Research Article

Tumor Characteristics Associated with Lymph Node Metastasis and Prognosis in Patients with ERBB2-Positive Gastric Cancer

Table 1

Patients’ characteristics.

VariableN (%)

Gender
 Male98 (80.3%)
 Female24 (19.7%)

Age (years)
 ≤6020 (16.4%)
 >60102 (83.6%)

Tumor size
 ≤4 cm64 (52.5%)
 >4 cm58 (47.5%)

AJCC T stage
 PT115 (12.3%)
 PT29 (7.4%)
 PT357 (46.7%)
 PT4a/PT4b41 (33.6%)

AJCC N stage
 PN040 (32.8%)
 PN128 (23.0%)
 PN217 (13.9%)
 PN337 (30.3%)

AJCC stage
 I17 (13.9%)
 II48 (39.3%)
 III55 (45.1%)
 IV2 (1.6%)

Histologic classification
 Moderately differentiated58 (47.5%)
 Moderately poorly differentiated54 (44.3%)
 Poorly differentiated10 (8.2%)

Histology
 Conventional AD101 (82.8%)
 Mucinous AD10 (8.2%)
 Papillary AD4 (3.3%)
 Signet-ring cell carcinoma6 (4.9%)
 Adenosquamous carcinoma1 (0.8%)

Tumor location
 Upper 1/341 (33.6%)
 Middle 1/310 (8.2%)
 Lower 1/358 (47.5%)
Mix13 (10.7%)

Vascular invasion
 (−)59 (48.4%)
 (+)63 (51.6%)

Neural invasion
 (−)62 (50.8%)
 (+)60 (49.2%)

Type of gastrectomy
 Proximal subtotal gastrectomy20 (16.4%)
 Distal gastrectomy58 (47.5%)
 Total gastrectomy44 (36.1%)

Postoperative chemotherapy
 Yes105 (86.1%)
 No17 (13.9%)

Chemotherapy approach
 S-136 (29.5%)
 CapeOX/SOX69 (56.6%)

Lauren type
 I (intestinal type)108 (88.5%)
 D (diffuse type)7 (5.7%)
 M (mixed type)7 (5.7%)

Tumor deposit
 Yes21 (17.2%)
 No101 (82.3%)

Abbreviations: CapeOX-capecitabine and oxaliplatin, SOX-S-1 plus oxaliplatin, AD-adenocarcinoma.