Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2010, Article ID 423672, 2 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/423672
Case Report

Bleeding Follicular Conjunctivitis due to Influenza H1N1 Virus

1Ophthalmology Department, La Fe University Hospital, Avenda Campanar 21, 46009 Valencia, Spain
2Gynaecology Department, La Fe University Hospital, Avenda Campanar 21, 46009 Valencia, Spain
3Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Valencia, 46003 Valencia, Spain
4Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
5CIBER of Rare Diseases, Biomedical Network Research Centre on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), 46010 Valencia, Spain

Received 17 August 2010; Accepted 1 October 2010

Academic Editor: Andrew G. Lee

Copyright © 2010 Maria Jesus Lopez-Prats et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Influenza H1N1 or A virus is a new virus serotype capable of human-to-human transmission. This infection causes a flu syndrome similar to that of seasonal influenza, with only one case of conjunctivitis described and no clinical details or microbiological confirmation. Its diagnosis is performed by PCR of pharyngeal smear of the patients affected. We report the first well-documented case in the medical literature of conjunctivitis by H1N1 virus.

1. Case Report

A 45-year-old woman, five days after diagnosis by pharyngeal smear of influenza H1N1, complained of an acute unilateral conjunctivitis condition of bleeding appearance. Her examination evidenced significant eyelid oedema, severe mixed conjunctival hyperaemia and moderate chemosis, and pseudomembrane formation. A large number of subtarsal follicles and petechiae were seen (Figures 1, 2, 3, and 4).

423672.fig.001
Figure 1: Lower chemosis and severe conjunctival hyperaemia, associated with significant eyelid oedema in both eyes.
423672.fig.002
Figure 2: Lower chemosis and severe conjunctival hyperaemia, associated with significant eyelid oedema in both eyes.
423672.fig.003
Figure 3: Presence of petechiae and significant upper subtarsal follicles.
423672.fig.004
Figure 4: Inflammatory pseudomembranes characteristic of viral conjunctivitis.

A smear of conjunctival secretion from both eyes and study by PCR of H1N1 virus were performed detecting the presence of H1N1 virus RNA only in the affected eye, being negative in the contralateral.

After 15 days of symptomatic treatment with topical NSAIDs and washes associated with topical ganciclovir, the condition subsided.

2. Discussion

In April 2009, the US CDC identified the organism responsible for the new worldwide influenza pandemic, the influenza A virus (H1N1), arising from the gene mutation of segments of two strains of an influenza virus present in swine [1].

The clinical symptoms caused by this new influenza virus are similar to those of seasonal human influenza, including high fever, cough, sore throat, generalised myalgia, headache, and asthenia, often associated with vomiting and diarrhoea. Only one case of conjunctivitis has been mentioned associated with this syndrome. Nevertheless, no information about its presentation, course, and outcome and no microbiological prove are available [2]. The CDC has developed a specific panel of real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (r-RT-PCR) for the specific microbiological diagnosis of the new influenza virus strain [3].

Although multiple complications have been described in association with infection by this virus, to date no microbiologically proven cases of conjunctivitis by H1N1 virus have been published.

Viral conjunctivitis in adults is generally caused by an adenovirus, with over 50 serotypes and a high susceptibility to cause epidemics. Its most characteristic clinical signs are those discussed in our case [4]. The presence of ipsilateral preauricular adenopathy, subtarsal follicles and subconjunctival bleeding, chemosis, and formation of pseudomembranes is characteristic in severe cases. There are no specific authorised antivirals for the treatment of conjunctivitis.

In the case of our patient, it was shown how the onset of the conjunctival infection, its clinical outcome, its duration of three weeks, and the characteristics of the eye examination would be virtually identical to those of adenoviral conjunctivitis, except for the absence of preauricular node. This should lead us to consider the differential diagnosis of conjunctivitis by the H1N1 virus in patients with consistent influenza conditions, all the more given the worldwide pandemic caused by this virus which now besets us.

In our case, the clinical outcome of the infection has been favourable, with no serious complications, and improving since the start of treatment, probably due to both the antiviral effect of topical ganciclovir and the natural course of the disease. She did not need treatment for her systemic infection. However, more cases should be described to evaluate the severity of the conjunctival infection by this new virus and the possible associated consequences.

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), “Swine influenza A (H1N1) infection in two children-Southern California,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 58, pp. 400–402, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  2. V. Shinde, C. B. Bridges, T. M. Uyeki et al., “Triple-reassortant swine influenza A (H1) in humans in the United States, 2005–2009,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 360, no. 25, pp. 2616–2625, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), “Performance of rapid influenza diagnostic tests during two school outbreaks of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus infection,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 58, pp. 1029–1032, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  4. C. Wirbelauer, “Management of the red eye for the primary care physician,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 119, no. 4, pp. 302–306, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus