Research Article
Evaluation of Different Power of Near Addition in Two Different Multifocal Intraocular Lenses
Table 1
Results and comparison between the +2.5 D ReSTOR and +3.0 D Oculentis group.
| Variables | Group | | Mean | Std. deviation | Std. error mean | value |
| Preoperative refraction | Oculentis | 41 | | 4.8 | 0.8 | 0.251 | ReSTOR | 30 | | 2.0 | 0.4 |
| Preoperative UDVA | Oculentis | 41 | 0.624 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.322 | ReSTOR | 30 | 0.690 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| Postoperative refraction | Oculentis | 41 | | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.001 | ReSTOR | 30 | 0.058 | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| Postoperative UDVA | Oculentis | 41 | 0.056 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.500 | ReSTOR | 30 | 0.033 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Postoperative UNVA | Oculentis | 41 | 0.098 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.001 | ReSTOR | 30 | 0.587 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Postoperative UIVA | Oculentis | 41 | 0.312 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.049 | ReSTOR | 30 | 0.287 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Postoperative CDVA | Oculentis | 41 | 0.002 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.509 | ReSTOR | 30 | 0.007 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Postoperative CNVA | Oculentis | 41 | 0.210 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.001 | ReSTOR | 30 | 0.153 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Postoperative CIVA | Oculentis | 41 | 0.315 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.005 | ReSTOR | 30 | 0.277 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
|
|
is statistically significant.
|