Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2016, Article ID 7030791, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7030791
Clinical Study

Microperimetric Assessment after Epiretinal Membrane Surgery: 4-Year Follow-Up

Department of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic, University of Turin, 10122 Turin, Italy

Received 14 January 2016; Accepted 9 March 2016

Academic Editor: Samuel N. Markowitz

Copyright © 2016 Marco Dal Vecchio et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Citations to this Article [8 citations]

The following is the list of published articles that have cited the current article.

  • Christos Haritoglou, Carlo L Schoenfeld, Wolfgang J Mayer, and Armin Wolf, “Surgery for epimacular membrane and vitreomacular traction syndrome,” Expert Review of Ophthalmology, pp. 1–8, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Memota Laishram, Krishnagopal Srikanth, Rajalakshmi Ramachandran Adityapuram, Swathi Nagarajan, and Ezhumalai Govindasamy, “Microperimetry – A new tool for assessing retinal sensitivity in macular diseases,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. NC08–NC11, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Wei-Cheng Chang, Chin Lin, Cho-Hao Lee, Tzu-Ling Sung, Tao-Hsin Tung, and Jorn-Hon Liu, “Vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane: A meta-analysis,” Plos One, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. e0179105, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Fernando José De Novelli, Mauro Goldbaum, Mario Luiz Ribeiro Monteiro, Fabio Bom Aggio, Mario Junqueira Nóbrega, and Walter Yukihiko Takahashi, “Recurrence rate and need for reoperation after surgery with or without internal limiting membrane removal for the treatment of the epiretinal membrane,” International Journal of Retina and Vitreous, vol. 3, no. 1, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Yoshiyuki Kita, Gábor Hollό, Tsunehiro Saito, Akiko Murai, Ritsuko Kita, and Akito Hirakata, “Circumpapillary microperimetry to detect glaucoma: a pilot study for sector-based comparison to circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer measurement,” International Ophthalmology, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • David Martins, and Pedro Neves, “Epiretinal membrane negative staining and double peeling in a single block with Brilliant Blue G,” European Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 112–116, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Mohamad Amr Salah Eddin Abdelhakim, Mohamed Mahmoud Khafagy, Hassan Aly Mortada, Mohamed Gaber Ahmed Mohamed Eissa, and Tamer Ahmed Macky, “Functional and structural outcomes of ILM peeling in uncomplicated macula-off RRD using microperimetry & en-face OCT,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 256, no. 2, pp. 249–257, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Stefan Palkovits, Nino Hirnschall, Stefan Georgiev, Christoph Leisser, and Oliver Findl, “Test–retest reproducibility of the microperimeter MP3 with fundus image tracking in healthy subjects and patients with macular disease,” Translational Vision Science and Technology, vol. 7, no. 1, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar