Effectiveness of a Global Multidisciplinary Supportive and Educational Intervention in Thermal Resort on Anthropometric and Biological Parameters, and the Disease-Free Survival after Breast Cancer Treatment Completion (PACThe)
Table 2
Diet and Body parameters at allocation.
Mean±σ
All groups (n=113)
BMI (kg/m2)
value of BMI effect
≤25 (n = 57)
25–30 (n = 38)
>30 (n = 18)
Diet parameters
Total energy intake (TEI) (kcal/d)
1492±450
1540 ± 358
1325 ± 378
1689 ± 678
0.038
Protein intake (g/d)
63.6±20.2
65.3 ± 15.1
58.7 ± 20.0
68.8 ± 30.1
0.86
(% TEI)
17.3±4.1
17.2 ± 3.5
17.9 ± 5.2
16.4 ± 3.1
0.71
Carbohydrate intake (g/d)
172.6±61.5
175.3 ± 54.1
156.8 ± 53.7
197.2 ± 85.1
0.65
(% TEI)
46.7±10.4
45.4 ± 9.5
48.1 ± 12.8
47.8 ± 6.5
0.75
Lipid intake (g/d)
59.7±25.4
63.5 ± 22.3
50.6 ± 23.6
66.8 ± 31.8
0.034
% TEI
35.5±8.6
36.8 ± 8.4
33.5 ± 9.8
35.8 ± 5.0
0.14
Body parameters
Body weight (kg)
65.2±12.5
56.6 ± 6.4
68.5 ± 5.8
85.3 ± 10.7
<10−7
Lean mass (LM) (kg)
42.1±5.8
39.6 ± 4.5
43.0 ± 4.8
47.9 ± 6.3
<10−7
(%)
65.2±6.8
69.6 ± 5.3
62.9 ± 3.7
56.3 ± 4.5
<10−7
Fat mass (FM) (kg)
23.0±7.8
17.2 ± 3.7
25.5 ± 3.1
36.2 ± 5.1
<10−7
(%)
34.6±6.7
30.1 ± 5.0
37.3 ± 3.8
43.1 ± 4.4
<10−7
Ratio LM/FM
2.0±0.6
2.4 ± 0.6
1.7 ± 0.3
1.3 ± 0.3
<10−7
Cell mass (kg)
25.0±4.0
22.8 ± 2.5
25.5 ± 3.3
30.7 ± 3.5
<10−7
Total water (l)
32.9±3.9
31.1 ± 2.6
33.2 ± 2.7
38.1 ± 4.6
<10−7
(%)
51.3±5.4
55.1 ± 4.0
48.5 ± 3.2
44.9 ± 2.8
<10−7
Extracellular water (%)
24.3±3.4
25.7 ± 1.7
23.1 ± 2.1
22.8 ± 6.5
<10−7
Intracellular water (%)
27.1±2.4
28.2 ± 1.8
26.1 ± 2.8
25.6 ± 1.2
<10−7
Tricipital fold thickness (cm)
17.4±8.6
12.5 ± 5.2
18.8 ± 7.2
29.6 ± 6.4
<10−7
Arm circumference (cm)
30.2±3.8
27.7 ± 2.2
31.1 ± 1.7
36.4 ± 3.3
<10−7
Waist circumference (WC) (cm)
84.0±13.5
75.4 ± 7.7
86.8 ± 9.0
105.5 ± 8.9
<10−7
Hip circumference (HC) (cm)
101.1±9.1
95.0 ± 4.9
103.5 ± 5.5
115.7 ± 5.6
<10−7
Ratio WC/HC
0.83±0.09
0.79 ± 0.07
0.84 ± 0.09
0.92 ± 0.08
0.000017
Diet parameters for food intake are expressed in raw value (gram/day) and in % of total energy intake. Body parameters are expressed in raw value (kilogram or liter) and in % of body mass. Comparison of outcomes per BMI group at allocation was tested with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The test was two-sided, and the nominal level of significance was 5%.
