In the original paper, the authors discovered a computer coding error that resulted in 33 of the women’s ages being incorrectly recorded.

All analyses were repeated for this paper using the corrected age dataset, as all our logistic regression analyses in the published paper were adjusted for age. The repeated analyses, using the corrected dataset, lead to minor changes that needed to be reported to the results in the published paper. These corrections did not change the conclusion of the published paper. The authors apologize for any inconvenience.

In the Abstract. line 8, should be changed from 7% to 8%; line 9, should be changed from 75% to 81%; line 9, should be changed from 59% to 69%.

Tables 23 were updated as provided.

In Section 2.1. page 3, column 1, paragraph 2, line 1, should be changed to .

In Section 2.2. page 3, column 1, paragraph 1, line 5, 70 should be changed to 170.

In Section 3. page 4, column 2, paragraph 2, line 5, 1.21 should be changed to 1.20; in line 5, 1.14–1.29 should be changed to 1.13–1.27; in line 8, 7% should be changed to 8%; in line 9, 0.93 should be changed to 0.92; in line 9, 0.90–0.97 should be changed to 0.88–0.96; in line 10, = 0.001 should be changed to < 0.001.

In Section 3. page 4, column 2, paragraph 3, line 5, 75% should be changed to 81%; in line 6, 0.25 should be changed to 0.19; in line 6, 0.12–0.52 should be changed to 0.09–0.41; in line 10, 59% should be changed to 69%; in line 10, 0.41 should be changed to 0.31; in line 10, 0.19–0.87 should be changed to 0.14–0.69; in line 10, 0.02 should be changed to 0.004.