Erratum to “Associations of Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Fatness with Metabolic Syndrome in Rural Women with Prehypertension”

Table 2

Logistic regressions predicting the metabolic syndrome from percent body fat and estimated cardiorespiratory fitness.

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

b

OR

95% CI

P

b

OR

95% CI

P

b

OR

95% CI

P

% Body fat

0.18

1.20

1.13–1.27

<0.001

0.20

1.22

1.13–1.31

<0.001

0.07

1.07

0.88–1.30

NS

Fitness

0.02

1.02

0.96–1.08

NS

−0.24

0.78

0.53–1.15

NS

% Body fat × fitness

0.01

1.01

1.00-1.01

NS

Fitness

−0.09

0.92

0.88–0.96

<0.001

All models were adjusted for age, education, and household income.
Nagelkerke 𝑅 squares were 0.24, 0.24, and 0.25 for % body fat models 1, 2 and 3, respectively.
Nagelkerke 𝑅 square was 0.11 for fitness model 1.