Review Article
Bioinspired Advances in Nanomaterials for Sustainable Agriculture
Table 3
Comparison of analytical methods of green nano-based sensors in agriculture.
| Nanomaterial in sensor | Sensing methodology | Sensing target | Limit of detection | Ref |
| Thiol–gold | Colorimetric | Listeria monocytogenes | 0.015 and 0.013 ng mL−1 | [79] | Fluorescent–SiO2 | Fluorescence | Brucella spp | 50 μL | [80] | Bis-aniline–cross-linked Au | Surface plasmon resonance | Neomycin | pM | [81] | Hyperbranched polyethyleneimine scaffolds–AgNPs | Fluorescence quenching | Nitrite | 100 nM | [82] | FDH–single-walled carbon nanotube paste electrode | Electrochemical detection | D-Fructose | 1 μM | [83] | DLS–superparamagnetic beads–AuNPs | Dynamic light scattering | Aflatoxin | 37.7 ng L−1 | [84] | AuNPs | Immunodipstick | Vitamin B12 | 1 mg mL−1 | [85] | MIP/sol–gel/MWNTs–CS/GCE | Electrochemical detection | Quinoxaline-2-carboxylic acid | mol L−1 | [86] | OVA–hapten conjugate and AuNPs | Lateral flow immunoassay | Sulfathiazole | 15 ng g−1 | [87] | XOD/CHIT/Fe-NPs@Au/PGE | Electrochemical detection | Xanthine | 0.1 μM | [88] |
|
|