Clinical Study

SMILE and Wavefront-Guided LASIK Out-Compete Other Refractive Surgeries in Ameliorating the Induction of High-Order Aberrations in Anterior Corneal Surface

Table 1

Preoperative patient characteristics (mean ± SD).

ParameterLASIKWF-LASIKFS-LASIKSMILE value

Age (Y)25.12 ± 4.7024.22 ± 3.6924.16 ± 4.4825.25 ± 4.200.088
SE (D)−4.91 ± 1.81−4.82 ± 1.55−5.43 ± 2.32−5.03 ± 1.890.125
HOAs (μm)
Total HOAs 0.14 ± 0.040.16 ± 0.060.15 ± 0.040.15 ± 0.060.084
SA0.25 ± 0.130.22 ± 0.180.23 ± 0.140.21 ± 0.150.441
Horizontal coma0.00 ± 0.140.01 ± 0.140.00 ± 0.160.01 ± 0.130.839
Vertical coma−0.01 ± 0.180.02 ± 0.26−0.02 ± 0.31−0.05 ± 0.170.095

LASIK: laser in situ keratomileusis; WF-LASIK: wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis with iris registration; FS-LASIK: femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis; SMILE: small incision lenticule extraction; HOAs: higher-order aberrations; SA: spherical aberration.