Journal of Nanotechnology

Journal of Nanotechnology / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 8073593 | 8 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8073593

Electrochemical Oxidations of p-Doped Semiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes

Academic Editor: Andrey Miroshnichenko
Received21 Jun 2016
Accepted01 Nov 2016
Published15 Dec 2016

Abstract

Two oxidation peaks at 0.99, 1.48 V versus Fc/Fc+ appear in the cyclic voltammograms of a series of defect-site functionalized SWNTs in methylene chloride solution in the presence of ferrocenes. These two peaks are demonstrated to be the electrochemical responses to the independent oxidation of v1 and v2 valence bands of -doped semiconducting SWNTs.

1. Introduction

The electrochemistry of fullerenes and their derivatives has been well documented since first report in 1990 [1]. So far, six one-electron reductions [2] and three one-electron oxidations [3] were reported for C60 in scrupulously experimental conditions such as dry solvent and adoptable supporting electrolyte. These established redox potentials for C60 have played a pivotal role in understanding its electronic and chemical behaviors [4, 5]. As the extended member of fullerene family, single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) have been extensively investigated for their unique electronic and chemical properties [6]. For examples, the side-wall addition reactions onto SWNTs have been correlated to the charge-transfer precursors [79] occurring from carbon nanotubes to chemical reactants. In addition, the photoinduced charge-transfers from carbon nanotubes to chromophores have been proposed in several systems [1019]. Unlike C60, these theoretical remarks are based on the density of electronic states (DOS) of SWNTs instead of their redox potentials. Such an awkward situation could be considerably ascribed to the lack of the redox potential data for SWNTs. Though a great deal of efforts have been made to investigate the electrochemical properties of SWNTs, most results demonstrated the fast electron transfer and catalytic properties of SWNTs [2031]. A direct electrochemical measurement on Prato-type side-wall functionalized SWNTs with cyclic voltammetry was recently reported; however, no apparent redox potential was observed experimentally [32]. On the other hand, like C60, the chemical doped SWNTs with either the electron donors (K, Cs) or the electron acceptors (I2, Br2) have been characterized in their corresponding optical absorption spectra of band gap energies [33, 34]. Moreover, these characteristic optical absorption spectra of chemical doped SWNTs were observed when tuning the electron potential of SWNTs films at 1.4 and 1.8 V (versus Ag), respectively [35, 36]. The facile oxidation of the semiconducting SWNTs dispersed in aqueous solution with small molecule reagents like oxygen was also reported [3739]. These literatures [3339] strongly suggest that the oxidation potentials of SWNTs should be comparable to those of fullerenes.

In this work, the cyclic voltammetry (CV) of a series of defect-site functionalized SWNTs, THPP·SWNTs, THPP-HMP-SWNTs, THPP-HHP-SWNTs, and C20-SWNTs (Scheme 1), was measured in the absence and presence of ferrocenes in CH2Cl2 solutions with [(t-Butyl)4N+]·[] as supporting electrolyte. In the cyclic voltammograms of these studied SWNTs, weak and broad oxidation peaks at 1.33 V (versus Ag+/Ag) appear with reducing current trend of C20-SWNTs < THPP-HHP-SWNTs < THPP-HMP-SWNTs < THPP·SWNTs in the absence of ferrocenes, while by adding ferrocenes a consistently strong oxidation peak at 1.48 V (versus Fc/Fc+) emerges with the similarly inclined weak and broad oxidation peak at 0.99 V (versus Fc/Fc+) following C20-SWNTs < THPP-HHP-SWNTs < THPP-HMP-SWNTs < THPP·SWNTs. However, the expected redox waves of porphyrin derivatives do not appear in these CVs of these porphyrin derived SWNTs. These observed peaks are rationalized and assigned to the independent oxidations of v1 and v2 valence bands of SWNTs, respectively. And the effects of -network SWNTs could account for the missing redox responses of porphyrin derivatives.

2. Results and Discussion

The syntheses of 5,10,15,20-Tetrakis(hexadecyloxyphenyl)-21H,23H-porphyrin (THPP), 5-hydroxymethylphenyl-10,15,20-tris(hexadecyloxyphenyl)-21H,23H-porphyrin (HMP-THPP), and 5-hydroxyhexyloxyphenyl-10,15,20-tris(hexadecyloxyphenyl)-21H,23H-porphyrin (HHP-THPP) were reported in literatures [40, 41]. THPP was sonicated with purified SWNTs in chloroform to give rise to noncovalently functionalized SWNTs (THHP·SWNTs), which are soluble in THF, CH2Cl2, and others [40]. THPP-HMP-SWNTs and THPP-HHP-SWNTs soluble in most common organic solvents were synthesized by reacting HMP-THPP and HHP-THPP with SOCl2 treated SWNTs at 105°C under the atmosphere of N2 [41]. THPP·SWNTs, THPP-HMP-SWNTs, and THPP-HHP-SWNTs were well characterized with NMR, IR, NIR, and Raman spectroscopies and electron microscopy [40, 41]. C20-SWNTs was synthesized using eicosanol (C20) in similar procedures to THPP-HMP-SWNTs and THPP-HHP-SWNTs [41]. The electrochemical experiments were conducted on a CHI-660 electrochemical workstation.

SWNTs produced via different methods (including arc discharge SWNTs studied herein) are composed of both metallic and semiconducting parts with statistical ratio of one to two [42]. The electrochemical and conducting investigations on pristine SWNTs showed that the semiconducting SWNTs dominate the electric properties of mixed SWNTs [43, 44]. And SWNTs purified with routine procedures [45, 46] usually display -type doping properties. For one example, Day et al. [43] demonstrated that the oxidization current intensity was higher than reduction current intensity on purified SWNTs network. More recently, -doping effect was reported to be further enhanced on SWNTs by SOCl2 treatment [47]. Though the semiconducting components of SWNTs were enriched in THPP·SWNTs [40], the similar electrochemical responses of -doped SWNTs are expected for these studied SWNTs. As evident in their CV curves (Figures 1 and 2), the oxidation current intensities are obviously stronger than the reduced current intensities.

Anodic Electrode. Fullerenes undergo facile reduction with stepwise, reversible electron accumulations [2]. The electrochemically reduced fullerides are stable enough to be exploited for fullerene separation [48]. Unlike fullerenes, the anodic current response of all studied SWNTs is very weak in proximity to the background (Figures 1 and 2). These silent anodic responses of SWNTs can be correlated to -doping electronic features. In -doped semiconducting materials, the Fermi level is usually beneath the first valence band. And the Fermi level of -doped SWNTs can only shift to a level possessing maximum intensity of band gap absorption and minimum electronic conductivity by electrochemical tuning of negative potential [36]. This implies that the external anodic potential (up to −1.8 V) can not reduce SWNTs to a negatively charged specie, but only adjust preexisting electrons and orbitals in their original electronic states. Though the optical absorption of the metallo-SWNTs (CCs0.10) was reported at 1.3 eV [33], such a characteristic absorbance was not observed for -doped SWNT films charged with negative potential up to −1.4 V versus Ag [35]. In our experiments, no peak corresponding to the reduction reaction from SWNT to SWNT- appears in these CV curves with a spectral window to −2.2 V versus Ag+/Ag. The lack of reduced species for SWNTs is possibly because the supporting potentials in these experimental conditions are insufficient to overcome the intrinsic Coulomb blockade effect [49] in quantized -type semiconducting SWNTs.

Cathodic Electrode. In contrast to their reduction, the oxidation of fullerenes is difficult. However, it has been reported that higher fullerenes (C70, C76, C78, and C80) are easier to oxidize than C60, despite being in the irreversible fashion [50]. Structurally analogous to fullerenes, SWNTs are expected to oxidize easily, at least comparable to these higher fullerenes. As seen in Figures 1 and 2, the cathodic responses of these studied SWNTs are more informative than their anodic responses. In the absence of ferrocenes (commonly used as the reference of potential), the irreversibly weak and broad oxidation peaks ( = 1.3 V versus Ag/Ag+) appear in Figure 1 superimposing the conductive curves. The visibility of this oxidation peak follows the trend: THPP.SWNTs > THPP-HMP-SWNTs > THPP-HHP-SWNTs > C20-SWNTs. When adding ferrocenes, the well-defined steady-state CV curves with two irreversible half-wave oxidation peaks ( = 0.99, 1.48 V versus Fc/Fc+) overlap the conductive curves (Figure 2). The oxidation peaks at 0.99 V are weak and broad, similar to the ones measured in the absence of ferrocenes. The oxidation peaks at 1.48 V are strong and consistent for all studied samples. The CVs of studied SWNTs were conducted at different conditions such as various scanning rate, different temperatures, and solvents (see Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8073593), and the similar CV curves were obtained. These results prove that the observed oxidation peaks are real, not false responses. The next is the assignment of these two oxidation peaks. These two oxidation peaks seem not to be from the functionalities or from the charge-transfer complex between functionalities and SWNTs. The strong argument is that the same oxidation peaks at 1.48 V appear in these CVs for both porphyrin derived SWNTs and eicosanol derived SWNTs. The skepticism on the impurities associated with SWNTs, such as fullerenes and carbonaceous nanoparticles, is unsupportive. Although the oxidation peaks of fullerenes resemble the observed ones, their reduction peaks could not be identified in these CV curves. As for carbonaceous nanoparticles, our previous spectroscopic investigations [41] on these studied SWNTs are lack of the reported fluorescence emissions, characteristic of carbonaceous nanoparticles [51, 52]. The left possibility for these two oxidation peaks is from SWNTs. The oxidation of SWNTs can be rationalized. First of all, the oxidation potentials of 0.99, 1.48 V versus Fc/Fc+ are surprisingly close to those of C78 C2v-isomer fullerene (0.95, 1.43 V vs Fc/Fc+) [50]. This means that the two potentials of 0.99, 1.48 V versus Fc/Fc+ are rational to oxidize SWNTs. Secondly, like the near IR absorption of ((C60/) = 1.26 V versus Fc/Fc+ [53]) at 1.26 eV [54], the first oxidation potential of 0.99 V versus Fc/Fc+ is proximately corresponding to the near IR absorption of -doped SWNTs (CBr0.15) [33, 34] at 1.07 eV. Thirdly, two near IR absorption peaks were observed at 1.15 eV and 1.24 eV when the -doped SWNTs film electrochemically tuned at 1.4, 1.8 V versus Ag, respectively [35]. The oxidation potential of 1.33 V versus Ag/Ag+ in Figure 1 and the oxidation potentials of 0.99, 1.48 V versus Fc/Fc+ in Figure 2 are consistent with these electrochemical tuning results. Finally, the DPV (differential pulse voltage) spectrum of THPP·SWNTs was measured in the presence of ferrocenes. As seen in Figure 3, two clear oxidation peaks were obtained at 0.99 and 1.48 V versus Fc/Fc+. Interestingly, the potential differences of these two oxidation peaks and their wave shapes are similar to those of two band gap energy transitions ( and ) of semiconducting SWTNs (seen in Figure 3). This implies that these two oxidation peaks are closely related to the band gap energy absorption of SWNTs. Therefore, the oxidation reactions of SWNTs can be expressed as = + and = + , where represents the required energy to remove one electron from conduct bands, and are band gap energies of and absorptions, respectively, and and represent the required energies to remove one electron from v1 and v2 valence bands, respectively. From these two expressions, the oxidation peaks can be considered as the electrochemical responses to the independent removal of one electron from v1 and v2 valence bands. This unambiguously explains why the oxidation peak at 1.48 V appears even without the oxidation peak at 0.99 V in the CV of C20-SWNTs.

The oxidation peaks of SWNTs at 1.48 V appear only in Figure 2. The different condition in Figure 2 from Figure 1 is the addition of ferrocenes. Though Barazzouk et al. [55] recently reported that the electrochemical activities of C60 cluster film were efficiently improved by the electrocatalysis of encapsulated ferrocenes, the electrochemistry of ferrocene derived SWNTs did not display any electrocatalytic effect of ferrocenes on the redox properties of SWNTs [56]. Therefore, the observed oxidation peaks of these studied SWNTs at 1.48 V need an alternative explanation. In an electrolyte gated carbon nanotube field emission transistor (NFET), the ionic cloud of the electrolyte was reported to behave like a near-lying gate electrode to compensate the excess charge drawn onto SWNTs when applying an external potential [57, 58]. As long as the ionic cloud of the electrolyte immediately responds to the external potential, the redox reactions of SWNTs cannot occur. Commonly, -doped SWNTs are so conductive when applying a positive potential that the real voltages on SWNTs keep below their oxidation potentials. When adding ferrocenes, the ferrocenium cations electrochemically produced from the surface of the electrode eliminated the compensating effect of surrounding electrolyte ionic cloud on SWNTs and lifted up their real voltages for the oxidation reactions.

Obviously, the weak and broad oxidation peaks in Figure 1 were not significantly changed in Figure 2 by adding ferrocenes. This hints that the oxidation of v1 band of SWNTs is determined by their -doping electronic properties relative to absorption. Different from THPP·SWNTs, the preparations of THPP-HMP-SWNTs, THPP-HHP-SWNTs, and C20-SWNTs were via thionyl method [59] which was reported [47] to enhance -doping effects. Therefore, the v1 oxidation peak is much more visible for THPP·SWNTs. Even though the -doping effects are determining, the v1 oxidation peaks could still be traced for THPP-HMP-SWNTs and THPP-HHP-SWNTs, but not for C20-SWNTs. This indicates that the porphyrin moieties have some impacts on the v1 oxidation of SWNTs. In addition, the v1 oxidation peak of THPP-HMP-SWNTs is a little bit more visible than that of THPP-HHP-SWNTs which has a longer linker onto the surfaces of SWNTs than THPP-HMP-SWNTs. This means that the impacts of porphyrin moieties on the v1 oxidation of SWNTs are relative to their linking lengths.

Porphyrin Moieties on SWNTs. Porphyrin and its analogy have been investigated for their conjugation with C60 [6063], nanoparticles [6466], and electrodes [6769] due to their diversity of tunable functionalities. The redox properties of porphyrins in these conjugates [6069] are strongly influenced by the molecular proximity/orientation to the substrates. The conjugations between porphyrin derivatives and SWNTs were reported for their photophysical properties [1017]. The electrochemistry of porphyrin moieties on SWNTs is scarce, though the outstanding electrocatalytic properties of hemin (containing a porphyrin ring) were demonstrated on MWNT electrodes [70]. The electrochemical responses of porphyrin moieties with varied orientation and proximity to a SWNT surface are presented in this work. For THPP·SWNTs, porphyrin cores are directly in contact with the -network of SWNTs, while porphyrin cores are 1- and 6-CH2- far away from defect sites of the SWNT surface in THPP-HMP-SWNTs and THPP-HPP-SWNTs, respectively. As shown in Figures 1 and 2, the redox waves of porphyrin moieties in these porphyrin derived SWNTs are invisible except the two weak and broad irreversible reduction peaks at −1.7, −2.35 V versus Fc/Fc+ emerge in the CV for THPP-HPP-SWNTs, comparable to those of HPP-THPP with E1/2 of −1.74, −2.14 V versus Fc/Fc+ (seen in Supplementary Material). These results are sharply in contrast to the redox behaviors of porphyrin derivatives/analogy on other substrates [6069], which indicates that the effects of SWNTs on the electrochemistry of porphyrin derivatives are different from those of C60, nanoparticles, and electrodes. These different effects are possibly due to the -network electron screening and/or strong - interactions of SWNTs with porphyrin moieties. The electron screening usually escapes porphyrin moieties from the direct charging from the electrode. The - interaction can merge the frontier molecular orbits of porphyrin rings into the electronic states of SWNTs. With these two effects, porphyrin moieties on the surface of SWNTs are hardly to be electrochemically active. The weak and broad irreversible reduction peaks for porphyrin derivatives shown in the CV curve possibly came from the lucky molecules tethered with the 6-CH2 flexible chain in THHP-HHP-SWNTs, which escaped out of the above-described effects of SWNTs.

3. Conclusion

In summary, the CV measurements of THPP·SWNTs, THPP-HHP-SWNTs, THPP-HMP-SWNTs, and C20-SWNTs methylene chloride solutions were conducted in the absence and presence of ferrocenes. The CV results in the presence of ferrocenes display two oxidation peaks at 0.99, 1.48 V versus Fc/Fc+, consistent with the electrochemical results of -doped SWNT films in literatures [35, 36]. By comparison of these two oxidation peaks in the DPV spectrum of THPP·SWNTs to its band gap energy absorption, these two peaks can be assigned to the independent oxidization of v1 and v2 valence bands, respectively. On the other hand, the redox behaviors of porphyrin moieties on these porphyrin derived SWNTs are invisible in their CV curves, except for THHP-HHP-SWNTs with two weak irreversible broad reduction waves. This could be due to the strong electronic effects of -network SWNTs on the porphyrin molecules.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary Materials

Experimental Conditions for CV measurements and CVs of THPPs in THF.

  1. Supplementary Material

References

  1. R. E. Haufler, J. Conceicao, L. P. F. Chibante et al., “Efficient production of C60 (buckminsterfullerene), C60H36, and the solvated buckide ion,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 94, no. 24, pp. 8634–8636, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. Q. Xie, E. Pérez-Cordero, and L. Echegoyen, “Electrochemical detection of C606- and C706-: enhanced stability of fullerides in solution,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 114, no. 10, pp. 3978–3980, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. Bruno, I. Doubitski, M. Marcaccio, F. Paolucci, D. Paolucci, and A. Zaopo, “Electrochemical generation of C602+ and C603+,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 125, no. 51, pp. 15738–15739, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. L. Echegoyen and L. E. Echegoyen, “Electrochemistry of fullerenes and their derivatives,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 593–601, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. M. Guldi and M. Prato, “Excited-state properties of C60 fullerene derivatives,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 695–703, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. R. C. Haddon, “Carbon nanotubes,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 997–997, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Holzinger, J. Abraham, P. Whelan et al., “Functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes with (R-)oxycarbonyl nitrenes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 125, no. 28, pp. 8566–8580, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. S. Strano, C. A. Dyke, M. L. Usrey et al., “Electronic structure control of single-waited carbon nanotube functionalization,” Science, vol. 301, no. 5639, pp. 1519–1522, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Banerjee and S. S. Wong, “Selective metallic tube reactivity in the solution-phase osmylation of single-walled carbon nanotubes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 7, pp. 2073–2081, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. D. M. Guldi, G. M. A. Rahman, J. Ramey et al., “Donor-acceptor nanoensembles of soluble carbon nanotubes,” Chemical Communications, no. 18, pp. 2034–2035, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. M. Guldi, G. M. A. Rahman, N. Jux, N. Tagmatarchis, and M. Prato, “Integrating single-wall carbon nanotubes into donor-acceptor nanohybrids,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 43, no. 41, pp. 5526–5530, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. D. M. Guldi, G. M. A. Rahman, M. Prato, N. Jux, S. Qin, and W. Ford, “Single-wall carbon nanotubes as integrative building blocks for solar-energy conversion,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 44, no. 13, pp. 2015–2018, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. L. Sheeney-Haj-Ichia, B. Basnar, and I. Willner, “Efficient generation of photocurrents by using CdS/carbon nanotube assemblies on electrodes,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 78–83, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. M. Guldi, H. Taieb, G. M. A. Rahman, N. Tagmatarchis, and M. Prato, “Novel photoactive single-walled carbon nanotube-porphyrin polymer wraps: efficient and long-lived intracomplex charge separation,” Advanced Materials, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 871–875, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. D. M. Guldi, G. M. A. Rahman, N. Jux, D. Balbinot, N. Tagmatarchis, and M. Prato, “Multiwalled carbon nanotubes in donor-acceptor nanohybrids—towards long-lived electron transfer products,” Chemical Communications, no. 15, pp. 2038–2040, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. Zhang and W. Gorski, “Electrochemical sensing platform based on the carbon nanotubes/redox mediators-biopolymer system,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 127, no. 7, pp. 2058–2059, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. D. Baskaran, J. W. Mays, X. P. Zhang, and M. S. Bratcher, “Carbon nanotubes with covalently linked porphyrin antennae: photoinduced electron transfer,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 127, no. 19, pp. 6916–6917, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. H. Paloniemi, T. Ääritalo, T. Laiho et al., “Water-soluble full-length single-wall carbon nanotube polyelectrolytes: preparation and characterization,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 18, pp. 8634–8642, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. Zhang, J. K. Lee, Y. Wu, and R. W. Murray, “Photoluminescence and electronic interaction of anthracene derivatives adsorbed on sidewalls of single-walled carbon nanotubes,” Nano Letters, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 403–407, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. E. Katz and I. Willner, “Biomolecule-functionalized carbon nanotubes: applications in nanobioelectronics,” ChemPhysChem, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 1084–1104, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. Wang, M. Musameh, and Y. Lin, “Solubilization of carbon nanotubes by Nafion toward the preparation of amperometric biosensors,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 125, no. 9, pp. 2408–2409, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. J. Gooding, R. Wibowo, J. Liu et al., “Protein electrochemistry using aligned carbon nanotube arrays,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 125, no. 30, pp. 9006–9007, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. Wang, R. P. Deo, P. Poulin, and M. Mangey, “Carbon nanotube fiber microelectrodes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 125, no. 48, pp. 14706–14707, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. P. Qi, A. Javey, M. Rolandi, Q. Wang, E. Yenilmez, and H. Dai, “Miniature organic transistors with carbon nanotubes as quasi-one- dimensional electrodes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 38, pp. 11774–11775, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. Shim, A. Javey, N. W. S. Kam, and H. Dai, “Polymer functionalization for air-stable n-type carbon nanotube field-effect transistors,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 123, no. 46, pp. 11512–11513, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. B. R. Azamian, J. J. Davis, K. S. Coleman, C. B. Bagshaw, and M. L. H. Green, “Bioelectrochemical single-walled carbon nanotubes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 124, no. 43, pp. 12664–12665, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. P. V. Kamat, K. G. Thomas, S. Barazzouk, G. Girishkumar, K. Vinodgopal, and D. Meisel, “Self-assembled linear bundles of single wall carbon nanotubes and their alignment and deposition as a film in a dc field,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 34, pp. 10757–10762, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. K. Campbell, L. Sun, and R. M. Crooks, “Electrochemistry using single carbon nanotubes [1],” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 121, no. 15, pp. 3779–3780, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. I. Heller, J. Kong, H. A. Heering, K. A. Williams, S. G. Lemay, and C. Dekker, “Individual single-walled carbon nanotubes as nanoelectrodes for electrochemistry,” Nano Letters, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 137–142, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. K. Balasubramanian, R. Sordan, M. Burghard, and K. Kern, “A selective electrochemical approach to carbon nanotube field-effect transistors,” Nano Letters, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 827–830, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. Y. Lin, F. Lu, Y. Tu, and Z. Ren, “Glucose biosensors based on carbon nanotube nanoelectrode ensembles,” Nano Letters, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 191–195, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. Melle-Franco, M. Marcaccio, D. Paolucci et al., “Cyclic voltammetry and bulk electronic properties of soluble carbon nanotubes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 6, pp. 1646–1647, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. Kazaoui, N. Minami, R. Jacquemin, H. Kataura, and Y. Achiba, “Amphoteric doping of single-wall carbon-nanotube thin films as probed by optical absorption spectroscopy,” Physical Review B, vol. 60, no. 19, pp. 13339–13342, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. Liu, A. G. Rinzler, H. Dai et al., “Fullerene pipes,” Science, vol. 280, no. 5367, pp. 1253–1256, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. S. Kazaoui, N. Minami, N. Matsuda, H. Kataura, and Y. Achiba, “Electrochemical tuning of electronic states in single-wall carbon nanotubes studied by in situ absorption spectroscopy and ac resistance,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 78, no. 22, article 3433, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Z. Wu, Z. Chen, X. Du et al., “Transparent, conductive carbon nanotube films,” Science, vol. 305, no. 5688, pp. 1273–1276, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. M. Zheng and B. A. Diner, “Solution redox chemistry of carbon nanotubes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 47, pp. 15490–15494, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. J. O'Connell, E. E. Eibergen, and S. K. Doorn, “Chiral selectivity in the charge-transfer bleaching of single-walled carbon-nanotube spectra,” Nature Materials, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 412–418, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. Z. Slanina, L. Stobinski, P. Tomasik, H.-M. Lin, and L. Adamowicz, “Quantum-chemical model evaluations of thermodynamics and kinetics of oxygen atom additions to narrow nanotubes,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 3, no. 1-2, pp. 193–198, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. H. P. Li, B. Zhou, Y. Lin et al., “Selective interactions of porphyrins with semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 1014–1015, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. H. P. Li, R. B. Martin, B. A. Harruff, R. A. Carino, L. F. Allard, and Y.-P. Sun, “Single-walled carbon nanotubes tethered with porphyrins: synthesis and photophysical properties,” Advanced Materials, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 896–900, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and P. Avouris, Eds., Carbon Nanotubes: Synthesis, Structure, Properties and Applications, vol. 80, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2001.
  43. T. M. Day, N. R. Wilson, and J. V. Macpherson, “Electrochemical and conductivity measurements of single-wall carbon nanotube network electrodes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 51, pp. 16724–16725, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. Boussaad, N. J. Tao, R. Zhang, T. Hopson, and L. A. Nagahara, “In situ detection of cytochrome c adsorption with single walled carbon nanotube device,” Chemical Communications, no. 13, pp. 1502–1503, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  45. M. E. Itkis, S. Niyogi, M. E. Meng, M. A. Hamon, H. Hu, and R. C. Haddon, “Spectroscopic study of the fermi level electronic structure of single-walled carbon nanotubes,” Nano Letters, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 155–159, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. F. Hennrich, R. Wellmann, S. Malik, S. Lebedkin, and M. M. Kappes, “Reversible modification of the absorption properties of single-walled carbon nanotube thin films via nitric acid exposure,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 178–183, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. U. Dettlaff-Weglikowska, V. Skákalová, R. Graupner et al., “Effect of SOCl2 treatment on electrical and mechanical properties of single-wall carbon nanotube networks,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 127, no. 14, pp. 5125–5131, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. D. Diener and J. M. Alford, “Isolation and properties of small-bandgap fullerenes,” Nature, vol. 393, no. 6686, pp. 668–671, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. J. Tans, M. H. Devoret, H. Dai et al., “Individual single-wall carbon nanotubes as quantum wires,” Nature, vol. 386, no. 6624, pp. 474–477, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. Y. Yang, F. Arias, L. Echegoyen et al., “Reversible fullerene electrochemistry: correlation with the HOMO-LUMO energy difference for C60, C70, C76, C78, and C84,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 117, no. 29, pp. 7801–7804, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. B. Zhao, H. Hu, S. Niyogi et al., “Chromatographic purification and properties of soluble single-walled carbon nanotubes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 123, no. 47, pp. 11673–11677, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. X. Xu, R. Ray, Y. Gu et al., “Electrophoretic analysis and purification of fluorescent single-walled carbon nanotube fragments,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 40, pp. 12736–12737, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. Q. Xie, E. Pérez-Cordero, and L. Echegoyen, “Electrochemically-reversible, single-electron oxidation of C60 and C70,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 115, no. 21, pp. 9818–9819, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. C. A. Reed, K.-C. Kim, R. D. Bolskar, and L. J. Mueller, “Taming superacids: stabilization of the fullerene cations HC60+ and C60·+,” Science, vol. 289, no. 5476, pp. 101–104, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. S. Barazzouk, S. Hotschandani, and P. V. J. Kamat, “Unusual electrocatalytic behavior of ferrocene bound fullerene cluster films,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 12, pp. 2021–2025, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. D. M. Guldi, M. Marcaccio, D. Paolucci et al., “Single-wall carbon nanotube-ferrocene nanohybrids: observing intramolecular electron transfer in functionalized SWNTs,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 42, no. 35, pp. 4206–4209, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. M. Kruger, M. R. Buitelaar, T. Nussbaumer, C. Schonenberger, and L. Forro, “Electrochemical carbon nanotube field-effect transistor,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 78, p. 1291, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. S. Rosenblatt, Y. Yaish, J. Park, J. Gore, V. Sazonova, and P. L. McEuen, “High performance electrolyte gated carbon nanotube transistors,” Nano Letters, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 869–872, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. W. Huang, S. Fernando, L. F. Allard, and Y.-P. Sun, “Solubilization of single-walled carbon nanotubes with diamine-terminated oligomeric poly(ethylene glycol) in different functionalization reactions,” Nano Letters, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 565–568, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. D. Bonifazi, M. Scholl, F. Song et al., “Exceptional redox and photophysical properties of a triply fused Diporphyrin-C60 conjugate: novel scaffolds for multicharge storage in molecular scale electronics,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 42, no. 40, pp. 4966–4970, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. D. I. Schuster, P. Cheng, P. D. Jarowski et al., “Design, synthesis, and photophysical studies of a porphyrin-fullerene dyad with parachute topology; charge recombination in the marcus inverted region,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 23, pp. 7257–7270, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. D. González-Rodríguez, T. Torres, D. M. Guldi, J. Rivera, M. Á. A. Herranz, and L. Echegoyen, “Subphthalocyanines: tuneable molecular scaffolds for intramolecular electron and energy transfer processes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 20, pp. 6301–6313, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. F. T. Tat, Z. Zhou, S. MacMahon et al., “A new fullerene complexation ligand: N-pyridylfulleropyrrolidine,” Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 69, no. 14, pp. 4602–4606, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. B. A. Gregg, M. A. Fox, and A. J. Bard, “Surfactant porphyrins linked to ruthenium oxide microcolloids: amicroheterogeneous photoreactor,” Tetrahedron, vol. 45, no. 15, pp. 4707–4716, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. U. Resch and M. A. Fox, “Influence of linking alkyl chain length on photoinduced intramolecular electron transfer in bipyridine-linked porphyrin-ruthenium dioxide clusters,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, vol. 95, no. 16, pp. 6169–6178, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. U. Resch and M. A. Fox, “Electron transfer from a surfactant-like zinc porphyrin to a covalently attached ruthenium dioxide cluster,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 95, no. 16, pp. 6316–6322, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. H. Yamada, H. Imahori, Y. Nishimura et al., “Photovoltaic properties of self-assembled monolayers of porphyrins and porphyrin-fullerene dyads on ITO and gold surfaces,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 125, no. 30, pp. 9129–9139, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. B. J. Vesper, K. Salaita, H. Zong, C. A. Mirkin, A. G. M. Barrett, and B. M. Hoffman, “Surface-bound porphyrazines: controlling reduction potentials of self-assembled monolayers through molecular proximity/orientation to a metal surface,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 50, pp. 16653–16658, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. Y.-J. Cho, T. K. Ahn, H. Song et al., “Unusually high performance photovoltaic cell based on a [60]fullerene metal cluster-porphyrin dyad SAM on an ITO electrode,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 127, no. 8, pp. 2380–2381, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. J.-S. Ye, Y. Wen, W. D. Zhang et al., “Application of multi-walled carbon nanotubes functionalized with hemin for oxygen detection in neutral solution,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 562, no. 2, pp. 241–246, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Huaping Li and Lili Zhou. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

584 Views | 281 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.