Research Article

Prognostic Value of Albumin to D-Dimer Ratio in Advanced Gastric Cancer

Table 2

Correlations between PFS and patient and tumor characteristics.

Univariate analysis valueMultivariate analysis value
Hazard ratio95% CIHazard ratio95% CI

Age (>59 years)0.9110.709–1.1710.467
Sex (male)1.0510.806–1.3700.715
Body mass index (<18.5 or >25 kg/m2)0.9710.731–1.2920.842
ECOG PS score (>1)0.9290.657–1.3130.675
Pathological differentiation (poorly)1.1970.902–1.5900.214
The number of organs affected by metastasis (>1)1.5111.161–1.9670.0021.2990.954–1.7680.096
Peritoneal metastasis (Yes)1.5061.144–1.9830.0041.1470.822–1.6020.419
TNM staging (IV)1.3751.009–1.8750.0441.0170.720–1.4360.924
CEA (>5 ng/mL)1.2400.959–1.6040.1011.1340.857–1.5010.377
CA19-9 (>37 U/mL)0.9250.713–1.2000.558
CA72-4 (>6 U/mL)1.4791.143–1.9140.0031.2410.941–1.6360.126
Thrombocyte counts (>300 × 109/L)1.1000.843–1.4350.483
ADR (≥41.64)0.4450.338–0.585<0.0010.5090.380–0.681<0.001

ADR, albumin to D-dimer ratio; ECOG PS, eastern cooperative oncology group performance status; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA72-4, carbohydrate antigen 72-4; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CI, confidence interval; PFS, progressive-free survival.