Research Article

Impact of Successful Weight Loss Maintenance on Serum Lipids and Glucose Concentrations of Previous Participants of a Weight Loss Programme in Accra, Ghana

Table 3

Comparison of successful and unsuccessful weight loss maintainers on fasting blood lipids, fasting blood glucose, and glycosylated haemoglobin concentrations.

VariableMean ± SD (95% confidence interval)P value
SWLM ()UWLM ()Model 1Model 2

Total cholesterol (mmol/L)5.16 ± 0.99 [4.76–5.57]5.59 ± 1.06 [5.37–5.82]0.0670.043ƛ
Low density lipoprotein (LDL) (mmol/L)3.58 ± 0.92 [3.22–3.96]3.87 ± 0.99 [3.66–4.08]0.1990.104ƛ
High density lipoprotein (HDL) (mmol/L)1.22 ± 0.38 [1.07–1.37]1.17 ± 0.32 [1.10–1.24]0.5120.365ƛ
Triglycerides (mmol/L)0.79 ± 0.28 [0.68–0.91]1.17 ± 0.51 [1.06–1.28]<0.0010.147ƛ
Fasting blood glucose (FBG) (mmol/L)4.48 ± 0.72 [4.19–4.78]4.73 ± 1.00 [4.52–4.95]0.2450.557
HbA1c (%)5.52 ± 0.39 [5.36–5.68]5.59 ± 0.59 [5.47–5.72]0.5550.411

SWLM = successful weight loss maintainers; UWLM = unsuccessful weight loss maintainers. Comparison of successful and unsuccessful maintainers is based on ANCOVA: Model 1, unadjusted model; Model 2, adjusted model. ƛAdjusted for total percent weight loss and post-treatment time and having hypercholesterolemia (categorical variable), cholesterol-lowering medication status (categorical variable), and total percent regain based on survey time, age, gender, and follow-up BMI; adjusted for total percent weight loss and post-treatment time and having hypercholesterolemia (categorical variable) and total percent regain based on survey time, age, gender, and follow-up BMI; significant P value.