Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2014, Article ID 402193, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/402193
Research Article

Impaired Corneal Biomechanical Properties and the Prevalence of Keratoconus in Mitral Valve Prolapse

1Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Yildirim Beyazit University, 06810 Ankara, Turkey
2Department of Cardiology, Ankara Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Yildirim Beyazit University, 06810 Ankara, Turkey

Received 16 February 2014; Revised 26 March 2014; Accepted 31 March 2014; Published 17 April 2014

Academic Editor: Antonio Queiros

Copyright © 2014 Emine Kalkan Akcay et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. K. Perloff, J. S. Child, and J. E. Edwards, “New guidelines for the clinical diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 57, no. 13, pp. 1124–1129, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Theal, K. Sleik, S. Anand, Q. Yi, S. Yusuf, and E. Lonn, “Prevalence of mitral valve prolapse in ethnic groups,” Canadian Journal of Cardiology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 511–515, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. H. Seelenfreund, B. Z. Silverstone, I. Hirsch, and D. Rosenmann, “Mitral valve prolapse (Barlow's syndrome) and retinal emboli,” Metabolic, Pediatric and Systemic Ophthalmology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 119–121, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. Lichter, N. Loya, A. Sagie et al., “Keratoconus and mitral valve prolapse,” The American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 129, no. 5, pp. 667–668, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. J. Tuori, I. Virtanen, E. Aine, R. Kalluri, J. H. Miner, and H. M. Uusitalo, “The immunohistochemical composition of corneal basement membrane in keratoconus,” Current Eye Research, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 792–801, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. L. Cheng, I. Maruyama, N. SundarRaj, J. Sugar, R. S. Feder, and B. Y. J. T. Yue, “Expression of type XII collagen and hemidesmosome-associated proteins in keratoconus corneas,” Current Eye Research, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 333–340, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. N. Bechrakis, M. L. Blom, W. J. Stark, and W. R. Green, “Recurrent keratoconus,” Cornea, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 73–77, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Y. Rabinowits, “Major review of keratoconus,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 42, pp. 297–319, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. D. H. Glass, C. J. Roberts, A. S. Litsky, and P. A. Weber, “A viscoelastic biomechanical model of the cornea describing the effect of viscosity and elasticity on hysteresis,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 3919–3926, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. Touboul, C. Roberts, J. Kérautret et al., “Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 616–622, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Hager, K. Loge, M.-O. Füllhas, B. Schroeder, M. Großherr, and W. Wiegand, “Changes in corneal hysteresis after clear corneal cataract surgery,” The American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 341–346, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. M. Fontes, R. Ambrósio Jr., D. Jardim, G. C. Velarde, and W. Nosé, “Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus,” Ophthalmology, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 673–679, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. S. Prata, A. K. Sousa, C. A. A. Garcia Filho, L. M. Doi, and A. Paranhos Jr., “Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis,” Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 44, no. 5, p. 602, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Emre, Ö. Kaykçoǧlu, H. Ateş et al., “Corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor, and intraocular pressure measurement in patients with scleroderma using the reichert ocular response analyzer,” Cornea, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 628–631, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. W. Sharif, T. A. Casey, and J. Coltart, “Prevalence of mitral valve prolapse in keratoconus patients,” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, vol. 85, no. 8, pp. 446–448, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Grayson, Diseases of the Cornea, CV Mosby, St Louis, Miss, USA, 1979.
  17. R. B. Devereux, J. K. Perloff, N. Reichek, and M. E. Josephson, “Mitral valve prolapse,” Circulation, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 3–14, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. Kaufman, M. B. McDonald, B. A. Barron, and S. R. Waltman, The Cornea, Churchill Livingstone, New York, NY, USA, 1988.
  19. D. A. Luce, “Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 156–162, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. Goldich, Y. Barkana, Y. Gerber et al., “Effect of diabetes mellitus on biomechanical parameters of the cornea,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 715–719, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. A. Javadi, N. Rafati, A. Mohebi, M. R. Poursalman, and M. R. Forghani, “Prevalence of keratoconus in patients with mitral valve prolapse,” Bina Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 11, pp. 40–44, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  22. A. R. Marks, C. Y. Choong, M. B. B. Chir, A. J. Sanfilippo, M. Ferre, and A. E. Weyman, “Identification of high-risk and low-risk subgroups of patients with mitral-valve prolapse,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 320, no. 16, pp. 1031–1036, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. A. Levine, E. Stathogiannis, J. B. Newell, P. Harrigan, and A. E. Weyman, “Reconsideration of echocardiographic standards for mitral valve prolapse: lack of association between leaflet displacement isolated to the apical four chamber view and independent echocardiographic evidence of abnormality,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1010–1019, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. Montalban, J. L. Alio, J. Javaloy, and D. Pinero, “Intrasubject repeatability in keratoconus-eye measurements obtained with a new Scheimpflug photography-based system,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 39, pp. 211–218, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. R. Ambrósio Jr., R. S. Alonso, A. Luz, and L. G. Coca Velarde, “Corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: tomographic indices to detect keratoconus,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1851–1859, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. P. Piñero, J. L. Alió, A. Alesón, M. E. Vergara, and M. Miranda, “Corneal volume, pachymetry, and correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in subclinical and different stages of clinical keratoconus,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 814–825, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. B. M. Fontes, R. Ambrósio Jr., G. C. Velarde, and W. Nosé, “Corneal biomechanical evaluation in healthy thin corneas compared with matched keratoconus cases,” Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, vol. 74, pp. 13–16, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  28. K. Zadnik, J. T. Barr, T. B. Edrington et al., “Baseline findings in the collaborative longitudinal evaluation of keratoconus (CLEK) study,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 39, no. 13, pp. 2537–2546, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R. I. Bashey, H. M. Bashey, and S. A. Jimenez, “Characterization of pepsin-solubilized bovine heart-valve collagen,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 173, no. 3, pp. 885–894, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. D. Hammer, C. V. Leier, N. Baba, J. S. Vasko, and C. F. Wooley, “Altered collagen composition in a prolapsing mitral valve with ruptured chordae tendineae,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 863–866, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. W. Chapman, “The cumulative risks of prolapsing mitral valve: 40 years of follow-up,” Texas Heart Institute Journal, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 267–271, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. J. Belliveau, W. N. Liao, S. Brownstein et al., “Myxomatous corneal degeneration: a clinicopathological study of six cases and a review of the literature,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 264–271, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. L. Dudakova and K. Jirsova, “The impairment of lysyl oxidase in keratoconus and in keratoconus-associated disorders,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 120, pp. 977–982, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. Z. Rabbanikhah, M. A. Javadi, P. Rostami et al., “Association between acute corneal hydrops in patients with keratoconus and mitral valve prolapse,” Cornea, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 154–157, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. T. L. Beardsley and G. N. Foulks, “An association of keratoconus and mitral valve prolapse,” Ophthalmology, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 35–37, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. S. Shah, M. Laiquzzaman, R. Bhojwani, S. Mantry, and I. Cunliffe, “Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 3026–3031, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. D. Johnson, M. T. Nguyen, N. Lee, and D. R. Hamilton, “Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, forme fruste keratoconus, and manifest keratoconus after statistical correction for potentially confounding factors,” Cornea, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 516–523, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. N. G. Congdon, A. T. Broman, K. Bandeen-Roche, D. Grover, and H. A. Quigley, “Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage,” The American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 141, no. 5, pp. 868–875, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. B. Nesburn, S. Bahri, J. Salz et al., “Keratoconus detected by videokeratography in candidates for photorefractive keratectomy,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 194–201, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S. E. Wilson and S. D. Klyce, “Screening for corneal topographic abnormalities before refractive surgery,” Ophthalmology, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 147–152, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus