Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 439483, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/439483
Clinical Study

Consecutive Macular Edema and Visual Outcome in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Department of Ophthalmology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, No. 896 Pyeongchon-dong, Anyang, Gyeonggi-do 431-070, Republic of Korea

Received 27 August 2013; Accepted 9 January 2014; Published 22 May 2014

Academic Editor: Edward Manche

Copyright © 2014 Sung Uk Baek et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. Mitchell, W. Smith, and A. Chang, “Prevalence and associations of retinal vein occlusion in Australia: the blue mountains eye study,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 114, no. 10, pp. 1243–1247, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. J. Chung, Y. T. Hong, S. C. Lee, O. W. Kwon, and H. J. Koh, “Prognostic factors for visual outcome after intravitreal bevacizumab for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 246, no. 9, pp. 1241–1247, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. O. F. Brasil, S. D. Smith, A. Galor, C. Y. Lowder, J. E. Sears, and P. K. Kaiser, “Predictive factors for short-term visual outcome after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection for diabetic macular oedema: an optical coherence tomography study,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 761–765, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. B. Jaissle, P. Szurman, N. Feltgen et al., “Predictive factors for functional improvement after intravitreal bevacizumab therapy for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 249, no. 2, pp. 183–192, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. I. U. Scott, P. C. Vanveldhuisen, N. L. Oden et al., “Baseline predictors of visual acuity and retinal thickness outcomes in patients with retinal vein occlusion: standard care versus corticosteroid for REtinal vein occlusion study report 10,” Ophthalmology, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 345–352, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. “Argon laser photocoagulation for macular edema in branch vein occlusion. The Branch Vein Occlusion Study Group,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 271–282, 1984.
  7. M. Kondo, N. Kondo, Y. Ito et al., “Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: results after 12 months and multiple regression analysis,” Retina, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1242–1248, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. B. Jaissle, F. Ziemssen, K. Petermeier et al., “Bevacizumab for treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion,” Ophthalmologe, vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 471–475, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. E. Hoeh, T. Ach, K. B. Schaal, A. F. Scheuerle, and S. Dithmar, “Long-term follow-up of OCT-guided bevacizumab treatment of macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 247, no. 12, pp. 1635–1641, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Bezatis, G. Spital, F. Höhn et al., “Functional and anatomical results after a single intravitreal Ozurdex injection in retinal vein occlusion: a 6-month follow-up—the SOLO study,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 340–347, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  11. W. S. Yeh, J. A. Haller, P. Lanzetta et al., “Effect of the duration of macular edema on clinical outcomes in retinal vein occlusion treated with dexamethasone intravitreal implant,” Ophthalmology, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 1190–1198, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. M. Beer, S. J. Bakri, R. J. Singh, W. Liu, G. B. Peters III, and M. Miller, “Intraocular concentration and pharmacokinetics of triamcinolone acetonide after a single intravitreal injection,” Ophthalmology, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 681–686, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Lee and J. H. Lee, “The effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide on cytoid macular edema,” Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society, vol. 45, pp. 408–413, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  14. C. H. Meyer, T. U. Krohne, and F. G. Holz, “Intraocular pharmacokinetics after a single intravitreal injection of 1.5 mg versus 3.0 mg of bevacizumab in humans,” Retina, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1877–1884, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. O. Tso, “Pathology of cystoid macular edema,” Ophthalmology, vol. 89, no. 8, pp. 902–915, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Ota, A. Tsujikawa, T. Murakami et al., “Foveal photoreceptor layer in eyes with persistent cystoid macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 273–280, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. S. Shilling and C. A. Jones, “Retinal branch vein occlusion: a study of argon laser photocoagulation in the treatment of macular oedema,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 196–198, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. J. Chung, Y. T. Hong, S. C. Lee, O. W. Kwon, and H. J. Koh, “Prognostic factors for visual outcome after intravitreal bevacizumab for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 246, no. 9, pp. 1241–1247, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Callizo, P. Kroll, S. Mennel, J. C. Schmidt, and C. H. Meyer, “Radial optic neurotomy for central retinal vein occlusion: long-term retinal perfusion outcome,” Ophthalmologica, vol. 223, no. 5, pp. 313–319, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus