Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Research Letters in Nanotechnology
Volume 2008, Article ID 701813, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/701813
Research Letter

Studies on Calcium Ion Selectivity of ZnO Nanowire Sensors Using Ionophore Membrane Coatings

1Department of Science and Technology, Linköping University, Campus Norrköping, 60 174 Norrköping, Sweden
2Department of Pure and Applied Biochemistry, Lund University, P.O. Box 124, 221 00 Lund, Sweden

Received 4 September 2008; Accepted 11 November 2008

Academic Editor: Thomas Thundat

Copyright © 2008 M. H. Asif et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Zinc oxide nanorods with 100 nm diameter and 900 nm length were grown on the surface of a silver wire (0.25 mm in diameter) with the aim to produce electrochemical nanosensors. It is shown that the ZnO nanorods exhibit a Ca2+-dependent electrochemical potentiometric behavior in an aqueous solution. The potential difference was found to be linear over a large logarithmic concentration range (1 𝜇M to 0.1 M) using Ag/AgCl as a reference electrode and the response time was less than one minute. In order to adapt the sensors for calcium ion measurements in biological fluids with sufficient selectivity and stability, plastic membrane coatings containing ionophores were applied. These functionalized ZnO nanorods sensors showed a high sensitivity (26.55 mV/decade) and good stability.

1. Introduction

Calcium is essential in the living cells; it has important functions such as regulation of enzyme activity, neuronal activity, muscle contraction, and vesicle exocytosis. In this letter, we present measurements showing potentiometric sensitivity of functionalized ZnO nanorods of Ca2+ in water solution. The advantages of ZnO nanorod sensors are their small size, being biosafe, possesses polar surface, and many other properties that facilitate chemical sensing. The detection of biological and chemical species is central to many areas of healthcare and life sciences [1]. Of major importance to detection is the signal transduction associated with selective recognition of a biological or chemical species of interest. Nanostructures, such as nanowires [27] and nanocrystals [712], offer new and sometimes unique opportunities in this rich and interdisciplinary area of science and technology. The diameters of these nanostructures are comparable to the size of the biological and chemical species being sensed, which intuitively makes them represent excellent primary transducers for producing electrical signals.

ZnO nanorods, nanowires, and nanotubes have recently attracted considerable attention for the detection of chemical and biological species [1318]. Among a variety of nanosensor systems, the nanostructured electrochemical wire approach employed in this study is one which offers high sensitivity and real-time detection [19]. ZnO nanostructures have unique advantages including high surface to volume ratio, nontoxicity, chemical stability, electrochemical activity, and high electron communication features, which make them one of the most promising materials for chemical and biological applications [20].

The focus of the current study is the fabrication and demonstration of ZnO nanorods on a relatively thin silver wire suitable for the sensing of calcium ions in aqueous chemical solutions. Silver wire with grown ZnO nanorods has proven to be a convenient and practical choice as we have demonstrated before in our intracellular pH nanosensor developed earlier [19]. Our main efforts have been directed toward the construction of a sensor having potentiometric properties. These ZnO nanorods are highly sensitive to detect and monitor calcium ions with potential applicability to in vivo measurements during biological processes in which Ca2+ is important for activating biological processes such as muscle contraction, protein secretion, as well as cell death and development [21].

2. Experimental Details

ZnO nanorods were grown on the surface of 0.25 mm thick silver wire by using a low-temperature growth technique as described below. For the optimization steps the silver wire (0.25 mm in diameter) was cut into small pieces of 5 cm in length. The wires were dipped into the seed solution to facilitate aligned growth. The wires were then dried in air for one minute. ZnO nanorods were grown in 150 mL of aqueous solution of 0.025 M zinc nitrate (Zn(NO3)2) and 0.025 M hexamethylenetetramine (HMT, C6H12N4) in a conventional flask. The reaction temperature was kept at 95C.

SEM images of the ZnO nanowires grown on the silver wires were made with a field emission scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM-6335F Scanning Electron Microscope) revealed that the diameter of the nanowires was 100–150 nm and the length was 900–1000 nm as shown in Figure 1. The nanorods were rather uniform in size.

701813.fig.001
Figure 1: SEM images of ZnO nanorods on silver wire that is 0.25 mm in diameter. The nanorods are 100 to 150 nm in diameter and 900–1000 nm long.

The ZnO layer on the silver wires was coated with ionophore membrane by a manual procedure. Powdered PVC, 120 mg was dissolved in 5 mL tetrahydrofuran together with 10 mg of a plasticizer (dibutyl phthalate, DBP) and 10 mg of Ca2+-specific ionophore (DB18C6). All chemicals were from Sigma-Aldrich-Fluka. The ZnO-coated wires were dipped two times into and in between the ionophore solution, and the solvent was allowed to evaporate. After this the probes were conditioned in 10 mM CaCl2 solution.

The electrochemical potential of the Ca2+-probe was measured with an Orion model 420 A+ pH-meter (Thermo Electron Corporation) versus an Ag/AgCl reference electrode. The ZnO-coated silver wire was mounted in a three-way junction for chromatography (Upchurch) using a tubing coupling screw and a small O-ring to make a fluid-tight seal around the wire. One of the remaining ports of the T-coupling was connected to a peristaltic pump and the other port served as outlet and was connected with the reference electrode. Thus a flow cell was formed with low dead volume allowing easy and quick change of sample solution. The response of the Ca2+-probe was checked with CaCl2 solutions with pH around 7 of all concentrations.

3. Results and Discussion

The potentiometric response of the Ca2+-electrode was studied in aqueous solutions of CaCl2 with concentration ranging from 1 𝜇M to 0.1 M. The construction of a two-electrode electrochemical potential cell is as follows:

Reference electrode | reference electrolyte solution test electrolyte solution | indicator electrode.

The electrochemical cell voltage (electromotive force) changes when the composition of the test electrolyte is changed. These changes can be related to the concentration of ions in the test solution via a calibration procedure. The actual electrochemical potential cell can be described by the following diagram: Ag|ZnO|CaCl2Cl|AgCl|Ag.(1) Figure 2 shows a typical induced voltage of our potentiometric sensor for different concentrations of Ca2+ ions. As clearly seen it presents a linear dependence, which implies that such sensor configuration can provide a large dynamic range.

701813.fig.002
Figure 2: Calibration curve showing the electrochemical potential difference, for the ZnO nanorod as potentiometric electrode with Ag/AgCl reference electrode versus logarithmic concentration range for Ca2+ change for buffer solution.

Polymeric membranes are mainly made of polymer, which can selectively transfer certain chemical species over others. Therefore, membranes are the key component of all potentiometric ion sensors [2224]. In fact, the vast majority of membranes used commercially are polymer-based. Analogous to biological ion channels, in analytical technology there are the so called ionophores and neutral carriers incorporated into synthetic membranes or biomolecule membranes in order to achieve the desired selectivity or detection of ionic species in complex samples.

DB18C6 is a coplanar, symmetrical, and polyether with a highly charged cavity [25] with diameter of 4 Å and can accommodate only the nonsolvated metal cation. The calcium ion being solvated in aqueous medium has a diameter of 7 Å, which is too large to be accommodated in the cavity. High charge on the oxygen atoms of DB18C6 turns the oxygen atoms into strong donors [26]. Calcium ions are also strong acids. Consequently there should be reasonably good interaction between oxygen atoms and calcium ions.

It is expected that the covalent functionalization is a chemical process in which a strong bond is formed between the nanostructured material and the biological and chemical species. In most cases, some previous chemical modification of the surface is necessary to create active groups that are necessary for the binding of biological and chemical species [27].

The emf values of the Ca2+-electrode system obtained with CaCl2 solutions in water ranging from 1 𝜇M to 0.1 M are plotted against the logarithmic concentration of Ca2+ as shown in Figure 3. The diagram includes three experiments showing good reproducibility and linearity. Here, the same ZnO sensor electrode was used for the three experiments to check the reproducibility. The ZnO sensor electrode was carefully washed with 18 MΩ water after each reading to remove the Ca2+ ions from the surface of the electrode. These calibration curves are for PVC membrane-coated ZnO electrodes with DB18C6 as ionophore. The coating increases the stability considerably as well as the selectivity. The results show that the electrode is highly sensitive to calcium ions with a slope around 26.5 mV/decade. The response time is fast. It takes less than one minute to obtain a stable signal as shown in Figure 4. The morphology of the functionalized ZnO sensor electrode was investigated after measurements. The results are shown in Figure 5. The ZnO nanorods were not dissolved but affected after measurements. As clearly seen in Figure 5(b), it shows shorter and thinner nanorods as compared to Figure 5(a). This was important to investigate as it is known that ZnO nanostructures can dissolve in many different aqueous solutions of different pH values. This result was expected because the functionalization provided protection for the surface of the nanowires.

701813.fig.003
Figure 3: Calibration curves from three different experiments using the same sensor electrode showing the electrochemical potential difference at different Ca2+ ion concentrations for the ZnO nanorod electrode with an Ag/AgCl reference electrode.
701813.fig.004
Figure 4: Stability curve for ZnO nanorod sensor at a Ca2+ concentration of 0.001 mM.
fig5
Figure 5: Scanning electron microscopy images of the ZnO nanorods grown on silver wire using low temperature growth. (a) Nanorods on silver wire coated with membrane before measurement. (b) SEM of the same sensor after measurements.

4. Conclusion

We have studied the use of ZnO nanorods as electrochemical nanosensor for Ca2+ in water solutions. A convenient sensor design was realized by growing the ZnO nanorods on a thin silver wire that could be readily inserted into a low-volume flow cell. Good performance in stability and selectivity was achieved by coating the sensor surface with a plastic ionophore membrane. The potential difference was linear over a wide logarithmic concentration range (1 𝜇M to 0.1 M). These results demonstrated the capability of performing biologically relevant measurements inside a solution of CaCl2 using functionalized ZnO nanorods.

References

  1. F. Patolsky and C. M. Lieber, “Nanowire nanosensors,” Materials Today, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 20–28, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. J. Hu, T. W. Odom, and C. M. Lieber, “Chemistry and physics in one dimension: synthesis and properties of nanowires and nanotubes,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 435–445, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. A. M. Morales and C. M. Lieber, “A laser ablation method for the synthesis of crystalline semiconductor nanowires,” Science, vol. 279, no. 5348, pp. 208–211, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. C. M. Lieber, “Nanoscale science and technology: building a big future from small things,” MRS Bulletin, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 486–491, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  5. L. Samuelson, “Self-forming nanoscale devices,” Materials Today, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 22–31, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. Y. Xia, P. Yang, Y. Sun et al., “One-dimensional nanostructures: synthesis, characterization, and applications,” Advanced Materials, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 353–389, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. Z. L. Wang, “Nanostructures of zinc oxide,” Materials Today, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 26–33, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. C. M. Niemeyer, “Nanoparticles, proteins, and nucleic acids: biotechnology meets materials science,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 40, no. 22, pp. 4128–4158, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. W. C. W. Chan, D. J. Maxwell, X. Gao, R. E. Bailey, M. Han, and S. Nie, “Luminescent quantum dots for multiplexed biological detection and imaging,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 40–46, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. J. L. West and N. J. Halas, “Engineered nanomaterials for biophotonics applications: improving sensing, imaging, and therapeutics,” Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 285–292, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  11. P. Alivisatos, “The use of nanocrystals in biological detection,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  12. P. Gould, “Nanoparticles probe biosystems,” Materials Today, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 36–43, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. B. S. Kang, F. Ren, Y. W. Heo, L. C. Tien, D. P. Norton, and S. J. Pearton, “pH measurements with single ZnO nanorods integrated with a microchannel,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 86, no. 11, Article ID 112105, 3 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. P. D. Batista and M. Mulato, “ZnO extended-gate field-effect transistors as pH sensors,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 87, no. 14, Article ID 143508, 3 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. R. Bashir, J. Z. Hilt, O. Elibol, A. Gupta, and N. A. Peppas, “Micromechanical cantilever as an ultrasensitive pH microsensor,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 81, no. 16, p. 3091, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. A. Wei, X. W. Sun, J. X. Wang et al., “Enzymatic glucose biosensor based on ZnO nanorod array grown by hydrothermal decomposition,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, no. 12, Article ID 123902, 3 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. J. S. Kim, W. I. Park, C.-H. Lee, and G.-C. Yi, “ZnO nanorod biosensor for highly sensitive detection of specific protein binding,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1635–1639, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  18. N. Kumar, A. Dorfman, and J.-I. Hahm, “Ultrasensitive DNA sequence detection using nanoscale ZnO sensor arrays,” Nanotechnology, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 2875–2881, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. S. M. Al-Hilli, M. Willander, A. Öst, and P. Strålfors, “ZnO nanorods as an intracellular sensor for pH measurements,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 102, no. 8, Article ID 084304, 5 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. X. W. Sun and H. S. Kwok, “Optical properties of epitaxially grown zinc oxide films on sapphire by pulsed laser deposition,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 408–411, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. D. W. Allan, “Statistics of atomic frequency standards,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 221–230, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. E. Bakker, P. Bühlmann, and E. Pretsch, “Polymer membrane ion-selective electrodes-what are the limits?,” Electroanalysis, vol. 11, no. 13, pp. 915–933, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. E. Bakker, P. Bühlmann, and E. Pretsch, “Carrier-based ion-selective electrodes and bulk optodes. 1. General characteristics,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 97, no. 8, pp. 3083–3132, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. P. Bühlmann, E. Pretsch, and E. Bakker, “Carrier-based ion-selective electrodes and bulk optodes. 2. Ionophores for potentiometric and optical sensors,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 1593–1687, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. C. J. Pedersen, “Cyclic polyethers and their complexes with metal salts,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 89, no. 26, pp. 7017–7036, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. A. Kumar and S. K. Mittal, “PVC based dibenzo-18-crown-6 electrode for Ca(II) ions,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 99, no. 2-3, pp. 340–343, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. A. K. Wanekaya, W. Chen, N. V. Myung, and A. Mulchandani, “Nanowire-based electrochemical biosensors,” Electroanalysis, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 533–550, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar