Research Article

Imaging Biomarkers as Predictors for Breast Cancer Death

Table 2

Relationship of mammographic appearance to basal phenotype, histologic tumor distribution, and conventional tumor attributes in both cohorts combined.

Stellate/Powdery/Crushed stone-likeCircularCastingArchitectural distortionNKχ2P value

Basal phenotype89.71<0.0001
 Non-basal619 (96.87)270 (78.03)59 (88.06)45 (83.33)42
 Basal20 (3.13)76 (21.97)8 (11.94)9 (16.67)11
 NK1055011813
Histologic tumor distribution817.74<0.0001
 Unifocal450 (63.11)260 (68.78)7 (9.21)7 (11.48)33
 Multifocal257 (36.04)116 (30.69)12 (15.79)9 (14.75)22
 Diffuse6 (0.84)2 (0.53)57 (75.00)45 (73.77)4
 NK3118217
Tumor size (mm)53.96<0.0001
 <15340 (47.82)127 (33.78)31 (42.47)3 (5.00)20
 ≥15371 (52.18)249 (66.22)42 (57.53)57 (95.00)40
 NK3320526
Histologic malignancy grade128.08<0.0001
 I/II613 (86.46)227 (60.21)35 (48.61)53 (86.89)40
 III96 (13.54)150 (39.79)37 (51.39)8 (13.11)17
 NK3519619
Lymph node involvement22.52<0.0001
 Negative479 (66.81)258 (68.07)45 (59.21)23 (38.33)39
 Positive238 (33.19)121 (31.93)31 (40.79)37 (61.67)20
 NK2717227

Those with unknown mammography feature were not included in the chi-square test. NK, not known.