Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2016, Article ID 3849316, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3849316
Research Article

Two-Dimensional Cutting (TDC) Vitrectome: In Vitro Flow Assessment and Prospective Clinical Study Evaluating Core Vitrectomy Efficiency versus Standard Vitrectome

Augencentrum Köln, Josefstraße 14, 51143 Cologne, Germany

Received 5 January 2016; Accepted 31 March 2016

Academic Editor: Mauricio Maia

Copyright © 2016 Mitrofanis Pavlidis. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Teixeira, L. P. Chong, N. Matsuoka et al., “Vitreoretinal traction created by conventional cutters during vitrectomy,” Ophthalmology, vol. 117, no. 7, pp. 1387–1392, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. DeBoer, S. Fang, L. H. Lima et al., “Port geometry and its influence on vitrectomy,” Retina, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1061–1067, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Y. Oshima, T. Wakabayashi, T. Sato, M. Ohji, and Y. Tano, “A 27-gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless microincision vitrectomy surgery,” Ophthalmology, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 93–102.e2, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Hayafuji, Y. Hanamura, and S. Niimura, “Surgical cutter,” (Kabushiki Kaisha Topcon), US Patent 5,106,364. April 2992.
  5. L. H. Lima, C. Deboer, M. McCormick, R. Kerns, P. Bhadri, and M. S. Humayun, “A new dual port cutter system for vitrectomy surgery,” Retina, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1515–1519, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Rizzo, F. Genovesi-Ebert, and C. Belting, “Comparative study between a standard 25-gauge vitrectomy system and a new ultrahigh-speed 25-gauge system with duty cycle control in the treatment of various vitreoretinal diseases,” Retina, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 2007–2013, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Hartstra, “Eye surgical cutting tool,” Patent WO 2014142663 A1, DORC International B.V., March 2014.
  8. M. P. Kummer, J. J. Abbott, S. Dinser, and B. J. Nelson, “Artificial vitreous humor for in vitro experiments,” in Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC '07), pp. 6406–6409, Lyon, France, August 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. L. Kellner, B. Wimpissinger, U. Stolba, W. Brannath, and S. Binder, “25-Gauge vs 20-gauge system for pars plana vitrectomy: a prospective randomised clinical trial,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 945–948, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. A. Rezaei and T. W. Stone, Eds., 2014 Global Trends in Retina Survey, American Society of Retina Specialists, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2014.
  11. J. T. Thompson, “Advantages and limitations of small gauge vitrectomy,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 162–172, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. Stalmans, “23-Gauge vitrectomy,” Developments in Ophthalmology, vol. 54, pp. 38–44, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  13. F. M. Recchia, I. U. Scott, G. C. Brown, M. M. Brown, A. C. Ho, and M. S. Ip, “Small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy: a report by the American academy of ophthalmology,” Ophthalmology, vol. 117, no. 9, pp. 1851–1857, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. W. Aylward, “Sutureless vitrectomy,” Ophthalmologica, vol. 225, no. 2, pp. 67–75, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus