Research Article

Characterization of the Newly Established Homoharringtonine- (HHT-) Resistant Cell Lines and Mechanisms of Resistance

Table 1

Comparison of the CALCRL expression characteristics of AML patients between low group and high group.

VariablesCALCRL expression value
Low groupHigh group

Number, n (%)130 (67)43 (33)
Age, median (range)51.5 (18,80)51 (14,69)0.647
Female, n (%)55 (42.3)21 (48.8)0.482
WBC1, median (range)13.4 (0.2, 453.2)37.5 (0.9, 214.0)0.235
HB2, median (range)81.0 (33.5, 154.0)74.0 (53.0, 134)0.090
PLT3, median (range)42 (2, 776)44 (4, 778)0.736
BM4 blast, median (range) %69 (17.5, 96.65)67.2 (23, 95)0.645
FAB5 type0.447
M08 (6.2)3 (7.0)
M113 (10.0)2 (4.7)
M253 (40.8)24 (55.8)
M46 (4.6)3 (7.0)
M540 (30.8)10 (23.3)
M64 (0.1)0 (0)
Karyotype risk6,n (%)1.000
Favorable5 (3.8)1 (2.3)
Intermediate105 (80.8)38 (88.4)
Unfavorable6 (4.6)2 (4.7)
Gene mutation
FLT3-ITD18 (16.2)26 (23.4)0.002
NPM124 (21.6)38 (34.2)0.693
CEBPADM719 (17.1)13 (11.7)1.000
IDH15 (4.5)14 (12.6)0.375
IDH29 (8.1)12 (10.8)0.778
DNMT3A7 (6.3)16 (14.4)0.775

1WBC, white blood cell; 2HB, hemoglobin; 3PLT, platelet counts; 4BM, bone marrow; 5FAB, French-American-British classification systems; 6karyotype risk. Favorable subgroup comprised t (8, 21)/AML1-ETO, inv16 or t (16, 16)(p13.1; q22)/CBFb-MYH11,CEPRADM, NPM1 without FLT3-ITD or FLT3-ITDlow. Adverse group consisted of t (8, 16), inv (3)/t (3, 3), −5, −7, del (5q), del (7p), 11q23, and complex translocations. Intermediate subtype contained cytogenetically normal and AML with other cytogenetic abnormalities. 7DM, double-allele.