Research Article

Clinical Validation of Adjusted Corneal Power in Patients with Previous Myopic Lasik Surgery

Table 3

Bland and Altman analysis outcomes of the comparison between and the corneal power obtained with other methods.

(D)LoA (D)Range (D) value

(D)0.14 ± 0.24−0.33 to 0.60−0.43 to 0.70<0.01
TNP – (D)0.03 ± 0.24−0.50 to 0.44−0.55 to 0.610.319
(D)1.61 ± 0.191.23 to 1.991.20 to 2.18<0.01

Methods requiring previous data
(D)0.90 ± 0.320.26 to 1.530.04 to 1.65<0.01
(D)0.56 ± 0.200.15 to 0.960.04 to 1.02<0.01
(D)1.09 ± 0.84−0.55 to 2.73−1.13 to 3.96<0.01
(D)1.11 ± 0.230.67 to 1.550.49 to 1.65<0.01
(D)1.30 ± 0.190.93 to 1.670.80 to 1.72<0.01

Methods not requiring previous data
(D)−0.04 ± 0.17−0.37 to 0.29−0.58 to 0.120.09
(D)1.34 ± 0.001.33 to 1.351.32 to 1.35<0.01
(D)0.59 ± 0.040.52 to 0.670.48 to 0.67<0.01

= adjusted keratometric corneal power; = Gaussian corneal power; TNP = True Net Power; = keratometric corneal power using ; = corneal power obtained using Awwad formula; = corneal power obtained using Camellin formula; = corneal power obtained using Clinical History method; = corneal power obtained using Haigis-L formula; = corneal power obtained using Jarade formula; = corneal power obtained using Savini formula; = corneal power obtained using Seitz formula; = corneal power obtained using Shammas formula.