3PO4 [17] and AlPO4 [18], which have been successfully applied on the surface of NCM to improve the electrochemical performance. Most of the aforementioned coating layers are inactive substances that only function as protective shells, which will result in polarization increasing and capacity decreasing. Another approach to enhance electrochemical performance of the NCM cathode material focused on reducing both NCM and coating layers on nanoparticles. SnO2 can react with Li reversibly by a conversion reaction and has been used to coat on the NCM surface [19].

GO-coated cathode materials were used to improve electrochemical performance based on their superior electronic conductivity and large surface area [20, 21]. In this study, a double-coating layer structure including an inner SnO2 nanosize and an outer GO layer was introduced to coat the NCM cathode material. The inner SnO2 not only promoted lithium-ion diffusivities but also suppressed the side reaction between electrode and electrolyte; the outer GO layer increased the electronic conductivity on the surface of the NCM. The pristine NCM was modified with SnO2 and GO, with electrochemical results revealing that the GO-SnO2 double-coating layer on the surface of the NCM cathode material exhibited high rate capability and long-term cyclability when compared with pristine NCM powders. A detailed comparison of the performance of NCM and the GO-SnO2-NCM composite was performed.

2. Experimental

2.1. NCM Synthesis

NCM was synthesized via a sol–gel citric acid-assisted method. Lithium acetate, nickel acetate, cobalt acetate, and manganese acetate were chosen as the starting materials, with a stoichiometric ratio of Li(Ni+Co+Mn)(=1.05 : 1) dissolved in ethyl alcohol. Excess 5% Li+ was added to supplement the loss, which occurred at high temperatures. Citric acid solution was added dropwise into the above solution with vigorous stirring. The molar ratio of metal ions to citric acid was 1 : 1. The mixture was evaporated at 80°C with continuous stirring until a gel formed; the gel was frozen at -80°C in a cryogenic refrigerator for 12 h, followed by a freeze-drying for 24 h to acquire the precursor. The precursor was heated at 450°C in air for 5 h, with subsequent calcinations at 900°C for 12 h to obtain the pristine NCM.

2.2. Synthesis of GO-SnO2-NCM

GO was produced via the modified Hummers method [22, 23]. GO-coated SnO2-NCM material was prepared via a facile wet chemical method. First, SnCl4∙5H2O was added into 100 mL ethanol using ultrasonic treatment for 1 h; second, 1 g NCM cathode material was dispersed into the above solution and stirring for 2 h; third, an adequate amount of NH3∙H2O was induced to form a precipitate. The resulting mixture was filtered with deionized water/ethanol (1 : 1 ) three times and dried for 12 h at 80°C. The dried powder was heat-treated in a furnace at 500°C for 6 h in air atmosphere. GO (0.03 g) was immersed into 50 mL of anhydrous ethanol and sonicated for 2 h to ensure complete dispersal. SnO2-NCM was added in the above solution with constant stirring, and the mixture was heated at 80°C until the ethanol was completely evaporated. The powder was dried at 80°C for 4 h in a vacuum to obtain GO-SnO2-NCM materials.

2.3. Material Characterization

The crystal structure was analyzed via X-ray diffraction (D8 advance, Bruker) with Cu-Kα radiation (40 kV, 40 mA) in the 2θ range of 10°–80° at a scan rate of 10°/min. The particle size, surface morphologies, and elemental composition of the samples were analyzed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM, S-4800, Hitachi) equipped with an energy-dispersive spectroscope (EDS). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Talos F200S, FEI) was used to estimate the thickness coated on the surface of the cathode powders. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB 250Xi, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was utilized to evaluate the ion valence states in the metal oxide.

2.4. Electrochemical Measurements

The electrochemical properties of pristine NCM and GO-SnO2-modified NCM were measured using a CR2032 coin cell. The electrodes were prepared by mixing the active material with acetylene black and polyvinylidene fluoride at a mass ratio of 80 : 10 : 10 in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone to obtain a slurry, which was coated onto a cleaned and polished aluminum foil and then dried at 80°C for 10 h in a vacuum oven. The cells were assembled in an argon-filled glove box, in which water and oxygen levels were maintained below 1 ppm. LiPF6 (1 M) was dissolved in EC:DMC (1 : 1 %) as the electrolyte. The cells consist of a prepared cathode, with lithium metal as an anode and a polypropylene microporous film (Celgard 2400) as the separator. A galvanostatic change–discharge test was performed at C () rates of 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 in the voltage range of 2.5–4.3 V at 25°C. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tests were performed on an Autolab PGSTAT 302N at a frequency range of 0.01 Hz to 100 kHz with a potential perturbation of 5 mV.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of the pristine NCM and GO-SnO2-NCM. It can be seen that a sharp peak at 11° corresponds to complete oxidation of graphite (GO) [24]. The synthesized materials exhibited similar XRD patterns with no impurity phase detected, and these patterns could be indexed to the hexagonal -NaFeO2 structure with a space group of Rm. The clear splitting of peaks (006)/(102) and (108)/(110) near 38° and 65°, respectively, exhibits a perfect layered structure [25]. The diffraction peaks of the material show no significant difference before or after coating, because the coated amount was below the election limit of the instrument or the nanoscale size feature of the low-content GO-SnO2 content [26]. The ionic radius of Ni2+ () is similar to Li+ (), and portions of Ni2+ might occupy the 3a site, which indicates cation mixing. The intensity of is a sensitivity parameter focused on the degree of cation mixing of the materials. When the ratio of , the degree of cation mixing is small [27]. The intensity ratio of for NCM and the GO-SnO2-NCM samples was calculated as 1.28 and 1.35, respectively, which displays that the sample possessed a well-layered structure with a low degree of cation mixing. The lattice parameter constants for these materials are shown in Table 1. Additionally, a value of c/a above 4.9 implies that the material exhibits a well-defined layered structure [28]. It was clear that the as-synthesized GO-SnO2-NCM increased the ordering degree of the layered structure and decreased the cation mixing in all samples.

Samplea (Å)c (Å)c/a


The morphologies of NCM and GO-SnO2-NCM were observed via SEM. Figure 2(a) shows that pristine NCM displayed homogeneous primary particles of the order of a few hundred nanometers, with few agglomerations. From the GO-SnO2-NCM image (Figure 2(b)), the nanosize SnO2-coated NCM particles were covered with a transparent GO sheet. The uniform GO-SnO2-NCM structures can be ascribed to the simple chemical mixing method. Moreover, ultrasonication and continuous stirring were effective in distributing SnO2-NCM throughout the GO sheets.

To further study the microstructure of the material, high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) was used to characterize results (Figure 3). Figure 3(a) shows that pristine NCM presented fine crystallinity with an obvious lattice fringe extending to the particle boundary. HRTEM images display that the lattice fringe was about 0.47 nm, which corresponded to the (003) lattice plane of NCM. The outer coating layer, with a thickness of approximately 15 nm, belongs to the GO layer; the inner coating layer, with a thickness of approximately 5–10 nm, represents the SnO2 layer, as shown in Figure 3(b). The SnO2 particles with good electrical conductivity can effectively increase the conductivity of the samples. The GO sheets were not only covered with SnO2 but also connected with NCM, which aids in improving material conductivity. Therefore, it could be identified that the double-coated layer not only increased the contact areas between electrode and electrolyte but also accelerated the electron transport speed of Li+ ions.

EDS was used to confirm the elemental distribution of the GO-SnO2-coated layer on the surface of NCM (Figure 4). Results showed that the Sn element from SnO2 and the C from GO were uniformly distributed on the NCM surface, which indicates that SnO2 and GO were coated successfully on the NCM surface via coprecipitation and a simple chemical approach, respectively.

The modification of NCM with GO and SnO2 can lead to the transition metals changing their oxidation states and issue in low discharge capacity and poor cycling performance. To confirm the valence state of the transition metal in the layered composite material, XPS analysis of GO-SnO2-NCM was performed (Figure 5) and revealed that the electron-binding energies of Ni2p1/2 and Ni2p3/2 appeared at 872.6 and 855.6 eV, which implied that the Ni ion maintained its high oxidation state [29]. The satellite peak with a binding energy at 861.2 eV can be attributed to the multiple splitting of the nickel oxide energy levels [30]. The corresponding results indicated that the ionic radius of Ni2+ was close to that of Li+; therefore, Ni2+ was easily located with regard to Li+, which agreed with the XRD results. Additionally, peaks with binding energies of 780.1 and 642.5 eV were assigned to Co2p3/2 and Mn2p3/2, which accorded with previous reports [31]. These results suggested that the valence state of Co and Mn after coating remained trivalent and tetravalent, respectively. Two major peaks at 487.2 and 495.6 eV emerged in the GO-SnO2-NCM sample, which corresponded to the Sn3d5/2 and Sn3d3/2 peaks and indicated the existence of an SnO2-coating layer on the samples and the tetravalent status of Sn [32]. The C1s spectra of the materials were deconvoluted into three main peaks. These peaks having binding energies of 288.5, 286.6, and 285.6 eV were ascribed to a carboxyl group (C=O), an epoxide group (–C–O–C), and a hydroxyl group (C–OH), respectively [33]. These results suggested that the GO-SnO2-coating layer on the surface of NCM did not change the valence state of the transition metal.

The initial charge–discharge curves of NCM and GO-SnO2-NCM at 0.1 C over the potential range of 2.5–4.3 V are shown in Figure 6. All charge–discharge curves exhibited typical potential plateaus (3.6–3.8 V) associated with layered NCM, which was attributed to the Ni2+/Ni3+ redox process [34]. For the NCM and GO-SnO2-NCM composite, the charge and discharge capacities were 190.7/172.6 mAh g−1 and 210.3/197.2 mAh g−1, respectively. The coulombic efficiency of coated NCM was 94%, which exceeded that of the pristine sample. This phenomenon indicates that the degree of cell polarization decreased. The GO-SnO2-coating layer protected the surface of cathode particles from the liquid electrolyte and unwanted side reactions.

Figure 7(a) shows the cycle performance of the pristine NCM and GO-SnO2-NCM materials at a constant current of 0.2 C and from 2.5 to 4.3 V at room temperature. The initial discharge capacity of the pristine NCM was 165.8 mAh g−1, which sharply decreased to 140.3 mAh g−1 after 100 cycles, with capacity retention of 84.6%. However, GO-SnO2-NCM not only increased the initial discharge capacity but also showed a high capacity retention of 93.5% after 100 cycles. These results indicated that the SnO2-coating layer along with a GO-coating layer on the surface of NCM enhanced cycling stability and capacity retention.

To verify the cycling performance and capacity retention at high rates, the pristine NCM and GO-SnO2-NCM cells were tested with a constant current density of 1 C between 2.5 and 4.3 V. After 100 charge–discharge cycles, the specific discharge capacity of the pristine NCM was 115.1 mAh g−1, with a retention of 74.3% of its initial capacity (Figure 7(b)). However, the specific discharge capacity of GO-SnO2-NCM was 158.1 mAh g−1, which retained around 90.7% of the initial discharge capacity. The significant enhancement in the cycling performance and capacity retention of GO-SnO2-NCM at 1 C can be ascribed to the following factors. First, the GO framework played a huge role in improving electrode conductivity during the process of charge transfer. Second, the nanosized SnO2 prevented the cathode material from dissolution and suppressed interfacial impedance and electrode polarization; the results could be verified by subsequent EIS test. Third, the GO-SnO2 double-coating layer suppressed the volume change and agglomeration during the cycling process.

The rate capabilities of NCM and GO-SnO2-NCM samples were investigated. The charge–discharge processes were measured at a rate of 0.2 C, increased to 5 C step-wise, before finally returning to 0.2 C (Figure 8). Both the discharge capacity of NCM and that of GO-SnO2-NCM decreased along with the increase in the current rate. The GO-SnO2-NCM samples distinctly exhibited improvement of discharge capacities as compared with the pristine samples at high rates, with the former releasing 119.3 mAh g−1 under a high current rate of 5 C, while the pristine NCM remained at 90.8 mAh g−1. Additionally, after cycling again at the low current rate of 0.2 C, the GO-SnO2-NCM material maintained a higher capacity of 181.5 mAh g−1 than that of pristine NCM that had a capacity of 160.8 mAh g−1. There are two main factors that affect the rate capacity of GO-SnO2-NCM. The first factor is that the large number of NCM nanoparticles distributed within SnO2 can shorten the electron transport path as well as strengthen the volume structure during the lithium-ion insertion/extraction process. The second factor is that GO introduced into the cathode material improved the reaction kinetics by increasing the electrical conductivity owing to the GO two-dimensional network. These results suggested strongly that the double-coating layer is a promising method to enhance the rate performance of NCM.

To further study the kinetic differences between pristine NCM and GO-SnO2-NCM, EIS measurements were performed after 100 discharge cycles. Results showed that the EIS curves comprised a single semicircle in the high-to medium-frequency region and revealed an inclined line in the low-frequency region (Figure 9). Generally, an intercept at the axis in the high-frequency region corresponded to the solution resistance (). The single semicircle represented the high-to-medium-frequency semicircle, with the frequency representing the charge-transfer resistance () at the electrode-electrolyte interface [35]. The low-frequency oblique line is related to the lithium-ion diffusion process in the electrode materials, as introduced by Warburg impedance () [36]. The equivalent circuit model is shown in Figure 9(b). The values of and were obtained by fitting with ZView software.

In particular, the value of the GO-SnO2-coated sample increased to 176 Ω, which was smaller than 362 Ω for the pristine material, after 100 cycles, revealing that the double-coated material exhibited better electrochemical performance than the bare NCM did. This indicated that the GO-SnO2 double-coating layer effectively increased the electrical conductivity and suppressed increases of charge transfer resistance.

The low-frequency oblique line is related to the lithium-ion diffusion process in the electrode materials. The lithium-ion diffusion coefficients () can be evaluated using the following equations [37, 38]; the explanation of symbols is shown in Table 2:


The gas constant 8.134 Jmol−1 K−1The charger transfer resistance
The absolute temperature 298.15 KWarburg factor
The surface area of the electrodeThe solution resistance
The number of elections per Molecule during oxidizationThe concentration of lithium ions in the material
The Faraday constant 96486 C mol−1The angular frequency

The linear relationship between and (square root of the frequency) is in the low-frequency region (Figure 10). Compared to the pristine sample with the lithium-ion diffusion coefficient of , the GO-SnO2-NCM material exhibited a greatly enhanced lithium-ion diffusion coefficient (). This can be ascribed to the following two factors: first, the SnO2-coating layer broadened Li+ insertion/deinsertion during the charge–discharge process and GO with a large surface area increased the content of the unbound cathode material; second, GO-SnO2 also enhanced the electrical conductivity and facilitated electrolyte movement through the cathode. Therefore, GO-SnO2-NCM substantially increased the Li+ diffusion coefficient when compared to pristine materials.

4. Conclusions

GO-coated SnO2-NCM cathode materials were successfully synthesized via a wet chemical method, and pristine NCM was prepared via a citric acid-assisted sol–gel method. The double-coating layer was placed on the NCM surface instead of entering into the crystal lattice. In comparison with pristine NCM, GO-SnO2-NCM showed a much higher discharge capacity, higher rate capability, and higher cycling performance. These improvements are mainly attributed to the GO-SnO2-coating layer, which can not only protect from HF attacks and electrolyte decomposition but also promote Li+ conductivity. Therefore, the double-coating layer represents an effective method to overcome the shortcoming of NCM material and a promising candidate for applications in EVs and HEVs.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


This work was financially supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51378183), the Research Program of Hubei Provincial Department of Education (T201215), and the Petroleum and Chemical Industry Federation Program of China (Grant Nos. 20171204, 20170902).


  1. K. T. Nam, D. W. Kim, P. J. Yoo et al., “Virus-enabled synthesis and assembly of nanowires for lithium ion battery electrodes,” Science, vol. 312, no. 5775, pp. 885–888, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. W. Park, J. H. Ahn, H. S. Ryu, K. W. Kim, and H. J. Ahn, “Room-temperature solid-state sodium/sulfur battery,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. A123–A125, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. V. Paladini, T. Donateo, A. de Risi, and D. Laforgia, “Super-capacitors fuel-cell hybrid electric vehicle optimization and control strategy development,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 3001–3008, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J.-H. Yum, P. Chen, M. Grätzel, and M. . K. Nazeeruddin, “Recent developments in solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells,” ChemSusChem, vol. 1, no. 8-9, pp. 699–707, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. W. C. Oh and J. Y. Park, “Hydrogen gas generation of metal-activated carbon for fuel cells,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 13, pp. 578–584, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  6. J. M. Tarascon and M. Armand, “Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries,” Nature, vol. 414, no. 6861, pp. 359–367, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. Patil, V. Patil, D. Wook Shin, J.-W. Choi, D.-S. Paik, and S.-J. Yoon, “Issue and challenges facing rechargeable thin film lithium batteries,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 43, no. 8-9, pp. 1913–1942, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. T. Eren, N. Atar, M. L. Yola, H. Karimi-Maleh, A. T. Çolak, and A. Olgun, “Facile and green fabrication of silver nanoparticles on a polyoxometalate for Li-ion battery,” Ionics, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 2193–2199, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Y. Takahashi, S. Tode, A. Kinoshita, H. Fujimoto, I. Nakane, and S. Fujitani, “Development of lithium-ion batteries with a LiCoO2 cathode toward high capacity by elevating charging potential,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 155, no. 7, pp. A537–A541, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. W. Moses, H. G. G. Flores, J. G. Kim, and M. A. Langell, “Surface properties of LiCoO2, LiNiO2 and LiNi1–xCoxO2,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 253, no. 10, pp. 4782–4791, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. Eftekhari, “On the fractal study of LiMn2O4 electrode surface,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 48, no. 19, pp. 2831–2839, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. G. Singh, A. Sil, S. Ghosh, and A. Panwar, “Effect of citric acid content on synthesis of LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 and its electrochemical characteristics,” Ceramics International, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1831–1836, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Uchida, N. Zettsu, K. Hirata, K. Kami, and K. Teshima, “High-voltage capabilities of ultra-thin Nb2O5 nanosheet coated LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 cathodes,” RSC Advances, vol. 6, no. 72, pp. 67514–67519, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. K. Araki, N. Taguchi, H. Sakaebe, K. Tatsumi, and Z. Ogumi, “Electrochemical properties of LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 cathode material modified by coating with Al2O3 nanoparticles,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 269, pp. 236–243, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. K. Hu, G. H. Cheng, M. Y. Cheng, B. J. Hwang, and R. Santhanam, “Cycle life improvement of ZrO2-coated spherical LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 cathode material for lithium ion batteries,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 188, no. 2, pp. 564–569, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. Li, M. Fan, X. He, R. Zhao, C. Jiange, and C. Wan, “TiO2 coating of LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 cathode materials for Li-ion batteries,” Ionics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 215–218, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. W. Lee, M. S. Kim, J. H. Jeong et al., “Li3PO4 surface coating on Ni-rich LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2 by a citric acid assisted sol-gel method: improved thermal stability and high-voltage performance,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 360, pp. 206–214, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. L. Li, Y. Cao, H. Zheng, and C. Feng, “AlPO4 coated LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 for high performance cathode material in lithium batteries,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1925–1930, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Z. M. Luo, Y. G. Sun, and H. Y. Liu, “Electrochemical performance of a nano SnO2-modified LiNi1/3CO1/3Mn1/3O2 cathode material,” Chinese Chemical Letters, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1403–1408, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. C. Xu, L. Li, F. Qiu et al., “Graphene oxide assisted facile hydrothermal synthesis of LiMn0.6Fe0.4PO4 nanoparticles as cathode material for lithium ion battery,” Journal of Energy Chemistry, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 397–402, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. F. Yu, L. Zhang, L. Lai et al., “High electrochemical performance of LiFePO4 cathode material via in-situ microwave exfoliated graphene oxide,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 151, pp. 240–248, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. W. S. Hummers Jr. and R. E. Offeman, “Preparation of graphitic oxide,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 80, no. 6, p. 1339, 1958. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. N. I. Kovtyukhova, P. J. Ollivier, B. R. Martin et al., “Layer-by-layer assembly of ultrathin composite films from micron-sized graphite oxide sheets and polycations,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 771–778, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Y. Ji, Q. Liu, M. Cheng et al., “Facile synthesis of reduced graphene oxide nanosheets by a sodium diphenylamine sulfonate reduction process and its electrochemical property,” Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 3811–3816, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. T. Ohzuku, A. Ueda, and M. Nagayama, “Electrochemistry and structural chemistry of LiNiO2 (R3m) for 4 volt secondary lithium cells,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 140, no. 7, pp. 1862–1870, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. S. Jan, S. Nurgul, X. Shi, H. Xia, and H. Pang, “Improvement of electrochemical performance of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 cathode material by graphene nanosheets modification,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 149, pp. 86–93, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. K. M. Shaju, G. V. Subba Rao, and B. V. R. Chowdari, “Performance of layered Li(Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3)O2 as cathode for Li-ion batteries,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 145–151, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. M. A. Hashem, A. E. Abdel-Ghany, A. E. Eid et al., “Study of the surface modification of LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 cathode material for lithium ion battery,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 196, no. 20, pp. 8632–8637, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. P. Manikandan and P. Periasamy, “Novel mixed hydroxy-carbonate precursor assisted synthetic technique for LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 cathode materials,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 50, pp. 132–140, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. K. Amine, H. Tukamoto, H. Yasuda, and Y. Fujita, “A new three-volt spinel Li1+xMn1.5O4 for secondary lithium batteries,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 143, no. 5, pp. 1607–1613, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. D. Wang, X. Li, Z. Wang et al., “Improved high voltage electrochemical performance of Li2ZrO3-coated LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 cathode material,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 647, pp. 612–619, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. X. Chen, D. Chu, L. Wang et al., “One-step synthesis of novel hierarchical flower-like SnO2 nanostructures with enhanced photocatalytic activity,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 729, pp. 710–715, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Q. Liang, L. Zhang, M. Cai et al., “Preparation and charaterization of Pt/functionalized graphene and its electrocatalysis for methanol oxidation,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 111, pp. 275–283, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. S. Yang, X. Wang, X. Yang et al., “Determination of the chemical diffusion coefficient of lithium ions in spherical Li[Ni0.5Mn0.3Co0.2]O2,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 66, pp. 88–93, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. Q. Wang, N. Tian, K. Xu et al., “A facile method of improving the high rate cycling performance of LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 cathode material,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 686, pp. 267–272, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. S. J. Shi, J. P. Tu, Y. Y. Tang, Y. Q. Zhang, X. L. Wang, and C. D. Gu, “Preparation and characterization of macroporous Li1.2Mn0.54Ni0.13Co0.13O2 cathode material for lithium-ion batteries via aerogel template,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 240, pp. 140–148, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. N. Takami, A. Satoh, M. Hara, and T. Ohsaki, “Structural and kinetic characterization of lithium intercalation into carbon anodes for secondary lithium batteries,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 371–379, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. J. Bard and L. R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods, Wiley, 2nd edition, 2001.

Copyright © 2019 Yuxin Ma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.