Research Article
BMI and an Anthropometry-Based Estimate of Fat Mass Percentage Are Both Valid Discriminators of Cardiometabolic Risk: A Comparison with DXA and Bioimpedance
Table 4
Prediction/discrimination of hypertension with degree of obesity as defined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bioimpedance analysis (BIA), an anthropometry-based estimate of fat mass percentage (FM% equation) and BMI.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method of measurement, based on which participants are classified in categories of obesity. bDifferent method of estimating obesity, the predictive power of which is compared to reference model/reference method. cNumber of participants. dNumber of participants that are positive with regard to respective outcome. eNumber of participants that are negative with regard to respective outcome. fPercentage improvement (+) or deterioration (−) in predictive power of new model compared to reference model. Categories of obesity/FM% as independent variable. gNet reclassification of cases + net reclassification of noncases. A positive number denotes increased predictive power for the new model. hLikelihood of net reclassification index to be 0, that is, the new model showing no improvement/deterioration over reference model. iNet reclassification of cases = percentage of cases reclassified by the new model into a higher risk category − percentage of cases reclassified by the new model into a lower risk category jNet reclassification of non-cases = percentage of non-cases reclassified by the new model into a lower risk category − percentage of non-cases reclassified by the new model into a higher risk category. kIntegrated discrimination improvement (+) or deterioration (−) of new model compared to reference model. Categories of obesity/FM% as independent variable in an age-adjusted model. lMean difference in predicted individual probabilities between cases and non-cases for two models. A positive number denotes increased predictive power for the new model. mLikelihood of net reclassification index to be 0, that is, the new model showing no improvement/deterioration over reference model. nMeasures of obesity (BMI/FM%) as continuous variable in a logistic regression model predicting respective outcomes. oDifference in area under curve of receiver operating characteristic compared to reference method. pProbability of 0-hypothesis (no difference). qDefinitions of hypertension according to European Societies for Hypertension and Cardiology {Mancia, 2007 #2897}. rEstimation of FM% with bioimpedance device InBody (720) (Biospace, Korea). sAnthropometry-based estimate; arithmetic mean of FM% estimations according to prediction methods Deurenberg et al. [12], Gallagher et al. [15], and Larsson et al. [14]. tTriacylglycerols ≥ 1.7 mmol/L or HDL cholesterol ≤ 1.29 mmol/L in men or HDL ≤ 1.03 mmol/L in women. |