Journal of Nanotechnology

Journal of Nanotechnology / 2021 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 8870453 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8870453

Vo Nguyen Xuan Que, Tran Tien Khoi, Nguyen Thi Thuy, Ta Thi Minh Dung, Dao Thi Thanh Binh, Nguyen Nhat Huy, "Factors Determining the Removal Efficiency of Procion MX in Waters Using Titanate Nanotubes Catalyzed by UV Irradiation", Journal of Nanotechnology, vol. 2021, Article ID 8870453, 10 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8870453

Factors Determining the Removal Efficiency of Procion MX in Waters Using Titanate Nanotubes Catalyzed by UV Irradiation

Academic Editor: Sumit Beniwal
Received13 Aug 2020
Revised18 Feb 2021
Accepted07 May 2021
Published19 May 2021

Abstract

The treatment of wastewater from the textile industry containing organic dyes faces many challenges since these compounds resist the biodegradation process in conventional treatment units. Among the physicochemical processes, photocatalysis is considered a facile, cheap, and environmental-friendly technology for treating persistent organic pollutants in waters at low concentrations. This study investigated several physicochemical factors determining the photocatalytic activity of titanate nanotubes (TNTs) to remove Procion MX 032 (PMX), an azo dye, in waters. Degradation of PMX by photocatalytic oxidation process at room temperature (30°C) was set up with the UV irradiation in the presence of different types of photocatalyst such as ST-01 (100% anatase), industrial TiO2, TNTs calcined at 120°C and 500°C. Effect of reaction time, catalyst amount, pH, light wavelength and intensity, and oxidants was investigated. Consequently, TNTs calcined at 500°C provided the highest removal efficiency. The photocatalytic oxidation of PMX by TNT calcined at 500°C was affected by pH variation, getting the highest removal at pH of 8, and inhibited with the presence of H2O2 and O2. Particularly, the PMX degradation using titanate nanotubes was optimized under the UV-A intensity of 100 W/m2. The dye was degraded by more than 95% at the TNTs concentration of 75 mg/L and pH 8.0 after 90 min. The results suggest that photocatalysis using TNTs can be a simple but efficient treatment method to remove PMX and potentially be applied for the treatment of wastewaters containing dyes.

1. Introduction

Textile industries produce a large amount of wastewater which contains a high concentration of inorganic salts and different types of reactive dyes for coloring clothes [1, 2]. These reactive dyes cause aesthetic problems, an increase of chemical oxygen demand of the wastewater [3]. They may result in inhibition, eutrophication, and perturbation of the ecosystem because of their toxic and mutagenic effect [4], even at low concentrations [5], that should be removed from wastewater before discharging into the water environment. Among different types of dye, Procion MX is a commonly used fabric reactive dye belonging to the dichlorotriazine class [6]. Several types of Procion MX were selected as the color target in wastewater treatment, such as Procion Red MX-5B [3], Procion Red MX 3B [7], Procion Blue MX-R [8], and Procion Brown MX-5BR [9], but the treatment wastewater containing Procion MX 032 (color name of Carmine Red) (hereinafter referred to as PMX) has been rarely found except one report from Nguyen et al. [10].

The requirement for wastewater treatment becomes more and more strict in Vietnam in order to prevent the serious pollution of the water environment. Although contributing a small portion of the wastewater treatment field, research on the treatment of textile and printing wastewaters has been attracted much attention due to their visible color of dyes and pigments and their refractory properties for treatment by traditional biological processes [11]. The available techniques for textile wastewater treatment are traditional methods (e.g., anaerobic and aerobic biodegradation, chemical coagulation, ion exchange, and adsorption) and advanced oxidation processes (e.g., Fenton, electro-Fenton, photo-Fenton, and photocatalysis) [5]. Traditional physical and chemical methods have their limitation for low volume but a high concentration of dyes, which are not suitable for the treatment of wastewater with low dyes concentration after biological treatment [12]. Moreover, these processes, popularly chemical coagulation and adsorption, only transfer the pollution from one phase (e.g., liquid) to another phase (e.g., solid) without actual degradation of the pollutants. Regarding advanced oxidation processes, Fenton and Fenton-like reactions are usually applied for high strength wastewater due to its high cost of chemicals (Fe(II), persulfate, and H2O2) or electricity. Therefore, photocatalysis, a destruction technique, is considered a promising technology to remove the low concentration of pollutants from aqueous phase systems for water purification and hazardous waste remediation [13], particularly for the advanced treatment of textile wastewater after biological processes. Moreover, accelerated physicochemical processes involved in photocatalysis reactions are either supplementary or complementary to some conventional approaches to transform hazardous chemical wastes such as organic and inorganic species into mineralized products. The major mechanism for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in water using TiO2 material under UV light is summarized in the following reactions [14]:

With important properties such as biological and chemical inert, long-term photo-stability, and most importantly, low-cost, TiO2 is the most successful photocatalyst for the degradation of organic compounds [15]. TiO2-based nanotubes (e.g., titanate nanotubes, TNTs) were firstly synthesized by Hoyer [16] applying the electrochemical method. TNTs provide larger specific surface areas and pore volumes, high ratios of length to tube diameter, and significant electron-transport capability [17, 18]. Studies widely used the hydrothermal synthesis method to quantitatively produce high-quality TNTs [1719]. In previous works, TNTs calcined at different temperatures were applied for NOx and Procion dyes removal, which showed high efficiencies and potential for environmental applications in air and wastewater treatment [10, 20]. However, the treatment condition for photocatalytic removals of PMX has not been systematically investigated.

Various factors such as type of catalyst, reaction time, amount of catalyst, solution pH, light, and oxidant have different effects on the performance of photocatalytic treatment of dyes and other pollutants in water and wastewater [21]. Studies showed that the types and properties of TiO2 material, such as crystal phase, surface area, and particle size, could strongly affect photocatalytic processes [2224]. Hydraulic retention time, catalyst dosage, solution pH, and light source are among other factors that usually determined the photocatalytic kinetics [2540]. Solution pH has controlled the photocatalytic activity via regulating the surface charge of the photocatalyst, the speciation of pollutants, and the concentration of hydroxide ion in the solution [4150]. Since the photocatalytic reaction is initiated by light, its performance is influenced by the wavelength and intensity of the light source [5155]. As electron receptors, the presence and effect of oxidants such as oxygen and hydrogen peroxide are usually investigated [48, 52, 56, 57]. Up to the present, there has not been any systematic investigation into how those factors regulate the efficiency and rate of photocatalytic removal of PMX using titanate nanotubes.

In this study, we synthesized TNTs and applied them for photocatalytic removal of PMX. The activity of synthesized TNTs was also compared with available and commercial TiO2 materials. By investigating the effects of reaction time, catalyst amount, pH, wavelength, light intensity, and oxidants on PMX removal efficiency, appropriate conditions for the photocatalytic treatment of PMX using TNTs were suggested.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Photocatalyst Materials

ST-01 (100% anatase) was purchased from Ishihara Sangyo Kaisha (Japan). TiO2 industrial (TiO2.H2O) was from China Steel Co. (Taiwan). Procion MX 032 (PMX) was from Jacquard (USA). Acid and base and other chemicals were purchased at analytical grade from Xilong (China).

2.2. Hydrothermal Preparation of TNTs

This TNTs synthesis procedure was modified from the works published in the literature [20, 58]. The aqueous mixture was first prepared with 180 mL of 10 M NaOH solution and 12 g of TiO2 (P25, Degussa, Merck) and ultrasonically treated for 60 min at room temperature (ca. 30°C) then hydrothermally treated in a Teflon autoclave at 135°C for 24 h. After that, the product was allowed to cool for 12 h, and the material was taken out, rinsed with 1000 mL deionized water, and followed by filtration. The collected material was treated into 1000 mL of deionized water at pH 1.6 (adjusted by HNO3 solution) under ultrasonication for 30 min and filtered using a funnel filtration apparatus. The residue solid was subsequently gently washed with deionized water until neutral pH and dried at 120°C for 12 h to get the postprocessing product as TNT-100. TNT-500 was then prepared by heat-treatment of TNT-100 material at 500°C for 2 h. Characteristics of the TiO2 materials used in this study are summarized in Table 1 and the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the TNTs materials are presented in Figure 1. The X-ray diffraction (XRD), Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET), and TEM results were obtained by using XRD (X’Pert Pro MRD, PANalytical), BET (ASAP 2020, Micromeritics), and TEM (HT 7700, Hitachi) machines, respectively. The pHzpc of the TNT-500 material was determined at pH 6.3 using a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Panalytical, UK).


TiO2 materialsMorphology (by TEM)Particle size/pore size (nm)Crystalline phase (by XRD)BET surface area (m2/g)

ST-01Nanoparticles7–8Anatase300.0
Industrial TiO2Nanoparticles20–30Anatase120.0
TNT-100Nanotubes4.5 (pore size)Amorphous390.0
TNT-500Nanorods12.4 (pore size)Anatase106.3

Note: information from the manufacture.
2.3. Photocatalytic Experiments

These tests were to find out the optimum operational conditions for PMX treatment. Firstly, the experiment was conducted to compare the treatment efficiency among different TiO2 catalysts, i.e., TNT-100, TNT-500, ST-01, and industrial TiO2. TNT-100 and TNT-500 were synthesized using the alkali hydrothermal method as previously described. A stock solution of Procion MX 032 (PMX) (i.e., 0.1 g of PMX in 1 L of deionized water) was prepared for the photocatalytic experiments. For each test, 2 L of synthetic wastewater (i.e., 1 : 20 dilutions from the stock solution of PMX) at pH 6.3 with suspended TiO2 catalysts (e.g., 0.1 g) was stirred for 90 min in the reactor. At 15 min irradiation time intervals, water samples were taken, centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 12 min, and analyzed for water color using a spectrophotometer (Hach DR5000, USA) at 455 nm.

Given the most effective catalyst from the first experiment, similar photocatalytic tests were conducted for maximum irradiation of 105 min to determine optimal irradiation time. Likewise, different concentrations of catalyst (0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2 g), pH conditions (5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, and 9.0), irradiation wavelength (UV-A lamps (Panasonic) and UV-C lamps (Toshiba) of 8 W, Japan), and irradiation intensity (set up by adding 1 to 3 UV lamps) were also investigated. The maximum irradiance intensity of UV-A and UV-C lamps are achieved at wavelengths of 365 and 254 nm, respectively.

To assess the importance of oxidants (e.g., O2 and H2O2) on the TiO2 photocatalytic efficiency, two series of experiments were carried out with the optimal TiO2 concentration at the optimal pH condition. Synthetic wastewater was firstly purged by N2 gas for 30 min to minimize the amount of dissolved oxygen. Subsequently, the wastewater was continuously aerated with air at different flow rates (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 L/min) for a 90 min-catalytic process. The experimental procedure for the H2O2-assisted batch was similar to the air-assisted batch and different amounts of H2O2 (1–100 mL) were added into the reactor.

The photocatalytic removal efficiency η (%) and removal capacity q (mg/g) of PMX can be calculated by the following equations:where C0 and C (mg/L) are the initial and treated concentrations of PMX in the solution, respectively. V (L) is the solution volume and m (g) is the catalyst amount.

2.4. Photocatalytic Degradation Kinetics

Heterogeneous photocatalytic oxidation kinetics of many organic substrates have widely been analyzed for comparing the reaction rate between different photocatalytic systems. The initial concentration of PMX would affect the removal of PMX, following Langmuir–Hinshelwood rate equations [35, 36]. The pseudo-first-order kinetics is expressed in equations (7) and (8), where C is the concentration of PMX and kapp is the apparent first-order rate constant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effects of TiO2 Catalysts

Results in Figure 2 showed that PMX removal efficiency using TNT-500 was the highest of 81.8% after 90 min of irradiation. Compared to other materials, PMX removal efficiency by TNT-500 was 2.45, 2.04, and 1.15 times higher than that of TNT-100, ST-01, and industrial TiO2, respectively. This result is consistent with the previous study showing the effects of calcination temperature on the surface and structural distinction of the catalyst materials [20, 59, 60]. Accordingly, specific surface areas decreased in the order of TNT-100, ST-01, and TNT-500, which reflected the inverse trend of particle sizes. In a previous study, Jang et al. [22] concluded that the particle size and anatase crystal phase determined the catalytic activity in photodegradation of methylene blue. Even with the highest surface area and small particle/pore sizes, the amorphous phase of TNT-100 was photocatalytically inactive under UV light due to its low anatase crystallinity of TiO2 structure. Amorphous TiO2 owned much more structural disorders than anatase, thus increasing the electron-hole recombination and consequently suppressed the catalyst activity [23, 24]. Therefore, the TNT-100 material with nanotube morphology is not suitable for photocatalytic application. The photocatalytic activity of ST-01 was also low in this study, although it has a very high surface area and anatase crystal phase, which could be due to the agglomeration of tiny particles and the high recombination of electron-hole in the photocatalyst with tiny particle size. Finally, the TNT-500 was slightly better than industrial TiO2 for PMX removal, possibly due to its similar material properties (e.g., particle size, surface area, and anatase crystallinity). The slightly better activity of TNT-500 could be attributed to its 1D structure (i.e., nanorods), which is more efficient for charged carriers transfer, thus reducing the electron-hole recombination and enhances the photocatalytic activity.

Kinetics of PMX photodegradation using different TiO2 catalysts are presented in Figure 2(b). The value of the rate constant (kapp) represented the amount of PMX in water transformed over time. Results showed that the rate constant of PMX photodegradation with TNT-500 was the highest (1.82 × 10−2), which was 1.5, 3.7, and 3.8 times higher than those provided by industrial TiO2, ST-01, and TNT-100 catalysts, respectively. This result could confirm the effectiveness of the TNT-500 photocatalyst to remove PMX and this photocatalyst was applied for the next experiments.

3.2. Effects of the Reaction Time

Figure 3 presents the effect of reaction time on the PMX photodegradation using TNT-500. The color of water decreased significantly over time in all three experiments. The degradation efficiency increased from 28.2 ± 6.9% after 30 min to 75.5 ± 2.3% after 90 min of reactions. After 90 min, water color reduction was achieved in all experiments to satisfy the national technical regulation on industrial wastewater (QCVN 40 : 2011/BTNMT, Column A). Therefore, the reaction time of 90 min would be run in the next experiments. Further prolonged reaction time might not be preferred due to interference effects of surface sorption phenomena on the photocatalytic process [37, 38]. The increased irradiance times could favor the adsorption of the dyes and their intermediates on the catalyst surface and may reduce the removal efficiency of PMX. Moreover, a prolonging of the irradiation time could also accelerate the nanoparticle aggregation and results in the reduction of TiO2 reactivity [39]. Consequently, the degradability of dye reduced because of the less availability of active sites on the catalyst surface for dye adsorption [40].

3.3. Effects of the Catalyst Concentration

For large-scale treatments, the amount of catalyst could be an economic issue affecting photodegradation rates. Experiments were conducted with different amounts of TNT-500, from 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, and 0.25 g in 2 L synthetic wastewater (i.e., at concentration of 12.5, 25, 50, 75, 100, and 125 mg/L, respectively) for 90 min (Figure 4). Results showed that the amount of catalysts was positively correlated with degradation efficiencies. The degradation efficiency was highest (95.3%) with 125 mg/L of TNT-500 and lowest (54.5%) with 12.5 g/L of TNT-500. Particularly, in the range from 75 to 125 mg/L of TNT-500, reaction rates were slightly improved. By increasing the catalyst amount, the number of surface active sites available for PMX adsorption was expected to increase [26]. The overoptimum catalyst amount, however, could result in counter effects. Firstly, the aggregation of nanoparticles and shielding effects might occur if the catalyst concentration was high [27, 28]. Secondly, a high concentration of nanoparticles induced the collision between ground-state and activated molecules and deactivating them [51, 61]. Thus, for the following experiments, the concentration of 75 mg/L TNT-500 was selected to optimize other operating conditions of the reactor. This concentration of photocatalysts was higher compared to that of Nguyen et al. [10], who applied a TNT concentration of 50 mg/L for PMX treatment with the initial color of 178–181 Pt-Co. However, this concentration was significantly lower than those of So et al. [52] with 500 mg/L of TiO2 and 10 mM of H2O2 for the treatment of Procion Red MX-5B (at initial concentration C0 of 40 mg/L), Sahel et al. [62] with 500 mg/L for Procion Red MX-5B (C0 of 5–120 μmol/L), and Sari et al. [63] with 0.5–8 g/L of TiO2 catalyst for Procion Red (Co of 150–300 mg/L). This lower optimum concentration of TNT found in this study would be due to the lower initial concentration of dye prepared (approximately 5 mg/L) since our target wastewater was with low dyes concentration after biological treatment.

Kinetic results showed that the amount of catalyst was also positively correlated with reaction rates. Degradation rates of PMX were highest at the highest catalyst concentration of 125 mg/L T-500 (kapp = 3.0 × 10−2 min−1). This phenomenon was well known in heterogeneous catalysis reactions, where the reaction rates are exponentially increased with the increase of catalyst concentrations [2931]. The irradiated photocatalyst could produce hydroxyl radicals, explaining the increase of reaction rates at higher catalyst concentrations [28]. However, a further increase in the amount of catalysts could reduce the degradation rate. The light scattering became more intensive and diminished the depth of photon infiltration [32, 33]. Beyond the optimum amount of catalysts, photodegradation activity was no longer positively correlated with the catalyst amount [34].

3.4. Effects of the Solution pH

It was reported that textile wastewater hardly met discharge criteria [64]. The pH of textile wastewaters usually varied in a broad range, representatively from 3.9 to 14 [65]. Hence, a set of experiments was conducted to evaluate the effect of pH variation, from 5.0 to 9.0, on PMX removal. As shown in Figure 5, the PMX photodegradation efficiency reduced from pH 5.0 to pH 7.0 and significantly increased to the highest value at pH 8.0, then again reduced at pH 9.0. It is stated that during photocatalytic reactions, varying pH of dye wastewaters essentially influenced either the adsorption and the breakdown of organic molecules [41, 42] or the active surface charge and the oxidation activity of catalysts [43]. The interaction between these factors affected differently on the dye removal, explaining the irregular effects of pH on the removal efficiency as observed in this study.

The ionization state of TiO2 surfaces, of course, determined the adsorption of dye molecules, a crucial step before the photocatalytic oxidation occurred. Below the point of zero charges of the TNT-500 (i.e., pHzpc = 6.3), TiO2 surfaces are positively charged and possibly have a strong electrostatic attraction with negatively charged molecules [44]. Therefore, at pH 5.0, such as this experiment, the degradation efficiency was enhanced. The increased degradation rate of some azo dyes with pH decreases was observed elsewhere [4547]. In addition, at low pH, the reduction by electrons in conduction bands may cause the cleavage of azo bonds [48]. At pH 7, the removal efficiency was lowest which could be due to this pH value being close to the pH of zero point charge of TiO2 surface. Hence, electrostatic attraction between photocatalyst surface and negatively charged molecules (i.e., the Procion MX) was minimized. The lowest rate constant of the photodegradation reaction of a Procion red dye at pH 7 was also found in the work of Byrappa et al. [66] using Nd2O3 coated titania composite designer particulates as photocatalyst.

The contribution of pH on degradation kinetics of azo dyes was dynamic, following the attack of hydroxyl radical, the oxidation by the positive hole, and the reduction in conducting bands [48]. At higher pH, i.e., pH 8 and 9, hydroxide ions available on the TiO2 surface were oxidized to produce hydroxyl radicals [49]. Consequently, hydroxyl radicals (•OH) are predominant at alkaline conditions of this study, thus enhancing the process efficiency. The photocatalytic degradation of acidic and triazine-containing azo dyes presented consistent results [51, 52]. Nevertheless, at strong alkaline conditions (pH = 9–11), the degradation rate may be inhibited since hydroxyl radicals undergo very fast scavenging and they are incapable of reacting with dyes [50].

3.5. Effects of Light Wavelength and Intensity

Results of the experiment on PMX photodegradation with 1–3 UV-A lamps (8 W, Panasonic, Japan) and one UV-C lamp (8 W, Toshiba, Japan) are summarized in Figure 6. Compared to the reference condition without irradiation, the degradation efficiency of PMX with UV irradiation was higher after 90 min. Specifically, the degradation efficiency with UV-A irradiation (96.5–99.8%) was significantly higher than with UV-C irradiation (19.2%). Under UV-A irradiation, light intensities sourced from the experimental setup of one, two, and three UV-A lamps were 100, 200, and 300 W/m2, respectively. The degradation efficiency was highest in the experiment with the strongest irradiance intensity. This is consistent with previous studies regarding the light intensity effect [51, 52]. Ollis et al. [53] stated that photocatalysis is a first-order reaction at low light intensities (0–200 W/m2) but a half order reaction at intermediate intensities (approximately 250 W/m2) or independent of the light intensities at high intensities. Particularly, the reactions predominantly involved electron-hole formation at low light intensities. However, as light intensities increased, electron-hole recombination is also engaged, resulting in the competence with electron-hole pair separation and lowering the reaction rate. Shen and Wang [54] reported that 90% of dye was removed at 82 W/m2 and the removal efficiency insignificantly increased at 102 W/m2. Moreover, Chanathaworn et al. [55] reported a rhodamine B dye removal efficiency increased from 42.1 to 87.8% with light intensity from 23 to 114 W/m2 after 90 min of irradiation, but the decolorization efficiency between 68 and 114 W/m2 was not significantly different.

3.6. Effects of Additional Oxidants

The influence of oxygen on the PMX degradation during the UV/TiO2 process was investigated. In a previous study, oxygen acted as an oxidizing agent to mineralize monochlorobenzene and reduced the reaction time needed for the complete decay [56]. Results showed that the degradation efficiency of PMX reduced with increased flows of aerated air (Figure 7). The highest degradation efficiency of PMX during the UV/TiO2 process was 95.2% without any air supply, which decreased to 94.4% at the air supply rate of 0.5 L/min. The rate constant of the PMX degradation process was also reduced from 3.5 × 10−2 min−1 with 0.5 L/min of supplied air to 1.9 × 10−2 min−1 with 2.0 L/min of supplied air.

On the other hand, the addition of oxidants such as H2O2 was reported to enhance the photo-oxidation of azo dyes [52, 57]. H2O2 can produce hydroxyl radicals by reacting with photo-generated electrons. Because hydroxyl radical is either a strong oxidant or an electron scavenger, the electron-hole recombination at photocatalyst surfaces can be inhibited. Experiments with H2O2 showed that degradation efficiencies reduced with the addition of H2O2. The degradation efficiency decreased from 96.4% without H2O2 to 42.6% at the dosage of 1 mL of H2O2 (∼5 mM) (Figure 8). The increase of H2O2 to 40 mL (∼196 mM) continuously improved the degradation efficiency of up to 70.4%. The more adding of H2O2 up to 100 mL (∼490 mM), however, gradually reduced the degradation efficiency to 49.6%. Kinetic data have confirmed the increased degradation rate with the addition of H2O2 in the range of 1–40 mL (∼5–196 mM). The rate constant was highest with the H2O2 amount of 40 mL (∼196 mM), followed by a descending trend if the dosage of H2O2 continuously increased. Excessive amounts of H2O2 could impede the degradation due to H2O2 scavenging of valence band holes and OH [48].

4. Conclusions

The photocatalytic oxidation of Procion MX 032 solutions using different synthesized forms of TiO2 was characterized. Optimal operation conditions for the degradation of a 5 mg/L PMX solution at room temperature (30°C) were determined to be TiO2 form of T-500, irradiation time of 90 min, TiO2 concentration of 150 mg/L, initial pH solution of 8.0, light wavelength of UV-A > UV-C, and light intensity of 100 W/m2. Under these conditions, Procion MX was degraded in 90 min by more than 95% without the presence of additional oxidants such as H2O2 and O2. These results indicate that the photocatalytic oxidation with TiO2 material can be used as a straightforward, competent, and economic treatment of textile wastewaters containing azo dyes. Further intensive study with characterizing TiO2 after the photocatalytic reaction, adding radical scavengers, and identifying reaction intermediates is needed to propose the mechanism for the photocatalytic removal of PMX using TiO2 material.

Data Availability

The experimental data used to support the findings of this study are included in the manuscript. The other data are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VNU-HCM) under grant no. C2020-20-45. The authors acknowledge the support of time and facilities from Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), VNU-HCM, for this study.

References

  1. S. Cotillas, D. Clematis, P. Cañizares, M. P. Carpanese, M. A. Rodrigo, and M. Panizza, “Degradation of dye Procion Red MX-5B by electrolytic and electro-irradiated technologies using diamond electrodes,” Chemosphere, vol. 199, pp. 445–452, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. N. S. Shah, J. A. Khan, M. Sayed et al., “Synergistic effects of H2O2 and S2O82− in the gamma radiation induced degradation of Congo-red dye: kinetics and toxicities evaluation,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 233, Article ID 115966, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Cotillas, J. Llanos, P. Cañizares et al., “Removal of Procion Red MX-5B dye from wastewater by conductive-diamond electrochemical oxidation,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 263, pp. 1–7, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. W. Bae, H. Won, B. Hwang et al., “Characterization of refractory matters in dyeing wastewater during a full-scale Fenton process following pure-oxygen activated sludge treatment,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 287, pp. 421–428, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. N. Ahmed, L. A. Naji, A. A. H. Faisal, N. Al-Ansari, and M. Naushad, “Waste foundry sand/MgFe-layered double hydroxides composite material for efficient removal of Congo red dye from aqueous solution,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 2042, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. C. Bonneau, “The chemistry of fabric reactive dyes,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 72, no. 8, p. 724, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. T. Calvete, E. C. Lima, N. F. Cardoso, S. L. P. Dias, and F. A. Pavan, “Application of carbon adsorbents prepared from the Brazilian pine-fruit-shell for the removal of procion Red MX 3B from aqueous solution-Kinetic, equilibrium, and thermodynamic studies,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 155, no. 3, pp. 627–636, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. A. Adebayo, L. D. T. Prola, E. C. Lima et al., “Adsorption of procion Blue MX-R dye from aqueous solutions by lignin chemically modified with aluminium and manganese,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 268, pp. 43–50, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Ö. Genç, Ç. Arpa, G. Bayramoğlu, M. Y. Arıca, and S. Bektaş, “Selective recovery of mercury by procion Brown MX 5BR immobilized poly (hydroxyethylmethacrylate/chitosan) composite membranes,” Hydrometallurgy, vol. 67, no. 1-3, pp. 53–62, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. T. T. Nguyen, A. T. Huynh, A. V. Ngo, and H. N. Nguyen, “Photocatalytic decolorization of procion 032 Carmine Red using titania nanotubes,” Science and Technology Development Journal, vol. 20, no. K3, pp. 141–146, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. T. Robinson, G. McMullan, R. Marchant, and P. Nigam, “Remediation of dyes in textile effluent: a critical review on current treatment technologies with a proposed alternative,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 247–255, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. E. Forgacs, T. Cserháti, and G. Oros, “Removal of synthetic dyes from wastewaters: a review,” Environment International, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 953–971, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. A. Rauf and S. S. Ashraf, “Fundamental principles and application of heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of dyes in solution,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 151, no. 1-3, pp. 10–18, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. G. Gutierrez-Mata, S. Velazquez-Martínez, A. Álvarez-Gallegos et al., “Recent overview of solar photocatalysis and solar photo-fenton processes for wastewater treatment,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2017, Article ID 8528063, 27 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Sayed, A. Arooj, N. S. Shah et al., “Narrowing the band gap of TiO2 by co-doping with Mn2+ and Co2+ for efficient photocatalytic degradation of enoxacin and its additional peroxidase like activity: a mechanistic approach,” Journal of Molecular Liquids, vol. 272, pp. 403–412, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. P. Hoyer, “Formation of a titanium dioxide nanotube Array,” Langmuir, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1411–1413, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. Ou and S. Lo, “Review of titania nanotubes synthesized via the hydrothermal treatment: fabrication, modification, and application,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 179–191, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. C. L. Wong, Y. N. Tan, and A. R. Mohamed, “A review on the formation of titania nanotube photocatalysts by hydrothermal treatment,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 1669–1680, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. N. Liu, X. Chen, J. Zhang, and J. W. Schwank, “A review on TiO2-based nanotubes synthesized via hydrothermal method: formation mechanism, structure modification, and photocatalytic applications,” Catalysis Today, vol. 225, pp. 34–51, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. N. H. Nguyen and H. Bai, “Photocatalytic removal of NO and NO2 using titania nanotubes synthesized by hydrothermal method,” Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1180–1187, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. U. G. Akpan and B. H. Hameed, “Parameters affecting the photocatalytic degradation of dyes using TiO2-based photocatalysts: a review,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 170, no. 2-3, pp. 520–529, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. H. D. Jang, S.-K. Kim, and S.-J. Kim, “Effect of particle size and phase composition of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on the photocatalytic properties,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 3, no. 2/3, pp. 141–147, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. F. M. Pesci, G. Wang, D. R. Klug, Y. Li, and A. J. Cowan, “Efficient suppression of electron-hole recombination in oxygen-deficient hydrogen-treated TiO2 nanowires for photoelectrochemical water splitting,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 117, no. 48, pp. 25837–25844, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. X. Chen, L. Liu, Z. Liu et al., “Properties of disorder-engineered black titanium dioxide nanoparticles through hydrogenation,” Scientific Reports, vol. 3, p. 1510, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. A. Fox and M. T. Dulay, “Heterogeneous photocatalysis,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 341–357, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. Epifani, S. Kaciulis, A. Mezzi et al., “Inorganic photocatalytic enhancement: activated RhB photodegradation by surface modification of SnO2 nanocrystals with V2O5-like species,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, p. 44763, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. S. Sohrabnezhad, A. Pourahmad, and E. Radaee, “Photocatalytic degradation of basic blue 9 by CoS nanoparticles supported on AlMCM-41 material as a catalyst,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 170, no. 1, pp. 184–190, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. X. Zhang, F. Wu, X. Wu, P. Chen, and N. Deng, “Photodegradation of acetaminophen in TiO2 suspended solution,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 157, no. 2-3, pp. 300–307, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Senthilvelan, V. L. Chandraboss, B. Karthikeyan, L. Natanapatham, and M. Murugavelu, “TiO2, ZnO and nanobimetallic silica catalyzed photodegradation of methyl green,” Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 185–192, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. L. Karimi, S. Zohoori, and M. E. Yazdanshenas, “Photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes in aqueous solutions under UV irradiation using nano-strontium titanate as the nanophotocatalyst,” Journal of Saudi Chemical Society, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 581–588, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. B. Neppolian, S. R. Kanel, H. C. Choi, M. V. Shankar, B. Arabindoo, and V. Murugesan, “Photocatalytic degradation of reactive yellow 17 dye in aqueous solution in the presence ofTiO2with cement binder,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 45–49, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. H. Lin, Y. Chen, and Y. Chen, “Water splitting reaction on NiO/InVO4 under visible light irradiation,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 86–92, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. H. Seshadri, S. Chitra, K. Paramasivan, and P. Sinha, “Photocatalytic degradation of liquid waste containing EDTA,” Desalination, vol. 232, no. 1-3, pp. 139–144, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. A. Barakat, H. Schaeffer, G. Hayes, and S. Ismat-Shah, “Photocatalytic degradation of 2-chlorophenol by Co-doped TiO2 nanoparticles,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 23–30, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. Saien and S. Khezrianjoo, “Degradation of the fungicide carbendazim in aqueous solutions with UV/TiO2 process: optimization, kinetics and toxicity studies,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 157, no. 2-3, pp. 269–276, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. C. G. da Silva and J. L. Faria, “Photochemical and photocatalytic degradation of an azo dye in aqueous solution by UV irradiation,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 155, no. 1-3, pp. 133–143, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. N. Riaz, F. K. Chong, B. K. Dutta, Z. B. Man, M. S. Khan, and E. Nurlaela, “Photodegradation of orange II under visible light using Cu-Ni/TiO2: effect of calcination temperature,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 185-186, pp. 108–119, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. C. Ramli, Z. Amali, N. Asim et al., “Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue under UV light irradiation on prepared carbonaceous,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 415136, 8 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. Sun, L.-H. Guo, H. Zhang, and L. Zhao, “UV irradiation induced transformation of TiO2 nanoparticles in water: aggregation and photoreactivity,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 48, no. 20, pp. 11962–11968, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. O. Sheikhnejad-Bishe, F. Zhao, A. Rajabtabar-Darvishi, E. Khodadad, and Y. Huang, “Precursor and reaction time effects in evaluation of photocatalytic properties of TiO2 nanoparticles synthesized via low temperature,” International Journal of Electrochemical Science, vol. 9, p. 3068, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  41. H. He, J. Huang, L. Cao, and J. Wu, “Photodegradation of methyl orange aqueous on MnWO4 powder under different light resources and initial pH,” Desalination, vol. 252, no. 1-3, pp. 66–70, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. F. Li, S. Sun, Y. Jiang, M. Xia, M. Sun, and B. Xue, “Photodegradation of an azo dye using immobilized nanoparticles of TiO2 supported by natural porous mineral,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 152, no. 3, pp. 1037–1044, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. N. Venkatachalam, M. Palanichamy, B. Arabindoo, and V. Murugesan, “Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol by Zr4+ doped nano TiO2,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, vol. 266, no. 1-2, pp. 158–165, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. I. Poulios and I. Tsachpinis, “Photodegradation of the textile dye Reactive Black 5 in the presence of semiconducting oxides,” Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 349–357, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. S. Naskar, S. Arumugom Pillay, and M. Chanda, “Photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes in aqueous solution with TiO2 nanoparticles immobilized on foamed polyethylene sheet,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 257–264, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. B. Neppolian, S. Sakthivel, B. Arabindoo, M. Palanichamy, and V. Murugesan, “Photocatalytic degradation of textile dye commonly used in cotton fabrics,” Recent Advances In Basic and Applied Aspects of Industrial Catalysis, vol. 30, pp. 329–335, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. S. Sakthivel, B. Neppolian, M. V. Shankar, B. Arabindoo, M. Palanichamy, and V. Murugesan, “Solar photocatalytic degradation of azo dye: comparison of photocatalytic efficiency of ZnO and TiO2,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 65–82, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. I. K. Konstantinou and T. A. Albanis, “TiO2-assisted photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes in aqueous solution: kinetic and mechanistic investigations,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. Tunesi and M. Anderson, “Influence of chemisorption on the photodecomposition of salicylic acid and related compounds using suspended titania ceramic membranes,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 95, no. 8, pp. 3399–3405, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. A. Davis and C. Huang, “The photocatalytic oxidation of sulfur-containing organic compounds using cadmium sulfide and the effect on CdS photocorrosion,” Water Research, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1273–1278, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. B. Neppolian, H. C. Choi, S. Sakthivel, B. Arabindoo, and V. Murugesan, “Solar/UV-induced photocatalytic degradation of three commercial textile dyes,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 89, no. 2-3, pp. 303–317, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. C. M. So, M. Y. Cheng, J. C. Yu, and P. K. Wong, “Degradation of azo dye Procion Red MX-5B by photocatalytic oxidation,” Chemosphere, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 905–912, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. D. F. Ollis, E. Pelizzetti, and N. Serpone, “Photocatalyzed destruction of water contaminants,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1522–1529, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. Y.-S. Shen and D.-K. Wang, “Development of photoreactor design equation for the treatment of dye wastewater by UV/H2O2 process,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 89, no. 2-3, pp. 267–277, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. J. Chanathaworn, C. Bunyakan, W. Wiyaratn, and J. Chungsiriporn, “Photocatalytic decolorization of basic dye by TiO2 nanoparticle in photoreactor,” Songklanakarin Journal of Science & Technology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 203–210, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  56. D.-H. Tseng, L.-C. Juang, and H.-H. Huang, “Effect of oxygen and hydrogen peroxide on the photocatalytic degradation of monochlorobenzene in aqueous suspension,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2012, Article ID 328526, 9 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. M. Saquib and M. Muneer, “TiO2-mediated photocatalytic degradation of a triphenylmethane dye (gentian violet), in aqueous suspensions,” Dyes and Pigments, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 37–49, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. T. Kasuga, M. Hiramatsu, A. Hoson, T. Sekino, and K. Niihara, “Formation of titanium oxide nanotube,” Langmuir, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 3160–3163, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. T. T. T. Vo, H. S. Nguyen, T. T. Tran, P. T. H. Lam, T. T. Nguyen, and N. H. Nguyen, “Effects of environmental factors and synthesis conditions on the photocatalytic activity of titanate nanotubes for removal of gaseous formaldehyde,” Research on Chemical Intermediates, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 4793–4809, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. N. H. Nguyen, K. Tran Tien, T. N. Hung et al., Photocatalytic Disinfection of Coliforms and Degradation of Natural Organic Matters in River Water Using Titanate Nanotubes, Environmental Technology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 2021.
  61. X. Qiu, Z. Fang, B. Liang, F. Gu, and Z. Xu, “Degradation of decabromodiphenyl ether by nano zero-valent iron immobilized in mesoporous silica microspheres,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 193, pp. 70–81, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. K. Sahel, N. Perol, H. Chermette, C. Bordes, Z. Derriche, and C. Guillard, “Photocatalytic decolorization of Remazol Black 5 (RB5) and Procion Red MX-5B-Isotherm of adsorption, kinetic of decolorization and mineralization,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 77, no. 1-2, pp. 100–109, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. M. I. Sari, T. E. Agustina, E. Melwita, and T. Aprianti, “Color and COD degradation in photocatalytic process of procion red by using TiO2 catalyst under solar irradiation,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1903, no. 1, Article ID 040017, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  64. T. Ito, Y. Adachi, Y. Yamanashi, and Y. Shimada, “Long-term natural remediation process in textile dye-polluted river sediment driven by bacterial community changes,” Water Research, vol. 100, pp. 458–465, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. S. Dey and A. Islam, “A review on textile wastewater characterization in Bangladesh,” Resources and Environment, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 15–44, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  66. K. Byrappa, M. H. Sunitha, A. K. Subramani et al., “Hydrothermal preparation of neodymium oxide coated titania composite designer particulates and its application in the photocatalytic degradation of procion red dye,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1369–1375, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Vo Nguyen Xuan Que et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views223
Downloads203
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.