Research Article
Characterization of the Newly Established Homoharringtonine- (HHT-) Resistant Cell Lines and Mechanisms of Resistance
Table 1
Comparison of the CALCRL expression characteristics of AML patients between low group and high group.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1WBC, white blood cell; 2HB, hemoglobin; 3PLT, platelet counts; 4BM, bone marrow; 5FAB, French-American-British classification systems; 6karyotype risk. Favorable subgroup comprised t (8, 21)/AML1-ETO, inv16 or t (16, 16)(p13.1; q22)/CBFb-MYH11,CEPRADM, NPM1 without FLT3-ITD or FLT3-ITDlow. Adverse group consisted of t (8, 16), inv (3)/t (3, 3), −5, −7, del (5q), del (7p), 11q23, and complex translocations. Intermediate subtype contained cytogenetically normal and AML with other cytogenetic abnormalities. 7DM, double-allele. |