Research Article

Determinants of Walking among Middle-Aged and Older Overweight and Obese Adults: Sociodemographic, Health, and Built Environmental Factors

Table 3

Adjusted ORs and 95% CI of walking the recommended ≥150 minutes per week for any purpose.

VariableOR95% CI value

Education
 High school or some college1.00
 College graduate or graduate school5.551.79–17.250.003
Difficulty walking for a quarter of a mile
 Not at all difficult1.00
 Only a little or somewhat difficult0.190.05–0.770.020
There are many distracted drivers in the neighborhood
 Strongly agree/agree1.00
 Strongly disagree/disagree4.081.47–11.360.007
There are sidewalks or protected walkways in neighborhood
 Strongly disagree/disagree1.00
 Strongly agree/agree3.561.10–11.500.034
Drivers do not yield to pedestrians or bicyclists
 Strongly agree/agree1.00
 Strongly disagree/disagree2.670.87–8.220.087
Most drivers exceed the posted speed limits while driving
 Strongly disagree/disagree1.00
 Strongly agree/agree2.851.10–7.410.031
Walkers and bikers on the streets can be easily seen
 Strongly agree/agree1.00
 Strongly disagree/disagree4.001.17–13.700.027
There is so much traffic along nearby streets
 Strongly disagree/disagree1.00
 Strongly agree/agree4.331.47–12.660.008
Employment
 Not employed1.00
 Employed0.310.11–0.850.022
Annual household income
 <$50,0001.00
 ≥$50,0001.550.47–5.200.474
Age group (years)
 50–641.00
 ≥650.870.30–2.510.791
Race/ethnicity
 Other1.00
 Non-Hispanic white0.350.10–1.210.096
Marital status
 Divorced, widowed, separated, or never married1.00
 Married or living with a partner0.730.20–2.630.625
Gender
 Male1.00
 Female0.780.30–2.060.621
Weight status
 Overweight1.00
 Obese1.300.52–3.260.570
Health condition
 Poor to fair1.00
 Good3.130.47–20.670.237
 Very good to excellent6.870.96–49.330.055
Someone to walk with
 No1.00
 Yes0.510.19–1.380.183
Dog in household
 No1.00
 Yes2.070.87–4.900.098
Has caregiving responsibilities for elders
 No1.00
 Yes0.640.17–2.330.495
Walk Score
 Less walkable1.00
 Walkable1.710.40–7.270.467

. Likelihood Ratio Chi2 = 53.33 (). Pseudo . Boldface indicates statistical significance (; ). Counter-intuitive association.