Study of Progress on Nanocrystalline Cellulose and Natural Fiber Reinforcement Biocomposites

Aravind, T.; Ashraf, Mohd. Shaikhul; A. S., Rajesh; Ahalya, N.; Rawat, Mahavir Singh; Uma, B.; Sharma, Rajneesh; Subbiah, Ram; Sida, SisayKetema

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6519480

Journal of Nanomaterials

On this page

Abstract Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Green Nanometal Oxides for Environmental and Biomedical Applications

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 6519480 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6519480

Study of Progress on Nanocrystalline Cellulose and Natural Fiber Reinforcement Biocomposites

T. Aravind,¹Mohd. Shaikhul Ashraf,²Rajesh A. S.,³N. Ahalya,⁴Mahavir Singh Rawat,⁵B. Uma,⁶Rajneesh Sharma,⁷Ram Subbiah,⁸and SisayKetema Sida⁹

Academic Editor: Arpita Roy

Received09 Apr 2022

Revised07 Jun 2022

Accepted27 Jun 2022

Published04 Oct 2022

Abstract

Cellulosic biomass hydrolysis yields a nanoscale substance known as nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC). Gel, liquid, or powder is adaptable to a variety of uses. Nanocrystalline cellulose has unique renewability, biodegradability, and mechanical and physicochemical qualities, and abundance boosts the material’s mechanical strength by many orders of magnitude when introduced into the material matrix (polymer, ceramic, or metal). Nanocrystalline cellulose is not related with any serious environmental issues because it is a natural substance. The progress of this biomaterial as a green and renewable biomaterial for the fabrication of lightweight and biodegradable composite materials gives further impetus. The current aim of nanocrystalline cellulose research is to optimise nanocrystalline cellulose characteristics for dispersion in hydrophilic and hydrophilic media. To assess the nanocrystalline cellulose reinforcing, antibacterial, stability, hydrophilicity, and biodegradability, imaging methods and protocols in complicated matrices will need to be developed. This review includes a discussion on nanocrystalline cellulose biocomposites.

1. Introduction about Nanocrystalline Cellulose

Current interest in cellulose-based materials has increased in demand for renewable and environmental considerations [1]. Natural cellulose fibers have exceptional strength and durability benefits, making them unique in various polymer matrices for reinforcement [2]. One of these agricultural wastes is rice straw consisting of three components: cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. The organic fiber is cellulose and hemicellulose, whereas the cell wall is lignin. Cellulose constitutes approximately 50% to 1/4 of the plant tissues and is a significant component of all plant materials; photosynthesis is continuously supplied [3]. It is environmentally friendly and renewable, has low density, has low surfaces, and contains hydroxyl surface bands that enable strong oxygen bonds in the single or close chains [4]. Cellulose is the world’s largest natural biopolymer. Figure 1 shows hierarchical patterns for cellulose microphones, nanofibers and nanocrystals, and transmission electron micrographs of cellulose microphones.

In the natural world, an essential element is the connection of nanocellulose with hydrogen to other polymer matrices, making cells from highly organized structures that hold chains firmly together and form highly tense microfibrils [9, 10]. Nanocellulose, its unique characteristics, has enhanced mechanical and heat properties such as a layer, mould, and latex [11, 12] by making it an exciting and safe material for polymer strengthening. Various reviews discussed the possible use of composite compounds by cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibrils [13, 14]. Cellulose has been a typical biomass with a broad spectrum of applications due to sharply growing demands of renewability and sustainability in recent years. During the last decades, particularly, nanocrystalline cellulose has deliberated high surface area, low density, and good mechanical strength, biodegradability, and nontolerable nanostructure characteristics. The nanocrystalline cellulose is now booming in numerous industries and daily applications, including drug excipients, polymers, reinforcement of adherents, and personal care products like hair conditioners and shampoos.

Figure 2 shows the amorphous cellulose chain area removed from cells of a rod structure by acid hydrolysis. Highly intensified scientific research is carried on nanometric cellulose because it is highly available and renovated. They also apply in different fields with their attractive mechanical and chemical characteristics. Both cellulose and nanometric fillers are associated with nanometric cellulose [16]. Nanocellulose is a biological material with the strength of tensile material similar to steel or Kevlar, a high specific surface area of low densities, and good biodegradability. Because of this, nanocellulose is being investigated to be used in some different equipment and sizes, including packaging materials, biomedical equipment, adhesives, electronic, and electroplating [17–25]. In the material sciences, the cellulose-nanofibers attract a considerable number. Due to their magnetic properties (for example, large areas (100 m² g^-1)), augmented volume-to-volume proportions of 100, and strong crystallinity, it has low density, lightweight mechanical characteristics, and high-poric mesh arrangement compared with other business fibers [26]. They are also easy to use at cheap rates, as they use less energy during combustion and can be easily recycled [27], in addition to their intrinsic properties and ecologically sodium fibers.

The chemical and mechanical processes are used to extract natural fibers of nanosizes. Hydrolysis chemical is widely used for the extraction of nanocrystalline cellulose. The nanocrystalline celluloses become tremendously interested in material science studies because of its nanometric, high crystallinity, high appearance rates, high mechanical resistance, low density, easy access, and high abundance [28, 29]. The addition of nanocrystalline celluloses has also been reported to decrease starch film permeability by water vapour. It is easy to the morphology of nitric cell fluid, which increases starch-based packaging’s slow-down tortuosity and thus improves its suitability for food packing application [30]. The cellulose molecular chains have inter- and intramolecular hydrogen connecting networks as shown in Figure 3.

Students have been highly interested in nanocellulose as a new nanobiomaterial. The nanocrystalline cellulose has a high aspect ratio and a high specific surface area [32]. Furthermore, a highly crystalline area in the single molecular structure makes nanocrystalline celluloses mechanically and accessibly available in food packaging [33]. As a result of its strong hydrogen bonding and its high surface area, the nanocrystalline cellulose is integrated with the organic polymer structures as a packaging material to handle protein defects [34]. Research shows that the alginate film and water barrier [35] are greatly affected by nanocrystalline cellulose.

Cellulose is the primary renewable polymer in the world and is used as nanofiller for PBS. It is often present in plants, tunicates, algae, and bacteria. It consists of a vast molecular polymer composed of multiple β-1,4 glucose units and hydroxyl groups on the side of the chain. Acid hydrolysis is the most common nanocrystalline cellulose extraction technique that breaks down cellulose amorphous areas and crystallises them [36]. Figure 4 shows the structure of the plant cell wall.

In recent years, research has been undertaken intensively on innovative materials filled with nanocellulose [38]. It is because of nanocellulose’s exceptional properties. Cellulose is inherently produced from large plant natural sources, such as rice [39, 40] wood, cotton, and biomash [41]. The algae and certain bacteria of cellulose are also synthesized. Marine animal tunics are other exciting sources of cellulose. In many applications, cellulose composites may be used. The adverse effects reduce on polymer composites. For years, it is still known that cellulose has surprised scientists such as automotive, packaging, electronics, and sport [42–44]. The structural structure and cellulose reduction and nonreturn in the planer form are illustrated in Figure 5.

Cellulose is most widely discovered as an important natural material for various applications. Mainly for the production of paper, door panels, seat backs, headliners, packing trays, dashboards, mobile covers, packaging, sports cars or liner, etc., biobased materials are used [46–49].

2. Different Properties of Nanocrystalline Cellulose

The nanocrystalline cellulose meaning covers the strongest and rigid natural market materials [50], such as the resistance of high voltages, high hardness, large surfaces [51], low densities, high-load ratio, hydroxyl reactive clusters’ variable surface characteristics, and other chemicals, with electrical, mechanical, thermal, and optical characteristics.

2.1. Chemical Properties

Under climatic conditions, age, and degradation process, the natural fiber is structured and chemical. The chemical components spreading across cell walls are the primary and secondary wall layers. Each chemical plant varies from one plant to the next and is presented in Table 1 [52]. Each plant cell wall is primarily charging cellulose. The polymerization of 30-36 β-1 chains and 4 correlated glucose units is a rigid and insoluble crystalline material around cell walls. Hemicelluloses also include plant polymers and acids such as xyloglucans, xylenes, glucomannans, and galactoglucans. Therefore, hydrogen uses to coordinate the cellulose fibrils and gravel them into a matrix of hemicelluloses and lignin’s with high molecular weight pectin molecules. In between cellulose and lignin in some walls, the hemicelluloses act as a clamp [53]. Lignin is also a connecting agent that enhances cellulose strength [54].

Cellulose is a biomass-derived biopolymer that is sustainable, abundant, and natural. The cellulose structure is arranged in fibrils with a lignin and hemicellulose matrix surrounding it [56]. It is the classic example for the plant of polymer plants of a renewable and biodegradable fabric polymer [57]. According to researchers, the overall production of the biopolymer is forecast to exceed € 7.5/1010 tonnes per year. However, only about 6 to 109 tonnes are processed in the paper chemical, fabric, material, and chemicals [58]. Figure 6 shows the biodegradable polymer matrices. Table 2 shows the chemical compositions of some natural fibers.

2.2. Thermal Properties

As regards nanocrystalline cellulose, its thermal property is one of the main restrictive factors in the application of nanocrystalline cellulose(NCC) mechanical characteristics at high temperatures [50]; however, the nanocrystalline cellulose is excellent for the treatment of heat thermoplastics (n200°C) [61] (NCC degradation, usual at 0 temperature). For example, in the paper industry, paper with extra durability, strength, and flexibility is produced using nanocrystalline cellulose. In addition, nanocrystalline cellulose has unique papers with optical characteristics [62], in some cases.

2.3. Optical Properties

Researchers initially found liquid crystalline nanocrystalline cellulose, which resulted in an interesting observation of the nanocrystalline cellulose in 1959, in birefringence suspension. Most of the studies focused on nanocrystalline cellulose observations of this phenomenon. Li et al. produced a solid, cellulose iridescent film with a unique NCC feature to create safety documents such as banknotes, passports, and flat-water supplies [61] concerning the optical qualities of nanocrystalline cellulose.

2.4. Mechanical Properties

Table 3 shows the cellulose nanocrystals and other strengthening materials mechanical properties. Nanocrystalline cellulose characterizations are calculated through atomic force microscopy (atomic force microscope), analysis of radiation diffraction, inelastic radiation dispersion, and Raman effect. It carries theoretical and indirect experimental measures [63].

Nanocrystalline cellulose has been extensively studied in several areas, including polymer electrical electrolytes, packaging, antireflective, and solid iridescent movies for its excellent mechanical properties [67]. Finally, nanocrystalline cellulose natural cellulose characteristics are not only inherent but have unique features like high crystallinity index (N70 per cent), large surface area (~150 m²/g), and high tensile strength aspect ratios (~70) (7500 MPa). NCC has been taken into account in specific sectors in recent years, for example, regenerative medicine, printing, optical applications, and composites [68].

3. Extraction Methods of Nanocrystalline Cellulose

In order to reach nanostructured cellulose molecules of high crystalline and surface areas, the hierarchical structure of natural fibers must be separated. Many extraction methods for glycosidic strips have been reported to break the cellulose nanofibril domain. It includes and combines two or more such techniques and mechanical, chemical, and biological treatment. Furthermore, all such methods lead to the development and disintegration of nanostructured cellulose molecules. Generally, nanofibrillar cellulose, called cellulose nanofiber, is produced by mechanical cellulosic decomposition. Cellulose’s nanofibers such as homogenising, cryocrushing, microfluidisation, grinding, and high-intensity ultrasonic have mechanical approaches available [69]. An essential approach to the alignment process is enzymatic pretreatment for lignocellulosic fiber. We know that pretreatment in mild and chemical processing conditions is economical, energy-free, environmental, productive, and biological [70].

In biological pretreatment, lignin and hemicellulose decay with the help of lignocellulosic materials such as brown, white, and spongy red champagne and bacteria. The natural treatment may include an enzyme from microbes. Brown red and soft fungi attack mainly cellulose, while white red hits both cellulose and lignin. Compared to other pretreatment procedures, there are also inherent disadvantages, such as long pretreatment times and high rates [71, 72]. Cellulose-nanocrystalline, alkaline pretreatment, acid hydrolysis, oxidants, and ionic fluids are the most promising methods in chemical pretreatment. Acid hydrolysis is the standard method used to prepare nanocrystalline cellulose because of moderate working conditions and excellent suspended stability. The amorphous regions around the cellulose fiber are destroyed in controlled conditions to maintain crystalline areas under acid hydrolysis. Nonetheless, to separate lignin from its cellulose biopolymers must be energetically pretreated. Then, biopolymers formed and required deconstruction, derivation, and nanoparticles. Three main routes are manufactured with cellulose-based polymers. The principal routes for biopolymer production in different forms of cellulose are exhibited in Figure 7.

Natural fillers based on cellulose nanofibrils and cellulose microfibrillated, essential particle size factors affect the stability, durability, and strength of lignocellulose-based biocomposite materials [73–75].

3.1. Plasma Processing Technology

The formation of cellulosic nanomaterials is derived from biomass residues. In the last few years, however, several attempts have been made during production on the bench scale to improve the process’ acceptance in an industrial context. In this light, the heterogeneous solid acid catalyst of the cotton linter microcrystalline cellulose with amberlite IR 120 was one step of forming nanocrystalline cellulose in this regard. The first-order kinetics of 42.8 per 10^-2 min^-1 and a response rate of 10.1 per 10^-5 mol/minute were followed in the production method.

It has shown that in ultrastructural morphological analysis, the average particulate diameter is 36 nm. Furthermore, they investigate four distinct types of lignocelluloses: feedstocks, a rapid and effective grinding method, liquefaction, centrifugation, and washing for nanocrystalline cellulose isolation [77]. Liquefaction of glycol and methane sulfonic acid shows efficacy during isolation. However, in terms of implementation, it takes a lot of time to respond to multistage processes and increases the total cost. In addition, a pot-oxidant method for hydrolysis has been developed as a biomaterial for the manufacture of cellulose tools with plain electroprocess. The mean nanostructure material fiber diameter was nm. In addition to conventional procedure, a 6.5 per cent added to crystallinity for the product acquired with the pot response. A further study used microcrystalline cellulose empty fruits to isolate nanocrystalline cellulose with ultrasound TEMPO oxidation as lignocellulosic feedback. Sonic treatment was observed when the yield increased by about 39 per cent compared to the nonsonic condition, with a significant effect on the insulation process. Structural analysis shows a rod similar to crystalline morphology for extracted nanocrystalline cellulose biomass, with an average length of 122 nm, respectively, and a width of 6 nm [78]. A new plasma solution method helps develop the nanocrystalline cellulose [79], microcrystalline cellulose, and FP as the source material in an electrolytic solution. Figure 8 shows the scheme for the experimental system used in plasma therapy for nanocrystalline cellulose development. The graphic anode placed under atmospheric pressure transmits direct current into the surface area of the electrolytic solution as a cathode. As a consequence, the redox reaction occurs when the glow discharge appears. Cellulose oxidation causes the hydroxyl surface to occur during the reaction when plasma processing is carried out with distilled water due to subsequent hydrolysis.

3.2. Acid Hydrolysis

Concentrate the desired acid and deionized water in combination with the purified initial product. It is the best technique used to separate cellulose nanocrystals from cellulose fibers [38, 78, 80]. The procedure involves acid-induced deconstruction, including the spread of acid molecules through heterogeneous acid hydrolysis to cellulosic microfibrils. Glycosidic bonds are cleaved into the amorphous cellulose fibrils which cause the hierarchy of fibril bundles to break down into cellulose nanocrystals [39, 81].

There was a selective splitting in the cellulosic chains [20] in the difference in kinetic hydrolysis from paracrystalline to crystalline areas. These acids’ most common chemical function consists of the release of a glycosidic cellulosic ion, which causes oxygen elements to spread and amorphous glycosidic bond hydrolytic splits [16] to react to glycosidic bonds between the two oxygen moieties 103, 102, 103, 103, and 102. The acidic therapy hydrolyzes pectin, and hemicellulose residues break polysaccharides into simple sucre. Thanks to their large freedom of motor after the hydrolytic division, these crystallites can grow in size and thus in dimensions greater than the original microfibrils [20]. Cellulose nanocrystals have quickly reduced their polymerization due to acid hydrolysis. Dialysis with deionized water separates and rinses the mixture at the end of the procedure to remove residual acid and neutralised salt as in Figure 9.

Sonic treatment is generally applied [16, 38, 78, 84, 85] to improve and homogeneously disperse cellulose nanocrystals in aqueous media.

3.3. Ionic Liquids

Cellulose is a potent solvent ionic liquid. It consists of liquid molten salts and is thus commonly referred to as “green” solvents at environmental temperatures. The first ionic liquid used to isolate NCC from the sugarcane bagasse was 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride. Studies show that cellulose dissolution in 1-ethyl3-methylimidezolium acetate results in no substantial 85°C degradations of the polymer cellulose chain. Cellulose dissolving potentially of this sort of ionic liquid is not decided to the same degree by the ionic liquid presence of water [86]. The cellulose has been dissolved and blocked by the homogenizer. Consequently, 100% NCC crystalline structure is one of the effective uses of ionic liquid. Cellulose was dissolved and passed by an ionic fluid without obstruction. Then, by adding water, cellulose was taken in, and by freezing, NCC regenerated. The reaction temperature, microwave power, and weight relationship between cellulose and ionic liquid are soluble in cellulose. The best solubilization found was also demonstrated when the 400 W microwave response temperature was 130°C and 1% ionic liquid ratio [82]. Thus, cellulose insolvency retains 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate with just 15-16 wt % of its water content. Some reports describe prepared NCCs, including totally amorphous and partially crystalline NCC, by regenerating lignocellulosic ionic liquid [87]. The crystallinity observed seems to depend on the time of dissolution, cinematic recovery, and solvent-free choice. Therefore, the ionic liquid offers a new route for the disintegration and restoration of lignocellulosic substances.

3.4. Mechanical Treatment

In the process of production with hydrolytic acid, oxidative and enzyme treatment combinations, or directly [14, 88, 89], the mechanical methods of producing nanoscale cellulose particles have also been extensively studied. They include microfluidisation, ultrasound, homogenization at high pressure, and ball milling.

The methods are often used to make cellulose nanofibers with nanometers or decades of nano-thermometers and up to several meters in length [10, 90]. Some researchers have used high energy bead framing (HEBM) [89] to develop a scalable mechanical method in recent years. Applications of commercially available microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) have been isolated from and aqueously dispersed or diluted acid (phosphoric acid) by the authors in the course of a HEBM process. The morphology and the dimension ratio values of acid hydrolysis are very similar to the cellulose nanocrystals. The cellulose nanocrystal output rate was between 57% and 76%. The resulting rod, similar to cellulose nanocrystals, is a high thermal stability crystallinity index between 85 and 95%, which is used to melt the most common thermoplastics. The isolation of cellulose nanocrystals by ultrasonic use was also mentioned by another mechanical method [61, 89]. Rod-shaped cellulose nanocrystals were made using a purely physical high-intensity ultrasound method from an aqueous dispersion of microcrystalline cellulose. The cellulose nanocrystal was 10-20 nm in diameter and 50-250 nm in length.

However, the output of this method of cellulose nanocrystals does not exceed 10%.The ultrasound effect was not selective, meaning that amorphous cellulose and crystalline cellulose can be eliminated. Water is known to have the ability to hydrolyze polysaccharides [91]. The main features of a prevailing hydrolysis rate are water molecules and the accessibility of H₃O⁺ and water species. In sub- and supercritical water, lower and higher species levels are present [92]. Their use for hydrolysis reactions could therefore be efficient. In some studies, water has previously been used to produce lignocellulosic material at high temperatures and pressure. Very few studies on subcritical water hydrolysis method cellulose nanocrystals production have been reported [93]. Not only because of its greener characteristics but also because of the low and cleaner waste, low corrosion, and low reactant costs, it is the sole use of water as a reagent promising. [94] used this procedure for the production of commercial microcrystalline cellulose nanocrystals. The authors reported that optimising reaction conditions certainly means high-quality cellulose nanocrystals [93]. Hydrolyzed cellulose joins with subscriptive water (120°C and 20.3 MPa for 60 minutes). The states of the experiment permit for more water, activity, and ionization diffusion. Partial cellulose hydrolysis with a yield of 21.9% has therefore been achieved. The cellulose nanocrystals obtained showed a high index of crystallinity (79.0 per cent) and rod-like form with the same aspect of cellulose nanocrystal as those reported. Moreover, the thermal firmness of these cellulose nanocrystals was better than the source of cellulosic (approximately 300°C).

4. Modification of Nanocrystalline Cellulose

Table 4 shows the effect of structural modifications on nanobased crystalline cellulose. Change of the nanosurface cellulose is the essential process to ensure homogenous distribution and enhanced polymer matrix compatibility. Some techniques for this purpose have also been registered, including esterification, siltation, polymer grafting, and mediate oxidation of 2.2,6.6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (tempo).

4.1. Acetylation

The esterification reaction has become a famous method of hydrophobic cellulose surface treatment. Cellulose pretreatment groups replace the surface cellulose groups with acetic nanoparticles with cellulose function groups (COCH₃). Acetylic anhydride is used in homogeneous and heterogeneous forms with acetylating cellulose nanoparticles in the presence of acetic acid and small amounts of catalysts such as sulfuric acid or perchloric acid. When the partially acetylated molecules are sufficiently soluble during a consistent acetylation process, on the other hand, precipitate isolation is not necessary during the heterogeneous reaction. In homogeneous reaction conditions, a replacement time, temperature, and molar cellulose derivative ratio can be easily managed. Natural polymer degradation is negligible during the response and degrading, and additional routes are available to replace or implement new working groups in full. The state of acetylation plays an essential role in altering the physical properties of cellulose while maintaining the microfiller morphology. Research shows a high degree of transparency and decreased hygroscopicity of acetylated composites and improved thermal resistance to cellulose acetylation and increased natural resistance to acetylated plant fiber/polyester composites [103].

4.2. Silylation

Another efficient mechanism to stabilise the spread of nanocellulose particles into a suspension is the partial nanocellulose situation. On the nanocellulose surface, a random distribution of alkyl molecules such as n-butyl, N-octyle, N-dodecyle, and isopropyl defines its content by surface substitution (DS). Cellulose might disperse with DS value 0.61–1, resulting in a colloidally stable dispersion, with intact morphological properties, in a solvent that has low polarity (tetrahydrofuran). But since the chains in the centre of crystals are linked with high sialylation (DS over 1), crystals are disintegrated and original morphology is lost. After the surfaces were altered by the partial sialylation of various alkyl moieties [104], Goussé et al. received a stable suspension of tetrahydrofuran tunicate whiskers (THF).

4.3. Polymer Grafting

An alternative way to improve the fiber-surface hydrophilicity is polymer grafting on the nanocellulose surface. Two main strategies are used for polymer grafting. Connector components are used in the “grafting on” approach to attach the presynthesized polymer chain to the hydroxyl cellulose surface groups. On the other hand, the “graft of” approach-initiated polymerization on location constitutes polymer chains onto the substratum by the immobilized initiator. The first approach to the “grafting on” approach was [105] to take the grafting of DNA oligomers on the cellulose surface [74], while Habibi et al. first reported the “grafting from” approach. This work involved the modification of the area by the grafting of poly (e-caprolactone) using stannous octoate (Sn (Oct)2) [7] through the ring-opening polymerization.

4.4. Active Agent/Surfactant Surface Area

By interacting with the subfactor and/or active surface agents, the hydrophilic cellulose suspension adhesive can also be increased to a nonpolar hydrophobic polymer matrix. Tensile is generally defined as an agent to lower water surface tension. Thus, the use of cellulose modified by surfactant would alter the dynamic of nanocomposites’ surface tension relative to their interface. The interfacial tensional value generally lies between the two immiscible phases of the surface tension values. Therefore, if two-stage molecules have similar surface tensions, interfacial tension will be zero [106].

For this reason, literature uses stresses such as alkenyl succinic anhydride, isocyanate, polypropylenes malleated, or chlorosilane. Noncovalent surface modification typically takes place by adsorption of the surface of nanocellulose. Surface modification by nanocellulose surfactant made of mono and phosphoric acid diester and alkyl-phenolic tails was introduced by [107]. Cellulose-modified particles have been dispersed in nonpolar solvents. Furthermore, in nanocomposites, [64] reported the polystyrene nanocellulose-coated surfactant. In addition, improve the dispersion of ionic surfactant modification cellulose in polylactic acid (PLA) polymer matrix [108].

5. Applications of Cellulose Nanoparticle-Reinforced Biocomposites

The potential for various applications for cellulose nanoparticles is present, and their use in nanocomposites is widely studied. With the integration of biofibers, biofibers, based on renewable energy resources such as cellulose plastics, starch plastic, polyhydroxyalkanoates, and polylactides, will become green biocomposites soon. Nanocells are primarily considered for applications on paper and packaging and construction, automotive and furniture, electronics, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics as in Figure 10.

For companies producing electro-electro acoustical devices, nanocellulose is used as a high-quality sound membrane. Nanocellulose has been used in various applications, including first-rate electronic paper additives (e-paper), ultrafiltration refining membranes, oils for mineral oil regeneration, and membranes. The high strength, rigidity, and small dimensions of nanocellulose can convey special features to the use of fiber-reinforced composites and may later in different applications, and it is shown in Table 5 [109].

5.1. Biomedical Applications of NCC

Since the toxicity of nanocrystalline cellulose has not been implemented, NCC has been introduced to biomedical applications by several research groups. [116] suggested modified nanocrystalline cellulose, especially chemotherapy agents, for the targeted delivery of medicines [113]. For example, NCC successfully targets and controls the supply of folic acid in the mammalian brain to cancerous tumours. Nanocrystalline cellulose also has numerous biomedical applications, such as the diagnosis and stagnation of NCC (e.g., the use of human elastase enzyme at a damaged site) [117] and also has cardiovascular graft replacements [8], enzyme/protein [118] immobilization, and viral inhibitors (alphaviruses and perhaps also herpes simplex viruses). The fluorescent labelling of nanocrystalline cellulose provides potential applications in biomedical questions such as biosamples, bioassays, and applications in bioimagery [63].

5.2. Other Potential Applications

Tissue engineering, wastewater packaging, structural and efficient characteristics of cellulosic products, and significant applications in the pharmaceutical sectors are also being utilised in several areas: alternative materials, the recognition of metal ions, and the production of electronic goods and parts. In polyvinyl alcohol, nanocrystalline cellulose is widely used and distributed to enhance mechanical properties (PVA). The main ingredient in nanocrystalline cellulose modification as a binding agent was 1-hydroxymethyl5-dimethylhydantoin with cyanuric chloride (cych) (HDH). The synthesiser NCC cych-HDH-Cl has been discharged into PVA or chitosan for antibacterial film preparation after chlorination. Effects on Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538) and Escherichia coli O157:H7 (ATCC 43895) [119] were significantly detrimental to the latter. Membranes of cellulose acetate (CA) are also used for food packaging. Nanocrystalline cellulose particles are, however, well integrated with these membranes to enhance their industrial usefulness, using N-halamine precursors for polymethacrylamide (NCC PMAMs). Thus, for Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, the composite membranes had good antibacterial properties within 10 and 5 minutes, respectively [83].

In the recent successful cellulosic derivatives study, Figures 11 and 12 shows a variety of applications. In preparation of biocomposite materials, nanocrystalline cellulose is widely used as possible nanofiller. But poor addiction between the matrix and the fillet causes nanoparticles to autoaggregate and reduces adhesion of the polymer matrix. Tempo-mediated oxidation was performed for PLA- and PHBV-strengthened polymer composites to overcome these constraints by the nanocrystalline cellulose suspension resulting from OPEFB [120].

The biocomposites are developed to offer full potential as packaging materials through the increased oxygen obstacle and mechanical stability. In addition, nanocrystalline cellulose helps maintain structural integrity in the production of sensors due to its structural description of a high surface area, an important aspect ratio and considerable rigidity. Nanocrystalline cellulose quantum point-assisted tyrosinase [122, 123], an integrated biosensor for aqueous system phenol detection, has been developed.

The NCC was amended during CTAB architecture to improve the conductivity of samples by decreasing the hydrophilicity of the cellulose derivative. In the end, a sensor has urbanized reasonable phenol detection limits with 0.0008 mg/L LODs of 0.5 to 3.8 mg/L. In research, NCC modified by CTAB and GO was produced to permeate the nickel ions selectively. SPR has been used to determine the nanocomposite material’s binding affinity constant. A nickel ion of a broad range of 0.01 to 0.1 mg/L is the 1.6/103 binding affinity constant [98]. In addition, for possible use in fuel cells as conducting membrane, a single proton-driving nanocomposite was prepared with NCC imidazole-doped molecule. The maximum electrical conductivity showed at 140 B/C with 1 imidazole per 1.7 units of glucose was 2.7 10-2 s/m, which is an improvement of 5 times that of nondoping performance [110, 124].

6. Conclusions

The exploration of new materials for advanced applications has been fascinating for environmentally sound biorenewable materials from various natural resources. (i)Among the several renewable resources, cellulose is the most common and significant polymer in nature. Several types of cellulose may be processed, including fiber, cellulose microphones, and nanos(ii)Recently, cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), especially for their crystalline structure and crystalline structure, were investigated in several advanced applications. Despite the great advantages of cellulose nanocrystals, their broad application was limited in terms of energy consumption and production costs(iii)Thus, the first portion of this study concentrated on cellulose supplies and CNC manufacturing processes. They also spoke about cellulose structural organization and cellulose nanomaterial nomenclature for beginners(iv)We consider that the research presented in this paper increases researchers’ interest in nanomaterials based on cellulose and a fundamental understanding of nanocrystals from cellulose

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article. Further data or information is available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the support from the Kombolcha Institute of Technology, Wollo University, Ethiopia, for the research and preparation of the manuscript. The author appreciates the assistance from the Saveetha Engineering College, MS Ramaiah Institute of Technology, IFTM University, Government Engineering College, Jhalrapatan, JSS Science & Technology University, for the assistance in doing the work.

References

A. K. Mohanty, M. Misra, and L. T. Drzal, Natural Fibers, Biopolymers, and Biocomposites, CRC press, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site
M. Li, L. Wang, D. Li, Y.-L. Cheng, and B. Adhikari, “Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from de-pectinated sugar beet pulp,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 102, pp. 136–143, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Johar, I. Ahmad, and A. Dufresne, “Extraction, preparation and characterization of cellulose fibres and nanocrystals from rice husk,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 93–99, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Åkerholm, B. Hinterstoisser, and L. Salmén, “Characterization of the crystalline structure of cellulose using static and dynamic FT-IR spectroscopy,” Carbohydrate Research, vol. 339, no. 3, pp. 569–578, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Dufresne, J. Cavaillé, and M. R. Vignon, “Mechanical behavior of sheets prepared from sugar beet cellulose microfibrils,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 1185–1194, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Saito, S. Kimura, Y. Nishiyama, and A. Isogai, “Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 2485–2491, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Habibi, A.-L. Goffin, N. Schiltz, E. Duquesne, P. Dubois, and A. Dufresne, “Bionanocomposites based on poly(ε-caprolactone)-grafted cellulose nanocrystals by ring-opening polymerization,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 41, pp. 5002–5010, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Lin and A. Dufresne, “Nanocellulose in biomedicine: current status and future prospect,” European Polymer Journal, vol. 59, pp. 302–325, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Oksman, Y. Aitomäki, A. P. Mathew et al., “Review of the recent developments in cellulose nanocomposite processing,” Composites. Part A, Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 83, pp. 2–18, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Moon, A. Martini, J. Nairn, J. Simonsen, and J. Youngblood, “Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 3941–3994, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Einchhorn, A. Dufresne, M. M. Aranguren et al., “Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–33, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Habibi, L. A. Lucia, and O. J. Rojas, “Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 3479–3500, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Siró and D. Plackett, “Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review,” Cellulose, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 459–494, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. P. S. A. Khalil, A. H. Bhat, and A. F. I. Yusra, “Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: a review,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 963–979, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Li, J. Fei, Y. Cai, Y. Li, J. Feng, and J. Yao, “Cellulose whiskers extracted from mulberry: sa novel biomass production,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 94–99, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Trache, M. H. Hussin, M. K. M. Haafiz, and V. K. Thakur, “Recent progress in cellulose nanocrystals: sources and production,” Nanoscale, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1763–1786, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Ø. Eriksen, K. Syverud, and Ø. Gregersen, “The use of microfibrillated cellulose produced from kraft pulp as strength enhancer in TMP paper,” Nordic Pulp & Paper Research Journal, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 299–304, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Chakraborty, M. Sain, and M. Kortschot, Cellulose Microfibrils: A Novel Method of Preparation Using High Shear Refining and Cryocrushing, Walter de Gruyter, vol. 59, no. 1, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site
W. Chen, H. Yu, Y. Liu, Y. Hai, M. Zhang, and P. Chen, “Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from four plant cellulose fibers using a chemical-ultrasonic process,” Cellulose, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 433–442, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Dufresne, Nanocellulose: from nature to high performance tailored materials, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site
M. Poletto and H. Ornaghi Jr., Cellulose: Fundamental Aspects and Current Trends, BoD–Books on Demand, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site
F. Fahma, S. Iwamoto, N. Hori, T. Iwata, and A. Takemura, “Effect of pre-acid-hydrolysis treatment on morphology and properties of cellulose nanowhiskers from coconut husk,” Cellulose, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 443–450, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. M. Dong, J.-F. Revol, and D. G. Gray, “Effect of microcrystallite preparation conditions on the formation of colloid crystals of cellulose,” Cellulose, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 19–32, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Henriksson, G. Henriksson, L. A. Berglund, and T. Lindström, “An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers,” European Polymer Journal, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 3434–3441, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Man, N. Muhammad, A. Sarwono, M. A. Bustam, M. V. Kumar, and S. Rafiq, “Preparation of cellulose nanocrystals using an ionic liquid,” Journal of Polymers and the Environment, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 726–731, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Ilyas, S. M. Sapuan, and M. R. Ishak, “Isolation and characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose from sugar palm fibres (Arenga pinnata),” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 181, pp. 1038–1051, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kaushik, M. Singh, and G. Verma, “Green nanocomposites based on thermoplastic starch and steam exploded cellulose nanofibrils from wheat straw,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 337–345, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Ilyas, S. M. Sapuan, M. L. Sanyang, and M. R. Ishak, “Nanocrystalline cellulose reinforced starch-based nanocomposite: a review,” in 5th Postgraduate seminar on natural fiber composites, pp. 82–87, Malaysia, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
R. A. Ilyas, S. M. Sapuan, M. L. Sanyang, M. R. Ishak, and E. S. Zainudin, “Nanocrystalline cellulose as reinforcement for polymeric matrix nanocomposites and its potential applications: a review,” Current Analytical Chemistry, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 203–225, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Follain, S. Belbekhouche, J. Bras, G. Siqueira, S. Marais, and A. Dufresne, “Water transport properties of bio-nanocomposites reinforced by Luffa cylindrica cellulose nanocrystals,” Journal of membrane science, vol. 427, pp. 218–229, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Fukaya, A. Sugimoto, and H. Ohno, “Superior solubility of polysaccharides in low viscosity, polar, and halogen-free 1, 3-dialkylimidazolium formates,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 3295–3297, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Habibi, “Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1519–1542, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Velásquez-Cock, P. Gañán, P. Posada et al., “Influence of combined mechanical treatments on the morphology and structure of cellulose nanofibrils: thermal and mechanical properties of the resulting films,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 85, pp. 1–10, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Qazanfarzadeh and M. Kadivar, “Properties of whey protein isolate nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose isolated from oat husk,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 91, pp. 1134–1140, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Sirviö, A. Kolehmainen, H. Liimatainen, J. Niinimäki, and O. E. O. Hormi, “Biocomposite cellulose-alginate films: promising packaging materials,” Food Chemistry, vol. 151, pp. 343–351, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Kargarzadeh, M. Ioelovich, I. Ahmad, S. Thomas, and A. Dufresne, “Methods for extraction of nanocellulose from various sources,” Handbook of nanocellulose and cellulose nanocomposites, vol. 1, pp. 1–51, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. B. Sticklen, “Plant genetic engineering for biofuel production: towards affordable cellulosic ethanol,” Nature Reviews. Genetics, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 433–443, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Jonoobi, R. Oladi, Y. Davoudpour et al., “Different preparation methods and properties of nanostructured cellulose from various natural resources and residues: a review,” Cellulose, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 935–969, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mariano, N. El Kissi, and A. Dufresne, “Cellulose nanocrystals and related nanocomposites: review of some properties and challenges,” Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 791–806, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Alcántara, I. González, M. M. Pareta, and F. Vilaseca, “Biocomposites from rice straw nanofibers: morphology, thermal and mechanical properties,” Materials (Basel), vol. 13, no. 9, p. 2138, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hassan, L. Berglund, R. Abou-Zeid, E. Hassan, W. Abou-Elseoud, and K. Oksman, “Nanocomposite film based on cellulose acetate and lignin-rich rice straw nanofibers,” Materials (Basel), vol. 12, no. 4, p. 595, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Valentim, S. Andrade, M. dos Santos et al., “Composite based on biphasic calcium phosphate (HA/β-TCP) and nanocellulose from the Açaí tegument,” Materials (Basel), vol. 11, no. 11, p. 2213, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Biagiotti, D. Puglia, and J. M. Kenny, “A review on natural fibre-based composites-part I,” Journal of Natural Fibers, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 37–68, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. K. Ramamoorthy, M. Skrifvars, and A. Persson, “A review of natural fibers used in biocomposites: plant, animal and regenerated cellulose fibers,” Polymer Reviews, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 107–162, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Pinkert, K. N. Marsh, S. Pang, and M. P. Staiger, “Ionic liquids and their interaction with cellulose,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 109, no. 12, pp. 6712–6728, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Di Bella, V. Fiore, G. Galtieri, C. Borsellino, and A. Valenza, “Effects of natural fibres reinforcement in lime plasters (kenaf and sisal vs. polypropylene),” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 58, pp. 159–165, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Majeed, M. Jawaid, A. Hassan et al., “Potential materials for food packaging from nanoclay/natural fibres filled hybrid composites,” Materials and Design, vol. 46, pp. 391–410, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. NagarajaGanesh and R. Muralikannan, “Physico-chemical, thermal, and flexural characterization of Cocos nucifera fibers,” International Journal of Polymer Analysis and Characterization, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 244–250, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Osong, S. Norgren, and P. Engstrand, “Processing of wood-based microfibrillated cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose, and applications relating to papermaking: a review,” Cellulose, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 93–123, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Brinchi, F. Cotana, E. Fortunati, and J. M. Kenny, “Production of nanocrystalline cellulose from lignocellulosic biomass: technology and applications,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 154–169, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Lam, K. B. Male, J. H. Chong, A. C. W. Leung, and J. H. T. Luong, “Applications of functionalized and nanoparticle-modified nanocrystalline cellulose,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 283–290, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Faruk, A. K. Bledzki, H.-P. Fink, and M. Sain, “Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000-2010,” Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1552–1596, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hv and P. Ulvskov, “Hemicelluloses,” Annual Review of Plant Biology, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 263–289, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Stamboulis, C. A. Baillie, and T. Peijs, “Effects of environmental conditions on mechanical and physical properties of flax fibers,” Composites. Part A, Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1105–1115, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Jawaid and H. P. S. A. Khalil, “Cellulosic/synthetic fibre reinforced polymer hybrid composites: a review,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. F. Rosa, E. S. Medeiros, J. A. Malmonge et al., “Cellulose nanowhiskers from coconut husk fibers: effect of preparation conditions on their thermal and morphological behavior,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 83–92, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. M. Haafiz, S. J. Eichhorn, A. Hassan, and M. Jawaid, “Isolation and characterization of microcrystalline cellulose from oil palm biomass residue,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 628–634, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Lavoine, I. Desloges, A. Dufresne, and J. Bras, “Microfibrillated cellulose - Its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 735–764, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. S. Stevens, Green plastics: an introduction to the new science of biodegradable plastics, Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ, 2002.
S. Shinoj, R. Visvanathan, S. Panigrahi, and N. Varadharaju, “Dynamic mechanical properties of oil palm fibre (OPF)-linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) biocomposites and study of fibre-matrix interactions,” Biosystems Engineering, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 99–107, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Li, J. Yue, and S. Liu, “Preparation of nanocrystalline cellulose via ultrasound and its reinforcement capability for poly(vinyl alcohol) composites,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 479–485, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Cha, Z. He, and Y. Ni, “Preparation and characterization of thermal/pH-sensitive hydrogel from carboxylated nanocrystalline cellulose,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 713–718, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. George and S. N. Sabapathi, “Cellulose nanocrystals: synthesis, functional properties, and applications,” Nanotechnology, Science and Applications, vol. 8, p. 45, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-H. Kim, B. S. Shim, H. S. Kim et al., “Review of nanocellulose for sustainable future materials,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 197–213, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Hamad, “On the development and applications of cellulosic nanofibrillar and nanocrystalline materials,” Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 513–519, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Ding, L. Calabri, X. Chen, K. M. Kohlhaas, and R. S. Ruoff, “Mechanics of crystalline boron nanowires,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 1112–1124, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Mohanta, G. Madras, and S. Patil, “Layer-by-layer assembled thin films and microcapsules of nanocrystalline cellulose for hydrophobic drug delivery,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 6, no. 22, pp. 20093–20101, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Tang, S. Yang, N. Zhang, and J. Zhang, “Preparation and characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose via low-intensity ultrasonic-assisted sulfuric acid hydrolysis,” Cellulose, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 335–346, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. P. S. Abdul Khalil, M. R. Nurul Fazita, M. Jawaid, A. H. Bhat, and C. K. Abdullah, “Empty fruit bunches as a reinforcement in laminated bio-composites,” Journal of Composite Materials, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 219–236, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Rojas, M. Bedoya, and Y. Ciro, “Current trends in the production of cellulose nanoparticles and nanocomposites for biomedical applications,” Cellulose: fundamental aspects and current trends, vol. 2015118-2017121, pp. 193–228, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Kumar, D. M. Barrett, M. J. Delwiche, and P. Stroeve, “Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 3713–3729, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Yang, Z. Dai, S.-Y. Ding, and C. E. Wyman, “Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic biomass,” Biofuels, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 421–449, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kamel, “Nanotechnology and its applications in lignocellulosic composites, a mini review,” Express Polymer Letters, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 546–575, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Dufresne, “Processing of polymer nanocomposites reinforced with polysaccharide nanocrystals,” Molecules, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 4111–4128, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Siqueira, J. Bras, and A. Dufresne, “Cellulosic bionanocomposites: a review of preparation, properties and applications,” Polymers (Basel), vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 728–765, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Ahmed-Haras, N. Kao, and L. Ward, “Single-step heterogeneous catalysis production of highly monodisperse spherical nanocrystalline cellulose,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 154, pp. 246–255, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kunaver, A. Anžlovar, and E. Žagar, “The fast and effective isolation of nanocellulose from selected cellulosic feedstocks,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 148, pp. 251–258, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Klemm, B. Heublein, H. Fink, and A. Bohn, “Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material,” Angewandte chemie international edition, vol. 44, no. 22, pp. 3358–3393, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. V. Surov, M. I. Voronova, N. V. Rubleva et al., “A novel effective approach of nanocrystalline cellulose production: oxidation–hydrolysis strategy,” Cellulose, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 5035–5048, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Eichhorn, “Cellulose nanowhiskers: promising materials for advanced applications,” Soft Matter, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 303–315, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-M. Ng, L. T. Sin, T. T. Tee et al., “Extraction of cellulose nanocrystals from plant sources for application as reinforcing agent in polymers,” Composites. Part B, Engineering, vol. 75, pp. 176–200, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Csiszar, P. Kalic, A. Kobol, and E. de Paulo Ferreira, “The effect of low frequency ultrasound on the production and properties of nanocrystalline cellulose suspensions and films,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 31, pp. 473–480, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Liu, L. Li, N. Pan et al., “Antibacterial cellulose acetate films incorporated with N halamine, modified nanocrystalline cellulose particles,” Polymers for Advanced Technologies, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 463–469, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. F. Vasconcelos, J. P. A. Feitosa, F. M. P. da Gama et al., “Bacterial cellulose nanocrystals produced under different hydrolysis conditions: properties and morphological features,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 155, pp. 425–431, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Bettaieb, R. Khiari, A. Dufresne, M. F. Mhenni, and M. N. Belgacem, “Mechanical and thermal properties of Posidonia oceanica cellulose nanocrystal reinforced polymer,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 123, pp. 99–104, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ma, B. Zhou, H.-S. Li, Y.-Q. Li, and S.-Y. Ou, “Green composite films composed of nanocrystalline cellulose and a cellulose matrix regenerated from functionalized ionic liquid solution,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 383–389, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Li, L. Shen, J. Wang et al., “Design of a nitrogen-doped, carbon-coated Li₄Ti₅O₁₂ nanocomposite with a core–shell structure and its application for high-rate lithium-ion batteries,” ChemPlusChem, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 128–133, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. K. Pandey, H. T. Lee, H. Takagi, S. H. Ahn, D. R. Saini, and M. Misra, “Dispersion of nanocellulose (NC) in polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene (PE) matrix,” Handbook of polymer nanocomposites. Processing, performance and application, Springer, pp. 179–189, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
K. N. M. Amin, P. K. Annamalai, I. C. Morrow, and D. Martin, “Production of cellulose nanocrystals via a scalable mechanical method,” RSC Advances, vol. 5, no. 70, pp. 57133–57140, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Menchaca-Nal, C. L. Londoño-Calderón, P. Cerrutti et al., “Facile synthesis of cobalt ferrite nanotubes using bacterial nanocellulose as template,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 137, pp. 726–731, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Vallejos, M. D. Zambon, M. C. Area, and A. A. da Silva Curvelo, “Low liquid–solid ratio (LSR) hot water pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse,” Green Chemistry, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1982–1989, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. V. Bandura and S. N. Lvov, “The ionization constant of water over wide ranges of temperature and density,” Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 15–30, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. P. Novo, J. Bras, A. García, N. Belgacem, and A. A. da Silva Curvelo, “A study of the production of cellulose nanocrystals through subcritical water hydrolysis,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 93, pp. 88–95, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. P. Novo, J. Bras, A. García, N. Belgacem, and A. A. S. Curvelo, “Subcritical water: a method for green production of cellulose nanocrystals,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 2839–2846, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. V. Averianov, M. A. Stepanova, I. V. Gofman et al., “Chemical modification of nanocrystalline cellulose for improved interfacial compatibility with poly (lactic acid),” Mendeleev Communications, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 220–222, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. N. Putro, S. Ismadji, C. Gunarto et al., “The effect of surfactants modification on nanocrystalline cellulose for paclitaxel loading and release study,” Journal of Molecular Liquids, vol. 282, pp. 407–414, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Foo, C. R. Tan, P. D. Lim, C. W. Ooi, K. W. Tan, and I. M. L. Chew, “Surface-modified nanocrystalline cellulose from oil palm empty fruit bunch for effective binding of curcumin,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 138, pp. 1064–1071, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. M. E. M. M. Daniyal, Y. W. Fen, J. Abdullah, A. R. Sadrolhosseini, S. Saleviter, and N. A. S. Omar, “Label-free optical spectroscopy for characterizing binding properties of highly sensitive nanocrystalline cellulose-graphene oxide based nanocomposite towards nickel ion,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, vol. 212, pp. 25–31, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Emam, S. A. A. Faraha, F. H. Kamal, A. M. Gamal, and M. Basseem, “Modification and characterization of nano cellulose crystalline from Eichhornia crassipes using citric acid: an adsorption study,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 240, article 116202, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. D. Gupta and N. Raghav, “Nano-crystalline cellulose: preparation, modification and usage as sustained release drug delivery excipient for some non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 147, pp. 921–930, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Tian, D. Yan, Q. Lu, and X. Jiang, “Cationic surface modification of nanocrystalline cellulose as reinforcements for preparation of the chitosan-based nanocomposite films,” Cellulose, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 163–174, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Fatona, R. M. Berry, M. A. Brook, and J. M. Moran-Mirabal, “Versatile surface modification of cellulose fibers and cellulose nanocrystals through modular triazinyl chemistry,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 2424–2435, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. K. Thakur, Nanocellulose Polymer Nanocomposites: Fundamentals and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site
C. Goussé, H. Chanzy, G. Excoffier, L. Soubeyrand, and E. Fleury, “Stable suspensions of partially silylated cellulose whiskers dispersed in organic solvents,” Polymer (Guildf), vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 2645–2651, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. P. Mangalam, J. Simonsen, and A. S. Benight, “Cellulose/DNA hybrid nanomaterials,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 497–504, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. L. Mittal and R. Jaiswal, Particle Adhesion and Removal, John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site
K. J. Saunders, Organic polymer chemistry: an introduction to the organic chemistry of adhesives, fibres, paints, Plastics and Rubbers, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
S. Kalia, B. S. Kaith, and I. Kaur, Cellulose Fibers: Bio-and Nano-Polymer Composites: Green Chemistry and Technology, Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site
S. Kalia, A. Dufresne, B. M. Cherian et al., “Cellulose-based bio- and nanocomposites: a review,” International journal of polymer science, vol. 2011, Article ID 837875, 35 pages, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. C.-F. Li, C. K. Dunn, Z. Zhang, Y. Deng, and H. J. Qi, “Direct ink write (DIW) 3D printed cellulose nanocrystal aerogel structures,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
S. M. Noorbakhsh-Soltani, M. M. Zerafat, and S. Sabbaghi, “A comparative study of gelatin and starch-based nano-composite films modified by nano-cellulose and chitosan for food packaging applications,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 189, pp. 48–55, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. T. Keshavarz, M. Imani, and F. Farahmandghavi, “Adsorption and solidification of peppermint oil on microcrystalline cellulose surface: an experimental and DFT study,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 1205, article 127558, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Kundu and T. Banerjee, “Development of microcrystalline cellulose based hydrogels for the in vitro delivery of Cephalexin,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 1, article e03027, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Huang, X. Peng, L. Geng et al., “Electrospun poly (butylene succinate)/cellulose nanocrystals bio-nanocomposite scaffolds for tissue engineering: preparation, characterization and in vitro evaluation,” Polymer Testing, vol. 71, pp. 101–109, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Sun, J. Ni, C. Zhao et al., “Preparation of a cellulosic adsorbent by functionalization with pyridone diacid for removal of Pb(II) and Co(II) from aqueous solutions,” Cellulose, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 5615–5624, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Dong, H. J. Cho, Y. W. Lee, and M. Roman, “Synthesis and cellular uptake of folic acid-conjugated cellulose nanocrystals for cancer targeting,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1560–1567, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Salas, T. Nypelö, C. Rodriguez-Abreu, C. Carrillo, and O. J. Rojas, “Nanocellulose properties and applications in colloids and interfaces,” Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 383–396, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Athar, R. Bushra, and T. Arfin, “Cellulose nanocrystals and PEO/PET hydrogel material in biotechnology and biomedicine: current status and future prospects,” Nanocellulose and nanohydrogel matrices: biotechnological and biomedical applications, pp. 139–173, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, R. Li, X. Ren, and T. Huang, “Preparation and characterization of antimicrobial films based on nanocrystalline cellulose,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 136, no. 8, p. 47101, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. K. Dasan, A. H. Bhat, and F. Ahmad, “Polymer blend of PLA/PHBV based bionanocomposites reinforced with nanocrystalline cellulose for potential application as packaging material,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 157, pp. 1323–1332, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. H. Bhat, Y. K. Dasan, I. Khan, and M. Jawaid, “Cellulosic biocomposites: potential materials for future,” Green Biocomposites, pp. 69–100, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. A. Abd Manan, W. W. Hong, J. Abdullah, N. A. Yusof, and I. Ahmad, “Nanocrystalline cellulose decorated quantum dots based tyrosinase biosensor for phenol determination,” Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 99, pp. 37–46, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Shaghaleh, X. Xu, and S. Wang, “Current progress in production of biopolymeric materials based on cellulose, cellulose nanofibers, and cellulose derivatives,” RSC Advances, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 825–842, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Tritt-Goc, I. Jankowska, K. Pogorzelec-Glaser, R. Pankiewicz, and P. Ławniczak, “Imidazole-doped nanocrystalline cellulose solid proton conductor: synthesis, thermal properties, and conductivity,” Cellulose, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 281–291, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 T. Aravind et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1018

Downloads

581

Citations