Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 940323, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/940323
Case Report

Successful Removal of Large Intraocular Foreign Body by 25-Gauge Microincision Vitrectomy Surgery

1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8574, Japan
2Division of Visual Advanced Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan

Received 30 October 2010; Accepted 23 February 2011

Academic Editor: Edward Manche

Copyright © 2011 Hiroshi Kunikata et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. Y. Fujii, E. De Juan Jr., M. S. Humayun et al., “Initial experience using the transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy system for vitreoretinal surgery,” Ophthalmology, vol. 109, no. 10, pp. 1814–1820, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. Y. Fujii, E. De Juan Jr., M. S. Humayun et al., “A new 25-gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy surgery,” Ophthalmology, vol. 109, no. 10, pp. 1807–1812, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Mura, S. H. Tan, and M. D. De Smet, “Use of 25-gauge vitrectomy in the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment,” Retina, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1299–1304, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  4. H. Kunikata and K. Nishida, “Visual outcome and complications of 25-gauge vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment; 84 consecutive cases,” Eye, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1071–1077, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  5. K. Kadonosono, T. Yamakawa, E. Uchio, Y. Yanagi, Y. Tamaki, and M. Araie, “Comparison of visual function after epiretinal membrane removal by 20-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 142, no. 3, pp. 513–515, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  6. L. Kellner, B. Wimpissinger, U. Stolba, W. Brannath, and S. Binder, “25-gauge vs 20-gauge system for pars plana vitrectomy: a prospective randomised clinical trial,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 945–948, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  7. C. W. Tsang, B. T. Cheung, R. F. Lam et al., “Primary 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment,” Retina, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1075–1081, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  8. S. K. Mahapatra and N. G. Rao, “Visual outcome of pars plana vitrectomy with intraocular foreign body removal through sclerocorneal tunnel and sulcus-fixated intraocular lens implantation as a single procedure, in cases of metallic intraocular foreign body with traumatic cataract,” Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 115–118, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  9. S. Kiss and D. Vavvas, “25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless pars plana vitrectomy for the removal of retained lens fragments and intraocular foreign bodies,” Retina, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1346–1351, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus