Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism / 2019 / Article / Tab 2 / Review Article
Anthropometric Parameters in Celiac Disease: A Review on the Different Evaluation Methods and Disease Effects Table 2 Sample characteristics in studies with celiac patients.
Scientific publication <18 years >18 years Control M F M F Bode et al. [25 ] 7 15 No Bardella et al. [26 ] 31 127 No Gonzalez et al. [27 ] 32 85 Rea et al. [28 ] 8 15 No Mautalen et al. [29 ] 5 9 No Smecuol et al. [30 ] 1 24 No Dickey and Bodkin [31 ] 35 15 No Lorenzo et al. [32 ] 12 31 30 Bardella et al. [18 ] 14 15 8 15 52 Barera et al. [23 ] 20 51 142 Capristo et al. [9 ] 16 23 63 Fabiani et al. [33 ] 26 18 No Carbone et al. [10 ] 15 33 41 Zipser et al. [34 ] 748 248 No West et al. [35 ] 2649 17925 Capristo et al. [36 ] 18 22 Dickey and Kearney [37 ] 114 257 No West et al. [38 ] 57 30 No Capristo et al. [20 ] 17 9 No Cheng et al. [39 ] 248 121 No Duerksen and Leslie [40 ] 6 37 233 Reilly et al. [41 ] 60 82 No Kabanni et al. [42 ] 166 513 No Passananti et al. [21 ] 95 No Brambilla et al. [11 ] 103 47 288 Valente [43 ] 8 12 39 Kurpaa et al. [44 ] 40 No Silva et al. [45 ] 23 8 31 Churruca et al. [46 ] 54 No Totais 212 231 1513 1725 18975
The data was separated in children and adolescents (<18 years) and adults (>18 years), subdivided by sex, male (M) and female (F). Control: the presence of a control groups.
Sex data not informed. These values were not included in stratification by sex.