The Impact of intra-abdominal Pressure on Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Table 1
Baseline characteristics of include studies and methodological assessment.
Author and year
Study design
Study arm based on proposed IAP categorization
Study arm (mmHg)
Patients (n)
BMI (kg/m2)
Age (years)
Prostate weight (g)
Preoperative PSA (ng/ml)
Rohloff (2020)
Prospective
LIAP vs. HIAP
8 vs. 12
96/105
NA
NA
62 ± 133.3
NA
55 ± 149.6
Rohloff (2018)
Retrospective
LIAP vs. HIAP
12 vs. 15
198/209
29.88 ± 6.5
NA
NA
NA
29.66 ± 7.25
Johnstone (2021)
Prospective
LIAP vs. HIAP
6 vs. 13–15
56/56
NA
NA
48 ± 20
NA
46.9 ± 22.75
Ferroni (2019)
Retrospective
LIAP vs. HIAP
6 vs. 15
300/300
29.8 ± 6.2
62.1 ± 9.75
53.4 ± 47.5
8.1 ± 20.13
29.4 ± 7.25
62.2 ± 9
52.7 ± 29.75
7.5 ± 8.25
Christensen (2016)
Retrospective
LIAP vs. HIAP
12 vs. 15
100/100
29.88 ± 6.5
63.6 ± 8.25
NA
NA
29.38 ± 7.25
62.04 ± 8
Modi (2015)
Retrospective
LIAP vs. HIAP
15 vs. 20
201/550
NA
58.7 ± 6.5
49.1 + 17.5
5.97 + 3.60
59.7 ± 7.0
48.3 + 20.0
6.44 + 7.69
BMI, body mass index; LIAP, low intraabdominal pressure; HIAP, high intraabdominal pressure; X ± Y, mean ± standard; NA, not available; NR, not report.
