Journal of Ophthalmology / 2016 / Article / Tab 3 / Review Article
Timing and Outcomes of Vitreoretinal Surgery after Traumatic Retinal Detachment Table 3 Visual Acuity after Traumatic Retinal Detachment.
Author Number of patients Initial (preintervention) BCVA Postintervention BCVA Comments Nashed et al. [5 ] 88 2.3%: ≥ 20/5016%: >20/800 8%: ≥20/5050%: >20/800 36% of patients who received a retinectomy had a VA of >20/800 after intervention Ehrlich and Polkinghorne [8 ] 19 5%: ≥20/5022%: <20/50 & ≥20/200 5%: <20/200 & ≥20/400 69%: <20/400 21%: ≥20/50 5%: <20/50 & ≥20/200 11%: <20/200 & ≥20/400 63%: <20/400 63% had improved VA 21% had worsened VA 16% were stable Rouberol et al. [9 ] 50 42%: ≥ 20/200 38%: ≥20/4080%: ≥20/200 Wang et al. [10 ] 31 3%: ≥20/509%: <20/50 & ≥20/200 87%: <20/400 28%: ≥20/509%: <20/50 & ≥20/200 3%: <20/200 & ≥20/400 58%: <20/400 These were all pediatric patients Only patients who have both a preintervention and postintervention BCVA are included in this chart 48% has improved VA 45% had worsened VA 6% were stable Eliott et al. [12 ] 1 20/30 20/20 Pediatric patients Sheard et al. [13 ] 47 Median for scleral buckle patients: 20/120 Median for vitrectomy patients: CF Median for scleral buckle patients: 20/80Median for vitrectomy patients: CF These were all pediatric patients Zhang et al. [14 ] 9 LP (average) Between LP and HM No statistical difference between preintervention and postintervention VA Lesniak et al. [15 ] 28 LP (average) 20/4000 (average) Pediatric patients with open globe injuries