Upregulated Expression of CYBRD1 Predicts Poor Prognosis of Patients with Ovarian Cancer

Table 7

Correlation between overall survival and clinicopathologic characteristics in EH cohort applied Cox regression and multivariate survival model after variable selection.

Characteristics	Total (N)	Univariate analysis		Multivariate analysis
		Hazard ratio (95% CI)	value	Hazard ratio (95% CI)	value
FIGO stage (stage III and stage IV versus stage I and stage II)	100	1.14 (0.65, 2.00)	0.646	0.67 (0.37, 1.21)	0.185
Histologic grade (G1 and G2 versus G3 and G4)	100	1.09 (0.60, 1.98)	0.781	0.99 (0.54, 1.83)	0.984
Age (age > 60 versus age ≤ 60)	100	1.28 (0.73, 2.27)	0.391	0.49 (0.25, 0.93)	0.031
Lymphatic invasion (yes versus no)	100	1.33 (0.76, 2.33)	0.320	1.35 (0.73, 2.51)	0.342
CYBRD1 (high versus low)	100	5.43 (2.31, 12.80)	<0.001	8.42 (3.24, 21.89)	<0.001