Research Article

A Comparative Study of the Metabolic and Skeletal Response of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N Mice in a Diet-Induced Model of Type 2 Diabetes

Table 3

Bone densitometry of the whole body along with bone microarchitectural and biomechanical parameters of the spine and tibia.

C57BL/6JC57BL/6NC3H/HeJ
ConHF valuesConHF valuesConHF values

Whole body bone densitometry
 BMC (mg)731.2 ± 30.3622.8 ± 23.60.0101614.5 ± 24.1492.9 ± 11.8<0.0001878.5 ± 25.1810.1 ± 14.3<0.0001
 BMA (cm2)12.31 ± 0.4010.87 ± 0.420.014911.03 ± 0.338.91 ± 0.12<0.000112.90 ± 0.1511.76 ± 0.22<0.0001
 BMD (mg/cm2)59.0 ± 0.857.2 ± 0.60.0866 55.9 ± 0.855.4 ± 0.60.6817 69.5 ± 0.768.6 ± 0.70.3777
 BMD/BW [(mg/cm2)/g]1.84 ± 0.051.39 ± 0.05<0.00011.67 ± 0.041.17 ± 0.02<0.00012.29 ± 0.051.76 ± 0.05<0.0001
Lumbar vertebra trabecular
 Conn density (1/mm3)232.45 ± 13.37249.77 ± 10.960.3398 221.21 ± 14.25214.62 ± 16.730.7766 145.78 ± 18.26116.81 ± 10.830.2023
 SMI 0.30 ± 0.090.67 ± 0.020.00280.59 ± 0.101.00 ± 0.090.01361.10 ± 0.111.07 ± 0.090.8508
 App density (mg HA/ccm)395.86 ± 20.97364.38 ± 7.040.1852 358.84 ± 7.84318.54 ± 8.850.0087279.49 ± 10.48287.93 ± 11.990.6070
 Mat density (mg HA/ccm)1093.1 ± 6.71084.0 ± 8.90.4366 1078.5 ± 8.31076.9 ± 8.20.9970 1123.5 ± 10.21135.5 ± 11.10.4464
Tibial midshaft
 Cortical porosity (%)4.30 ± 0.264.35 ± 0.130.2026 4.50 ± 0.144.71 ± 0.100.8831 3.07 ± 0.083.69 ± 0.450.0505
 Cortical thickness (mm)0.17 ± 0.040.19 ± 0.040.0796 0.14 ± 0.030.16 ± 0.030.8602 0.18 ± 0.050.20 ± 0.040.1381
 Cortical area (mm2)0.011 ± 0.0010.010 ± 0.0010.0535 0.010 ± 0.0010.011 ± 0.0010.8756 0.014 ± 0.0010.013 ± 0.0010.3270
 Medullary area (mm2)0.035 ± 0.0010.032 ± 0.0010.8879 0.034 ± 0.0040.037 ± 0.0020.7738 0.030 ± 0.0010.034 ± 0.0010.0218
 Indentation distance (m)34.7 ± 1.532.9 ± 0.90.3231 29.9 ± 0.734.9 ± 4.50.2603 35.3 ± 1.138.4 ± 3.10.3587
 Touchdown distance (m)162.1 ± 12.9150.2 ± 8.20.4465 148.2 ± 6.5179.6 ± 14.70.0615 158.8 ± 10.8157.6 ± 6.70.4269

Whole body bone densitometry and trabecular and cortical bone microarchitecture, along with reference point indentation (RPI) after 24 wk on a control (AIN-93M) or a HF (45% kcal from fat). Values are means ± SE, –15 mice per group for bone densitometry and mice per group for micro-CT data. values show the differences between dietary treatments within a given strain. Values are means ± SE.