Research Article

Clinical Validation of Adjusted Corneal Power in Patients with Previous Myopic Lasik Surgery

Table 4

Bland and Altman analysis outcomes of the comparison between and the corneal power obtained with other methods.

(D)LoA (D)Range (D) value

(D)−0.14 ± 0.24−0.60 to 0.33−0.70 to 0.43<0.01
TNP – (D)−0.11 ± 0.01−0.13 to −0.09−0.08 to −0.13<0.01
(D)1.47 ± 0.191.10 to 1.841.07 to 1.97<0.01

Methods requiring previous data
(D)0.76 ± 0.290.18 to 1.34−0.28 to 1.26<0.01
(D)0.42 ± 0.140.15 to 0.680.04 to 0.78<0.01
(D)0.95 ± 0.83−0.67 to 2.58−1.55 to 3.76<0.01
(D)0.97 ± 0.180.63 to 1.320.40 to 1.36<0.01
(D)1.16 ± 0.140.88 to 1.450.70 to 1.49<0.01

Methods not requiring previous data
(D)−0.18 ± 0.21−0.60 to 0.23−0.71 to 0.40<0.01
(D)0.45 ± 0.26−0.06 to 0.97−0.18 to 1.04<0.01
(D)1.20 ± 0.230.74 to 1.660.64 to 1.67<0.01

= adjusted keratometric corneal power; = Gaussian corneal power; TNP = True Net Power; = keratometric corneal power using ; = corneal power obtained using Awwad formula; = corneal power obtained using Camellin formula; = corneal power obtained using Clinical History method; = corneal power obtained using Haigis-L formula; = corneal power obtained using Jarade formula; = corneal power obtained using Savini formula; = corneal power obtained using Seitz formula; = corneal power obtained using Shammas formula.