Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2016, Article ID 6347236, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6347236
Research Article

Comparison between a New Optical Biometry Device and an Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomographer for Measuring Central Corneal Thickness and Anterior Chamber Depth

1School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
2Key Laboratory of Vision Science, Ministry of Health, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
3G.B. Bietti Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy

Received 19 February 2016; Accepted 9 May 2016

Academic Editor: George M. Saleh

Copyright © 2016 Jinhai Huang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. O. Gordon, J. A. Beiser, J. D. Brandt et al., “The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 120, no. 6, pp. 714–720, 829–730, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. W. Price Jr., D. L. Koller, and M. O. Price, “Central corneal pachymetry in patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis,” Ophthalmology, vol. 106, no. 11, pp. 2216–2220, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. N. C. Wheeler, C. M. Morantes, R. M. Kristensen, T. H. Pettit, and D. A. Lee, “Reliability coefficients of three corneal pachymeters,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 645–651, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. W. McLaren, C. B. Nau, J. C. Erie, and W. M. Bourne, “Corneal thickness measurement by confocal microscopy, ultrasound, and scanning slit methods,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 137, no. 6, pp. 1011–1020, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Mimura, S. Yamagami, T. Usui, N. Honda, F. Araki, and S. Amano, “In vivo confocal microscopy of human cornea covered with human amniotic membrane,” Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 493–496, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. Avitabile, F. Marano, M. G. Uva, and A. Reibaldi, “Evaluation of central and peripheral corneal thickness with ultrasound biomicroscopy in normal and keratoconic eyes,” Cornea, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 639–644, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. J. Hoffer, “Definition of ACD,” Ophthalmology, vol. 118, no. 7, article 1484, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. J. Hoffer, “Clinical results using the Holladay 2 intraocular lens power formula,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1233–1237, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. Kaswin, A. Rousseau, M. Mgarrech, E. Barreau, and M. Labetoulle, “Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: comparison with the gold standard,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 593–600, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Huang, G. Savini, J. Li et al., “Evaluation of a new optical biometry device for measurements of ocular components and its comparison with IOLMaster,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 98, no. 9, pp. 1277–1281, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Kola, H. Duran, A. Turk, S. Mollamehmetoglu, A. Kalkisim, and H. Erdol, “Evaluation of the repeatability and the reproducibility of AL-scan measurements obtained by residents,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2014, Article ID 739652, 6 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. Yagci, E. Güler, A. E. Kulak et al., “Repeatability and reproducibility of a new optical biometer in normal and keratoconic eyes,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 171–177, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Srivannaboon, C. Chirapapaisan, P. Chonpimai, and S. Koodkaew, “Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 709–715, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. S. Dervişoğullari, Y. Totan, and B. Gürağaç, “Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements of Nidek AL-Scan and Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer,” Contact Lens & Anterior Eye, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 85–88, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Srivannaboon, C. Chirapapaisan, P. Chonpimai, and S. Koodkaew, “Comparison of corneal astigmatism measurements of 2 optical biometer models for toric intraocular lens selection,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 364–371, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Q. Wang, X. Ding, G. Savini et al., “Anterior chamber depth measurements using Scheimpflug imaging and optical coherence tomography: repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 178–185, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. Nemeth, A. Vajas, A. Tsorbatzoglou, B. Kolozsvari, L. Modis Jr., and A. Berta, “Assessment and reproducibility of anterior chamber depth measurement with anterior segment optical coherence tomography compared with immersion ultrasonography,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 443–447, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, “Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement,” The Lancet, vol. 1, no. 8476, pp. 307–310, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. Kriechbaum, C. Leydolt, O. Findl, M. Bolz, and W. Drexler, “Comparison of partial coherence interferometers: Acmaster versus laboratory prototype,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 811–816, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P.-F. Su, A. Y. Lo, C.-Y. Hu, and S.-W. Chang, “Anterior chamber depth measurement in phakic and pseudophakic eyes,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 85, no. 12, pp. 1193–1200, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. E. Aghaian, J. E. Choe, S. Lin, and R. L. Stamper, “Central corneal thickness of Caucasians, Chinese, Hispanics, Filipinos, African Americans, and Japanese in a glaucoma clinic,” Ophthalmology, vol. 111, no. 12, pp. 2211–2219, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. E. Dai and C. A. Gunderson, “Pediatric central corneal thickness variation among major ethnic populations,” Journal of AAPOS, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 22–25, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. Wang, G. Huang, M. He, L. Wu, and S. Lin, “Comparison of anterior ocular segment biometry features and related factors among American Caucasians, American Chinese and mainland Chinese,” Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 542–549, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. G. Savini, P. Barboni, M. Carbonelli, and K. J. Hoffer, “Repeatability of automatic measurements by a new Scheimpflug camera combined with Placido topography,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1809–1816, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. U. de Sanctis, A. Missolungi, B. Mutani, L. Richiardi, and F. M. Grignolo, “Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in keratoconus using the rotating scheimpflug camera and ultrasound pachymetry,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 712–718, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. M. Nam, C. Y. Im, H. K. Lee, E. K. Kim, T.-I. Kim, and K. Y. Seo, “Accuracy of RTVue optical coherence tomography, pentacam, and ultrasonic pachymetry for the measurement of central corneal thickness,” Ophthalmology, vol. 117, no. 11, pp. 2096–2103, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. G. Savini, M. Carbonelli, A. Sbreglia, P. Barboni, G. Deluigi, and K. J. Hoffer, “Comparison of anterior segment measurements by 3 Scheimpflug tomographers and 1 Placido corneal topographer,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1679–1685, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. Huang, X. Ding, G. Savini et al., “A comparison between Scheimpflug imaging and optical coherence tomography in measuring corneal thickness,” Ophthalmology, vol. 120, no. 10, pp. 1951–1958, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. J. Rozema, K. Wouters, D. G. P. Mathysen, and M.-J. Tassignon, “Overview of the repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of the biometry values provided by various ophthalmic devices,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 158, no. 6, pp. 1111.e1–1120.e1, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Mohamed, G. K. Y. Lee, S. K. Rao et al., “Repeatability and reproducibility of pachymetric mapping with visante anterior segment-optical coherence tomography,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 5499–5504, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J.-H. Huang, L.-N. Ge, D.-Z. Wen, S.-H. Chen, Y. Yu, and Q.-M. Wang, “Repeatability and agreement of corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam Scheimpflug photography and Visante optical coherence tomography,” Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 250–256, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C. O'Donnell, A. Hartwig, and H. Radhakrishnan, “Comparison of central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measured using LenStar LS900, Pentacam, and Visante AS-OCT,” Cornea, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 983–988, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. G. Nemeth, Z. Hassan, E. Szalai, A. Berta, and L. Modis Jr., “Anterior segment parameters measured with 2 optical devices compared to ultrasonic data,” European Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 177–182, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. T. Yazici, G. Pekel, E. Bozkurt et al., “Measurements of anterior segment parameters using three different non-contact optical devices in keratoconus patients,” International Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 521–525, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. R. Lavanya, L. Teo, D. S. Friedman et al., “Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements using the IOLMaster, scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 91, no. 8, pp. 1023–1026, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. I. Bueno-Gimeno, E. España-Gregori, A. Gené-Sampedro, A. Lanzagorta-Aresti, and C. Dualde-Beltrán, “Anterior chamber depth measurement in teenagers. Comparison of two techniques,” Journal of Optometry, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 161–166, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. U. A. Dinc, E. Gorgun, B. Oncel, M. N. Yenerel, and L. Alimgil, “Assessment of anterior chamber depth using visante optical coherence tomography, slitlamp optical coherence tomography, IOL Master, Pentacam and Orbscan IIz,” Ophthalmologica, vol. 224, no. 6, pp. 341–346, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus