Review Article

Emerging Therapies for Noninfectious Uveitis: What May Be Coming to the Clinics

Table 1

Clinical trials for emergent therapies in noninfectious uveitis.

DrugMechanism of actionStudy name
phase
Sample sizeInterventionResults

AIN457
secukinumab
(SK)
Fully humanized antibody blocks IL-17A [6]SHIELD
Phase III
118(i) SK 300 mg s.c. at baseline, week 1 and week 2 (loading phase), and then every 2 weeks
(ii) SK 300 mg s.c. loading phase and then monthly
(iii) Placebo s.c. loading phase and then every 2 weeks
(i) Greater reduction in mean total postbaseline composite immunosuppressive medication (ISM) in the SK group compared with placebo
(ii) No statically significant differences in change in BCVA between the SK group and placebo
(iii) Median decrease in vitreous haze was similar among treatment groups
INSURE
Phase III
31(i) SK 300 mg s.c. loading phase and then every 2 weeks
(ii) SK 300 mg s.c. loading phase and then monthly
(iii) SK 150 mg s.c. loading phase and then monthly
(iv) Placebo s.c. loading phase and then every 2 weeks
(i) No major differences in mean change in vitreous haze from baseline to week 28 in all groups
(ii) ISM score 0.0 for all SK groups, 1.83 for placebo
(iii) No loss in BCVA in all the groups
(iv) No apparent dose-response relation for the incidence of AEs (adverse events)
ENDURE
Phase III
125(i) SK 300 mg s.c. loading phase and then every 2 weeks
(ii) SK 300 mg s.c. loading phase and then monthly
(iii) SK 150 mg s.c. loading phase and then monthly
(iv) Placebo s.c. loading phase and then every 2 weeks
(i) No statistically significant differences between all the groups in the time of first recurrence of uveitis
(ii) Composite ISM score is similar across all the groups

DE-109 sirolimus mTOR inhibitor [7]SAVE
Phase I
30(i) Intravitreal sirolimus: 325  g at days 0, 60, and 120
(ii) Subconjunctival injection: 1320  g at days 0, 60, and 120
(i) Did not find statistically significant differences between the two study groups at month 6
(ii) improvement of two steps or more of vitreous haze in 40% of the patients
SAVE-2
Phase II
30(i) Intravitreal sirolimus 440  g at baseline and months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 and then prn after month 6
(ii) Intravitreal sirolimus
880  g at baseline and months 2 and 4 and then prn after month 6
Recruiting
SAKURA
Phase III
500 (i) Sirolimus low dose (44  g) intravitreal
(ii) Sirolimus medium dose (440  g) intravitreal
(iii) Sirolimus high dose (880  g) intravitreal
Recruiting

EGP-437 iontophoresis dexamethasone phosphateGlucocorticoid receptor antagonist [8]Phase I/II40(i) 1.6 mA-min
(ii) 4.8 mA-min
(iii) 10 mA-min
(iv) 14 mA-min
(i) By day 28, 40 patients (60%) achieved an anterior chamber cell score of zero
(ii) 1.6 mA-min was the most effective dose
(iii) Intraocular pressure and BCVA remained stable throughout the study

XOMA 052 gevokizumab Recombinant humanized anti-IL1 antibody [9]EYEGUARD A
Active Uveitis
Phase III
(i) Placebo drug s.c.
(ii) Group 1 gevokizumab s.c.
(iii) Group 2 gevokizumab s.c.
Recruiting
EYEGUARD C
Controlled Uveitis
Phase III
(i) Placebo drug s.c.
(ii) Dose 1 gevokizumab s.c.
(iii) Dose 2 gevokizumab s.c.
Recruiting

Abatacept
(Orencia)
CD28 inhibitor [10]Abatacept in the Treatment of Noninfectious Uveitis
Phase II
20(i) Abatacept 10 mg/kg for the first 6 months
(ii) At month 6 randomization to receive either 5 mg mg/kg or 10 mg/kg
Recruiting

TocilizumabIgG1 recombinant humanized antihuman monoclonal antibodies that target IL-6 receptors [11, 12]STOP Uveitis
Phase I-II
36(i) Tocilizumab 4 mg IV, 6 monthly doses, and then prn after month 6
(ii) Tocilizumab 8 mg IV
6 monthly doses, and then prn after month 6
Recruiting
SarilumabStudy to Analyze Sarilumab in Noninfectious Uveitis
Phase II
57(i) Sarilumab s.c. every 2 weeks up to 50 weeks
(ii) Placebo s.c. every 2 weeks up to 50 weeks
(iii) In both groups prednisone as single therapy or in combination with methotrexate are continued
Recruiting