Clinical Study

Lifestyle Intervention Improves Heart Rate Recovery from Exercise in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Results from the Look AHEAD Study

Table 3

HRR according to treatment, select variables, weight loss, fitness gain, and combined effects of weight loss/fitness gain.
(a) Influence of treatment upon HRR at Year 1

VariableSubgroup Mean ± SD value

TreatmentDiabetes support and education1665 <.0001
Weight loss intervention1706

(b) Influence of select variables upon HRR at Year 1

VariableSubgroup Mean ± SD value

Age45–551239 <.0001
56–651723
66–76409
GenderMale1310 0.0540
Female2061
Diabetes severityNo diabetic meds, no insulin435 <.0001
Diabetic meds only2290
Insulin only128
Insulin and diabetic meds469
History of CVDNo3124 0.0160
Yes247
HypertensionNo729 <0.0001
Yes2642
Waist circumference group (adjusted for gender)1676 0.0062
2695
3799
4516
5681

(c) Influence of weight losses and fitness gains upon HRR at Year 1

VariableSubgroup Mean ± SD value

Weight groupWeight gain (1)*839 <.0001
4.9% weight loss to 0% weight gain (2)1154
5% weight loss to 9.9% weight loss (3)706
10% weight loss and greater (4)741
Fitness groupFitness loss (5)764 0.0001
0% to 7.49% fitness gain (6)781
7.5% fitness gain to 14.9% fitness gain (7)526
15% fitness gain and greater (8)1284
Combined weight and fitness group*Low success 818 <0.0001
Moderate low success 537
Moderate success 595
Moderate high success 925
High success480

*Groupings: The five combined weight and fitness groups were determined by combining the four weight groups with the 4 fitness groups, based upon relatives success in both weight loss and fitness gain. Low success (1 and 5; 2 and 5; 1 and 6); moderate low success (3 and 5; 1 and 7; 2 and 6); moderate success (3 and 6; 2 and 7; 4 and 5; 1 and 8); moderate high success (2 and 8; 4 and 6; 4 and 7; 3 and 6; 3 and 8); high success (4 and 8).