Comparison of Newly Diagnosed Ocular Hypertension and Open-Angle Glaucoma: Ocular Variables, Risk Factors, and Disease Severity
Table 4
Summary of the Humphrey visual field test findings.
Variable
OAG
OH
Mean differencea
-valueb
(95% CI)
Mean fixation losses ± SDc
2.3 (−0.1, 4.6)
0.058
Mean false positive rate ± SD
−0.71 (−2.1, 0.6)
0.299
Mean false negative rate ± SD
2.7 (1.6, 3.8)
<0.0001
Mean of mean deviation ± SD
−4.1 (−4.8, −3.4)
<0.0001
Mean pattern standard deviation ± SD
2.7 (2.3, 3.1)
<0.0001
Visual field unreliable, (%)
43 (14.7)
16 (14.2)
1.0 (0.6, 1.9)
0.885
Presence of artifacts, (%)c
10 (3.4)
5 (4.5)
0.8 (0.3, 2.3)
0.625
Abnormal visual field overall, (%)c
181 (62.2)
13 (11.6)
12.5 (6.7, 23.4)
<0.0001
Within 10° of fixation, (%)d
134 (45.9)
27 (24.1)
2.7 (1.6, 4.4)
<0.0001
Glaucoma hemifield test outside normal limits, (%)e
166 (59.1)
14 (13.0)
9.7 (5.3, 17.8)
<0.0001
Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; : number of subjects; OAG: open-angle glaucoma; OH: ocular hypertension; SD: standard deviation.
aMean difference calculated as OAH.
bSignificance of differences between the OAG and OH groups was tested using the chi-square test for categorical data and the t-test for continuous data. Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical data when the expected marginal size was <5.
cMissing data for 1 subject in both the OAG and OH groups.
dMissing data for 1 subject in the OH group.
en: 281 in the OAG and n: 108 in the OH group.