Research Article
Does Weight-Cycling Influence Illness Beliefs in Obesity? A Gender-Sensitive Approach
Table 3
Differences in subjective illness representations depending on weight-cycling.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note. value (two-sided), interpretation according to hypotheses (one-sided); weight-cycling: number of previous dieting attempts, weight-cyclers: 10 times or more (overall N = 212, women N = 196, men N = 16), non-weight-cyclers: less than 10 times or none (overall N = 221, women N = 160, men N = 61); IPQ-R: Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised, range of the subscales “acute vs. chronic,” “consequences,” “sense of coherence,” and “emotional representation” from 0 to 25, range of the subscales “constant vs. cyclical,” “personal control,” and “treatment control” from 0 to 20; aWelch correction. |