Research Article
Development of a Dietary Factor Assessment Tool for Evaluating Associations between Visceral Fat Accumulation and Major Nutrients in Japanese Adults
Table 1
Anthropometric parameters of participants in Survey 1 and Survey 2.
| | Sex | Age | n | Age (years) | BMI (kg/m2) | Waist (cm) | VFA (cm2) | t-test1 |
| Survey 1 | Male | 20–29 | 1317 | 26.3 ± 2.0 | 21.9 ± 2.8 | 78.1 ± 7.6 | 56 ± 37 | | 30–39 | 1888 | 34.5 ± 2.9 | 23.0 ± 3.1 | 81.5 ± 8.2 | 76 ± 42 | | 40–49 | 2810 | 44.9 ± 2.6 | 23.6 ± 3.0 | 84.5 ± 8.0 | 90 ± 42 | | 50–59 | 2046 | 54.1 ± 2.9 | 23.7 ± 2.8 | 85.5 ± 8.0 | 95 ± 41 | | 60+ | 311 | 61.9 ± 2.3 | 23.7 ± 2.4 | 86.2 ± 6.4 | 100 ± 37 | | Female | 20–29 | 678 | 26.0 ± 2.1 | 20.0 ± 2.5 | 72.0 ± 6.4 | 33 ± 19 | | 30–39 | 1029 | 34.6 ± 2.9 | 20.5 ± 2.6 | 74.4 ± 7.0 | 39 ± 21 | | 40–49 | 1029 | 43.9 ± 2.7 | 21.1 ± 3.0 | 77.0 ± 8.1 | 47 ± 26 | | 50–59 | 300 | 53.4 ± 2.7 | 21.5 ± 3.0 | 78.8 ± 8.6 | 54 ± 28 | | 60+ | 30 | 62.0 ± 1.6 | 22.7 ± 3.1 | 82.8 ± 10.6 | 68 ± 36 | |
| Survey 2 | Male | 30–39 | 113 | 35.2 ± 3.0 | 23.6 ± 3.2 | 83.0 ± 9.3 | | 0.028 | 40–49 | 118 | 44.3 ± 2.9 | 24.0 ± 2.9 | 84.2 ± 7.6 | | n.s. | 50–59 | 68 | 53.1 ± 2.7 | 23.8 ± 3.5 | 86.2 ± 8.2 | | n.s. | 60+ | 75 | 63.5 ± 3.0 | 23.4 ± 2.3 | 87.1 ± 6.6 | | n.s. | Female | 30–39 | 38 | 34.4 ± 3.0 | 20.6 ± 3.4 | 70.5 ± 8.1 | | n.s. | 40–49 | 42 | 43.8 ± 2.6 | 21.5 ± 2.8 | 72.8 ± 8.6 | | n.s. | 50–59 | 72 | 53.4 ± 2.5 | 21.4 ± 3.6 | 73.5 ± 10.4 | | n.s. | 60+ | 53 | 63.0 ± 2.7 | 22.4 ± 3.5 | 78.8 ± 11.1 | | n.s. |
|
|
Mean ± SD. BMI: body mass index; VFA: visceral fat area. 1Differences in BMI in each sex and age group between Survey 1 and Survey 2.
|