Review Article

Anthropometric Parameters in Celiac Disease: A Review on the Different Evaluation Methods and Disease Effects

Table 2

Sample characteristics in studies with celiac patients.

Scientific publication<18 years>18 yearsControl
MFMF

Bode et al. [25]715No
Bardella et al. [26]31127No
Gonzalez et al. [27]3285
Rea et al. [28]815No
Mautalen et al. [29]59No
Smecuol et al. [30]124No
Dickey and Bodkin [31]3515No
Lorenzo et al. [32]123130
Bardella et al. [18]141581552
Barera et al. [23]2051142
Capristo et al. [9]162363
Fabiani et al. [33]2618No
Carbone et al. [10]153341
Zipser et al. [34]748248No
West et al. [35]264917925
Capristo et al. [36]1822
Dickey and Kearney [37]114257No
West et al. [38]5730No
Capristo et al. [20]179No
Cheng et al. [39]248121No
Duerksen and Leslie [40]637233
Reilly et al. [41]6082No
Kabanni et al. [42]166513No
Passananti et al. [21]95No
Brambilla et al. [11]10347288
Valente [43]81239
Kurpaa et al. [44]40No
Silva et al. [45]23831
Churruca et al. [46]54No
Totais2122311513172518975

The data was separated in children and adolescents (<18 years) and adults (>18 years), subdivided by sex, male (M) and female (F). Control: the presence of a control groups. Sex data not informed. These values were not included in stratification by sex.