Research Article
Validity of Nutritional Screening Tools for Hospitalized Children
Table 4
Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio between nutritional screening tools and SGNA.
| | Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) | Positive predictive value (95% CI) | Negative predictive value (95% CI) | Positive LR (95% CI) | Negative LR (95% CI) |
| PYMS | 95.31 (0.87–0.98) | 76.92 (0.63–0.86) | 83.56 (0.73–0.9) | 93.02 (0.81–0.97) | 4.13 (2.507–6.804) | 0.061 (0.02–0.186) | STAMP | 100 (0.94–1) | 11.54 (0.05–0.23) | 58.2 (0.48–0.67) | 100 (0.61–1) | 1.13 (~) | 0 (0–~) | STRONG-kids | 100 (0.94–1) | 7.7 (0.03–0.18) | 57.14 (0.479–0.659) | 100 (0.51–1) | 1.083 (1.036–1.222) | 0 (0–0.757) |
|
|
LR: likelihood ratio.
|